Quote from: buybitcoinscanada on December 22, 2014, 07:29:04 PM

Quote from: jl777 on December 22, 2014, 05:45:54 PM

Quote from: buybitcoinscanada on December 22, 2014, 05:14:02 PM

Quote from: BTCDDev on December 22, 2014, 04:12:02 PM

Quote from: Momimaus on December 21, 2014, 08:59:51 PM

I hope NXTventure, Jl777hodl and BTCD will follow, they are far behind.

Once SuperNET is released and people see what kind of value these hold, I believe they will do quite well.

JLH and BitcoinDark are the reference asset/currency for InstantDEX. That alone is huge. (Not to mention the 5% of SuperNET fees going directly to BitcoinDark holders amongst other things)

Matthew

To holders or to active stakers? And in what form are the fees paid (assets, btcd, btc, something else)? If Btc for example (or anything other than btcd), where are they paid to?

financially it will work like a multipool. Whatever form the revshare comes in, will be converted to BTCD and then sent directly to the addresses in proportion to their staking. That is the only way to maintain privacy

James

all blocks will be counted with the same weight, so if an account staked 0.1% of the blocks, 0.1% of the revshare will be sent to that account. I just happen to have a database with the required info to find and tally the accounts that are staking

Thanks for the clarification.

Is an actively staking/(unlocked) wallet more vulnerable is some ways than a passive/(locked) wallet?

you can unlock only for staking
however by staking you are most likely leaking some info, similar to forging in NXT, so stuff like IP address correlation becomes easier if you are staking (or forging with NXT)

James