Quote from: Este Nuno on December 23, 2014, 10:20:31 AM

Quote from: buybitcoinscanada on December 23, 2014, 07:44:26 AM

You were compensated how many 10's of thousands UNITY for those assets? And still more meaningless saying you "gave" them for free or below market value when they are fantastically shallow markets on totally unproven assets.

Where are you getting that he was compensated 10s of thousands of UNITY? From what I remember he exchanged the assets with no strings attached, but also put forth the bonus plan at the time which was voted on by stakeholders and overwhelmingly passed at something like 85-95% Yes votes.

I figured there might eventually be some issues with the wording, so I'm not too surprised that it's coming up. We could really use someone with some law training to make these things more clear and more explicit. But it also doesn't really matter too much at the moment considering it was already voted on by stakeholders and James has decided to share any bonus with people involved with SuperNET now anyway. That is if the conditions can even be met, which is probably not going to happen anyway.

That bolded part is wrong. He received a considerable amout of UNITY for those "assets".