Quote from: ikeboy on December 29, 2014, 05:02:30 PM

Quote from: WaffleMaster on December 29, 2014, 04:43:01 PM

Quote from: Paul Revere on December 29, 2014, 04:33:11 PM

P.S: GAW FINALLY took down the fake testimonials. Did the one person at GAW with a tiny bit of common sense return from Christmas vacation and realize that they were publicly announcing that GAW is a pack of stinking liars and decide to pull the page with the FAKE testimonials??

Holy shit, you're right. And it's archived. 100% fraud detected and legal proof available. READY THE LAWYERS.

So this lie is still going around. I posted a response https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=857670.msg9969146#msg9969146 and haven't gotten any replies yet, but people are continuing to repost this lie deliberately. There's no other explanation at this point.

Now for a direct response for someone who's told me to learn the law. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=857670.msg9975540#msg9975540 Even if it were true that gaw lied about paysave/paybase, it would not be basis for a legal case against gaw. I spoke to a lawyer about this point this week. There's a legal concept called consideration, which means that a promises are only binding if the one that makes them benifits directly from them. (Look it up yourself, I'm simplifying, it's not easy to explain in one sentence.) This means that a company can't be sued with cause for lying in advertising unless that caused a direct gain to the company. Writing fake reviews is not a lie that leads to a direct gain. The lawyer I spoke to said that the promise of $20 a coin is not one that can be upheld in court either as legally binding.

So, you're saying lying about how good a service is to promote sales and use of the service isn't direct gain? Get real buddy. The $20 thing isn't going to hold up in court, because all they would have to do is buy one coin for $20. Lol