Convenient now that the facebook thread this was originally addressed on got deleted by Lee.
Here's one of many interesting reads on fsa and bitcoin, hell contact them yourself. Taking Lee's word for it is lunacy at best, stupidity at worst.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=49862.0Do some googling if you're going to be lazy about it. It's easy to find stuff.. I'll do a little bit of it for you.
Lee doesn't need ssl.. OK a financial institution(includes asset and equity management) is not required to have an ssl?... OK good one... PCI security standards amongst other things don't apply I guess.... ok whatever let's move on. I'll concede this point if it will get you to shut up about many things you apparently have no idea about.
You've gone on about this tax before having it as an argument. Really something that should be dropped from my list as its really not something I'm going to argue with you about. Pays his employees in bitcoin(there are copies of contracts out there so don't bullshit me when you have no clue), server in bitcoin, sells on LBC and hides cash in laser tag business. Yay tax evasion. Part of the reason you admire him so much... but hey you're an expert on his taxes so OK, again I'll concede that point.
You've been aggressive through this whole thing... quite easy to see. Down to threatening to hack doms server. Guess that's not aggressive, again I'll concede the point.
If you don't like what someone has to say f off. You only came here because the crap started on facebook and you needed to defend your interests.
You're all libertarian until someone messes with your investments. Yea 1000 bitcoin locked in pop with rumors of covered up hacks and I would defend a stinking ship tooth and nail as well I suppose.
1) I don't use it anymore. I will be paying back what I owe shortly and any usage is a minimum only because I feel a need to repay my debts to people.
2)Lee assured everyone that pop was flying above the water on everything. After I started to see things going to shut and a poor production process; as well as hiding two hacks and loss of bitcoin from said hacks he because less credible. Kind of an obvious one there, but hey... whatever.
3) See point two. You mad because I pay back early and it gives higher returns and you didn't really get in on it and now I'm leaving? Schade Marmelade.
4)Not AT all and of anybody wishing to put the shares up for the price they paid I will happily see their funds returned no problem at all. When this poor excuse of a site is shut down, I'd rather not have had people lose out on funds in one of my projects because of someone else.
5) wow good job for being able to look up my profile and using it as a rather weak point of argument. So almost a month ago is last week? It's when I started voicing concerns? Weak.
My arguments and everything are pretty bad. Guess I'll have to concede everything to you.
Guess you win..
Good job.
interested to know, is your research of the same standard as your comprehension used here?
twice you quoted doms threat on ddosing gaws site as cas threatening doms site, unbelievably, the second time was after being corrected.
Also, remarkable how you are openly admitting to being involved in criminal activities.
the ipo system is illegal? you know this? you have reaserched this? yet your making use of it? (still not sure of your comprehension and reading skills)
in a court of law, others involved may not of known, but you have admitted to aiding and being knowingly involved in what you believe to be a criminal activity. (out in public, i must add)