I'm so sorry, I really busy these last few weeks. So, I'm not testing it yet. I'll check it when I get free time. 

A bit busy with everything in a real-life, I'll test it this weekend, I swear 


Agree! 

I don't test it yet. Why don't you share your experience, U've been testing it, don't you?

Yep, straight to practice, always be a good idea.
K, I'll try it later.

It turns out quite boring to read a technical white paper 

Source: http://cryptographicasset.com/a-brief-history-of-bitcoin-com/

Bitcoin.com CEO Roger Ver once told me he manages Bitcoin.com, a Bitcoin-themed website offering many services and products. I wasn’t sure what “managed” meant in this context, since most everyone in the crypto space seemed to believe he owned the site. His company, Saint Bitts LLC, is the registered owner of the website. The registration date is 1-04-2008. But, yet, Mr. Ver is the manager.

Ver didn’t elucidate on what “manages” means when over e-mail. So who owns Bitcoin.com remains a mystery. Several sources I reached out to for this story told me they were under NDA as to the true history of Bitcoin.com.

Bitcoin.com has pages on how to buy bitcoin, how to use bitcoin, a forum (with its own .onion address), a wiki, a free bitcoin faucet, news, a mining pool, a store, and a recently incorporated casino with software by Curacao-based SoftSwiss. Ver, who refers to himself as the “world’s first Bitcoin investor”, says people will soon be able to gamble on the darknet with bitcoins via Bitcoin.com’s Tor onion address.

Rumors abound regarding the history of Bitcoin.com. Wayback Machine details a history of Bitcoin.com dating back to 2003, when it redirected to Ivntech.com, a Korean wireless technology site. In 2009, defunct photo editor Picnik.com appeared at Bitcoin.com.

By 2011, the first Bitcoin company, Tradehill, a Bitcoin exchange that suspended operations citing regulatory and banking issues, appears at Bitcoin.com. Ver seemingly takes over management duties sometime thereafter and begins renting the site to others. In 2013, Bitcoin.com was used as a Coinbase affiliate program, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong told me via e-mail. CoinDesk, a blockchain news website, falsely reportedly  in 2014 that Coinbase operated Bitcoin.com.

“It looks like I will be managing things for years to come,” Ver told me via e-mail late last year.

While Ver says the terms of the deal were finalized in an afternoon, the whole process transpired over years. He calls the process towards what he terms “sole control” over Bitcoin.com  “complicated.” Ver knows of four prior users of the domain, and said our research seems “about right.”

Once Ver had “sole control” over Bitcoin.com, numerous Bitcoin companies and individuals rented the digital real estate.

Blockchain.info, a Bitcoin wallet service launched in 2011, rented the domain for five-years starting in 2015 from Ver. The company said it would use the site to help “drive consumer adoption and education.” Ver didn’t feel that Blockchain.info, in which he has invested, was making full use of the domain. The deal was terminated.

Ver then signed a five year deal to lease the site to OKCoin, a Chinese based Bitcoin exchange. Several months into the contract, Ver claims OKCoin ceased paying for their use of the website. Ver claims the company (or somebody at the company) even forged his signature. You can watch a dramatic encounter between Ver and the OKcoin CEO, Star Xu, in which they argue at a Bitcoin conference about their contractual disagreements over Bitcoin.com.

“Lawyers and courts move very slowly, but I look forward to things finally being settled one day,” said Ver, who calls himself an “anarcho-capitalist”.

Jack Liu, OKCoin Chief Strategy Officer, told me Ver’s allegations were “completely false and without any factual basis.”

He added: “OKCoin has provided every piece of evidence to prove our innocence. We are glad to proceed in court.”

Uncovering Ver’s road to “managing” Bitcoin.com ultimately led me to Medellin, Colombia, where Jered Kenna, the former CEO of Tradehill, is opening a brewery with the namesake of 20Mission, his San Francisco Mission District based co-working space for artists and technologists. Kenna offers insights into Bitcoin.com during the early days of Bitcoin.

“I had a deal that I got as an equity investment,” Kenna told me. “The investor, who wants to remain anonymous, approached me out of nowhere when I launched Tradehill in June 2011.” Right after Tradehill launched, Mt. Gox froze deposits and withdrawals for sixteen days.

“Bitcoin was about to go nuts,” Kenna, an early Bitcoin miner who bought his first coins at two cents, recalls.

“I could see the value in the domain. So I traded a million equity in the company for Bitcoin.com on the condition that if we went under, the domain wouldn’t be liquidated or anything, but, rather, returned to the owner,” he shares. Kenna says he had “complete control.”

Ultimately, Dwolla stopped processing Tradehill transfers, and the Bitcoin exchange had to shut down. The investor asked for the domain back. Kenna said no problem.

“He was pleasantly surprised I just handed it over instead of giving him B.S. that we were going to relaunch soon,” he said.

Kenna says he felt “pretty broken”, recalling the excitement he had over holding Bitcoin.com. Kenna suspects the true Bitcoin.com owner purchased it on the cheap, perhaps pre-Bitcoin. He might have simply thought the words “bit” and “coin” sounded cool together.

Kenna suspects the owner paid thousands of dollars for the domain, not the millions it is now worth. He reckons the owner would have been happy to sell it for “a lot of money” and make “the kind of return you see in Bitcoin.” But, he wouldn’t surprised if the individual held onto the site.

“He’s a long term believer [in Bitcoin],” he said. “Still involved.”

Is there any difference in temp between the bottom group and above one? (I know those additional fans will help to push hot air) I don't recognize, what cards is it? One more thing, is that unpowered risers?

I think that setup will work great on reference cards (AMD) related to the air-flow that will push hot air to one side. Good setup, I like this.



So, you are using two PSU (server and consumer PSU). But my question is, is there any magic trick related to the glass above the PSU?  . Good work!

Nah...
This is related to the question (the revenue shares) mean stacking nor MN. As we know for doing stacking nor Master-Node, we need to keep some number of tokens (mostly), and what the minimum, that's it. (Or may what is the mechanism like?)

Yeah, you were right. But I'm not doing this, Q1 2018 is a pretty good moment for mining (at least for me), so I don't even think to sell my gear. Maybe I'll do this next time (I Just need to know the moment). Good idea!


For some miners maybe yes (most miners do that), but I've never held the coins, I need to pay all the bill (at least once a month) but I still get some profit after bill payment.

Yeah, that was included on memberships type (as shown on the table - this is the 2nd time you remembered me about page 28, thanks). It's just giving different fees discount for PoS nor MN isn't offering a revenue sharing.

Page 29 might more relevant to the question, but it's just a short explanation related to PoS nor MN. I doubt for a small number of tokens. There should be a minimum number of tokens to keep.

No argue with OP's post (-absolutely agree-).

Mostly I'm doing on Ethash (but not ETH), even sometimes I'm doing solo mining. Two months back I'm doing solo with a few Ethash's coins, DBIX (only for 3-4 days - when the price still at $3), UBQ (Almost two weeks), YOC (one-day solo mining),.... That gives me more than enough profit (when I get the moment).

For regular mining, mostly I mine specific coins (on the pool). My electricity cost cheaper than Leonix  ($0.1)

Agreed, this is one of the keys! (not only for pooled mining but also for optimization and efficiency that effect to our profits)


Be more flexible on mining if you want to survive!

---

     Maybe Vitalik will come here, then hard lol after reading this.

This is mine.


Thanks!

Listen to me, young man! Don't make me look like the turtle!  -But yeah indeed.


Yeah, I think so!..Sssttttt 

That was a one-time load. 
But yeah, that what we call as aesthetic after the function. Both are important, but the function should be the first.

I doubt about it (I haven't found any statement related to it - or might I miss something). As far as I know, hold the tokens will give you benefits on memberships type (but need some specific amount). It'll provide us with an advantage on trading nor withdrawal fees.


Yeah indeed, that's next (year) 


as Zedd said "Are you happy now..Are you happy now" 

You knew it, that's good. 
That's enough! Let's back to the topics. Sorry OP, we just put some fun here with a bit joke.   

Did you think I understand what I read? Of course not. 
Seriously, I'm just trying to understand what they present, not fully understand all of the content.

I doubt OP will tell us which coins, moreover if it right (OP make $3 a day with single 1080 Ti on this current situation) or maybe auto-switch mining, I mean isn't direct mining. Who knows, right?