Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 21 results by 01010100b
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: 💰www.bitcrasha.com |⚡️Free BTC|⚡️⚡️$100K Jackpots|⚡️⚡️Free jobs and earnings|⚡️
by
01010100b
on 08/03/2021, 11:42:59 UTC
I think it's pretty clear all the stats are faked.

The stats, in and of themselves, are real. It's just that the site owner is running most/all accounts himself. Here's a backup of the data I got for the week before 5 march 2021 (about 20mb): https://01010100.net/bustabit/bitcrasha.com.zip It includes snapshots of the stats page every few hours, as well as the games played during that time, which should allow anyone to verify my results above should the site owner decide to fake his previous games now or something.

Quote
I kind of understand the desire to "fake it until you make it", but with trust being such a critical part of casinos -- being anything but a 100% straight shooter seems like shooting your own foot

It is quite hilarious watching the OP frantically trying to "patch" things as they got brought up, first the shiba bot, then the players' strategies, now probably the previous games. Sure, it cost me 1k bits (about $50) but it got me value already the same way as paying for a ticket to a stand-up comedy show.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: 💰www.bitcrasha.com |⚡️Free BTC|⚡️⚡️$100K Jackpots|⚡️⚡️Free jobs and earnings|⚡️
by
01010100b
on 08/03/2021, 09:36:01 UTC
This is just to make it seem that there are active players on board.
They have about 169 users, but how many of them are really active?

Maybe one or two are real, the rest is run by the site owner himself, see below.

Quote
I don't think this gambling site will gain players here. Seems they are running a shady business here.

Well they stole 0.001006 BTC from me, so shady is quite an understatement. Not that I'm all that salty about it, I knew the risk and it was more an experiment than anything else. Either way the OP has had several days to give me my money back but chose to ignore it, so here's the full analysis of how the scam works. I gave the OP a chance to be honest, as Ryan said upthread it was always possible that they were just doing a "fake it till you make it" but given that they chose not to return my money it's clear that it's just a scam. Which is ultimately, pretty stupid, since by scamming they got my 1k bits and maybe a couple other players until everyone knows it's a scam and they get nothing anymore. Whereas, if they were just being honest, they'd probably make tons more in the long run since there is a demand for an old-style bustabit game, and there are plenty of gamblers who would enjoy such a game. Anyway, onto the analysis - I still had some old code from the Bustabit days lying around that could do this:

Almost all the players on that site use a particular strategy that isn't used by any actual gamblers but is just designed to make them appear human-like. Specifically, for each player there are two arrays defined: Cashouts and Amounts. Each player for each game chooses an amount and a cashout as follows: amount = player.Amounts[game_id % player.Amounts.Length], cashout = player.Cashouts[game_id % player.Cashouts.Length]. Below are those arrays for most players, all these players are basically the same script with different values in the arrays, as can be seen by the arrays having about the same length each time. With this anyone can quickly calculate what amount & cashout a given player would use in any given game.

Player cocky
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.97 - 1.05 - 0 - 6.6 - 3.12 - 4.01 - 3.17 - 1.89 - 1.14 - 2.11 - 1.82 - 0 - 1.01 - 1.92 - 2.93 -
Amounts: 250 - 17000 - 300 - 400 - 25 - 782 - 669 - 200 - 194 - 805 - 256 - 0 - 50000 - 444 - 1200 -

Player learnthegame
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.69 - 1.97 - 1.11 - 1.78 - 2 - 1.82 - 2 - 1.5 - 1.35 - 1.99 - 1.11 - 1.2 - 1.91 - 10 - 0 -
Amounts: 5000 - 9911 - 100 - 3550 - 2000 - 100 - 15000 - 9827 - 1500 - 2075 - 7000 - 400 - 3070 - 6500 - 0 -

Player Cheese
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.02 - 2.18 - 1.14 - 1.33 - 1.5 - 2 - 1.65 -
Amounts: 21000 - 15010 - 2100 - 978 - 6121 - 1040 - 333 -

Player Panther
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 6.27 - 9.89 - 3.14 - 1.11 - 16.12 - 0 - 8.12 - 4.92 - 2.93 - 6.17 - 7.01 - 4.53 - 5 - 7.82 - 8.24 -
Amounts: 55 - 20 - 18 - 300 - 6 - 0 - 132 - 62 - 220 - 42 - 92 - 37 - 33 - 71 - 25 -

Player usa
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.97 - 1.15 - 1.73 - 1.6 - 1.44 - 2 - 2.89 - 1.31 - 1.82 - 3.92 - 0 - 1.2 - 1.62 - 5.19 - 1.47 -
Amounts: 1000 - 4200 - 555 - 1000 - 1700 - 500 - 500 - 1492 - 1000 - 100 - 0 - 5000 - 1000 - 40 - 3500 -

Player Mute
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 2.14 - 2.02 - 1.37 - 1.21 - 1.5 - 1.82 - 0 - 2 - 1.43 - 1.24 - 2 - 1.3 - 1.15 - 1.03 - 1.46 -
Amounts: 1111 - 4110 - 160 - 100 - 80 - 100 - 0 - 1000 - 1000 - 2000 - 3500 - 1234 - 8000 - 5000 - 1000 -

Player Bet360
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.54 - 1.37 - 1.03 - 1.4 - 2.04 - 1.42 - 1.67 - 1.21 - 1.02 - 1.92 - 0 - 1.17 - 1.43 - 1.19 - 2 -
Amounts: 1000 - 3100 - 1980 - 1000 - 1300 - 300 - 300 - 2000 - 5000 - 100 - 0 - 1862 - 1050 - 4000 - 275 -

Player Corona
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.16 - 1.1 -
Amounts: 80000 - 100000 -

Player purity
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 3.22 - 4.68 - 2.01 - 6.01 - 8.63 - 4.6 - 7.92 - 2.74 - 5 - 2.29 - 6.18 - 8.19 - 4.5 - 0 - 2.03 -
Amounts: 140 - 270 - 305 - 160 - 125 - 100 - 200 - 110 - 299 - 150 - 180 - 122 - 100 - 0 - 150 -

Player KGB
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.83 - 1.47 - 1.81 - 2.53 - 1 - 7.82 - 9.21 - 4.54 - 4.69 - 2.04 - 2.11 - 8.02 - 0 - 1.03 - 2.22 -
Amounts: 620 - 812 - 620 - 165 - 50 - 41 - 60 - 89 - 69 - 27 - 400 - 44 - 0 - 10000 - 560 -

Player Tentris
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.92 - 1.74 - 1.21 - 1.5 - 1.92 - 0 - 2 - 1.63 - 1.44 - 2 - 1.69 - 1.05 - 1.83 - 1.96 - 2.04 -
Amounts: 1110 - 1600 - 1000 - 2000 - 100 - 0 - 1681 - 1050 - 260 - 3500 - 1124 - 5000 - 1000 - 260 - 2274 -

Player Mcmohan
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 6.47 - 7.81 - 4.53 - 5 - 7.82 - 8.24 - 6.57 - 8.79 - 5.94 - 1.71 - 18.02 - 0 - 8.82 - 4.72 - 2.43 -
Amounts: 143 - 240 - 135 - 50 - 41 - 60 - 89 - 69 - 27 - 400 - 44 - 0 - 132 - 462 - 820 -

Player Samantha
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.11 - 1.46 - 2 - 2.71 - 1.26 - 1.62 - 6.7 - 1.97 - 1.71 - 1.2 - 8.16 - 2 - 3.72 - 1.04 - 61.31 -
Amounts: 8182 - 711 - 500 - 371 - 861 - 682 - 271 - 610 - 500 - 1000 - 25 - 624 - 50 - 2461 - 33 -

Player GuleGule
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 4.53 - 5 - 7.82 - 8.24 - 6.57 - 8.79 - 5.94 - 1.71 - 18.02 - 0 - 8.82 - 4.72 - 2.43 - 6.47 - 7.81 -
Amounts: 135 - 50 - 41 - 60 - 89 - 69 - 27 - 400 - 44 - 0 - 132 - 462 - 820 - 143 - 240 -

Player polcia
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.04 - 1.02 - 1.02 - 1.08 - 1.24 - 4 - 1.1 -
Amounts: 10000 - 50000 - 19500 - 10000 - 2000 - 1078 - 6241 -

Player Kicku
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.97 - 1.05 - 0 - 6.6 - 3.12 - 4.01 - 3.17 - 1.89 - 1.14 - 2.11 - 1.82 - 0 - 1.01 - 1.92 - 2.93 -
Amounts: 250 - 17000 - 300 - 400 - 25 - 782 - 669 - 200 - 194 - 805 - 256 - 0 - 50000 - 444 - 1200 -

Player Gozail
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.65 - 1.28 - 1.8 - 2 - 1.01 - 2 - 1.97 - 0 - 1.41 - 1.23 - 1.69 - 1.91 - 1.35 - 1.94 - 2 -
Amounts: 1000 - 1111 - 222 - 100 - 900 - 1000 - 250 - 0 - 1000 - 2000 - 500 - 200 - 1000 - 200 - 150 -

Player Bitcrasha
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 0 - 1.41 - 1.23 - 1.69 - 1.91 - 1.35 - 1.94 - 2 - 1.65 - 1.28 - 1.8 - 2 - 1.01 - 2 - 1.97 -
Amounts: 0 - 1000 - 2000 - 500 - 200 - 1000 - 200 - 150 - 1000 - 1111 - 222 - 100 - 900 - 1000 - 250 -

Player Automatic
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.77 - 2.08 - 1.69 - 2.31 - 1.76 - 1.21 - 1.54 - 0 - 1.5 - 1.08 - 2 - 1.42 - 1.23 - 1.2 - 2.34 -
Amounts: 1000 - 500 - 950 - 718 - 1500 - 888 - 371 - 0 - 2000 - 2000 - 612 - 300 - 4000 - 2102 - 666 -

Player Kuruk
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.16 - 1.1 -
Amounts: 80000 - 100000 -

Player XRP
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.14 - 1.02 - 1.02 - 1.04 - 1.24 - 1.04 - 1.1 -
Amounts: 10000 - 25000 - 14500 - 20000 - 15000 - 16008 - 8652 -

Player shuahada
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 2.94 - 1.27 - 1.29 - 7.56 - 1.34 - 1.15 - 2.17 - 1.94 - 0 - 2 - 1.53 - 1.99 - 1.62 - 1.08 - 1.47 -
Amounts: 350 - 1000 - 555 - 50 - 900 - 3000 - 400 - 969 - 0 - 200 - 550 - 300 - 270 - 2921 - 425 -

Player mistries
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 3.12 - 4.01 - 3.17 - 1.89 - 1.14 - 2.11 - 1.82 - 0 - 1.01 - 1.92 - 2.93 - 1.97 - 1.05 - 5.53 - 6.6 -
Amounts: 25 - 782 - 669 - 200 - 194 - 805 - 256 - 0 - 50000 - 444 - 1200 - 250 - 17000 - 300 - 400 -

Player shakaal
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.57 - 2.04 - 2.69 - 2.31 - 1.43 - 1.17 - 1.94 - 2.11 - 0 - 1.03 - 2 - 4.21 - 1.22 - 1.41 - 2.34 -
Amounts: 500 - 1000 - 281 - 1000 - 900 - 3000 - 888 - 268 - 0 - 17250 - 561 - 180 - 860 - 371 - 700 -

Player Gemini
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.11 - 1.46 - 2 - 2.71 - 1.26 - 1.62 - 6.7 - 1.97 -
Amounts: 8001 - 700 - 500 - 377 - 865 - 685 - 274 - 610 -

Player nude
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 8.24 - 6.57 - 8.79 - 5.94 - 1.71 - 0 - 0 - 8.82 - 4.72 - 2.43 - 6.47 - 7.81 - 4.53 - 5 - 7.82 -
Amounts: 60 - 89 - 69 - 27 - 400 - 44 - 0 - 132 - 462 - 820 - 143 - 240 - 135 - 50 - 41 -

Player Kezzy
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.18 - 1.21 - 1.38 - 1.73 - 1.5 - 1.21 - 1.1 - 1.83 - 1.74 - 2.31 - 2 - 1.91 - 1.74 - 0 - 2 -
Amounts: 11000 - 7100 - 370 - 1000 - 10000 - 8000 - 2000 - 4000 - 2500 - 170 - 710 - 200 - 50 - 0 - 5000 -

Player inza
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.45 - 1.03 - 1.66 - 8.14 - 10.16 - 1.37 - 1.21 - 1.5 - 1.92 - 0 - 2 - 1.43 - 1.24 - 100 - 2 -
Amounts: 2200 - 3500 - 1000 - 11 - 50 - 1000 - 4000 - 500 - 100 - 0 - 2000 - 1000 - 5000 - 35 - 1000 -

Player Tough
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.05 - 5.53 - 6.6 - 3.12 - 4.01 - 3.17 - 1.89 - 1.14 - 2.11 - 1.82 - 0 - 1.01 - 1.92 - 2.93 - 1.97 -
Amounts: 17000 - 300 - 400 - 25 - 782 - 669 - 200 - 194 - 805 - 256 - 0 - 50000 - 444 - 1200 - 250 -

Player Ether
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 3.18 - 2.28 - 2.38 - 1.73 - 3 - 1.21 - 1.1 - 2.83 - 1.74 - 2.31 - 2 - 1.91 - 1.74 - 0 - 2 -
Amounts: 12250 - 6500 - 250 - 1000 - 10000 - 7000 - 3000 - 5000 - 2500 - 110 - 150 - 200 - 150 - 0 - 2500 -

Player kickass
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.02 - 6.2 - 0 - 3.51 - 1.76 - 1.03 - 8.17 - 1.51 - 4.13 - 8.1 - 4.11 - 2.29 - 3.01 - 3.81 - 5.14 -
Amounts: 39 - 100 - 0 - 50 - 45 - 48 - 162 - 161 - 24 - 50 - 70 - 30 - 98 - 20 - 48 -

Player Wind
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.82 - 1.92 - 0 - 1.8 - 1.72 - 2.09 - 1.27 - 1.97 - 3 - 6 - 1.38 - 1.24 - 1.77 - 2.89 - 1.14 -
Amounts: 300 - 100 - 0 - 1000 - 250 - 1000 - 2000 - 1000 - 100 - 100 - 1000 - 1500 - 500 - 193 - 1800 -

Player Nyancat
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.92 - 15 - 0 - 20 - 45.11 - 0 - 8.57 - 18.51 - 45.13 - 18.1 - 4.11 - 2.25 - 3.17 - 3.09 - 24.14 -
Amounts: 30 - 10 - 0 - 20 - 5 - 2 - 20 - 10 - 15 - 3 - 6 - 25 - 50 - 20 - 8 -

Player Menuchunk
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.35 - 1.31 - 2.53 - 3.64 - 2.17 - 1.34 - 4.16 - 1.31 - 1.75 - 1.94 - 2.44 - 0 - 1.79 - 1.03 - 1.19 -
Amounts: 7500 - 1000 - 250 - 550 - 430 - 1000 - 690 - 860 - 492 - 800 - 135 - 0 - 4810 - 18000 - 5000 -

Player Shameon
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.11 - 16.12 - 0 - 8.12 - 4.92 - 2.93 - 6.17 - 7.01 - 4.53 - 5 - 7.82 - 8.24 - 6.27 - 9.89 - 3.14 -
Amounts: 300 - 6 - 0 - 132 - 62 - 220 - 42 - 92 - 37 - 33 - 71 - 25 - 55 - 20 - 18 -

Player tribals
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.23 - 1.2 - 2.34 - 1.77 - 2.08 - 1.69 - 2.31 - 1.76 - 1.21 - 1.54 - 0 - 1.5 - 1.28 - 2 - 1.42 -
Amounts: 3200 - 2102 - 666 - 1000 - 500 - 950 - 718 - 1500 - 888 - 371 - 0 - 2500 - 2000 - 612 - 300 -

Player mrSam
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 4 - 4.18 - 2.1 - 2.97 - 0 - 3.41 - 4.21 - 2.19 - 8.51 - 3 - 2.44 - 2 - 2.15 - 2.48 - 6.81 -
Amounts: 100 - 138 - 100 - 250 - 0 - 100 - 200 - 100 - 50 - 100 - 200 - 150 - 100 - 125 - 100 -

Player TotheSky
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.77 - 1.83 - 1.74 - 2.31 - 2 - 1.91 - 1.74 - 0 - 0 - 2 - 1.83 - 1.51 - 1.97 - 1.83 - 1.5 - 1.61 -
Amounts: 2000 - 4000 - 2000 - 1700 - 2010 - 200 - 50 - 0 - 0 - 2192 - 4281 - 5620 - 350 - 2300 - 10000 - 8000 -

Player Akarba
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.08 - 1.47 - 2.94 - 1.27 - 1.29 - 7.56 - 1.34 - 1.15 - 2.17 - 1.94 - 0 - 2 - 1.53 - 1.99 - 1.62 -
Amounts: 2921 - 425 - 350 - 1000 - 555 - 50 - 900 - 3000 - 400 - 969 - 0 - 200 - 550 - 300 - 270 -

Player cryptocoin
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.2 - 2.34 - 1.77 - 2.08 - 1.69 - 2.31 - 1.76 - 1.21 - 1.54 - 0 - 1.5 - 1.28 - 2 - 1.42 - 1.23 -
Amounts: 2102 - 666 - 1000 - 500 - 950 - 718 - 1500 - 888 - 371 - 0 - 2500 - 2000 - 612 - 300 - 3200 -

Player Ohello
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 0 - 1.5 - 2.06 - 10.04 - 1.9 - 2 - 1.26 - 2.5 - 1.38 - 3 - 2.82 - 1.1 - 1.99 - 3.71 - 1.44 -
Amounts: 1 - 560 - 400 - 50 - 481 - 2000 - 816 - 381 - 1628 - 1000 - 100 - 5000 - 428 - 200 - 475 -

Player canyouseeme
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.27 - 1.43 - 2.28 - 1.05 - 1.47 - 1.14 - 4.86 - 3.08 - 2.01 - 1.4 - 1.55 - 0 - 2.06 - 1.93 - 1.84 -
Amounts: 924 - 1000 - 250 - 3500 - 1000 - 1761 - 50 - 100 - 400 - 800 - 500 - 0 - 2000 - 600 - 500 -

Player Sharmota
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.03 - 1.19 - 1.35 - 1.31 - 2.53 - 3.64 - 2.17 - 1.34 - 4.16 - 1.31 - 1.75 - 1.94 - 2.44 - 0 - 1.79 -
Amounts: 18000 - 5000 - 7500 - 1000 - 250 - 550 - 430 - 1000 - 690 - 860 - 492 - 800 - 135 - 0 - 4810 -

Player Lara
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 2 - 1.26 - 2.5 - 1.38 - 3 - 2.82 - 1.1 - 1.99 - 3.71 - 1.44 - 0 - 1.5 - 2.06 - 10.04 - 1.9 -
Amounts: 2000 - 816 - 381 - 1628 - 1000 - 100 - 5000 - 428 - 200 - 475 - 1 - 560 - 400 - 50 - 481 -

Player Gambling
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 2 - 3.18 - 2.28 - 2.38 - 1.73 - 3 - 1.21 - 1.1 - 2.83 - 1.74 - 2.31 - 2 - 1.91 - 1.74 - 0 -
Amounts: 2500 - 12250 - 6500 - 250 - 1000 - 10000 - 7000 - 3000 - 5000 - 2500 - 110 - 150 - 200 - 150 - 0 -

Player maker
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.73 - 3 - 1.21 - 1.1 - 2.83 - 1.74 - 2.31 - 2 - 1.91 - 1.74 - 0 - 2 - 3.18 - 2.28 - 2.38 -
Amounts: 1000 - 10000 - 7000 - 3000 - 5000 - 2500 - 110 - 150 - 200 - 150 - 0 - 2500 - 12250 - 6500 - 250 -

Player income
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 7 - 2.26 - 6.1 - 8.19 - 4.5 - 0 - 2.5 - 3.52 - 4.23 - 2.01 - 6.01 - 8.63 - 4.6 - 7.12 - 2.24 -
Amounts: 99 - 53 - 78 - 85 - 100 - 0 - 135 - 162 - 232 - 127 - 162 - 125 - 10 - 10 - 10 -

Player Yildirim
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 2.82 - 1.1 - 1.99 - 3.71 - 1.44 - 0 - 1.5 - 2.06 - 10.04 - 1.9 - 2 - 1.26 - 2.5 - 1.38 - 3 -
Amounts: 100 - 5000 - 428 - 200 - 475 - 1 - 560 - 400 - 50 - 481 - 2000 - 816 - 381 - 1628 - 1000 -

Player Game
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 6.01 - 8.63 - 4.6 - 7.12 - 2.24 - 7 - 2.26 - 6.1 - 8.19 - 4.5 - 0 - 2.5 - 3.52 - 4.23 - 2.01 -
Amounts: 162 - 125 - 10 - 10 - 10 - 99 - 53 - 78 - 85 - 100 - 0 - 135 - 162 - 232 - 127 -

Player Bitcoin
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 7.82 - 8.24 - 6.57 - 8.79 - 5.94 - 1.71 - 18.02 - 0 - 8.82 - 4.72 - 2.43 - 6.47 - 7.81 - 4.53 - 5 -
Amounts: 41 - 60 - 89 - 69 - 27 - 400 - 44 - 0 - 132 - 462 - 820 - 143 - 240 - 135 - 50 -

Player 1000x
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.89 - 4.19 - 1.01 - 7.72 - 0 - 1.02 - 4.92 - 2.43 - 1.57 - 7.01 - 4.53 - 1.3 - 4.42 - 2.24 - 1.27 -
Amounts: 200 - 664 - 150 - 160 - 0 - 10000 - 500 - 200 - 4000 - 980 - 350 - 3000 - 440 - 650 - 855 -

Player zentecho
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 8.24 - 6.57 - 8.79 - 5.94 - 1.71 - 18.02 - 0 - 8.82 - 4.72 - 2.43 - 6.47 - 7.81 - 4.53 - 5 - 7.82 -
Amounts: 60 - 89 - 69 - 27 - 400 - 44 - 0 - 132 - 462 - 820 - 143 - 240 - 135 - 50 - 41 -

Player Lasvegas
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.75 - 1.94 - 2.44 - 0 - 1.79 - 1.03 - 1.19 - 1.35 - 1.31 - 2.53 - 3.64 - 2.17 - 1.34 - 4.16 - 1.31 -
Amounts: 492 - 800 - 135 - 0 - 4810 - 18000 - 5000 - 7500 - 1000 - 250 - 550 - 430 - 1000 - 690 - 860 -

Player Goddess
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 2 - 1.91 - 1.74 - 0 - 2 - 1.18 - 1.21 - 1.38 - 1.73 - 1.5 - 1.21 - 1.1 - 1.83 - 1.74 - 2.31 -
Amounts: 710 - 200 - 50 - 0 - 5000 - 11000 - 7100 - 370 - 1000 - 10000 - 8000 - 2000 - 4000 - 2500 - 170 -

Player afromaniac
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.35 - 1.11 - 4.03 - 2.64 - 1.17 - 1.34 - 4.16 - 1.31 - 1.75 - 1.94 - 1.44 - 0 - 2.09 - 6.03 - 1.19 -
Amounts: 750 - 4000 - 250 - 350 - 1000 - 1000 - 69 - 791 - 400 - 400 - 825 - 0 - 481 - 100 - 500 -

Player boxer
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 7.82 - 8.24 - 6.27 - 9.89 - 3.14 - 1.11 - 16.12 - 0 - 8.12 - 4.92 - 2.93 - 6.17 - 7.01 - 4.53 - 5 -
Amounts: 71 - 25 - 55 - 20 - 18 - 300 - 6 - 0 - 132 - 62 - 220 - 42 - 92 - 37 - 33 -

Player hackforums
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 3.92 - 0 - 1.2 - 1.62 - 5.19 - 1.47 - 1.97 - 1.15 - 1.73 - 1.6 - 1.44 - 2 - 2.89 - 1.31 - 1.82 -
Amounts: 100 - 0 - 5000 - 1000 - 40 - 3500 - 1000 - 4200 - 555 - 1000 - 1700 - 500 - 500 - 1492 - 1000 -

Player kidsbar
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 18.1 - 4.11 - 2.25 - 3.17 - 3.09 - 24.14 - 1.92 - 15 - 0 - 20 - 45.11 - 70.03 - 8.57 - 18.51 - 45.13 -
Amounts: 3 - 6 - 25 - 50 - 20 - 8 - 30 - 10 - 0 - 20 - 5 - 2 - 20 - 10 - 15 -

Player Aila
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.21 - 1.54 - 0 - 1.5 - 1.28 - 2 - 1.42 - 1.23 - 1.2 - 2.34 - 1.77 - 2.08 - 1.69 - 2.31 - 1.76 -
Amounts: 888 - 371 - 0 - 2500 - 2000 - 612 - 300 - 3200 - 2102 - 666 - 1000 - 500 - 950 - 718 - 1500 -

Player Gnome
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 4.5 - 0 - 2.03 - 3.22 - 4.68 - 2.01 - 6.01 - 8.63 - 4.6 - 7.92 - 2.74 - 5 - 2.29 - 6.18 - 8.19 -
Amounts: 100 - 0 - 150 - 140 - 270 - 305 - 160 - 125 - 100 - 200 - 110 - 299 - 150 - 180 - 122 -

Player arnold
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 0 - 2.5 - 3.52 - 4.23 - 2.01 - 6.01 - 8.63 - 4.6 - 7.12 - 2.24 - 7 - 2.26 - 6.1 - 8.19 - 4.5 -
Amounts: 0 - 135 - 162 - 232 - 127 - 162 - 125 - 10 - 10 - 10 - 99 - 53 - 78 - 85 - 100 -

Player Teki
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 2.97 - 0 - 3.41 - 4.21 - 2.19 - 8.51 - 3 - 2.44 - 2 - 2.15 - 2.48 - 6.81 - 4 - 4.18 - 2.1 -
Amounts: 250 - 0 - 100 - 200 - 100 - 50 - 100 - 200 - 150 - 100 - 125 - 100 - 100 - 138 - 100 -

Player mafia
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 8.16 - 2 - 3.72 - 1.04 - 61.31 - 1.11 - 1.46 - 2 - 2.71 - 1.26 - 1.62 - 6.7 - 1.97 - 1.71 - 1.2 -
Amounts: 25 - 624 - 50 - 2461 - 33 - 8182 - 711 - 500 - 371 - 861 - 682 - 271 - 610 - 500 - 1000 -

Player Grizzly
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.03 - 1.66 - 8.14 - 10.16 - 1.37 - 1.21 - 1.5 - 1.92 - 0 - 2 - 1.43 - 1.24 - 0 - 2 - 1.45 -
Amounts: 3500 - 1000 - 11 - 50 - 1000 - 4000 - 500 - 100 - 0 - 2000 - 1000 - 5000 - 35 - 1000 - 2200 -

Player Suffer
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 3.14 - 1.11 - 16.12 - 0 - 1.03 - 1.32 - 2.93 - 6.17 - 7.01 - 4.53 - 5 - 7.82 - 8.24 - 6.27 - 9.89 -
Amounts: 104 - 345 - 596 - 0 - 30000 - 4500 - 888 - 929 - 476 - 651 - 375 - 156 - 165 - 455 - 700 -

Player soldier
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 10.04 - 1.21 - 1.5 - 2 - 1.65 - 3.02 - 0 -
Amounts: 20 - 9780 - 2261 - 2 - 4816 - 2000 - 0 -

Player genie
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 6.14 - 1.31 - 1.03 - 0 - 1.65 - 1.22 - 2.08 -
Amounts: 200 - 9000 - 15000 - 81 - 1324 - 2000 - 7000 -

Player earnings
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 5.71 - 3.68 - 2 - 3.11 - 9.13 - 6 - 7.12 - 4.14 - 5 - 8.29 - 10 - 4.89 - 6.11 - 0 - 4.83 -
Amounts: 1100 - 2000 - 3000 - 1000 - 1250 - 100 - 2000 - 750 - 1282 - 1000 - 4000 - 650 - 1000 - 0 - 1500 -

Player JKing
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 4.01 - 3.17 - 1.89 - 1.14 - 2.11 - 1.82 - 0 - 1.01 - 1.92 - 2.93 - 1.97 - 1.05 - 5.53 - 6.6 - 3.12 -
Amounts: 782 - 669 - 200 - 194 - 805 - 256 - 0 - 5000 - 444 - 1200 - 250 - 17000 - 300 - 400 - 25 -

Player Santa
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 3.52 - 4.23 - 2.01 - 6.01 - 8.63 - 4.6 - 7.12 - 2.24 - 7 - 2.26 - 6.1 - 8.19 - 4.5 - 0 - 2.5 -
Amounts: 162 - 232 - 127 - 162 - 125 - 10 - 10 - 10 - 99 - 53 - 78 - 85 - 100 - 0 - 135 -

Player MJNewyork
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 2.03 - 3.22 - 4.68 - 2.01 - 6.01 - 8.63 - 4.6 - 7.92 - 2.74 - 5 - 2.29 - 6.18 - 8.19 - 4.5 - 0 -
Amounts: 150 - 140 - 270 - 305 - 160 - 125 - 100 - 200 - 110 - 299 - 150 - 180 - 122 - 100 - 0 -

Player Lucy
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 0 - 2 - 3.18 - 2.28 - 2.38 - 1.73 - 3 - 1.21 - 1.1 - 2.83 - 1.74 - 2.31 - 2 - 1.91 - 1.74 -
Amounts: 0 - 2500 - 250 - 682 - 250 - 790 - 912 - 700 - 7500 - 500 - 265 - 800 - 1500 - 811 - 111 -

Player saint
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 6.57 - 8.79 - 5.94 - 1.71 - 18.02 - 0 - 8.82 - 4.72 - 2.43 - 6.47 - 7.81 - 4.53 - 5 - 7.82 - 8.24 -
Amounts: 89 - 69 - 27 - 400 - 44 - 0 - 132 - 462 - 820 - 143 - 240 - 135 - 50 - 41 - 60 -

Player Jason
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.92 - 15 - 0 - 20 - 45.11 - 70.03 - 8.57 - 18.51 - 45.13 - 18.1 - 4.11 - 2.25 - 3.17 - 3.09 - 24.14 -
Amounts: 30 - 10 - 0 - 20 - 5 - 2 - 20 - 10 - 15 - 3 - 6 - 25 - 50 - 20 - 8 -

Player America
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 0 - 3.51 - 1.76 - 1.03 - 8.17 - 1.51 - 4.13 - 8.1 - 4.11 - 2.29 - 3.01 - 3.81 - 5.14 - 1.02 - 6.2 -
Amounts: 0 - 50 - 45 - 48 - 162 - 161 - 24 - 50 - 70 - 30 - 98 - 20 - 48 - 39 - 100 -

Player Nastrodamas
GameIdCyclerStrategy
Cashouts: 1.21 - 1.38 - 1.73 - 1.5 - 1.21 - 1.1 - 1.83 - 1.74 - 2.31 - 2 - 1.91 - 1.74 - 0 - 2 - 1.18 -
Amounts: 7100 - 370 - 1000 - 10000 - 8000 - 2000 - 4000 - 2500 - 170 - 710 - 200 - 50 - 0 - 5000 - 11000 -
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: 💰www.bitcrasha.com |⚡️Free BTC|⚡️⚡️$100K Jackpots|⚡️⚡️Free jobs and earnings|⚡️
by
01010100b
on 06/03/2021, 20:13:21 UTC
(sorry for the multiple posts, just sharing my findings)

Here's a representative part of the chat:

20:48 Teki: Fuck it
20:49 arnold: ty
20:49 tribals: !prof 30m
20:49 Tentris: greems soon
20:49 Jackpot: @tribals Hit JACKPOT 0.0001 BTC 💰 💰 Earn More BTC under your account in free section. 🥇🍀
20:49 hackforums: !c 100k bits
20:49 Teki: !bst 100
20:49 arnold: !n
20:49 tribals: mama
20:50 Tentris: 5x
20:50 hackforums: !c 1 btc
20:50 Kuruk: nyan
20:50 Teki: greedy
20:50 arnold: yes
20:50 tribals: Next low red
20:50 hackforums: boom
20:50 Tentris: @rainbot
20:50 Teki: lol
20:50 Kuruk: Cool
20:50 arnold: add me

What can be noticed here is that multiple accounts are giving commands to the bustabit bot (!bst, !n, etc) even though the bot obviously doesn't work on this site. Yet that doesn't stop accounts from continuing to give these commands, indeed in the small sample above the account "hackforums" can be seen doing it twice in short succession, completely undeterred by the fact that there is no bot. Upon further examination it quickly becomes clear that this is not a real chat but just a replay of the real bustabit chat. This strongly suggests that the site owner is himself running a script on bustabit that is recording the chat, or at least has done so in the past.

Looking into the other accounts on the site, several things can be determined. First, they're all scripts. Second, almost all of them - especially the bigger players - follow this pattern:

var amount = amounts_array[game_id % amounts_array.length]
var cashout = cashouts_array[game_id % cashouts_array.length]

In other words, they constantly cycle between a fixed set of {amount,cashout} values per game. The length of this cycle tends to be 15. The remaining players follow similar patterns or have partially determinable patterns. These accounts are hence most likely run by the site itself, given their chat output and their behaviour which only really makes sense as a simplistic attempt to appear human-like. Given the peculiarity of almost all of them using the specific pattern above, and the fact that the site owner must be running, or have run, a script on the real bustabit site to get the chat logs it might be possible to determine their account on bustabit by checking for a script running the same pattern.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: 💰www.bitcrasha.com |⚡️Free BTC|⚡️⚡️$100K Jackpots|⚡️⚡️Free jobs and earnings|⚡️
by
01010100b
on 06/03/2021, 19:45:37 UTC
The game crashes fail verification. On the FAQ is stated: "Since BitCrasha is provably fair, you can verify that yourself https://jsfiddle.net/1L1uqcgv/6/embedded/result/" When you actually do that for game 1099385[1] (the latest game at the time of writing) with hash 8a1fccd8eb96d97ee7bee904878502f5a339c57c6381b8c802b17044f6f9f3a8 then it should've crashed at 1.42x but it actually crashed at 9.07x.

[1] https://bitcrasha.com/game/1099385
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: 💰www.bitcrasha.com |⚡️Free BTC|⚡️⚡️$100K Jackpots|⚡️⚡️Free jobs and earnings|⚡️
by
01010100b
on 06/03/2021, 18:55:04 UTC
I gave it a try and deposited 1000 bits[1], played some games under the username jameer[2], and then when I tried to withdraw again it claimed my password was incorrect even though it's definitely correct (it's saved by chrome). At the same time I noticed a strong drop in other players, compare the number of players between [3] and [4]. I can only assume it's a scam and they lock you out of your account after you've deposited so you can't get your bits back.

[1] https://blockstream.info/tx/ba451a7fad5131bd27460740543932efb3432dcb9e8bba48e1dd342c07776e98
[2] https://bitcrasha.com/user/jameer
[3] https://bitcrasha.com/game/1098693
[4] https://bitcrasha.com/game/1098989
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: bustabit v2 – No commission on investors & dilution fee lowered to 1%
by
01010100b
on 06/03/2018, 16:48:17 UTC
It doesn't make sense to sum those growth multipliers.

Obviously, and that is indeed the reason why I'm not summing them. I said "in absolute numbers" multiple times now.

These "absolute numbers" you're talking about are the expected profits, not the expected growth factors. They are different things.

Expected profits are "absolute numbers" - you can add them. Expected growths are multipliers - you can multiply them.

So you have nothing but semantics and quibbling over the meaning of the word "growth"? Do you perhaps have something substantial to say about the argument I made?

Let's define this properly. Let B_0 be the initial bankroll and B_N the bankroll after a sequence of N bets. Then BG is a random variable which, when given said sequence of N bets, takes the value B_0 * log(B_N / B_0) / N. Likewise for PG.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: bustabit v2 – No commission on investors & dilution fee lowered to 1%
by
01010100b
on 06/03/2018, 16:36:03 UTC
Can you check where I'm going wrong with this? Here's how I looked at it:

Let BG and PG be two random variables, BG is the house's bankroll growth and PG is the player's bankroll growth (in absolute numbers). Then:

BG + PG = 0 (money only moves back and forth between the house and the player, so a loss for one is a gain for the other and vice versa)

It doesn't make sense to sum those growth multipliers.

Obviously, and that is indeed the reason why I'm not summing them. I said "in absolute numbers" multiple times now. Anyway, I'm pretty sure my argument is correct, especially since the edge case trivially shows that it is indeed possible for a player to be -EV and +EBG.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: bustabit v2 – Dilution fee lowered to 1%
by
01010100b
on 06/03/2018, 14:39:05 UTC
It's at least definitely possible for a player to be +EBG yet -EV, the edge case is simple. Suppose the casino bets 100% of its bankroll on each bet, then even though it may have +EV, at some point it's going to lose. So the player will have, with probability one, gained money and hence is at +EBG - though he may require a deep bankroll.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: bustabit v2 – No commission on investors & dilution fee lowered to 1%
by
01010100b
on 06/03/2018, 13:04:48 UTC
Yes, the expected value of the bankroll growth in absolute numbers. BG and PG are random variables.
"Expected value of the bankroll growth in absolute numbers" - crazy confusing wording.
There are "expected value" and "expected growth".

Do you know what a random variable is? Do you know what the expected value of a random variable is? I'm not talking about the expected value of the bet, I'm talking about the expected value of the bankroll growth.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: bustabit v2 – No commission on investors & dilution fee lowered to 1%
by
01010100b
on 06/03/2018, 11:29:28 UTC
However I think he made the same mistake I struggled with too, which was thinking that if the bankroll is -EBG that would allow a player to be +EBG.  Fortunately (for investors) this isn't the case, so there's no real abuse avenue.

Can you check where I'm going wrong with this? Here's how I looked at it:

Let BG and PG be two random variables, BG is the house's bankroll growth and PG is the player's bankroll growth (in absolute numbers). Then:

BG + PG = 0 (money only moves back and forth between the house and the player, so a loss for one is a gain for the other and vice versa)
E[BG + PG] = E[0] (taking the expected value of both sides)
E[BG + PG] = 0 (expected value of a constant is that constant)
E[BG] + E[PG] = 0 (by linearity of expected value)
E[BG] = -E[PG]

Which leads to the player's EBG being the opposite of the house's EBG, so if the house is at -EBG then the player is at +EBG and vice versa. Perhaps by EBG is meant the median bankroll growth and not the mean bankroll growth? In which case the linearity condition above wouldn't apply.
No. That is for expected value only.

Yes, the expected value of the bankroll growth in absolute numbers. BG and PG are random variables.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: bustabit v2 – No commission on investors & dilution fee lowered to 1%
by
01010100b
on 06/03/2018, 09:12:22 UTC
However I think he made the same mistake I struggled with too, which was thinking that if the bankroll is -EBG that would allow a player to be +EBG.  Fortunately (for investors) this isn't the case, so there's no real abuse avenue.

Can you check where I'm going wrong with this? Here's how I looked at it:

Let BG and PG be two random variables, BG is the house's bankroll growth and PG is the player's bankroll growth (in absolute numbers). Then:

BG + PG = 0 (money only moves back and forth between the house and the player, so a loss for one is a gain for the other and vice versa)
E[BG + PG] = E[0] (taking the expected value of both sides)
E[BG + PG] = 0 (expected value of a constant is that constant)
E[BG] + E[PG] = 0 (by linearity of expected value)
E[BG] = -E[PG]

Which leads to the player's EBG being the opposite of the house's EBG, so if the house is at -EBG then the player is at +EBG and vice versa. Perhaps by EBG is meant the median bankroll growth and not the mean bankroll growth? In which case the linearity condition above wouldn't apply.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: bustabit v2 – No commission on investors & dilution fee lowered to 1%
by
01010100b
on 06/03/2018, 06:47:03 UTC
That is only the case for an individual investor that (ab)uses the offsite investment system to risk more than he actually has.

The offsite system is meant to allow investors to lower their counterparty risk and free up liquidity by not depositing their entire investment. I strongly recommend to only use it for that purpose. If you use the offsite system properly or don't use it at all, you never have an expectation of negative growth.

This statement is false, just think about it. Suppose there are two investors, A and B, and each have 50 btc onsite and 50 btc offsite. A is lying about it but B isn't. Why would A have -EBG but B have +EBG?

I've been attempting to find a good answer to your question, and came up with a surprising realization. Your "A" guy would appear to be running a 2x kelly risk, and so we would say he has zero expected bankroll growth. We know that if the percentage you risk is twice the house edge then your expected growth is zero.

BUT... he is only risking 2x on the first bet. After that his offsite stays constant. If the house loses money, A starts risking more than 2x kelly, and if the house wins money, A finds himself risking less than 2x kelly. A isn't really using "leverage" at all. Leverage would be where he is constantly risking 2%. But this "offsite" feature means he is always risking 1% of (onsite + 50) - which is quite a different thing.

In conclusion, we can't accurately say that if you go 2x using offsite investment then you can expect 0 bankroll growth. That's not true, because kelly only talks about what happens if you are risking the same percentage of your actual bankroll on every bet, and A isn't...

Yes, that's exactly why I'm saying that it would be best if they just stopped referring to it as leverage, because the system doesn't function as one.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: bustabit v2 – No commission on investors & dilution fee lowered to 1%
by
01010100b
on 05/03/2018, 10:08:27 UTC
maybe the best would be to stop offering the offsite feature for Investors

I think it would be best if they just stopped referring to it as leverage. It's that description which put me, as an investor, on the wrong track for a while. Specifically, I thought that the leverage would remain constant, however, since offsite is constant and onsite changes in response to betting, the leverage goes up and down as the game progresses.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: bustabit v2 – No commission on investors & dilution fee lowered to 1%
by
01010100b
on 05/03/2018, 09:56:27 UTC
However I think he made the same mistake I struggled with too, which was thinking that if the bankroll is -EBG that would allow a player to be +EBG.

That was indeed the core error I made with thinking this would be exploitable. I'm still going to have to wrap my head around this sometime, but that's for later.

Quote
I've just been working on this problem domain for quite a while

Yeah I'm new to this domain (until recently on BaB I never even considered anything of the sort). Even though measure theory (of which probability theory is a special case) is kind of my specialty, there's a whole lot of specific aspects to consider with applying it to a casino like Bab. Add to that that I'm mostly stoned as a goat whenever I bother with this, and the result is that I'm pretty error-prone with this Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: bustabit v2 – No commission on investors & dilution fee lowered to 1%
by
01010100b
on 04/03/2018, 19:42:59 UTC
Well yes, but as B moves coins from his offsite to his onsite then his L (as per post above) changes. Let's consider the simplified situation where A and B have the same investment (say 50 btc onsite and 50 btc offsite), A is lying and B isn't, and B will move his offsite to his onsite when he gets margin called (ie when his onsite reaches 0) and not before. While it is true that B will be able to recover whereas A won't, the probability of their onsite going to 0 is the same since they have the same investment, up until the point where B actually starts moving his offsite to his onsite both A and B will evolve in tandem. So if A has the expectation of negative bankroll growth and going bust then B has the same expectation of his onsite going down too.

Sure, the moment B actually moves some coins from his offsite to his onsite the analysis changes since A and B won't have the same investment anymore, but as long as that doesn't happen B has the same (short-term) expectation of losing his onsite as A does. If A can expect to go bust then B can expect to lose his onsite as well, irrespective of whether B will be able to recover again afterwards or not.

You are correct: If an investor is not prepared to move his offsite investment onsite, then he potentially faces negative EBG–like A does in your example.

Consider this scenario: All investors initially set their offsite to be as high as permitted. The overwhelming majority of the bankroll is provided by investors who are not prepared to move their offsite investment onsite if necessary, e.g. because they don't actually own the coins. Only a single investor will move his offsite investment onsite before he is margin called. In this example, the majority of investors are overleveraged and can expect to be eventually margin called. The bankroll as a whole clearly has a negative EBG.

However, this risk is borne solely by the overleveraged investors. Each round, our "compliant" investor is risking 1.125 % of his total investment, which is 1.5x his expected value of 0.75 %. Therefore, he has a positive EBG for all bets, regardless of whether his fellow investors end up being margin called or not.

Eventually, the other investors will be margin called. As the total bankroll shrinks, the compliant investor's stake will increase until he is the only investor, but the risk to his bankroll will stay the same.

Since the investor will move his offsite investment onsite before he is margin called, it makes no difference whether he uses the offsite investment system or not. Not even being margin called and letting time pass before moving his offsite investment back onsite will cause him to have a negative EBG. There is an opportunity cost of being margin called, but he will continue to have a positive EBG, assuming that any sequence of EBG+ bets is also EBG+.

Yes you are right. What is -EBG for A is really just variance for B but B keeps being at long-term +EBG as long as B actually moves his offsite to his onsite as needed. That's where my analysis went wrong, and it is hence probably not exploitable after all.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: bustabit v2 – No commission on investors & dilution fee lowered to 1%
by
01010100b
on 04/03/2018, 18:49:31 UTC
This statement is false, just think about it. Suppose there are two investors, A and B, and each have 50 btc onsite and 50 btc offsite. A is lying about it but B isn't. Why would A have -EBG but B have +EBG?

Great question.

These are the situations of your two investors:

 * A has 50 BTC in total, it's all on-site, but he lies about having another 50 BTC offsite just to get more exposure to the action. He is willing to risk 2% of his 50 BTC on every bet. He's risking 1 BTC per bet of his 50 BTC.

 * B has 100 BTC in total, He is willing to risk 1% of his 100 BTC on every bet. He's risking 1 BTC per bet of his 100 BTC.

Immediately it should be obvious that A's position is riskier than B's. A is risking 2% of his bankroll on the first bet, whereas B is only risking 1% of his bankroll.

The "realness" of your offsite has nothing whatsoever to do with whether your onsite will go up (+EBG) or down (-EBG).

But we're not concerned with whether our "onsite" grows. We only care about our net worth. (EBG = expected *bankroll* growth, where "bankroll" means "coins you actually own"). In A's case his onsite is the same as his net worth, whereas in B's case his net worth is the sum of his onsite and offsite. I think that's the point you're missing. As A loses his onsite he risks an ever increasing percentage of his net worth until he ends up being margin called. As B loses his onsite he tops it up with the coins which were offsite until now, and avoids the margin call. A goes bust, B doesn't.

Well yes, but as B moves coins from his offsite to his onsite then his L (as per post above) changes. Let's consider the simplified situation where A and B have the same investment (say 50 btc onsite and 50 btc offsite), A is lying and B isn't, and B will move his offsite to his onsite when he gets margin called (ie when his onsite reaches 0) and not before. While it is true that B will be able to recover whereas A won't, the probability of their onsite going to 0 is the same since they have the same investment, up until the point where B actually starts moving his offsite to his onsite both A and B will evolve in tandem. So if A has the expectation of negative bankroll growth and going bust then B has the same expectation of his onsite going down too.

Sure, the moment B actually moves some coins from his offsite to his onsite the analysis changes since A and B won't have the same investment anymore, but as long as that doesn't happen B has the same (short-term) expectation of losing his onsite as A does. If A can expect to go bust then B can expect to lose his onsite as well, irrespective of whether B will be able to recover again afterwards or not.

The assumption that B will replenish his onsite with his offsite as he takes losses doesn't hold in real life, there will be a delay before B logs in and makes those changes, and the bankroll can change by a lot very fast - before B might be able to react by moving coins from offsite to onsite. My argument above applies to a constant offsite.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: bustabit v2 – No commission on investors & dilution fee lowered to 1%
by
01010100b
on 04/03/2018, 07:06:30 UTC
Let L = (onsite + offsite) / onsite. Then, given a certain bet distribution D, whether an investor (or the house as a whole for that matter) is +EBG or -EBG is solely determined by L. Specifically, there will be an L* such that for all L < L* the investor is +EBG and for all L > L* the investor is -EBG. Whether the offsite is real or not has nothing to do with this. Furthermore, given the current structure of the bankroll on BaB, there exists a legal (ie in conformance with the rules/limits) bet distribution D such that a player using D will be at +EBG.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: bustabit v2 – No commission on investors & dilution fee lowered to 1%
by
01010100b
on 04/03/2018, 06:13:37 UTC
The "realness" of your offsite has nothing whatsoever to do with whether your onsite will go up (+EBG) or down (-EBG). If two people have the exact same investment (say 50 btc onsite + 50 btc offsite) then that investment (specifically their onsite) will take the exact same trajectory. Obviously...

Do take that mail I sent you seriously Ryan, because this isn't just wrong but (as BaB currently stands) exploitably wrong.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: bustabit v2 – No commission on investors & dilution fee lowered to 1%
by
01010100b
on 04/03/2018, 05:55:35 UTC
Again, this is false, obviously so.

I don't think so. DarkStar's reply makes perfect sense, maybe re-read it again =)

Taking your example: "Suppose there are two investors, A and B, and each have 50 btc onsite and 50 btc offsite. A is lying about it but B isn't."

A 50 BTC loss to A is 100% loss of their bankroll, but a 50 BTC loss to B is only a 50% loss. This drastically changes things as a margin call to A is fatal, while B would just be looking at replenishing their onsite investment.


I'm sorry, haven't both A and B lost 50 BTC here? So aren't both -EBG? And hence it doesn't matter whether your offsite is real as to whether you'll be +EBG or -EBG? And hence, like I said, Daniel's and DarkStar's claims are simply false?

Maybe let's try this another way: Suppose I invest 50 BTC onsite and 50 BTC offsite. Will I be +EBG or -EBG? And if your response is to ask me "Are you lying about your offsite" then my answer is "I'm not telling you." So go on, will my investment go up (+EBG) or go down (-EBG)?
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: bustabit v2 – No commission on investors & dilution fee lowered to 1%
by
01010100b
on 04/03/2018, 05:33:51 UTC
That is only the case for an individual investor that (ab)uses the offsite investment system to risk more than he actually has.

The offsite system is meant to allow investors to lower their counterparty risk and free up liquidity by not depositing their entire investment. I strongly recommend to only use it for that purpose. If you use the offsite system properly or don't use it at all, you never have an expectation of negative growth.

This statement is false, just think about it. Suppose there are two investors, A and B, and each have 50 btc onsite and 50 btc offsite. A is lying about it but B isn't. Why would A have -EBG but B have +EBG? Whether they are lying about it is only "revealed" when their onsite gets to 0, so why would A's onsite go to 0 whereas B's onsite doesn't - even before it is known whether they are lying or not? Surely the site can not predict the future of whether A or B will turn out to have been lying, and then set A to -EBG and B to +EBG based on predicting the future. Whether they are at +EBG or -EBG depends solely on their onsite and offsite, obviously...
When you leverage, the expectation is that you are willing to move those off-site coins on site as you lose, so that you do not get margin called. You are at a 2x Kelly maximum (current bustabit rules), which allows for +EBG. That person can expect their bankroll to increase.

Again, this is false, obviously so.

Quote
A 50 BTC + 50 BTC fake off-site gives a 4x Kelly

And a 50 BTC + 50 BTC real off-site doesn't?