I received mine & sent a PM also.

Thanks again for running this!

Any update on the ETA?  any estimate would be useful.

The original Adafruit Pi Case works with the LCD if you leave the top off:  http://www.adafruit.com/products/859

Also the new Geauxrobot Compact Enclosure works great with the LCD:  http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00DT5FJEK/ref=oh_details_o03_s01_i03?ie=UTF8&psc=1  (This amazon link has my referral ID, but I'm not sure how to get the link without it.)

Thanks for the ideas and feedback.

To answer your question - you are correct, the hubs are not in series, but rather connected in a hub/spoke style.  (RPi -> Hub1. Then Hub1 connects to Hub2, 3 and 4 directly.)

I did not try specifying ttyUSB13 & 14, although that is a great suggestion.  

I'll try it in a few days when I get back in town, and post my results back here.

Thanks for the great project, LaserHorse.

My Pi Miner has been running great for the past week with 9 Erupters.   But, I'm having a problem adding more Erupters to it and hope that someone may be able to share some guidance.  

When trying to add 6 additional Erupters (for a total of 15), I discovered that it will only "see" 13 total.  i.e., typing "ls /dev/*USB*" only lists ttyUSB0 - ttyUSB12, even though there are 15 Erupters installed.

A few notes:

• I built a second RPi Miner, with a newly imaged SD-card, and ran into the exact same issue.
• The 15 Erupters were installed across 3 DLink DUB-H7 hubs, 5 in each hub.  So I don't think its power related.
• These 3 hubs feed into a 4th hub which is connected to the RPi.
• I'm using Raspbian, and followed the build process specified in your project walk-through.
• The 2 Erupters that it wont see are running fine on a separate RPi miner.  So it doesn't appear to be a hardware problem with those Erupters.

Any recommendations for troubleshooting this?   Is there a default max number of USB serial devices that are enumerated in Raspbian?

Awesome.  Thank you for the prompt shipping and excellent communication.

Cheers!

Just transferred 1 share -

Transaction ID & Receiving address sent in PM/

Thanks for setting this up!

Hi Burt -

Can you get me a code?  I'd be very appreciative!

Thanks.

I agree with the other poster that you should just call them, as they were very responsive and helpful when I signed up. 

I'm on my third transaction now, and have had no problems. 

33Warlord; 6; 6.01; 191SaJkySuzqnguNtSe4zd8DMggivyMmwm

353

191SaJkySuzqnguNtSe4zd8DMggivyMmwm

I did submit my address an newbcoin, and even got the 2nd webpage showing my bitcoin address.    Not sure why you're data didn't show it - but not worth getting upset about. Thanks anyway.

I just discovered the mistake I made yesterday (and almost made again today).  I inadvertently clicked a link from the newbcoin webpage which re-directed me to a completely different website - where I entered my information. 

I wanted to share my opinion on how you could improve the UI of you site to help other users avoid this going forward:

• There is a 10 second delay on newbcoin, during which there is no visible place to enter or submit an address.
• This leads the user to think they must need to click a link somewhere on the  page to enter their address.
• There's a link on the main page titled "click here for extra coin" which, when clicked, displays a very clear "bitcoin address for coins" entry box.
• This gives the user the perception that the "found" the right place to enter their address, and that they completed the process.
• The fact that this goes to an external site is not clear unless you look at the URL, and who's going to spend a lot of time looking at all the details for fractions of a penny.

I suggest you make the "enter address here" visible as soon as the page opens.  If you feel the need to force a delay, I suggest you simply disable submission for 10 seconds.  This will at least let users know they've found the right place to enter their info, and they wont start looking for URLs.

Thanks for offering this contest, and I hope this info is a little valuable to you.

565

191SaJkySuzqnguNtSe4zd8DMggivyMmwm

I'm in for .10

This is a great strategy!  Thanks for sharing.

Welcome!

I agree with all of the posts complaining about the 4 hour limit.  I'm a member of many huge online forums, and this is the first one I've encountered with a 4 hour new user punishment.  It's not a very welcoming way to engage new users into the community.

How about an optional link to a 3rd party "trust service" - something like TrustCloud.  You could then allow users who have linked to it, and have above a certain "trust" score, to skip the 4 hour wait.

Voted: 183-186

191SaJkySuzqnguNtSe4zd8DMggivyMmwm