I think it would be easier for people to just have 10^-(x) satoshi or whatever payment form, that way it would be harder to miss a zero or add one and everyone can get their payments performed smoothly.

Hello, I have seen some of the people dropping out of the campaign recently and I was curious if I would be able to enroll in the program.

Basic info;

Name: 4by2
Activity: 30
Posts: 32 (including this one)
Address: 18V7kpbqSRkMPy68Re3Y8usJ1yxHDcugFp

I hope I can get accepted!

Ignore my post, I am no longer interested in joining the campaign.

I agree that it is dead, but I kind of wish we were still in a golden age of computing, per say. I personally believe that it is slightly under doubling, but it is nowhere near stagnant yet.

Am I just being too hopeful?

I believe you're specifically referring to something like Dogecoin, right?

Well, you can look at the price of it now. It's like $0.25 per 1,000 Dogecoin at this point. Has it been going lower?

I think that the concept is good, but I'm not sure how many people would aim to make use of this opportunity.

I have a feeling that some people are actively interested right now. This probably helped them quite a bit.

It all depends on the method you use, but I would think that yes, it is possible to make more Bitcoin in an easy way than it is to make dollars. Relative to the amount of work you put in, signature campaigns are massive money makers.

In an anarchic society, something like this would work. I just personally believe that this is going to have a... "unique" time with all the various things that will happen or I predict will happen thanks to the use of this app.

I hate to say it, but I'm not sure how well this would work. It certainly would help get people less dependent on the government, but this could end up backfiring.

And 300BTC is a massive investment...

That's what I understand from this article, but I could be wrong. It seems like they're using a different blockchain, though, and it isn't being paired against the actual Bitcoin blockchain.

It would have been cool if it was

I personally prefer multibit because of it's ease of use and the ability to send transactions without having to download anything, but I wish it did have some more security behind it.

If I remember Electrum was the best lightweight and secure wallet, while Multibit was the best wallet that you would be able to quickly send and receive Bitcoin with.

If I remember correctly, didn't the Electrum devs stop working on their wallet a while ago?

Well there was that one time they sponsored a nascar driver, but I have a feeling they never really expected it to go anywhere.

I think the "doge" memes died pretty quickly, and dogecoin died along with it.

Truthfully I don't care which chain everyone decides to follow, as long as there is a consensus and the community doesn't get massively divided over this.

In a way it isn't totally unrealistic to see a double of the price after a halving event, but I would say that it is very unlikely for such a thing to occur.

There hasn't been a halving on this scale before, however, with such a massive market cap. For all we know anything can happen.

Fiat will always have it's place for the exact reason you detail, people are comfortable with the current system and don't have any intent on changing something that already works well, in their eyes.

Statistically speaking, the largest majority of us would lose in these games and a very small amount of people would actually end up making any money off gambling.

It is very possible that you could earn money, but chances are you will lose.

Whoever mined that block is likely going to be very, very happy with their luck and enjoy a nice, what would that be, ~60% bonus?

That or some mining-pool owner just got himself a nice amount to spend.

Well this is obvious, there is no way that banks would ever get behind Bitcoin as an entity, but they might get behind the technology of the blockchain, as we have been seeing recently.

I'm curious if this is actually a surprise for you, it seems like something that would be normal in a typical society.

Russia has been dabbling with bitcoin for a while, but keep in mind this is only the finance minister, and such a comment is expected of him.

Well, considering that Bitcoin technically has no regulations, there isn't technically a whole lot that can be done. I could be very easily messing this up, but I would think there is no way for anyone to really be charged for anything.

You can earn interest on BTC by investing it (Which is not necessarily accomplished by just investing it, the asset also has to perform) on any reputable platform you can find, or through holding it somewhere that offers interest like poloniex or other services.

Alternatively, if you feel like loaning it is a better way to do it, sites like BTCJam seem reputable right now, so you can look at those and aim to loan our some of your Bitcoin.

Make sure to do your own research, though. I am not telling you what to do, just giving you ideas.