Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 142 results by AlexTrebbert
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆
by
AlexTrebbert
on 12/07/2025, 16:41:31 UTC
Why do so many new accounts here have SWC avatars?  Or is it just one person with many alt accounts with SWC avatars?  I'm probably just being paranoid.  No one would be pathetic enough to create alts on SWC's bitcointalk thread.

SwC started running a signature campaign and other marketing efforts.

The signature campaign functions as de facto advertising on bitcointalk. As campaigners comment on various threads, other users see our advertising in a similar way that bitcointalk ads used to be served before Theymos turned them off.

We aim to increase traffic to our poker site with this an other marketing efforts.

Is the signature campaign AI generated posts?  All the posts in this thread now seem like complete gibberish.  None of the users are saying anything an actual person who plays on the site would say.  It seems like the goal is just to fill this thread with a lot of posts regardless of content.  This thread use to be full of constructive criticism and suggestions.  Now it is complete trash. 
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆
by
AlexTrebbert
on 12/06/2025, 21:06:38 UTC
Why do so many new accounts here have SWC avatars?  Or is it just one person with many alt accounts with SWC avatars?  I'm probably just being paranoid.  No one would be pathetic enough to create alts on SWC's bitcointalk thread.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆
by
AlexTrebbert
on 09/11/2021, 01:08:17 UTC


the rake cap across the board at acr is 3 dollars. It is 4 to 6 dollars here.





Last rake adjustment was at $50,000 BTC price.  With BTC at $67,750 at time of this post, the rake has increased 35.5% in USD value since the last adjustment on March 2nd, 2021.

Now would be a good time to adjust the rake again to be competitive with other sites.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆
by
AlexTrebbert
on 08/10/2021, 12:44:51 UTC
I'm not here to argue. SwC is a good room, it's time to look at rake again though.



Please remember that the current SWC is not the SWC of old.   In August 2020, SWC introduced a new rake schedule and the rake percent and caps were all drastically increased.  SWC was some of the lowest rake in the industry prior to August 2020.  Granted there were times pre 2020 when the rake wasn't adjusted in a timely manner during a spike up in the BTC price, but the rake targeted on the date of change was substantially lower than it is now.  The last rake adjustment was on March 2, 2020 (https://swcpoker.club/old-rake) when the BTC price was $50,000.  If you check the rake changes we are at about the rake that I believe SWC wants.  50 cents HU caps at mid stakes limit, $1.00 caps at high stakes limit and mid and high stakes no limit/pot limit, $3 and $4 caps at no limit and pot limit games, and $1 drops for the Bad Beat Jackpot.  These are around or slightly above the industry standard. Not super high, but definitely not low rake.



Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆
by
AlexTrebbert
on 01/10/2021, 12:52:27 UTC

SwC has always showed that they indeed have some of the highest standards in the industry. But everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

I believe the discussion was about collusion.  How on earth are you backing up this claim here with regards to game integrity/security?  Are you claiming that SWC has a security/game integrity team?  I have never once been refunded for cheating scandals on SWC and I have played a significant amount of hands on this site.  I'm not saying cheating exists on SWC. I'm just saying that sites often give refunds when players have been found to be cheating.  So either: 1) no one has ever cheated/colluded on SWC, 2) SWC has never caught anyone colluding because there is no one monitoring the games, or 3) SWC keeps completely silent with regards to all security measures. Most sites don't reveal their security measures in detail, but they do reveal enough to make players feel comfortable playing there.  SWC to my knowledge has shown the community absolutely nothing with regards to their game integrity team.

There is absolutely no way SWC's game integrity team is anywhere near as advanced as some of the industry leaders like Poker Stars or America's Cardroom. So your claim that SWC has "some of the highest standards in the industry" is probably completely false.



Nice comment Alex, discussion about collusion is not new, and those who follow this thread could see some very suspicious situations happening on the tables! And SwC didn't do anything about that...

PS: Still waiting for my hats! Smiley I guess this is a funny part, I won two of them, and both times I gave them my info... after that once again when they said they lost it. I don't think they will send them, but it's interesting for me to poke them here and there about that! Smiley

I was just trying to be objective. You can not say that collusion is happening on SWC.  You just don't have enough to data to confirm this.  Only SWC can.  SWC can see the hole cards and can analyze all the hand histories of suspect players.  Players don't even get hard copies of the hand histories to save locally.  SWC has done very little, possibly nothing, with regards to communicating with their user base to make them feel safe.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆
by
AlexTrebbert
on 01/10/2021, 10:40:12 UTC
SwC has always showed that they indeed have some of the highest standards in the industry. But everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

I believe the discussion was about collusion.  How on earth are you backing up this claim here with regards to game integrity/security?  Are you claiming that SWC has a security/game integrity team?  I have never once been refunded for cheating scandals on SWC and I have played a significant amount of hands on this site.  I'm not saying cheating exists on SWC. I'm just saying that sites often give refunds when players have been found to be cheating.  So either: 1) no one has ever cheated/colluded on SWC, 2) SWC has never caught anyone colluding because there is no one monitoring the games, or 3) SWC keeps completely silent with regards to all security measures.

There is absolutely no way SWC's game integrity team is anywhere near as advanced as some of the industry leaders like Poker Stars or America's Cardroom.

Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆
by
AlexTrebbert
on 22/07/2021, 16:43:00 UTC
SWC user LGBTQSS's hateful chat:


Chat from today:


How hard could it possibly be to monitor the chat?  Why do these people still have chat?  Do you even read the posts here or the emails that get sent to support?

Can someone explain why regs like Veganhippie and BertBetr are chat banned, yet other players who post swastikas in chat like these 2 are still able to chat. Never seen Bert or Vegan use hate speech in chat.  

LOL, Vegan is a big shit talker and sunrunner. Don't defend this trash.
But its true that people posting stuff like this should not be allowed to chat at all.

yes some very hateful chat. never seen bert or vegan chat like this either. swc's chat enforcement seems rather arbitrary. one could even say random.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆
by
AlexTrebbert
on 15/06/2021, 00:25:22 UTC
SWC user LGBTQSS's hateful chat:


Chat from today:


How hard could it possibly be to monitor the chat?  Why do these people still have chat?  Do you even read the posts here or the emails that get sent to support?

Can someone explain why regs like Veganhippie and BertBetr are chat banned, yet other players who post swastikas in chat like these 2 are still able to chat. Never seen Bert or Vegan use hate speech in chat.  

LOL, Vegan is a big shit talker and sunrunner. Don't defend this trash.
But its true that people posting stuff like this should not be allowed to chat at all.

yes some very hateful chat. never seen bert or vegan chat like this either.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆
by
AlexTrebbert
on 12/06/2021, 15:14:16 UTC
I was told my posts get deleted because this is a promotional-only thread.

Going well, isn't it?  Grin

Depends what you are promoting. If you are promoting transphobia, the answer would be yes it is going rather well.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆
by
AlexTrebbert
on 11/06/2021, 19:30:30 UTC

SWC user LGBTQSS's hateful chat:



Chat could be worse.  Could have mentioned poker being rigged or site bots.  #FREEBULLY
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆
by
AlexTrebbert
on 25/04/2021, 16:00:01 UTC
Never have a trouble before but im still wating my withdrawal from 4 days ago.

SwC targets the 50th block for withdrawals and 2 weeks ago the mempool exploded. Some transactions remain unconfirmed.

https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#BTC,2w,weight

SwC will introduce player-selects-fee option soon.

Should i cancel my pending withdraw and do it the process again?

I don't believe this is an option.  SWC probably already sent the BTC.  The fee attached to the transaction is just too low and this is resulting it the transaction not being confirmed.

If you post the BTC address of the withdrawal, I can provide you with more information.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆
by
AlexTrebbert
on 25/04/2021, 15:54:44 UTC
Does SwC is going to add new crypto currencies as deposit option to the site? I'm asking because it's beyond good and evil (sic!) to deposit through Bitcoin now. And on site is now only two options: Bitcoin and BCH (the things i don't have neither want to buy)

We have considered an option to offer a service to convert to other currencies during deposit and withdrawal, with play still in uBTC and uBCH.

Would you play at SwC with this feature?

I highly doubt more than 20% of you players have any holdings in shitcoins.

The only solutions to your cashout problems is:

1) Consolidate swc's smaller balances to a single address while the mempool is less congested.
2) Batch player withdrawals.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆
by
AlexTrebbert
on 07/04/2021, 21:30:57 UTC
Leaderboard is no longer updating: https://swcpoker.club/krill-leaderboard
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆
by
AlexTrebbert
on 19/03/2021, 00:31:10 UTC
Thanks for the lowest possible miner fee prob will never even confirm over 18 hours in block

It turns out, trying to save costs like this wasn't a good decision. Who could have known.

Seriously SWC, I have no stake in this anymore. Just batch the transactions at a set time of day and stop holding player's money hostage, in one extreme or the other.

I really don't think it's ethical for SWC to be charging for withdrawals if they don't use basic common practices to keep the fees low. Part of the reason SWC's fees are so high is that they don't consolidate UTXOs.  You will often find that most of your withdrawals come from multiple addresses.  The more addresses there are the higher the fee is.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ Player Lounge
by
AlexTrebbert
on 13/03/2021, 21:54:50 UTC
Quote
MARCH MADNESS BITCOIN POKER SERIES
March 18th - April 4th

No 5k or 10k mixed events?  Only 1 3k mixed event?  Only 6 non nlh events?  Only 1 PLO event? Are you even listening to your user base?  One of the few things SWC still has going for it is that all the non-nlh games get spread and played there. For some reason there is the misconception by your tourney director that lower buyins brings in more player. Lower buyins bring more players who like to play tourneys with lower buyins. These are not the same players who play higher buyins.  You have a large group of cash game players who play mix who aren't really interested in playing $20 or $55 mtts that pay out under $1k usd for 1st and would rather play $215s or $530s. You are not catering to them at all.

Obviously you will get more players in a micro stakes nlh tourney.  The non nlh mtts are a niche thing. You have to keep them on the schedule and hope to build them over time. What you do not want to do is be results oriented right away.  Play to your strengths which in this case is that you actually spread games like 27td, badeucey, badacey, badugi, stud, stud8, 5 card PLO, BigO.  You can't expect them to crush it every time, but you want to keep them around.  Patience, grasshopper.  You aren't failing as a poker site if you run a non nlh tourney and it doesn't run, you are establishing a base for the long run and investing in the future.

What you do not want to do are the following things you have been doing:
1) DO NOT CHANGE THE START TIME EVER.  The high roller 11 game was originally at something like 7 pm EST 2 or 3 months ago. Then it got shifted to 4 or 5 pm EST. And then a few weeks ago it got switched to 9:30 pm EST.  You want to be consistent.  Some timeslots are better for some players, some aren't.  For example, the high roller is set to start at 9pm EST every weekend and Joe is a reg who plays almost every week. Joe can play at 9pm EST but can't play at 3pm EST.  If you switch it from 9pm to 3pm you lose Joe, you don't necessarily gain another person who is available at that time slot right away.  That takes time.  It's not like you are aggressively advertising.  And say you do find someone who would be a potential regular at the new time slot.  They have to actually remember that it is at 3pm EST.  Joe knew it was at 9pm and would make time for it.  When you shift the time slot you lose players, when you lose players there is a chance the tourney doesn't run, when it doesn't run it discourages players from showing up in the future and they begin looking for other things at that time and then your tourney dies. CHANGE IS BAD.

2) DO NOT CHANGE THE BUYIN.  This is a huge issue at a bitcoin poker site and sometimes you are forced to.  I think you often overlook one of the key psychological aspects of poker.  Human beings hate losing more than they love winning.  This is often why you see people move up in stakes aggressively when losing: chasing loses. Now when you apply this to bitcoin and poker, you will see that people almost always want to win back the amount of bitcoin they have lost.  This is completely independent of the price of bitcoin in USD.  For example, James had 50,000 chips on SWC when BTC was $10,000, he has lost 20,000 chips over the last few months and now he has 30,000 chips with BTC is at $50,000. Chances are James is thinking that he is down 20,000 chips, losing, and wants to win those chips back, not that he is up $1000 in USD.  People don't like to move down in stakes and that applies to stakes in BTC too.  People will be much more apt to move up in stakes than down.  You had a healthy 11 game tourney at 10k chips and it very rarely didn't run.  By changing it to 5k you upset a lot of players and a lot of players lost interest in it because it was not what they were accustomed to playing for.  Now combine this with the changing of time slots repeatedly and another drop in price to 3k chips and you have practically killed this once very healthy MTT.  Now of course I would imagine that at some point you would have had to reduce this MTT from it's original 10k but you don't need to jump the gun on this because CHANGE IS BAD.  All you can do is lose when you change anything regarding a scheduled MTTs timeslot or buyin.

3) YOU DO NOT NEED TO STAGGER YOUR MTT SCHEDULE WITH REGARDS TO BIG BUYIN MIXED GAMES.  9:30 pm EST on a Sunday has to be the nut worst time to run a regular scheduled mixed tourney.  Everything in the MTT world on Sundays starts at around 11pm EST, gets really going around 1pm or 2pm EST, and then drops off around 4 pm or 5 pm EST.  This would coincide with when most of the NFL games are running.  Also this would be as soon as possible after Sunday morning church service.  9pm is no man's land. People have already played their tourneys for the day. The sporting events are over and people are no longer sweating their bets.  Some have even had too many beers at this point.  If somehow you are thinking that staggering your big buyin MTTs is a good idea, you are doing it backwards.  You should run the 11 game high roller before or right around the same time as the Big BTC, not after.  A player who busts from the 11 game is much more likely to join the Big BTC in an effort to get unstuck than a player who busts the Big BTC is to join the 11 game tourney.  A player who plays mixed knows how to play nlh.  And on the off chance that the 11 game doesn't run, a player can jump into the Big BTC (This is also a great reason to have the 11 game be 5k chips like the Big BTC).

I suggest changing the weekly 11 game to 5k chips and moving it to 5pm EST or earlier.

Don't micromanage the timeslots and buyins.  Pick something and run with it.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆
by
AlexTrebbert
on 13/03/2021, 21:53:43 UTC
MARCH MADNESS BITCOIN POKER SERIES
March 18th - April 4th

No 5k or 10k mixed events?  Only 1 3k mixed event?  Only 6 non nlh events?  Only 1 PLO event? Are you even listening to your user base?  One of the few things SWC still has going for it is that all the non-nlh games get spread and played there. For some reason there is the misconception by your tourney director that lower buyins brings in more player. Lower buyins bring more players who like to play tourneys with lower buyins. These are not the same players who play higher buyins.  You have a large group of cash game players who play mix who aren't really interested in playing $20 or $55 mtts that pay out under $1k usd for 1st and would rather play $215s or $530s. You are not catering to them at all.

Obviously you will get more players in a micro stakes nlh tourney.  The non nlh mtts are a niche thing. You have to keep them on the schedule and hope to build them over time. What you do not want to do is be results oriented right away.  Play to your strengths which in this case is that you actually spread games like 27td, badeucey, badacey, badugi, stud, stud8, 5 card PLO, BigO.  You can't expect them to crush it every time, but you want to keep them around.  Patience, grasshopper.  You aren't failing as a poker site if you run a non nlh tourney and it doesn't run, you are establishing a base for the long run and investing in the future.

What you do not want to do are the following things you have been doing:
1) DO NOT CHANGE THE START TIME EVER.  The high roller 11 game was originally at something like 7 pm EST 2 or 3 months ago. Then it got shifted to 4 or 5 pm EST. And then a few weeks ago it got switched to 9:30 pm EST.  You want to be consistent.  Some timeslots are better for some players, some aren't.  For example, the high roller is set to start at 9pm EST every weekend and Joe is a reg who plays almost every week. Joe can play at 9pm EST but can't play at 3pm EST.  If you switch it from 9pm to 3pm you lose Joe, you don't necessarily gain another person who is available at that time slot right away.  That takes time.  It's not like you are aggressively advertising.  And say you do find someone who would be a potential regular at the new time slot.  They have to actually remember that it is at 3pm EST.  Joe knew it was at 9pm and would make time for it.  When you shift the time slot you lose players, when you lose players there is a chance the tourney doesn't run, when it doesn't run it discourages players from showing up in the future and they begin looking for other things at that time and then your tourney dies. CHANGE IS BAD.

2) DO NOT CHANGE THE BUYIN.  This is a huge issue at a bitcoin poker site and sometimes you are forced to.  I think you often overlook one of the key psychological aspects of poker.  Human beings hate losing more than they love winning.  This is often why you see people move up in stakes aggressively when losing: chasing loses. Now when you apply this to bitcoin and poker, you will see that people almost always want to win back the amount of bitcoin they have lost.  This is completely independent of the price of bitcoin in USD.  For example, James had 50,000 chips on SWC when BTC was $10,000, he has lost 20,000 chips over the last few months and now he has 30,000 chips with BTC is at $50,000. Chances are James is thinking that he is down 20,000 chips, losing, and wants to win those chips back, not that he is up $1000 in USD.  People don't like to move down in stakes and that applies to stakes in BTC too.  People will be much more apt to move up in stakes than down.  You had a healthy 11 game tourney at 10k chips and it very rarely didn't run.  By changing it to 5k you upset a lot of players and a lot of players lost interest in it because it was not what they were accustomed to playing for.  Now combine this with the changing of time slots repeatedly and another drop in price to 3k chips and you have practically killed this once very healthy MTT.  Now of course I would imagine that at some point you would have had to reduce this MTT from it's original 10k but you don't need to jump the gun on this because CHANGE IS BAD.  All you can do is lose when you change anything regarding a scheduled MTTs timeslot or buyin.

3) YOU DO NOT NEED TO STAGGER YOUR MTT SCHEDULE WITH REGARDS TO BIG BUYIN MIXED GAMES.  9:30 pm EST on a Sunday has to be the nut worst time to run a regular scheduled mixed tourney.  Everything in the MTT world on Sundays starts at around 11pm EST, gets really going around 1pm or 2pm EST, and then drops off around 4 pm or 5 pm EST.  This would coincide with when most of the NFL games are running.  Also this would be as soon as possible after Sunday morning church service.  9pm is no man's land. People have already played their tourneys for the day. The sporting events are over and people are no longer sweating their bets.  Some have even had too many beers at this point.  If somehow you are thinking that staggering your big buyin MTTs is a good idea, you are doing it backwards.  You should run the 11 game high roller before or right around the same time as the Big BTC, not after.  A player who busts from the 11 game is much more likely to join the Big BTC in an effort to get unstuck than a player who busts the Big BTC is to join the 11 game tourney.  A player who plays mixed knows how to play nlh.  And on the off chance that the 11 game doesn't run, a player can jump into the Big BTC (This is also a great reason to have the 11 game be 5k chips like the Big BTC).

I suggest changing the weekly 11 game to 5k chips and moving it to 5pm EST or earlier.

Don't micromanage the timeslots and buyins.  Pick something and run with it.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆
by
AlexTrebbert
on 11/03/2021, 18:32:51 UTC
MARCH MADNESS BITCOIN POKER SERIES
March 18th - April 4th

No 5k or 10k mixed events?  Only 1 3k mixed event?  Only 6 non nlh events?  Only 1 PLO event? Are you even listening to your user base?  One of the few things SWC still has going for it is that all the non-nlh games get spread and played there.  For some reason there is the misconception by your tourney director that lower buyins bring in more player. Lower buyins bring more players who like to play tourneys with lower buyins. These are not the same players who play higher buyins.  You have a large group of cash game players who play mix who aren't really interested in playing $20 or $55 mtts that pay out under $1k usd for 1st and would rather play $215s or $530s. You are not catering to them at all.

Obviously you will get more players in a micro stakes nlh tourney.  The non nlh mtts are a niche thing. You have to keep them on the schedule and hope to build them over time. What you do not want to do is be results oriented right away.  Play to your strengths which in this case is that you actually spread games like 27td, badeucey, badacey, badugi, stud, stud8, 5 card PLO, BigO.  You can't expect them to crush it every time, but you want to keep them around.  Patience, grasshopper.  You aren't failing as a poker site if you run a non nlh tourney and it doesn't run, you are establishing a base for the long run and investing in the future.

What you do not want to do are the following things you have been doing:
1) DO NOT CHANGE THE START TIME EVER.  The high roller 11 game was originally at something like 7 pm EST 2 or 3 months ago. Then it got shifted to 4 or 5 pm EST. And then a few weeks ago it got switched to 9:30 pm EST.  You want to be consistent.  Some timeslots are better for some players, some aren't.  For example, the high roller is set to start at 9pm EST every weekend and Joe is a reg who plays almost every week. Joe can play at 9pm EST but can't play at 3pm EST.  If you switch it from 9pm to 3pm you lose Joe, you don't necessarily gain another person who is available at that time slot right away.  That takes time.  It's not like you are aggressively advertising.  And say you do find someone who would be a potential regular at the new time slot.  They have to actually remember that it is at 3pm EST.  Joe knew it was at 9pm and would make time for it.  When you shift the time slot you lose players, when you lose players there is a chance the tourney doesn't run, when it doesn't run it discourages players from showing up in the future and they begin looking for other things at that time and then your tourney dies. CHANGE IS BAD.

2) DO NOT CHANGE THE BUYIN.  This is a huge issue at a bitcoin poker site and sometimes you are forced to.  I think you often overlook one of the key psychological aspects of poker.  Human beings hate losing more than they love winning.  This is often why you see people move up in stakes aggressively when losing: chasing loses. Now when you apply this to bitcoin and poker, you will see that people almost always want to win back the amount of bitcoin they have lost.  This is completely independent of the price of bitcoin in USD.  For example, James had 50,000 chips on SWC when BTC was $10,000, he has lost 20,000 chips over the last new month and now he has 30,000 chips with BTC is at $50,000. Chances are James is thinking that he is down 20,000 chips, losing, and wants to win those chips back, not that he is up $1000 in USD.  People don't like to move down in stakes and that applies to stakes in BTC.  People will be much more apt to move up in stakes than down.  You had a healthy 11 game tourney at 10k chips and it very rarely didn't run.  By changing it to 5k you upset a lot of players and a lot of player lost interest in it because it was not what they were accustomed to playing for.  Now combine this with the changing of time slots repeatedly and another drop to in price to 3k chips and you have practically killed this once very healthy MTT.  Now of course I would imagine that at some point you would have had to reduce this MTT from it's original 10k but you don't need to jump the gun on this because CHANGE IS BAD.  All you can do is lose when you change anything regarding a scheduled MTTs timeslot or buyin.

3) YOU DO NOT NEED TO STAGGER YOUR MTT SCHEDULE WITH REGARDS TO BIG BUYIN MIXED GAMES.  9:30 pm EST on a Sunday has to be the nut worst time to run a regular scheduled mixed tourney.  Everything in the MTT world on Sundays starts at around 11pm EST, gets really going around 1pm or 2pm EST, and then drops off around 3 pm or 4 pm EST.  This would coincide with when most of the NFL games are running.  Also this would be as soon as possible after Sunday morning church service.  9pm is no man's land. People have already played their tourneys for the day. The sporting events are over and are no longer sweating their bets.  Some have even had to many beers at this point.  If somehow you are thinking that staggering your big buyin MTTs is a good idea, you are doing it backwards.  You should run the 11 game high roller before or right around the same time as the Big BTC, not after.  A player who busts from the 11 game is much more likely to join the Big BTC in an effort to get unstuck than a player who busts the Big BTC is to join the 11 game tourney.  A player who plays mixed knows how to play nlh.  And on the off chance that the 11 game doesn't run, a player can jump into the Big BTC (This is also a great reason to have the 11 game be 5k chips like the Big BTC).
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆
by
AlexTrebbert
on 05/03/2021, 00:37:52 UTC
It sounds like you were playing OFC 2-7, where the middle row is the best low hand, and anything over a 10 low is a foul. Thus a fullhouse would be a foul in the middle. Check your hand history to see if this was the case.

There is no option to store/save OFC hand histories.  Can you please fix this.  There should be the ability to have all hand histories stored locally on a player's computer. 
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ Player Lounge
by
AlexTrebbert
on 03/03/2021, 18:12:13 UTC
I believe there is new text shown in the Withdraw section of the SwC Poker cashier:

Quote
Your withdraw will be slightly less due to Bitcoin network fee. Users pay exact network fee, there is no charge by SwC.



This is correct. For withdrawals, the required network fee will be deducted from the total amount withdrawn. Players will only pay the exact network fee required to complete the transaction. SwC does not charge or keep any fees for deposits or withdrawals.

Can you please announce changes that negatively affect users prior to their implementation in the future.  Your failure to communicate changes prior to their implementation has caused outrage in the past with regards to issues like rake.

I would also suggest discussing proposed changes with the community first to see how they will go over.

I would like to point out that NitrogenSports offers 1 free withdrawal per week for users who gamble over a certain amount of their initial deposit.  Possibly something like this could be a better solution to keep costs down.

You could have users specify the fee that they would like to pay.  I realize that something like this may require software development.   Maybe you could do something like the withdrawal's last digit would signify the speed of transaction your user would like to implement.  Say a withdrawal of 10,000.01 would signify that the user wants the transaction sent with a high fee whereas a withdraw of 10,000.09 would suggest that a user wants the transaction sent with the lowest fee possible.

Also the way you are sending bitcoin seems very suboptimal. When the site is paying for fees this isn't a problem, but if you are charging your users the actual transaction fee you should do your best to keep these fees as low as possible.  Below is a withdrawal processed by SWC within the last 24 hrs.  The user is a regular and was charged the actual network fee. The user posted this in the SWC trollbox and made it public. I have converted the transaction to USD values and hidden the addresses to keep this transaction as private as possible.



How to keep fees low and BTC lingo is not an area of my expertise so I will leave discussing how this is a very suboptimal transaction and the possible solutions to someone with more knowledge in this area.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆
by
AlexTrebbert
on 03/03/2021, 16:40:34 UTC
I believe there is new text shown in the Withdraw section of the SwC Poker cashier:

Quote
Your withdraw will be slightly less due to Bitcoin network fee. Users pay exact network fee, there is no charge by SwC.



This is correct. For withdrawals, the required network fee will be deducted from the total amount withdrawn. Players will only pay the exact network fee required to complete the transaction. SwC does not charge or keep any fees for deposits or withdrawals.

Can you please announce changes that negatively affect users prior to their implementation in the future.  Your failure to communicate changes prior to their implementation has caused outrage in the past with regards to issues like rake.

I would also suggest discussing proposed changes with the community first to see how they will go over.

I would like to point out that NitrogenSports offers 1 free withdraw per week for users who gamble over a certain amount of their initial deposit.  Possibly something like this could be a better solution to keep costs down.

You could have users specify the fee and they would like to pay.  I realize that something like this may require software development.   Maybe you could do something like a cash outs last digit would signify the speed of transaction your user would like to implement.  Say a withdrawal of 10,000.01 would signify the user wants the transaction send with a high fee whereas a withdraw of 10,000.09 would suggest that a user wants the transaction sent with the lowest fee possible.

Also the way you are sending bitcoin seems very suboptimal. When the site is paying for fees this isn't a problem, but if you are charging your users the actual transaction fee you should do your best to keep these fees as low as possible.  Below is a withdrawal processed by SWC within the last 24 hrs.  The user is a regular and was charged the actual network fee. I have converted the transaction to USD values and hidden the addresses to keep this transaction as private as possible.



How to keep fees low and BTC lingo is not an area of my expertise so I will leave discussing how this is a very suboptimal transaction and the possible solutions to someone with more knowledge in this area.