Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 54 results by BC12345
Post
Topic
Board Deutsch (German)
Re: lieferservice.de akzeptiert keine Bitcoins mehr
by
BC12345
on 04/06/2015, 16:03:32 UTC
Hmm,

ich werde nach der Eingabe meiner Postleitzahl zu lieferando.de weitergeleitet und da habe ich nur folgende Zahlungsmethoden zu Auswahl:

Barzahlung
Lastschrift
Kreditkarte
Sofortüberweisung
Paypal

Post
Topic
Board Deutsch (German)
Topic OP
lieferservice.de akzeptiert keine Bitcoins mehr
by
BC12345
on 04/06/2015, 15:43:44 UTC
Hallo,

wie ich gerade bemerkt habe macht lieferservice.de jetzt wohl mit Lieferando.de gemeinsame Sache und eine Zahlung mit Bitcoin ist nicht mehr möglich.

Schade, muss ich heute wohl selber kochen...
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Re: Please help, old wallet rescan is taking forever, CPU at 1%
by
BC12345
on 31/08/2014, 01:10:37 UTC
...
could you copy the wallet to a hard disk or better internal flash drive?
...

Now it's working. Don't know why I wasn't thinking of this myself.

Thank you!

Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Topic OP
Please help, old wallet rescan is taking forever, CPU at 1%
by
BC12345
on 31/08/2014, 00:17:24 UTC
Hello,

I am trying to access an old backup wallet and bitcoin-qt is stuck in rescan, it is taking forever.

I am using Ubuntu and bitcoin-core v0.9.2.1 with the blockchain and wallet on an usb hard-drive.

My debug.log:
Code:
2014-08-30 23:43:47 Bitcoin version v0.9.2.1-g354c0f3-beta (Thu, 19 Jun 2014 09:51:15 +0200)
2014-08-30 23:43:47 Using OpenSSL version OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014
2014-08-30 23:43:47 Using BerkeleyDB version Berkeley DB 4.8.30: (April  9, 2010)
2014-08-30 23:43:47 Default data directory ---
2014-08-30 23:43:47 Using data directory ---
2014-08-30 23:43:47 Using at most 125 connections (1024 file descriptors available)
2014-08-30 23:43:47 Using 4 threads for script verification
2014-08-30 23:43:47 Using wallet wallet.dat
2014-08-30 23:43:47 init message: Verifiziere Wallet...
2014-08-30 23:43:47 CDBEnv::Open : LogDir=---/db.log
2014-08-30 23:43:48 Bound to [::]:8333
2014-08-30 23:43:48 Bound to 0.0.0.0:8333
2014-08-30 23:43:48 init message: Lade Blockindex...
2014-08-30 23:43:48 Opening LevelDB in ---/blocks/index
2014-08-30 23:43:48 Opened LevelDB successfully
2014-08-30 23:43:48 Opening LevelDB in ---/chainstate
2014-08-30 23:43:48 Opened LevelDB successfully
2014-08-30 23:43:52 LoadBlockIndexDB(): last block file = 170
2014-08-30 23:43:52 LoadBlockIndexDB(): last block file info: CBlockFileInfo(blocks=370, size=77590453, heights=317948...318316, time=2014-08-28...2014-08-30)
2014-08-30 23:43:52 LoadBlockIndexDB(): transaction index disabled
2014-08-30 23:43:52 LoadBlockIndexDB(): hashBestChain=00000000000000001e6122f1aa47bba9839510e5c0e4d18ebc35f3a7b138790a height=318316 date=2014-08-30 21:07:58 progress=0.999694
2014-08-30 23:43:52 init message: Verifiziere Blöcke...
2014-08-30 23:43:52 Verifying last 288 blocks at level 3
2014-08-30 23:44:38 No coin database inconsistencies in last 289 blocks (111184 transactions)
2014-08-30 23:44:39  block index           50987ms
2014-08-30 23:44:39 init message: Lade Wallet...
2014-08-30 23:44:40 nFileVersion = 90201
2014-08-30 23:44:40 Keys: 105 plaintext, 0 encrypted, 0 w/ metadata, 105 total
2014-08-30 23:44:40  wallet                  738ms
2014-08-30 23:44:40 init message: Durchsuche erneut...
2014-08-30 23:44:40 Rescanning last 318316 blocks (from block 0)...
2014-08-30 23:45:40 Still rescanning. At block 675. Progress=0.000007
2014-08-30 23:46:40 Still rescanning. At block 1288. Progress=0.000013
2014-08-30 23:47:40 Still rescanning. At block 1898. Progress=0.000019
2014-08-30 23:48:40 Still rescanning. At block 2503. Progress=0.000025
2014-08-30 23:49:40 Still rescanning. At block 3105. Progress=0.000031

I am confused because my CPU utilization is only at about 1% ...

I know that bitcoin-core does a rescan because of the old wallet but at this speed it will take forever. Is it rescanning all the blocks in the blockchain or just the last 318316 blocks?
Any ideas why this process is so slow (and my CPU only at 1%)?

Any help would be appreciated,
BC12345

Edit:
Ok, I just realized that 318316 blocks is almost the complete blockchain at this point.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Best way to store and forget btc?
by
BC12345
on 06/11/2013, 20:04:11 UTC
Create three copies of your wallet.dat or your paper wallets.

Encrypt these copies with three different, strong passwords.

Store this copies at three different and safe locations (e.g. bank deposit boxes at different banks) each with the passwords for the other copies.

This way your bitcoins are safe if one of your copies gets compromised or stolen but you can still access them through the other two copies.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Ripple Giveaway!
by
BC12345
on 03/03/2013, 21:40:59 UTC
rNy61KXKUYPMFf5fMV6ojo3u98dc5WhiVu
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Re: Questions about wallet.dat
by
BC12345
on 20/01/2013, 20:26:49 UTC
Another thing that might be good to know (correct me if I'm wrong):

When you encrypt your wallet, the keypool with your spare private keys is flushed and a new set of spare addresses is created.
This means that you should update your backups immediately if you encrypt your wallet, otherwise you might loose some/all of your coins when you send a transaction and try to recover/restore your wallet with your backups.

Nope. You're not wrong.

As a matter of fact, this other guy mentioned it a few posts back in this thread:

. . . Also be aware that when you encrypt your wallet, it tosses out the entire 100 address pool, and generates a new set of 100 addresses.  If you create a backup before encrypting, it won't be good for very long after encrypting.

Whoops, sorry...
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Re: Questions about wallet.dat
by
BC12345
on 20/01/2013, 20:03:26 UTC
Another thing that might be good to know (correct me if I'm wrong):

When you encrypt your wallet, the keypool with your spare private keys is flushed and a new set of spare addresses is created.
This means that you should update your backups immediately if you encrypt your wallet, otherwise you might loose some/all of your coins when you send a transaction and try to recover/restore your wallet with your backups.
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Re: Configure folder for wallet.dat?
by
BC12345
on 20/01/2013, 19:42:03 UTC
Try symlink under linux or sysinternal junction under windows and let us know.

Symlink seems to work (didn't check sysinternal junction under windows) , thx.
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Topic OP
Configure folder for wallet.dat?
by
BC12345
on 20/01/2013, 18:00:19 UTC
Hi,

does anyone know if it's possible to configure the folder destination for the "wallet.dat" independently from the "-datadir"-folder?

Edit:
I'm using bitcoin-qt.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Kim Dotcom Mansion: Press conference 2013-01-19 GMT
by
BC12345
on 19/01/2013, 15:54:01 UTC
Does anyone know if there's a live stream of the mega press conference this evening?
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: A word of caution to those who have bought recently
by
BC12345
on 13/01/2013, 21:01:37 UTC
I have bought recently and am not concerned if the price drops.

If the price drops, I will chalk it up to "Oh well, I missed a better opportunity to buy I could have never known for certain would exist", and that it will go up again eventually before I need to spend that money.

I am convinced that one day, which could be tomorrow, or could be 6 months, 12 months, 18 months from now, somebody who owns a single building in all of Manhattan (which on paper is worth more than Bitcoin as a whole) will make it over our arduous learning curve and will say OMG, $150 million for the future of money is a god damn bargain, this is it, right here right now, and the risk is manageable.  And they will act accordingly.  And at that point, buying bitcoin at anything remotely what we're used to will be a long gone opportunity, and people will be saying, "WTH was I thinking listing an ask at $15?"

In my view, the only thing standing between now and then, which may or may not happen, is some threat to the block chain or a major vulnerability, or someone successfully demonstrates a 51% attack or scary double spend, which would cause a temporary sharp dip in the price, followed by a fix within days.  People without the ability to assess the technical aspects of a problem and the soundness of any fix will fold and run, and meanwhile I know my well-secured paper bitcoins will be safe.  I'll be buying and telling everyone else I know to buy, watching the price slowly climb back as everyone else realizes that Bitcoin will always win the long game, the same way BitTorrent wins the long game against the Hollywood media cops.

This.

(and this)
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: BTC Adoption Continues: Now Accepted at 4chan
by
BC12345
on 13/12/2012, 20:22:07 UTC
As of today, Bitcoin is being accepted as a payment method for buying such subscriptions.

I was certain this was going to be some type of prank when I went to look.

Nope, it's real:
 - https://www.4chan.org/pass

Reddit post on it:
 - http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/14rp5n

For me https://www.4chan.org/pass says:

"Pass purchasing is currently disabled, please come back in 2 hours."

?

Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: my intuition says: we're sitting on a rocket about to be ignited
by
BC12345
on 18/11/2012, 01:57:36 UTC
Of course you are right. The Prisoners Dilemma is an oversimplification but there is an aspect of it. The problem is there are people who are even hoarding the Bitcoins they buy regularly and spend nothing.
Although I have no idea how many, but by observation on volatility it seems significant.
I agree. If I were to speculate on the causes, I'd say that to a great extend people are holding on to their coins not so much until they are worth a fortune but until there is something useful they can spend them on. You know, there is only so many alpaca socks you really need Wink
The situation seems to be better in the US, but for the rest of the world, the amount of goods and services that can be purchased for Bitcoins and that one really needs is still rather limited.

Many people seem to happily pledge to buy Reddit gold, donate to the EFF or Wikipedia if only they could use Bitcoin for that. Sure, some probably do so in part because they simply want to reward Bitcoin acceptance, but most would probably genuinely like to help these organizations and for any number reasons prefer not using credit cards or PayPal.
Until people find a better use for their coins I can not blame them for holding on to them or even enjoy trading/speculating with them a bit. In any case, I don't really see hoarding as a long term problem of Bitcoin.

I completely agree with that.

As for the rocket analogy:
I think we are still in the blueprint/prototype stage...

Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: How long before the price tanks sharply because Silk Road is down?
by
BC12345
on 17/11/2012, 00:48:35 UTC
Registration for new members is open again.
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Re: Silk road down for second day, what's going on?
by
BC12345
on 10/11/2012, 23:45:39 UTC
Relax:

http://Linking to illegal sites is forbidden. If you bypass this censorship, you will be banned./index.php?topic=70572.0


Quote from the SR forum:

"I am so sorry to leave you guys hanging for so long wondering what is going on with the site today. Let me just make everything clear and reassure you all that Silk Road has NOT been compromised, DPR has NOT been busted, and EVERYTHING IS OKAY!

Yes, we are having some technical difficulties. We have been making some serious overhauls and changes to the system, server, and website. While I cannot tell you exactly what is wrong today, I can assure you that we will fix it and have it back up soon. By soon, I mean I would be shocked if we didn't have it back up by Monday.

Please, I beg of you, don't start spreading any unnecessary rumors that will surely stir up chaos, fear, and confusion amongst out community.

..."
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: How long before the price tanks sharply because Silk Road is down?
by
BC12345
on 10/11/2012, 23:20:15 UTC
Relax:

http://(link to SR forum removed)/index.php?topic=70572.0

Quote from the SR forum:

"I am so sorry to leave you guys hanging for so long wondering what is going on with the site today. Let me just make everything clear and reassure you all that Silk Road has NOT been compromised, DPR has NOT been busted, and EVERYTHING IS OKAY!

Yes, we are having some technical difficulties. We have been making some serious overhauls and changes to the system, server, and website. While I cannot tell you exactly what is wrong today, I can assure you that we will fix it and have it back up soon. By soon, I mean I would be shocked if we didn't have it back up by Monday.

Please, I beg of you, don't start spreading any unnecessary rumors that will surely stir up chaos, fear, and confusion amongst out community.

..."
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: How long before the price tanks sharply because Silk Road is down?
by
BC12345
on 10/11/2012, 20:59:26 UTC
SR volume is a tiny fraction of Bitcoin economy. There are convincing estimates based on the academic study of SR published about four months ago.

I call bullshit on that. If you were writing the truth you'd cite that study in detail. But you didn't.

I am not saying that the first statement is correct but I think maybe he was referring to this

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.7139v1   (chapter 5.2 "Transaction volumes")

paper.
Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: It's good luck to tip The Satosh via the Wisdom Well
by
BC12345
on 31/10/2012, 14:48:04 UTC
The second message

Quote
01101110 01101111 01110100

says "not"  Cheesy
Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: (new game) We're on a starship...
by
BC12345
on 30/10/2012, 20:28:30 UTC
Ten minutes earlier...

The name is BurbolGii (some say I'm a genius but most say I'm a retard)...

Where am I, how did I get here? Damn, my head hurts!

It looks like I am on some kind of starship... Where is everyone?

Oh, what a nice, blinking machine! I wonder what happens if I connect this two wires?

BZZZZZZ!

Ouch!

Rattling sound....

Uh oh, I think I'll better hide for a while...

BurbolGii