For early investors that got in before the supply manipulation took place it is a good investment, if I knew Rijk was going to cut the supply of Novo and change the name I would of also purchased 500 coins. The same if Rijk told us he was selling Gulden before he sold , everyone would sell.

Florin 100000 sat is more likely then Gulden at 6 sat. At 5 sat i will buy 5 million coins np.

The right price for florin is under 50000 sat. No real buy orders to keep the price above 200000 sat. A weeks worth of rewards and those buy orders are good as gone. Gulden on the other hand is real low.

Investors want to make money off us, whales are the ones that pump prices. Gulden is a better investment at these prices while florin has some way to fall still. imho

Why weren't the "whales" able to keep the price down before Gulden was removed from bitcoinmeester. It's low demand due to low number of buying options available, I bet 100 000 nlg that if Gulden was added to bitvavo or binance the price will increase to €0.10 within a week of being added.

Rijk and the community always had it hard with Gulden, I was one of the members against the 2nd development reward increase but no point crying over the past. What was done was done, I am happy for the community that this is no longer a problem.

I was banned on slack for talking about the CMC ranking in trader channel. No insults to anyone, I am on telegram these days but I hear slack is more relaxed compared to 2018 when people got banned for anything negative.

I was banned from slack about 2 years ago for talking about Guldens ranking on coinmarketcap in traders, Gulden was still top 250 , Gulden can't keep in the top 1000.

The ranking dropped fast after the 2 development rewards and the announcement of Novo. Both were anti price.

I believe slack is more open to sensitive topics in 2021 which is a good change.

Rijk, I am really impressed with how you handling things, I can understand why Novo was created and was to help fund development because Gulden reward is not enough to cover the costs and to be honest I would rather you started the new coin then raise the development reward to 120. It's sad it had to come to you guys going this route, maybe one day the Gulden price will cover all the costs.

I have no problem with the dev reward at 80 because Malcolm has always helped the community with technical questions and is a developer with lots of respect. I believe if the price gets worse the GAB will keep Malcolm and Rijk will have to go find a job until the price recovers. The work Rijk does with social media and the website can be done after hours.

When the price recovers the team can grow with employing developers on a contract basis, if the price dumps you don't have to renew the contract.
Most people have full time work that invest in Gulden which is why we need a team to do the work and why we like Rijk and Malcolm to be full time on Gulden to work on Gulden.

I got a PM on telegram, some people suspect the Gulden development reward btc is used to support the Novo market. Most sellers in the last 2 weeks is because of this and was trying to get out at the best prices and with btc going up in price it has made it worse. Gulden community got a worst situation.

Bedankt.

GAB needs to add Stex to the Gulden homepage. I would ask in #gab channel but I am banned from slack.

Nocks was a big loss for NLG, Malcolm on the blockchain and Roel developing Nocks was a strong pairing. Gulden still lucky to have Malcolm and if anyone deserves to see success for Gulden its Malcolm.

I would invest in a coin with Roel and Malcolm together. 2 great developers

It's a new token by Rijk , the main difference is you can only buy 2000 and Rijk and his team do all the work to promote the token as part of the IPO goes to marketing and btc to support the market, which is normal for tokens.

Disclaimer: Make sure the buyers are not expected to make Novo a success, with Gulden the community must make it a success while Malcolm and his devs improve Gulden. Rijk has made it clear Gulden is in the hands of the community and the GAB makes the decisions.

Not again. 

Gulden had lots of rich investors that did not get on with Rijk, the GAB came too late as those investors have gone but for new investors the GAB is very welcoming. Rijk is not a people person like Jared but his development team is very good. It's the reason I will stay with Gulden for a long time.

What does Nocks and Novo have in common besides both starting with N? Novo will also fail because Rijk will hold all the coins and expect the community to market and do all the work. With Gulden he could get away with it because it was decentralized project but Novo is 99.9% centralized. All the tokens he will be in competition with don't expect the community to do the marketing.

Selling all my coins for a loss was the best decision I made at the time, as my losses would be far worse if I was bag holding in witness accounts. When I was banned from slack I knew I had to get out.

I am glad you making fun of this , it's easy to laugh when you have not invested in the coin. Raising the rewards betrays the trust of every holder because we accepted a reward rate of 100, by raising the reward rate it's no better then holding Euros or Dollars with quantitative easing. You debase the value of the currency.

You think we would be here today if bitcoin increased rewards by 50% every 4 years? It would never have gotten off the ground.