Search content
Sort by

Showing 15 of 15 results by Barrykbest
Post
Topic
Board Nigeria (Naija)
Merits 1 from 1 user
Topic OP
Can Bitcoin Really Protect People from Inflation?
by
Barrykbest
on 28/09/2025, 19:49:19 UTC
⭐ Merited by igebotz (1)

I have been thinking about this, Inflation happens when the value of money drops and the cost of goods and services rises. People lose purchasing power, and their savings can buy less over time. Because Bitcoin has a limited supply of about only 21 million coins, many call it “digital gold” with this can it  act as a hedge against inflation?. The idea is that, unlike paper money which governments can print endlessly, Bitcoin cannot be inflated beyond its fixed supply.

In some countries with high inflation,  people already turn to Bitcoin as a store of value to protect their savings from local currency collapse. They can convert money to Bitcoin quickly and send it across borders without banks. But currently Bitcoin’s price itself is very volatile. While it has risen greatly over the long term, it also experiences deep drops in the short term. This makes it risky for people who need stability in their savings. In a bad market, the value of Bitcoin can fall even faster than inflation eats away at fiat money.
The question is Do you think Bitcoin will ever become stable enough to truly act as a reliable protection against inflation?
Post
Topic
Board Mining
Re: Is Bitcoin mining still worth it?
by
Barrykbest
on 28/09/2025, 11:17:30 UTC
If the OP thinks mining has a lot of expenses then he should definitely know that the rewards and it benefits are worth the hard work and expenses.
Getting ASICs  (Application Specific Integrated Circuits) might looks very expensive and even make a huge noise and un-comfortability to his or her neighborhood then I will suggest going for cloud mining which will just enables him to be at comfort or even trying out mining pool software. This are perfect suggestions but surely it will cost some funds.
Or what did you think about my suggestion.

To me I think Cloud mining used to sound attractive, but in reality almost all “rent-a-hash” offers today are either unprofitable or outright Ponzi schemes. The few that start by paying usually do so with new users’ deposits and later change terms or vanish.
So if you want to mine without running gear at home, the safer option is to buy your own ASIC and place it with a reputable hosting company that gives you a direct account to the pool and pays rewards straight to your wallet. Otherwise you’re basically sending money to strangers and hoping they mine for you.
Post
Topic
Board Nigeria (Naija)
Re: Is HODLING also a sign that I am too scared to sell?
by
Barrykbest
on 28/09/2025, 11:01:48 UTC
I believe the concept of HODLing Bitcoin is nearly as old as Bitcoin itself with the fundamental reason and hope that it will increase more in value over the years. Although several persons are entitled to there own reasons for HODLing, could it be that some persons HODL because they are waiting for the perfect time or they are too scared to sell or lose a percentage of their Bitcoin?
There is no other reason to hold bitcoin other than making profits in the long run. Holding bitcoin doesn't mean being scared to sell, there is a season to hold and a different season that is appropriate for an investor to sell. It comes in a bear season where investors are intrigued to buy more, while the bullish season that comes after a bear season, is the season for investors to sell. Any investor that sell during the bearish season is doing the wrong thing, we hold bitcoin so to make maximum profits not cause we scared.


I believe While long-term profit is one major reason to HODL, it’s not the only one. Some people hold Bitcoin to hedge against inflation, to bypass banking restrictions, or simply as a store of value. Also, saying never sell in a bear market can be risky advice.



In real investing, personal circumstances and risk tolerance matter. Some investors might need liquidity, rebalance their portfolio, or exit to cut losses. Timing the market perfectly is almost impossible. A better approach is to have a clear plan and to know why you’re holding, set profit targets or stop-loss levels, and rebalance as needed rather than following a rigid always hold in bear markets rule.
Post
Topic
Board Nigeria (Naija)
Re: Is HODLING also a sign that I am too scared to sell?
by
Barrykbest
on 28/09/2025, 10:54:57 UTC
I believe the concept of HODLing Bitcoin is nearly as old as Bitcoin itself with the fundamental reason and hope that it will increase more in value over the years. Although several persons are entitled to there own reasons for HODLing, could it be that some persons HODL because they are waiting for the perfect time or they are too scared to sell or lose a percentage of their Bitcoin?
There is no other reason to hold bitcoin other than making profits in the long run. Holding bitcoin doesn't mean being scared to sell, there is a season to hold and a different season that is appropriate for an investor to sell. It comes in a bear season where investors are intrigued to buy more, while the bullish season that comes after a bear season, is the season for investors to sell. Any investor that sell during the bearish season is doing the wrong thing, we hold bitcoin so to make maximum profits not cause we scared.


I believe While long-term profit is one major reason to HODL, it’s not the only one. Some people hold Bitcoin to hedge against inflation, to bypass banking restrictions, or simply as a store of value. Also, saying never sell in a bear market can be risky advice.
[/quote]


In real investing, personal circumstances and risk tolerance matter. Some investors might need liquidity, rebalance their portfolio, or exit to cut losses. Timing the market perfectly is almost impossible. A better approach is to have a clear plan and to know why you’re holding, set profit targets or stop-loss levels, and rebalance as needed rather than following a rigid always hold in bear markets rule.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Political aspects of cryptocurrencies
by
Barrykbest
on 28/09/2025, 10:40:37 UTC
Why do you say that the middle class disappears? They don't disappear; they become poor and then go into the poor category because they can't keep up with their current class due to high inflation and low wages. Also, maybe you are not aware of it, but even Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are regulated and taxed in countries where they are legalized and bills are passed for them to be used by the general public, but they will be regulated, and people will be taxed based on their assets.
In the real world context, the poor have an high likelihood of becoming poorer but the middle class have every tendency of becoming rich if the effectively utilize the little they have. both the rich, the poor and the average individual get taxed but in the real sense, the rich even get to pay the highest amount in the for of tax. the only way most poor people get to pay their tax is usually in the form of VAT and nothing is usually deducted in form of income tax.

The rich has his worth visible to the public and hence, all tax laws can be implemented on him. the average guy can smartly play games around and grow his finance via small scale investment that are not al that visible which in most cases is not taxed. the major leverage that the rich have above the middle class is that with more resource, it becomes easy for them to invest not just into bitcoin but also into other profitable asset.


Sure, visibility and resources changes how taxation and investing work. The rich can deploy large sum into assets and benefit from scale, while the average person can quietly build small investments over time. The encouraging is that with tools like Bitcoin and other decentralized assets, even small consistent contributions can compound into something meaningful. The real difference isn’t just the size of the initial capital, but the discipline to invest steadily and to reinvest the gains gotten instead of eating them. Anyone who follow this will improve over time.
This is just my opinion on this.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Is a University Degree Still Worth Anything?
by
Barrykbest
on 28/09/2025, 10:22:49 UTC
....
In fact, a university degree may not be enough to get a job, so it is necessary to acquire skills as well. According to my country, people with work experience are preferred over university degrees. However, university degrees are evaluated in some job fields, but those positions are very limited. And experience is preferred in company jobs. Those who gain experience in any work do not have to be unemployed, but those who get a degree sit unemployed if they don't get a job. And despite having a university degree in our country, it is difficult to get any government job without bribery.

That is from your own point of view, their is know point for discrimination between degree and skills both are very important stage one needs to acquire because they help in gaining financial stability among people. Some people doing well now are people without skills but  educational qualification while some also are not academically balanced but have skills that transformed their life for good, so inconclusively both are important level one needs to attain so as to put you ahead of your pairs.

It varies from country to country.As we belong to developing country, most people here focus on obtaining high degrees. They often spend lot of amount on getting higher degrees. In developing countries, having the higher degrees increase the chance of getting  higher jobs. Because here many people are still unaware of importance of practical skills.
Whereas the developed countries emphasize both on degrees and skill equally. They usually train the student at university level , so by the time they graduate, they already have the skills. When they enter in the market they play better role as compare to us.
Personally I believe that both degrees and skills are important for the career success

I concur with you, many in thinks that degree alone can 100% guarantee jobs but without practical skills the paper doesn’t carry much weight. What developed countries have done well is to integrate practical trainings into the  university system so that graduates leave with both theory and practical experience. Also if students actively seek internships, projects, and certifications alongside their studies, they stand out far more than those with just a certificate. Degrees still matter, but combined with relevant skills and experience increase it worth.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Always invest from your discretionary funds
by
Barrykbest
on 28/09/2025, 10:09:18 UTC
All these by one person?
Body isn't a machine, this will cause burnout bro.
I myself do not understand how they say these things because how can our human body take so much pressure? We just keep talking while talking but it is never possible to complete the tasks we say in this way. For this, before giving advice or saying anything to someone, one should think about it. I do not know how he said these words. Is it really possible for a human body to do so many tasks at once?

This actually a working for money strategy, not money working for you moves.
There may be a strategy to work for money but I could not understand how such excessive work is possible for a person. We need money a lot in life but I can do as much as I can earn by working hard, it is not possible to say more than this.
You clearly don't understand my point, I didn't say that inorder to build your discretionary funds must get another job to add to the one you're doing. I didn't also mean that on top of the two jobs you have to get a side hustle and learn skills at the same time to increase your income, it'll be unreasonable. What I said and many posters actually grabbed it was that you can do either of the following if your income is not enough to get a discretionary fund. People that wants to make it in life cannot remain static, if where you are is not giving what you want you need to leave that comfort zone. You cannot be doing the same thing and expect a different result, be proactive and find ways to increase your income.

Yea your point is great about leaving your comfort zone. Many people think that earning more automatically leads to having discretionary funds, but like you said, if income stays the same and expenses rise, nothing changes. Learning new skills, starting side hustles, or even just rethinking how we spend our current income can create that extra margin for investment. I think this is exactly what helps small investors grow into bigger ones over time. Your comment is a great reminder that building wealth is not passive at the start but it takes intentional effort and change before money starts working for you.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: We work to earn, not to struggle in life.
by
Barrykbest
on 28/09/2025, 10:01:17 UTC
In our country, this is the most common tradition or belief. While we're young, we were taught to study hard and finish schooling, and get a stable job. Because once we have already acquired a stable job, we will start earning and improve our lives. And create consistent progress, until we end up getting rich and enjoy the best things in life.

But I don't think we are getting align with it. Instead of working to earn and get rich, why are majority now end up struggling in life? Honestly, what I'm seeing right now is that we work to survive, not to make money and get rich in the process. Could this be the real possibility of life? Or we are just blinded by fantasies in life? Or is it because working alone is never sufficient enough to make riches in life, but we need various investments to achieve success and get wealthy in the long run?

I know different opinions and ideas may arise, but I'll be more willing to read and reflect each of it.
Because the system is broken and it's made for us to believe that we'll have a good life after we finish schooling and started to work. This is designed for the rich to get richer and the commoners to struggle even if we've gone through the process. So, there are jobs that workers are fortunate in getting paid rightly. But those that aren't, needs to work harder and look for more side hustles just to survive. The job market is tough and not only the wages are the problem but also the prices of the commodities and goods that we consume are dealt to inflate.

You made a very valid point. The system really is structured in a way that rewards capital more than labor, which explains why many who follow the study hard, get a job path still end up struggling. I think the real key is learning to diversify using your skills not just for wages but also for investments, side businesses, and developing assets that grow over time. This way, we’re not only depending on a single paycheck but building something sustainable for the future.
Post
Topic
Board Politics and society (Naija)
Re: Balancing Financial security and Bitcoin Accumulation
by
Barrykbest
on 25/09/2025, 17:05:38 UTC
But this may not be acceptable for everyone. Because everyone's earning capacity is different. Again, everyone's needs are different. Those who basically spend 80 percent of their income on basic family expenses. If they start investing without creating an emergency fund and suddenly their expenses increase and they fall into a financial crisis or disaster, they will not be able to maintain their investment. This will not maintain the long-term normal rules of Bitcoin.

You can do whatever you like Xhowdhury, but the fact remains that it's wrong to set up an emergency funds before investing. Do you know how long it will take you to set up an emergency funds of at least three months of your expenses from your discretionary income. It can take more than a year to set it up, and you feel that's the best for you because you prioritize emergency funds over bitcoin investment.

Cmon what will it profit you to waste more than one year piling up fiat currency that depreciated in value overtime instead of putting half of it into bitcoin and safe your money from inflation while your bitcoin investment continues to grow bit by bit.

If your monthly expense increases and you don't have any discretionary income, you are not to buy bitcoin at that time but wait till the next pay day when you have a discretionary income before you buy again. Your emergency funds isn't to take care of family basic needs and monthly expenses. Rather, it should be only used when there is a real life emergency.

Your bitcoin investment should be given the first priority, followed by your emergency funds because emergency may come or not, but it's better to be prepared for an unforeseen circumstances which is why when you don't have an emergency funds, you don't need waiting and wasting time to build it because emergency might not come. It's better to build it along side with your bitcoin portfolio. It does not mean that because you are building your emergency funds with your bitcoin investment that you wouldn't be able to hodli your bitcoin investment for long term.

There is no need building an emergency funds to protect your bitcoin investment when you don't have any bitcoin because you have nothing to protect. Bitcoin is an investment and you should be thinking on how you can accumulate as many bitcoin as possible overtime, by looking for other mean to increase your income when you have started investing and cut down your expenses in order to enable keep your bitcoin investment ongoing without selling a dime.

I think the balanced, practical approach is to start both accumulating Bitcoin and an emergency fund at the same time, but to prioritize liquidity until a minimal safety net is in place. You just have to allocate your discretionary income with a temporary tilt toward the emergency fund, for instance like 60 to 70% to cash, 30 to 40% to BTC until you’ve covered 3 months of essential expenses. This lets your DCA consistently so you don’t wait on the sidelines while still building protection against life shocks that might otherwise force you to sell BTC at a bad time.
Post
Topic
Board Nigeria (Naija)
Topic OP
Does Bitcoin mining affect the environment?
by
Barrykbest
on 25/09/2025, 16:14:11 UTC
Bitcoin mining consumes huge amount of electricity, especially in regions where the power source is coal or gas. This raises concerns about carbon emissions and climate change. At the same time mining is also pushing innovation in renewable energy, since many miners are switching to solar, hydro, and wind power to cut costs and reduce impact. But Bitcoin can also make use of wasted energy that would otherwise not be used at all, in regards to this do you think Bitcoin mining is a real threat to the environment, or can it actually become a driver for cleaner energy in the future?
Post
Topic
Board Politics and society (Naija)
Re: Balancing Financial security and Bitcoin Accumulation
by
Barrykbest
on 25/09/2025, 15:34:44 UTC
2. Make use of the 50/30/20 allocation rule: 50% of your income allocation should go to taking care of essential expenses and immediate needs. The mistake people often make is neglecting this aspect, forgetting that it is actually inevitable and unavoidable, even when you manage to avoid it today, it'll come back tomorrow bigger, and you'll be forced to still sort them out, thereby messing up your plans. 30% goes to your discretionary income and the other 20% towards your savings and also for debt repayments.
Adopting the DCA strategy as guide was totally resourceful to me,though the 50%,30% and20% could be adjustable depending on personal priorities  at the moment,investment requires nothing but determination so that the end result  will turn out juicy,sometimes circumstances could  change the initial plan to 40%,40%,20%,this is where I totally advice investors to focus on initial decision and be determined  to survive outside the investment so that one's result wount fluctuate when others are rejoicing.

There are some problems with the division, and sure it could be possible that we could elect to have our basic expenses to be somewhere in the ballpark of 50% of our income, and once we figure out what our basic expenses, then the rest is discretionary income.

Portions of our discretionary income that we allocate towards debt servicing is not discretionary income, that is part of basic expenses.

With our discretionary income we can choose to invest (save), or consume. Each of us can figure out how much of our discretionary income we want to allocate to each of these.

Most people are not going to have 50% of their income as discretionary income, so 50% is pretty high.  many will fit somewhere in the ballpark of 10% and 30%.

You are actually right and I agree with these points. Firstly, the 50%, 30% and 20% division may not work for some people due to high expenses demand and or the level of income that comes in. We know that expenses varies alot. Mr A might be spending a whole of 70% of his income on expenses while Mr B might just be needing 45, 50% or there about to clear up weekly of monthly basis needs, and offcours we know that this has a whole lot to do with how far you were able to clear or provide for previously and also the level of income that comes in weekly or monthly. However, everything boils down to your level of income. A high level of income earner can work with that division formula, not even always because at times expenses can increase as I explained earlier, while on the other hand, a low income earner will find the 50% discretionary worrisome and may not work with it comfortably.

So what really matters is getting to actually know what your expenses might be, or surely will be before the right discretionary can be discovered and allotted. And secondly, in picking out our discretionary, we shouldn't be too desperate or greedy in a bid to increase our accumulation speed over night by allocating big percentage to the discretionary income which in turns increases your accumulation without properly settling your basic needs and much needed expenses, because if this is done in any was, would hunt you within the week or month of such rash decision.

So I think individually, investors should check their possible income, determine there sure expenses and from it do there division to suit all sides and ensure peaceful living and accumulating simultaneously. It very clear that the formula that works for Mr A may not work for me

I totally agree with this point because no one’s financial life is the same. If you don’t fully understand your real expenses, it’s easy to set targets that you cannot meet up. Building a balance between covering needs and slowly growing investments like Bitcoin is safer than rushing in with percentages that are not realistic.. In the long run, steady progress with a clear view of your income and expenses will always give better results than forcing yourself into a strict formula, So I agree with you.
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Buy Buy Buy or Sell Sell Sell?
by
Barrykbest
on 25/09/2025, 14:46:26 UTC
prices are lower. Starting a dca say 100 usd a week for a year would be an okay move. Doing 100 usd a week for 2 years would be better. As long as you  Just stack them and hold them.

Especially now, DCA is the most appropriate pattern to use. A decline can occur at any time and continue if we look at the BTC price chart, although it's not considered particularly necessary. But for me, it's quite helpful. Adding a small amount, even if I have good moment to get a really low price in the past two or five days.

Investing in Bitcoin requires a level of psychological skill in relation to risk management as the system is volatile it can fluctuate anytime. Everyone has their own choice, their own money, and their own level of risk they can handle so if you can't handle such level of volatility then investing in Bitcoin isn't for you.
Post
Topic
Board Nigeria (Naija)
Topic OP
Is Bitcoin the Future of Money or Just a Digital Asset?
by
Barrykbest
on 25/09/2025, 14:22:28 UTC
Topic: Is Bitcoin the Future of Money or Just a Digital Asset?

Thinking of this, Bitcoin have been around since 2008 which is over a decade now and truly speaking it has changed the way we see money. Since it's not controlled by any government, this makes it borderless as anyone can send and receive value in few minutes and it  tends to give financial freedom to anyone that invest into it reasonably.
But reasoning this carefully is Bitcoin stable enough to replace our everyday money or just a digital assets like gold and others relating to as the price goes up and down on a daily basis. On a second thought is the truth in the middle of being the future of money or a digital asset? Since it can be used to hold and protect wealth against inflation or anything of such.
What about countries with weak money system?
Do you think that Bitcoin will one day replace traditional money, or will it remain mostly an investment like digital gold?

Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Every successful person had a mentor
by
Barrykbest
on 11/02/2025, 09:19:16 UTC
Yea most successful persons have a mentor but though very few rise themselves, the importance of having a mentor is that they can provide invaluable guidance, support, and insight. A mentor offers a wealth of experience, which helps  to navigate challenges and avoid common failures. They can also provide networking opportunities which can accelerate personal and professional growth. In our society today, mentorship is not tied to a physical guardian but an individual can choose to have an online mentor that aligns with his thriving path and still excel.


Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: The free things are the most expensive!
by
Barrykbest
on 10/02/2025, 18:55:39 UTC
Yea, especially in our present society with advance technology like the AI and data science some service might not have monetary value but the user data and information serves as exchange which are used to train differs AI models. For instance, our most used social media platform Facebook, it usage is free but it operates in a model where user data is exchanged for access to the platform, this information is used to create targeted advertisements which is the key aspect of Facebook revenue strategy.