I don't know Why but i Just want to make same ATH guess like last time
Rules ....: the one  with the right date of ATH gets .25 btc paid directly  (UTC time)    (closest to ATH.....)
I look to Every page in here from now When a date is picked first iT cannot been taken again ( 1st =1st)
Another .25 btc is rewarded for ho makes best of technical analyse of the time When we strike ATH.... and Why iT happens at that time.....
So This .25 also only to been payed 1 time .... and not 2 times te same explanation.... (1st =1st)

Both answers to win must been inside before 20-09-2017
Goodluck to the ones that like This 

UPDATE listmaking                 notice a * is when the person put good enough explanation for other .25 BTC  (person with no * only play ATH or have to put little better )

19/9 rayx12
24/9 kidbitter*
25/9 binaryreign*
26/9 player99
27/9 xhomerx10
28/9 khufuking
29/9 jhayzxenon*
30/9 yermom
02/10 bitchick *
03/10 ^BuTcH^
04/10 minermannc
05/10 punisher1314*
06/10 jimbo Toronto*
07/10 player514*
09/10 Oinas*
10/10 bikerlezno*     LAST WINNER
11/10 ted e. bare
12/10 harrymmmm*
13/10 cryptoqueeen*
14/10 bitcoinaire*
15/10 ludwigvon*
17/10 shroomskit_disgrace
18/10 dakustaking76
19/10 birobob*
20/10 leowonderful
21/10 paashaas
22/10 cmacwiz*
23/10 spaceman_spiff_original*
24/10 colonel panic
25/10 soullyG
26/10 weltmaster*
27/10 vroom
28/10 entons*
29/10 roombot*
30/10 notme*
31/10 twocorn
01/11 YamashitaRen
02/11 orpington
03/11 Haciendo*
04/11 lilloboy
05/11 jojo69*
06/11 d_eddie*
07/11 empowering*
08/11 northyplole*
09/11 podyx*
10/11 u9y42*
11/11 starving_marvin
12/11 sirazimuth*
13/11 dotto*
14/11 hazukison*
15/11 organic*
16/11 Heater*
17/11 foxygoxy*
18/11 600watt
19/11 arriemoller
20/11 drbrockcoin*
21/11 icygreen*
22/11 rakessh
23/11 erisdiscordia
24/11 oblox*
25/11 mfort312*
26/11 globbo*
27/11 lfc_bitcoin
28/11 conspirosphere.tk*
29/11 rjclarck2000
30/11 last of the v8s *
01/12 newworldcoiner*
02/12 souspeed*
03/12 jaapgvk
04/12 sgk*
05/12 fluidjax
07/12 free-bit.co.in
08/12 imbatman
09/12 yonton
10/12 fragout*
11/12 itod
12/12 lontonbit*
13/12 CistaCista
14/12 cAPSLOCK
15/12 philivey
16/12 marcus_of_augustus*
17/12 mattimann
18/12 coincube*
24/12 bones261*
25/12 mndan
26/12 karatma1*
28/12 deathangel*
30/12 erre
31/12 elwar
01/01/2018 lewis pirenne*
02/01/2018 addressed*
03/01/2018 bathy
05/01/2018 bitcoin psycho
06/01/2018 chowhan
18/01/2018 raja_mbz*
21/12 2dogs
22/01/2018 _javi_
26/01/2018 kurious*
28/01/2018 steelboy*
29/01/2018 alcohodl
01/02/2018 cristitcm
18/02/2018 in the silence
20/04/2018 fractal universe*
15/05/2018 oldtimegin*
15/06/2018 samson
16/08/2018 samarkand

THIS IS THE LAST UPDATE OF THE LIST

chosen date of     petahashminer where allready taken so can give one UNTILL     MAXIMUM 23.59 UTC 19-09-2017    so 20 september 2017

The latest news is block 494784.

I'm a little surprised it's as high as 90% still flagging intention for NYA/Segwit2x, but yeah, it's currently 930 out of the last 1000 blocks.  There were some claims that miners using Bitcoin Core were only using the BIP91 patch to avoid a split, but if that were true, surely they would have stopped signalling intention for larger blocks by now?  SegWit is locked in and definitely happening, so they can easily back out of the NYA if they genuinely weren't keen on it and just have SegWit by itself.  At the risk of repeating "intention" too much, that's all it currently is.  There's nothing stopping them from changing their minds any time between now and November.  Are some of the miners possibly playing mind games and making it look like 2x has more support than it really does?  Are some of them maybe waiting until the last minute to drop the 2x intent?  And will some of them start changing their minds a little faster if the next Core release goes through with the proposal to disconnect nodes signalling 2x?

So many questions, heh.  The plot continues to thicken.  



If you hold a bitcoin (BTC) balance on any address before the November fork, you'll have the same amount on the newly forked 2x chain.  

You don't have to worry about moving any BCC/BCH because that's already on its own separate chain, completely unrelated to the SegWit2x one.  You can keep those funds on any address you want.  

The SegWit2x fork will have literally zero impact on your BitcoinCash holdings (with the possible exception of maybe stealing some of the hashpower from that chain, making it potentially slower to transact in BitcoinCash)

Sell your car, take out student loans, borrow money from your girlfriend, pawn the title of her car, sell your fillings, then buy bitcoin.

Where did you hear that? What's the reason behind it? I don't see any resistance except 500$ and 600$.

It is not easy to arrive at those levels without well knowing reasons.

$3k would be pretty conservative imo. We are at the very low end of the log channel with a huge amount of free space above. When we make an ATH, all bets are off.

So my husband was working on a spreadsheet to figure out the rake in which we will take some profits.  He had the price going out to over 10 Billion but then he deleted it saying "we won't ever get to that price!"  I then looked at him with shock and disgust and said, "YOU'RE A BEAR!"    

Even I have my limits as a bull, but it somewhere close to a million per coin!  

No one can know that but I will do a pray (even I don't believe in God) to arrive at least at 600.   It will be a big achievement even this amount. But I think that the most important thing, and even much more important than the arrive of that price, is the stability in any kind of price can arrive. Going high and seeing going again down (even fast) is painful. Seems like bitcoin have no power to stay in high levels.

Interesting? Sure. Realistic? Not at all, however optimistic you may be. Taking a more rational approach at things, possibilities can only go for so long

I think $450 is definitely do-able by end of Nov'2015. $550 by end of Dec'2015. $650 by end of Jan'2016. $1000 by end of Feb'2016. $2500 by end of March'2016. $5000 by end of April'2016. $2500 by end of May'2016. $1000 by end of June'2016. $500 by end of July'2016.

I think they would just wait for a professional, properly regulated fund. Why take the counterparty risk dealing with these exchanges? They could disappear in an instant.

12% fixed.
Yes, that's high, but I really had no option.

I probably could have gotten lower from bank if Verizon hadn't screwed me over, but I don't have the assets needed to sue them.

My opinion on the whole credit rating thing is that it's all a big scam, there is no recourse when the customer is f***ed over like I was, nothing I could do. It's basically legal extortion - you either bow before corporate America when there's a payment dispute and pay them or they screw up your credit rating.

What's funny is how much Verizon could have made off of me by now had they simply done the right thing. I don't get it.

Over a matter of $60 (last bill) when I had a $500 deposit - they lost me as a customer for life, and by now I've spent several thousand dollars with their competition that they could have had.

Free low credit score. Banks do not want you if you pay off with no fees. That's the thing, a high score means you will borrow more than you can pay off and will go into debt. The credit business is about getting you in debt, not lending you money.