I access to the bitcoin network with tor.

Somebody has successfully sent coins to the mixer, and redeemed the new mixed coins. If they post the two transaction IDs (sending and receiving) and the value of RandomPrime to the reddit thread, they can have a reward of 0.01BTC.

edit: Really, all they need to post is the RandomPrime - I already know the two transaction IDs (only because there were only two transactions mixed and I made one of them. In the future when many people use the mixer this would not be possible).

The mixer has received 1.0, 0.5, 0.2, 0.1 and 0.05 BTC transactions (always testnet) - is it all the same person? The 0.05BTC transaction is now redeemed.

I need to say more about this service. The system operates on the basis of minimum trust. From the time you receive a MixAddress from the mixer, until the time you receive your new mixed coins, you need almost zero trust in the mixer.

The mix address you receive is signed by a key which can be traced to the PGP key posted here in the forum. So if you send coins there, we cannot deny the address belongs to us.

When you claim the transaction and send your new address to the mixer (the 'SinkAddress') this is also signed (blind signed) by the mixer. If you have the unblinded signature and we do not send you the new mixed coins, you can prove that we are scammers.

Yes. Theymos may reveal all informations he has about me. I registered using a tor bridge.

This is not a hostname I know. But it might be one of the servers. Can you explain how you found this hostname?

I am not asking for anyone's bitcoins yet, only testnet coins. Do you think the operators of a bitcoin mixing service should announce their identities? Did you ever buy anything from SR?
I will add your question to the FAQ - it will be the first one.

I have made the announcement of the blind mixing service. Maybe you will find more informations there to identify me.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1caf2s/announce_a_tor_based_blind_bitcoin_mixing_service/

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=175959.msg1832604#msg1832604

I am announcing a new bitcoin mixing service using Chaum's blind signature scheme. Since it is not allowed to announce tor urls on bitcointalk, you can view the url on reddit here.

It is fair I suppose. But you must still provide some evidence or a good reason why you suspect that person. Just random guesses are not allowed.

I have made the same donation to FSF as I promised to.

http://blockchain.info/tx/063531718d60bc33a596353ef87ac853a1b807d8f40d48a96df5ec914a8c1bee

You can get good random numbers from many things. Easiest might be a temperature sensor. Imagine a temperature sensor with a digital display, with 20 digits of precision. So it might say the temperature is 72.54472792884724655763 F  (about 22C). But the next time you look it might say 72.47798392534y7328... or, if it was a very expensive thermometer it might say 72.545076543277...

The very last digits will change very fast, and very randomly. They are good sources of randomness.

But, most random numbers used in computers come from pseudo-random number generators. These are mathematical programs which are designed to produce numbers that are as random as possible. Some of these are not good for cryptography, and you can crack them, and anything encrypted with them is not secure.

Yes, I have already made rules to say that someone who has a hunch, and explains where the hunch comes from (so it is not just a guess), then they can make a donation to FSF or torservers.net. And if you make the donation, then I will answer. I only said 0.005BTC for the donation.  0.2BTC is $30 now, so that would be too much.

We could make the donation higher, and then I will also make another equal donation to the same charity (FSF or torservers). Is that fair? Is 0.02BTC ok?

But I want to make sure everyone understands: even if you pay the donation, if you just guess with no explanation of your guess, or with an explanation that is just invented, then I still won't answer. There needs to be a convincing reason.

I read all your thread and I am following almost all the advice you received, but I think the evidence against you was very specific - if someone discovers a unique thing like that about me and links directly to my real user, then I will admit it. But you can see that people think "IP-address" or ' ' single quotes identify me, and they are not right yet. Also, you released some information about yourself, I will release only the URL of the onion website (it is not fully ready yet). But your bounty was 14BTC at $7 per bitcoin. Mine is 2.5BTC at $140 per bitcoin.

If everyone agrees, I will let molecular be the judge of what is "hard evidence". molecular must imagine he is the police chief trying to find out who I am, and must decide if he should spend lots of money to enter my home and to confiscate all my computers and then to pay the IT specialists much more money to investigate my computer hardware and to crack the encryption and so on. Obviously he cannot do it for just stupid random guesses. So if molecular says so, then I must respond to a post. Do you agree molecular?

edit: if everyone wants, I will also place 2.5BTC in escrow with a reputable hero member of the forum. But if someone does gets the right answer, then everyone needs to trust me to say the truth anyway.

edit: or to rubberhose the encryption 

The text "IP-address" is cut and pasted from the original findmeifyoucan thread, linked in OP. It is not my grammar.

Hahaha. But I am better looking than him.

This is not "hard evidence" but it might be enough to make the authorities to come to my door. Except I am not octavion. I am certainly not as good looking as him

I was going to reply to your post. I am not OpenYourEyes.

The reason I ask to PM me with real names and addresses, is to protect my privacy, but also to protect privacy of others if you are wrong. Please remove this, and show more evidence.

I am not changing the rules aribtrarily, just making it clear that guesses will be ignored. The donation applies only to posts which do not show "hard evidence". If you show "hard evidence" and you are correct, I will admit it. I have created a file with my username in it:


I will show the file whoami.txt if

• You show hard evidence and you are correct or
• You show some evidence and make the donation and you are correct

I will decide what is "strong" evidence. "Some" evidence is needed just to demonstrate you are not doing stupid random guesses.

For reference, these are the kinds of posts I will be ignoring.

What is your evidence?

This is not evidence. Can you give more?

There are only 90000 members in this forum. You could try them all.

Only 89997 users left.

Yes you need to go on. What is the evidence?

Evidence?

Evidence?

It would be a flaw if you were correct. deepceleron and jasinlee have shown that I am using a proxy.

Correct. In fact, there are many replies here, so I'm going to change the rules.

New extra rules:

• Anything without "hard evidence" will be ignored, even if the "guess" is correct (note double quotes, even if I am only quoting "hard evidence" by Wardrick!). It needs to be something that would be strong enough to make the authorities knock on my door.
• If you are sure you are correct, then make a 0.005BTC donation to the Free Software Foundation https://my.fsf.org/donate/other/ (bitcoin address 1PC9aZC4hNX2rmmrt7uHTfYAS3hRbph4UN) or to torservers.net  https://www.torservers.net/donate.html (bitcoin address 14fadryvAkoXye2XtH4qSwSerhi7BX4rtG) and paste the transaction ID of the donation in your message. That will attract my attention. (these sites use a single bitcoin address for all donations)
• To avoid people making lots of extra user accounts and making lots of guesses, only accounts registered before the UTC time of this post are allowed to participate.

Rules:

The mods can also claim the reward. Or you can try to bribe a mod to get the informations that you need.