I am not sure this is an adequate explanation to how it is not a zero sum with regards to a community 'rallying together to make money'. I am genuinely interested in what you have to say about this so do not take this as me being sarcastic or something. I do not see the relationship between money supply being constant, or the relavence of bitcoins 'exponential rise' in price. Basically we have FIAT that we trade for BTC, then we are just trading two goods with a market value. BTC => Alt => BTC +> Etc.... The price relationship between BTC and FIAT has nothing to do with the fact that when you are trading BTC and the ALT it is a zero sum game. When you trade from BTC to FIAT it is another zero sum game. The fact that 'BTC can go up 1000000% and both people who traded ALTs could technically gain FIAT in the end' misses the point that when they were trading the ALTs, someone gained on a trade and someone lost. If one of the persons would not have traded they would have been better off than if they had traded. Then you move to the FIAT market, someone is winning and someone is losing there too, Another zero sum game.

I guess we may just have different definitions or look at the markets in different scopes. My opinion is there should not and cannot be a community based on making money, it is delusional to think that we are all here to make sure everyone makes money. You and I are here to try and gain an advantage over people who are invested in the coin but are not part of the Bitcointalk community, this is just to say we are screwing over different people; we do not care about people who hold this coin, we care about making their money, our money.

Edit: Also I do look forward to what you have to say on the topic, thanks.

You understand that trading is a zero sum game right? "We all rally together to make money" does not exist. If I make money, someone lost the equivalent or the opportunity to make that money.

I don't mean to be a downer, but the 'best' people at the crypto game are the ones who are willing to go to great lengths to manipulate people into doing whatever they want. Community is an illusion anymore.

This may be off putting to you but what would be more off putting would be if the devs would have promised the initial investors an amount when they invested and then changed the agreement closer to launch after they had the investors BTC for the development stage. I think how it was handled is the correct way, even if it suits you and I both poorly. It was a great investment for those individuals, but wasn't it open to the public?

A lot of those points are from months ago, he averages around 4m a day which is nice setup none the less.

Buy pressure created by these pools is almost none.... I think BCpool last time I looks was creating 7BTC of buy pressure... That is nothing. Those multipools are basically hype machines for people that do not do the math. Sounds like it would work though.

What is your username on F@H? And what is your estimated PPD and payout?

Folding has as much to do with ASICs as a penny does. Both are coins, and both can not be mined with ASICs; This is every way in which both are related to ASICS. If someone is wondering whether or not to fold for curecoins and they land on "Well I would, but what about ASICS? I guess since it doesn't list it is ASIC proof/resistant I wont" Then they have no idea about what folding is and need to be asking questions to the community anyways. Why would we list ASIC proof/resistant when miners with ASICS are needed for the coin? And why is this topic going on and on? I am starting to think you are just being stubborn about it when you know you are incorrect. This concept has been being explained to you for hours now.

The point is that ASICs are used for this coin, just not for the folding of it. ASICs can not be used for folding, so it is redundant to say ASIC resistant folding.

Come over to the IRC channel http://webchat.freenode.net/         room: #Curecoin

You can not mine Curecoin with a graphics card, you need to be running folding@home that is outlined in the OP

Join the IRC and I will try to help out http://webchat.freenode.net/

Room is #CureCoin

They are working on different jobs, The PPD is what you want to focus on. Your 270x should be getting 70-80k. If you are running multiple cards you may nee to pause your CPU.

It should be almost instant, double check your junk folders, mine got filtered into 'newsletters' for some reason.

I'm not sure if the Devs can say much about the mining returns... The free market decides the value of the coins you are receiving.

I think the Dev said yesterday that the manual payouts will be processed twice daily. He will have to verify this though. I can ask when he gets back in the #Curecoin IRC

CureCoin team just broke top 100 on Stanford's  Total Point Team Rankings!

? You asked for help, but yes this is the last reply. Glad I was able to resolve your issue!

Replying to other folders saying they will not be paid out for the work they completed is just BS. So I addressed your BS. You are not 'warning people' you are telling them that something is broken, when it has been explained SEVERAL times, but you don't listen.

Here is your help: Folding takes a long time, when your WU is submitted (possibly 24+ hrs after you start) it takes Stanford another possible 12-24 hrs to post your work to where Cryptobullions has access to it. Then CrytpoBullions pays out once a day. Soo what does that mean? You start now, possibly complete a unit in 24 hrs, then another possible 24 hrs to post, then another possible 24 hrs to get paid out... Look at that, 3 days.

:rolls eyes: Looks like we found the first coin troll... Where did I say that you won't get the coins you deserve? Where does it state that ANYWHERE? Your coins will be paid out, what I was trying to address in my post to you is that 'yes it takes longer than the coins you are used to mining' and 'you are mining a coin in the early stages of development, so stop bitching about things after they are clearly explained to you OR stop mining coins in early development'.... Quite simple... Quite.

You dove into something the is completely revolutionary and want all of the bells and whistles immediately... I agree we all want things laid out neat and perfectly for us, but this is why early investors in a new tech get huge payouts, while people who take the 'safe route' get average returns. Things will get better, and yes all I have for you is "be patient"... This is not another clone coin, this is something bigger than whatever it is you are probably pointing your miners too, but now you can see your current hashrate

Edit: I am not trying to be condescending, but you are trying to be an early adopter who demands everything found in an established coin.