Could you provide here, some other cases where Holydarkness acted in a "normal way"?
What i see so far is Holydarkness giving the reason to a Bookmaker when they accuse someone of doing fraud (Without showing any proof), and stealing all client's money.
Anyway, if he is (as he says), neutral, he should change his opinion regarding this particularly matter. I repeat. A bookmaker is taking EVERY FUND of various clients, accussing them of doing fraud without any showing any proof.
No one without any conection with bookmakers could defend this. It's obvious that common sense says you that this is wrong, so if he defended this, and the only reason to defend this, is because he has some interests on it. I don't see any other reason.