Search content
Sort by
Showing 7 of 7 results by Chimer47
Power 100%
CPU +100
Memory +950
270 watts consumption of video card
Past results with these settings/fixed a bug in the post
For ETH(Claymore ) 57.7 Mh/s
Power 73%
CPU -480
Memory +950
180 watts consumption of video card
CPU +100
Memory +950
270 watts consumption of video card
Past results with these settings/fixed a bug in the post
For ETH(Claymore ) 57.7 Mh/s
Power 73%
CPU -480
Memory +950
180 watts consumption of video card
I wouldnt recommend 100% Power. Another thing that you need to keep in mind is to keep lower energy
Wow that's very disappointing. Just 88 Sol/s for 2080ti with 144_5? I already get now 80 Sol/s with 1080ti at full power. That's just 10% increase for nearly double the money for the new GPU. Bummer.
Perhaps EWBF_ can do some magic with new code optimizations or perhaps using Tensor Cores or RT Cores for mining too - if that's possible in any way I don't know. Otherwise Turing will be a big flop for us miners
Those card aren't optimized yet on the new Miner release. Remember it has faster memory of GDDR6 which would highly benefit EthHash rather than equi.Perhaps EWBF_ can do some magic with new code optimizations or perhaps using Tensor Cores or RT Cores for mining too - if that's possible in any way I don't know. Otherwise Turing will be a big flop for us miners
Hmm still dissappointed. As markiz73 wrote, 2080ti delivers about 57.7 Mh/s with EthHash and costs 1200$ and above. For that money I can buy 3 RX Vegas each of them delivering about 42Mh/s when optimized. So in total I get 126Mh/s with 3 Vegas for 1200$. So you can say Vega beats the shit out of Turing for the same hardware invest. So no need to buy any Turing at all so far. Too bad I had high hopes for new Nvidia Generation
Aw man you guys doing fee 0 really don't understand it. If we give EWBF_ his very well-earned fee, we miners also will earn MORE money in the end. As you see with going from v0.5 to v0.6 EWBF_ can do increases in hashrates about 10-15%. So we all will earn 10-15% more every time he makes improvements. So from this 10-15% MORE we just need to give him 2%. So we still have 8% to 13% MORE money in the end from now on till forever. With fee it's a win/win for both, everybody earns. Give 2% now for getting 8 - 13% more tomorrow. Don't give 2% now, there will be no tomorrow. Because that's the money he needs to do this job after all - but he only can do this work in the long run if he has the time for it and perhaps can live of that. So if we don't give him his fee, he is forced to stop making improvements because he will have no time, forced to do other jobs to earn his money for paying his bills. So you guys doing fee 0 are only harming yourselves because it's you by yourself, that will lose money at the end with your avarice. Don't you get that?
It's better for you to go back to school. You would have earned 10-15% more only if you and only you would have mined with 0.6 while everybody were mining with 0.5. But even ignoring the math, the base argument is wrong. If everyone mines with the same miner - it doesn't matter what the performance of the miner is. The better the performance => the larger net difficulty. Your income is the same at the end of the day. As long as performance of the miner is better than one of the competitors, EWBF can stop development. That's what he did with his older miner and everyone was happy for over 18 months (I was
).Aw man you guys doing fee 0 really don't understand it. If we give EWBF_ his very well-earned fee, we miners also will earn MORE money in the end. As you see with going from v0.5 to v0.6 EWBF_ can do increases in hashrates about 10-15%. So we all will earn 10-15% more every time he makes improvements. So from this 10-15% MORE we just need to give him 2%. So we still have 8% to 13% MORE money in the end from now on till forever. With fee it's a win/win for both, everybody earns. Give 2% now for getting 8 - 13% more tomorrow. Don't give 2% now, there will be no tomorrow. Because that's the money he needs to do this job after all - but he only can do this work in the long run if he has the time for it and perhaps can live of that. So if we don't give him his fee, he is forced to stop making improvements because he will have no time, forced to do other jobs to earn his money for paying his bills. So you guys doing fee 0 are only harming yourselves because it's you by yourself, that will lose money at the end with your avarice. Don't you get that?
Wow that's very disappointing. Just 88 Sol/s for 2080ti with 144_5? I already get now 80 Sol/s with 1080ti at full power. That's just 10% increase for nearly double the money for the new GPU. Bummer.
Perhaps EWBF_ can do some magic with new code optimizations or perhaps using Tensor Cores or RT Cores for mining too - if that's possible in any way I don't know. Otherwise Turing will be a big flop for us miners
Perhaps EWBF_ can do some magic with new code optimizations or perhaps using Tensor Cores or RT Cores for mining too - if that's possible in any way I don't know. Otherwise Turing will be a big flop for us miners
Hi EWBF_,
OK thanks for the reply. BTW do you expect any great hashrates from the new Nvidia Turing GPUs with your miner? Do the new Tensor Cores and RT Cores of RTX 2080ti will have any benefit to the hashrate? Or is it just the regular Shader/Compute Cores that will be used for mining?
OK thanks for the reply. BTW do you expect any great hashrates from the new Nvidia Turing GPUs with your miner? Do the new Tensor Cores and RT Cores of RTX 2080ti will have any benefit to the hashrate? Or is it just the regular Shader/Compute Cores that will be used for mining?
Hello EWBF_,
is it possible that you bring 200,9 back too? - just in addition to the other algorithms. Yes, I know ASIC's are more efficient now, but not everybody wants to buy them or can afford them - or even wants them to run at home because they are super hot and super loud. Besides there is a big risk to buy one, because every day there could be an asic fork away like Monero and Bitcoing Gold already did. So I still use your old 0.34b but I think it's outdated now and probably you can create a much more powerful version now. P.S.: I still love to give you my full fee amount, because I honor and respect your work. I know this is hard work and it should not be for nothing. This is hard work to program these miners and like every other work it should be remunerated accordingly!
is it possible that you bring 200,9 back too? - just in addition to the other algorithms. Yes, I know ASIC's are more efficient now, but not everybody wants to buy them or can afford them - or even wants them to run at home because they are super hot and super loud. Besides there is a big risk to buy one, because every day there could be an asic fork away like Monero and Bitcoing Gold already did. So I still use your old 0.34b but I think it's outdated now and probably you can create a much more powerful version now. P.S.: I still love to give you my full fee amount, because I honor and respect your work. I know this is hard work and it should not be for nothing. This is hard work to program these miners and like every other work it should be remunerated accordingly!