Search content
Sort by
Showing 18 of 18 results by Chosen Username
qs has no need to post with new accounts.
QS has more accounts then you have satoshis
Proof? do you think you should bring unsubstantiated claims ? I mean as a campaign manager? That is a seriously fragile position. If QS or anyone else started to spread unsubstantiated rumours about yourself to say new projects or their investors that put you in an untrustworthy light it could reflect on their project.
I mean think of it like this... If i found out a campaign manager was later demonstrated to spread unsubstantiated claims to discredit another user who was trying to post accurate facts and observable events that demonstrated untrustworthy behaviour then that campaign could by those actions be reasoned to be untrustworthy. I mean if he pokes his nose in seemingly to defend proven liars, system abusers and even sock puppet sig spammers then that does not look good at all.
Do you have some evidence of this or just spreading this kind of stuff for fun?
I am not saying if he does or does not.
Can you present your facts here please.
ch have more satoshis than exist accounts
me 2
now that theymos went against my advice of totally separating DT and Merit sources he has firmly placed DT in the hands of merit cyclers
tis is a dissapointment for me too but theymos did just dt1 exclude tman and actmyname
Re: marlboroza using ""plagiarism"" as weapon to silence critics
mods r in on it
delete my posts in MY OWN THREAD
delete 1/5 of all my post but in MY OWN THREAD proof mods r in on it
cant allow users see my rebuttal to moronbozo - was post 3
delete my posts in MY OWN THREAD
delete 1/5 of all my post but in MY OWN THREAD proof mods r in on it
cant allow users see my rebuttal to moronbozo - was post 3
marlboroza using ""plagiarism"" as weapon to silence critics
⭐ Merited by cryptohunter (2)
all start with cryptohunter not agree when one of central gang say "pre merit legends are spammers"
CH point out the fact & data of the still broken aspect & centralize merit system correctly
marlboroza have most centralized merit history & get angry when data show
marlboroza then try stop CH with fake RED TRUST but had to remove 4 fake
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086816.0
gang cant handle criticism centralize merit
one of gang make sock first to ban CH on plagarisms
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg48790244#msg48790244
& fail - source was there but still "" Merited by Lauda (2), Foxpup (1), LoyceV (1)
next marlboroza main account start digging for plagarisms again to shut down CH with 4yoa post
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg48828854#msg48828854
& fail again
keep digging
marlboroza dig posts still today try to ban CH
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086297.msg48837494#msg48837494
still fail
this dirty tactic of marlboroza shut down opinion by search ancient post 4 plagarisms
we not worry about ""plagarisms"" in 2013-2014 like now
TP & SM hide from subject in threads
I say dirty tactic used
you think good to use tactic ?
how u feel if marlboroza search all your old post 2 ban u on technical if u disagree with marlboroza ?
marlboroza try find me 2 to dig 4 plagarisms but wont expose
apology - have to hide writing type or be attack by dirty tactic
CH point out the fact & data of the still broken aspect & centralize merit system correctly
marlboroza have most centralized merit history & get angry when data show
marlboroza then try stop CH with fake RED TRUST but had to remove 4 fake
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086816.0
gang cant handle criticism centralize merit
one of gang make sock first to ban CH on plagarisms
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg48790244#msg48790244
& fail - source was there but still "" Merited by Lauda (2), Foxpup (1), LoyceV (1)
next marlboroza main account start digging for plagarisms again to shut down CH with 4yoa post
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg48828854#msg48828854
& fail again
keep digging
marlboroza dig posts still today try to ban CH
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086297.msg48837494#msg48837494
still fail
this dirty tactic of marlboroza shut down opinion by search ancient post 4 plagarisms
we not worry about ""plagarisms"" in 2013-2014 like now
TP & SM hide from subject in threads
I say dirty tactic used
you think good to use tactic ?
how u feel if marlboroza search all your old post 2 ban u on technical if u disagree with marlboroza ?
marlboroza try find me 2 to dig 4 plagarisms but wont expose
apology - have to hide writing type or be attack by dirty tactic
Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
power is working
No one responded to those posts yet. Such a waste of "power".
POW
Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Trying to insert yourself in threads on pretty much every one of your favorite topics:
CH has all the power now
ch can post anywhere now and kick you 2 out of any thread because you cant reply to him
me to i guess
ch can post anywhere now and kick you 2 out of any thread because you cant reply to him
me to i guess
power is working
Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
CH has all the power now
ch can post anywhere now and kick you 2 out of any thread because you cant reply to him
ch can post anywhere now and kick you 2 out of any thread because you cant reply to him
We can still reply to threads. We're just gonna ignore your posts in those threads. Eventually you'll get bored and slither away. The only reason you were able to crap so widely recently is because people tend to engage in discussions and can't immediately see that you only care about you. This all feigned concern about plagiarism bans etc was also just your attempt to whitewash your own copypasta.
CHs .5btc payment for plagarism thread was bad but their is a chance to make it right with hilarious's thread
i cared when their was false red trust put on ch because you couldnt handle his opinion
i cared when you try to use c/p as a weapon to ban him because you couldnt defeat his debate
because righteous
u cn think whatever conspracy about me that makes you feel better
garbled txt 2 avoid being panthered
u are on ropes hiding in corner now
ta ta
Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
I made a mistake to post in the Wall of shame thread. CH and her alt took it as a permission to troll that thread. From now on I'll reply to CH and post any other CH-related stuff only in this thread.
mistake deleting it to
makes u look foolish
foolish calling me her alt 2
From now on I'll reply to CH and post any other CH-related stuff only in this thread.
defeat
lmfao
Cryptohunter has been trolling the forum extensively as of late, and there is no reasoning or rebuttal that will get through to him. He is spreading lies and espousing a conspiracy about a "gang" that exists in his own fantasy world.
I am therefore vowing to cease replying to any of his posts and put him back on ignore permanently, because I refuse to feed a troll who is so obviously vicious, disturbed, and hungry for attention. This thread is for members who would like to take the same vow. I would encourage you to do so, because that's pretty much the only way to get the trolling to stop.
If you want to take the same vow, just write your response here--that's the sole purpose of this thread and is not one for cryptohunter or his sad little alt account to post in. Those posts will be deleted.
I am therefore vowing to cease replying to any of his posts and put him back on ignore permanently, because I refuse to feed a troll who is so obviously vicious, disturbed, and hungry for attention. This thread is for members who would like to take the same vow. I would encourage you to do so, because that's pretty much the only way to get the trolling to stop.
If you want to take the same vow, just write your response here--that's the sole purpose of this thread and is not one for cryptohunter or his sad little alt account to post in. Those posts will be deleted.
you think so much alike one would almost think you were conspiring like a gang but you are not because you said so
srry SM cant post in ur thread
can red trust him
cant ban him
can win a debate
last desperate attempt b4 defeat - run to your threads
tp cant post here
sp cant post there
get rings with those vows
?can i post in TPs safe space thread since i am not his alt
or do u mean me ??
Re: Wall of fame / shame. Shit posts so bad that they are actually funny
how it get here at all
??...........
later - nice delete but he quoted
Ok, first of all if you're not familiar with the cryptohunter debacle - lucky you, and do you have any extra room under that rock you've been hiding under?
But there is some genuinely funny albeit cringy stuff there, just don't click on those links and don't get sucked into it if you value your sanity.
But there is some genuinely funny albeit cringy stuff there, just don't click on those links and don't get sucked into it if you value your sanity.
You pulled the dragons tail and I am already massively wealthy now thanks to bitcointalk and my excellent trading skills ..and well thanks the pharmacist you did your bit...hahah I'll have a bottle of 2013 Armand de Brignac Rose on you ...thanks dude,.
thanks for proving how amazing i have been ...look at your crawling around in my history admiring me wish you were me...hahah
Just going out for a drive in my VERY expensive automobile hahah catch you bums later you broke down cowardly scum
Just going out for a drive in my VERY expensive automobile hahah catch you bums later you broke down cowardly scum
I am net positive beyond what you will ever be and am a giant of achievements compared to you all
look @ them right now searching years of posts using plagarism as a weapon trying to silence cryptohunter
first marbroza trys to stop him with fake red trust and had to remove
then one of the gangs socks thought he had him on C&P but source was in the posts the entire time https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg48790244#msg48790244
now marbroza is try again with 2014 posts during the hight of epic battle against scammers giving valuable information without ""proper"" sourcing https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg48828854#msg48828854
all because a merit argue
STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON C&P NOW
should not be applied other than cheating sigspam 4 post count
first marbroza trys to stop him with fake red trust and had to remove
then one of the gangs socks thought he had him on C&P but source was in the posts the entire time https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg48790244#msg48790244
now marbroza is try again with 2014 posts during the hight of epic battle against scammers giving valuable information without ""proper"" sourcing https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg48828854#msg48828854
all because a merit argue
THIS IS WRONG
STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON C&P NOW
should not be applied other than cheating sigspam 4 post count
Re: DT trust ABUSE by people here. Needs attention at once before goes out of hand
Scare quotes (also called shudder quotes,[1][2] sneer quotes,[3] and quibble marks) are quotation marks a writer places around a word or phrase to signal that they are using it in a non-standard, ironic, or otherwise special sense.[4] Scare quotes may indicate that the author is using someone else's term, similar to preceding a phrase with the expression "so-called";[5] they may imply skepticism or disagreement, belief that the words are misused, or that the writer intends a meaning opposite to the words enclosed in quotes..
FAIL
MAY
FAIL
not as a direct quote of something anybody said.
MAY
Re: Report plagiarism (copy/pasting) here. Calling for Mod action: please permban
Oh how the tables turn quickly. Bumping this.
Bumping your head
unfortunately better material would have to be found than this.
an unfortunate travesty
I don't see a link to the original post, but there is a link to the topic in which the original is posted. I don't think it's enough to only show show a link to the thread from which post #611 on page 31 is copied.
last link in CH post links to a post that has the original in quote
not a perfect source linkage !
better ban him right loyce ?
GOT HIM
never mind the posts are not sigspam just hurry to ban
ban
ban
ban
no ?
bones get to digging quick quick
Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Going to hav change thread title
""top 200 merit recievers problem with cryptohunter""
Gong to hav 2 change username to "Cryptohunter's Sole Sockpuppet Supporter".""top 200 merit recievers problem with cryptohunter""
. What are you doing here with your high profit sig that now you mention it I notice many gang members are wearing. This is of great interest to me too.
thyne sprekith it "chipmixer crew"
Going to hav change thread title
""top 200 merit recievers problem with cryptohunter""
Gong to hav 2 change username to "Cryptohunter's Sole Sockpuppet Supporter".""top 200 merit recievers problem with cryptohunter""
omg i shld hve chse that!!!!!
obfuscate meine Sprache oder wie ein speeddealer lol
Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
m post wus delete so is fixes it 2 b smaller
lmfao btfo
malboroza
#truth
copy/pase other than scamming a sig camp by spamming is of no concern
You dumb asses don't even realise that all of those posts have a link to the original quote at the bottom.
lmfao btfo
last I checked the only person who's left you a neg recently is Lauda
malboroza
It would not matter how many copy and pastes you found because none of those would be for any other reason than helping people or helping the community.
#truth
copy/pase other than scamming a sig camp by spamming is of no concern
Re: Let us devise a Sensible solution to Copy and Paste situation.
See whilst I beat your power hungry bullying little mind into pieces in public with observable events and corroborating evidence and raw data over and over again and reduced you to a barely functioning mess shouting out ludicrous pathetic statements like "most pre merit legneds are spammers " and " that I was an idiot for saying i believed some of the 99.93% of the users here are capable of making posts as good if not better than some of the 0.13% of users" and then you running away and refusing to go back on those statements or answer questions regarding them you were left wondering how.
Can you please contain your personal grievances in the thread created for this purpose: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086297
dont u wish
CH is wiping the floor with every bit of face you have exposed world wide
u hve meet ur accumulative matchs, show some respect
their should be a statute of limitations agreed upon for plagiarism
2 or 3 years especially if it is not related to signature spam or shitposting
if you are motivated enough to go through the many years and thousands of posts on my legendary account you can probably find some example of text copied from someplace on the net without a link or something as an excuse to ban me
it was not a major concern back then but now it is a ticking time bomb and major anxiety
all it will take is to cross the wrong person enough for them to put in the time to search it all - they will probably find something - and all of years of effort i put into this forum will be gone and i would not even be able to start again with a new account because it would be ban evasion
this is true for many good users old accounts full of years of banter
a permanent account ban is harsh enough but a complete ban from even being able to start over is ludicrous
what should i do ? spend weeks searching all my old posts in google and delete anything that matches ? what if the post has been quoted ? what about archives or waybacks ?
2 or 3 years especially if it is not related to signature spam or shitposting
if you are motivated enough to go through the many years and thousands of posts on my legendary account you can probably find some example of text copied from someplace on the net without a link or something as an excuse to ban me
it was not a major concern back then but now it is a ticking time bomb and major anxiety
all it will take is to cross the wrong person enough for them to put in the time to search it all - they will probably find something - and all of years of effort i put into this forum will be gone and i would not even be able to start again with a new account because it would be ban evasion
this is true for many good users old accounts full of years of banter
a permanent account ban is harsh enough but a complete ban from even being able to start over is ludicrous
what should i do ? spend weeks searching all my old posts in google and delete anything that matches ? what if the post has been quoted ? what about archives or waybacks ?