@Coinanalyst: Schön, dass Ihr Euch zu öffentlicher Kommunikation durchringen konntet! But why are we talking german now?
1.
First things first: CoinAnalyst is not an empty vessel and the ICO is not a scam. CoinAnalyst is also more than a project. It is a real product that is available in a beta version, can be tested (after registration) and benefits from Cogia Intelligence's proven technological expertise in its features. (Cogia has not only received the STEP Award of the FAZ, but also the TechBoost Award of the Deutsche Telekom and has numerous DAX companies as customers).
2.
The commentators seem to find a special pleasure in asking CoinAnalyst to apply the "allegedly" developed scam detector to themselves. Very funny, but like so much else also clouded by a good portion of arrogance and ignorance, especially in view of the current situation in the highly speculative crypto markets, which indeed attract rip-offs and fraudsters. Here the development of a scam detector is an absolute desideratum, and CoinAnalyst has invested a lot of resources to bring such a feature to product maturity. However, this is not possible overnight, because artificial intelligence methods have to be used (can be read in relevant studies), which require la long training. Nevertheless, a first version of the spam detector has already been implemented.
3.
Again and again, still Savedroid. All the necessary information has already been said from our side and can be read in the thread. Guys, there is no point in flogging a dead horse. If you do, you might think that you are just looking for an excuse to cultivate your resentments.
4.
We, on the other hand, take seriously the accusations regarding Nexus. Yes, Nexus works with a structural sales organisation - and something like that doesn't have a good reputation. But: our cooperation with Nexus has a precisely defined purpose. It's not about turning highly speculative tokens on people, but about winning customers and therefore users for CoinAnalyst. The tokens sold are utility tokens that are used to gain access to the application. Of course we want to make money with them, because we have already invested hundreds of thousands of euros in their development.
5.
We also take the article in the Fintelegram seriously. However, because this article contains a lot of half-truths and insinuations that stretch the boundaries of malevolence. To pick up only the most important assertions...
- Neither a soft cap nor a hard cap for the ICO of CoinAnalyst are indicated. A look at the white paper immediately disproves this. Explicitly the hard cap is here quantified with 20 Mio Euro.
- It is claimed that with the entry of Nexus the COY prices are manipulated. This is not only nonsense, but a bad assumption. Nexus customers do not buy themselves with extra bonuses and receive tokens at favourable prices in order to then drive the prices. Nexus customers receive a longer period of time to use our application as a bonus! We are not interested in market manipulation, but in expanding the customer base for CoinAnalyst.
- It is claimed that through Nexus the Telegram channel of CoinAnalyst has more than 33,000 members. This is wrong: there were already over 33,000 members when Nexus arrived.
- CoinAnalyst never advertised through the BaFin Circulars. This is forbidden - and we have always respected it.
The article concludes that "the project is coming to market too late". The ICO hype is over, many "Shit Coins" and "Dead Coins" are disappearing from the market, a regulation of the crypto exchanges is to be expected. Thus the attractiveness of the CoinAnalyst ICO is kept within narrow limits; to speak of a "mega opportunity" here is a "misleading of potential investors".
What the author does not seem to have understood is that the CoinAnalyst application can and will play out its potential precisely in this situation (which is described quite correctly). Since the crypto markets are so volatile and insecure, it is more important than ever to create transparency through the use of suitable tools. The project cannot come to the market too late, as long as the market is as turbulent as it is now. It is certainly the case that in the current situation ICOs are confronted with serious problems. But this is no argument against the usefulness of an application like CoinAnalyst!