I've been on read-only mode for this thread since yesterday and actually wanted to pass for this case but, uhh... OP, would you perhaps consider to exercise some patience? It's barely 12 hours from your change of decision from contacting 3rd party mediator to a proposed alternate resolution, where you gave them 7 days [that's just two posts above mine], so... perhaps wait a little, they're still within the timeframe you gave them yourself. Not to mention that consecutive posts is highly frowned by the mods of the forum.

Coingambling has reported to a moderator here at bitcointalk that I'm lying about him in calling him a Professional Gambler. Here are his words:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5169089.msg61883270#msg61883270

If you would like to consult a 3rd party mediator, please let us know now, and we will communicate with the mediator only, going forward.  Everything that we have said prior about you getting the deposit back, as long as there are not multiple accounts will be null and void. We do not lose mediation, as we do not suspend an account without clear evidence of abuse. You will be subject to withholding of the entire balance, going forward. You get 1 mediator, so pick a good one! Please let us know what you have decided, as once our resolution is complete, the matter will be closed.

I see 3 other accusations on the first 6 pages. The first was resolved promptly, according to the player. The 2nd and 3rd were provable multi-accounting violations, 1 which was decided in our favor by a 3rd party mediator and 1 which the player didn't bother to follow up, as he knew he was guilty. If you want people to trust you, stop lying to them. No one has confiscated any money from you, as of right now. We have stated that you are in violation of terms and that we are reviewing the severity prior to resolving. I can tell you that with certainly, we are well within our rights to confiscate your entire balance, per the terms of service you agreed to upon signup. However, as we have stated, that is only done in the case of a previous violation. If this is your first offense, we hope that we have shown you that it is not worth returning, as your little bot scam doesn't work on us.

Regarding our relationship with this community, you are wrong again. Unlike you, we are daily participants here, and as was shown above, we are one of the oldest and most trusted books on the forum.

Regarding our relationship with SBR, you are wrong once again. When they offered mediation on offshore books, we were in compliance with 100% of their decisions. Only one of their decisions went against us and it was because although were were able to prove that the player was in the wrong, SBR does not support confiscating the entire balance. They asked that we instead confiscate the winnings, which we agreed to. This is why he told you to take the deposit and run. He doesn't agree with our TOS, that we can confiscate the entire balance, however that rule is rarely used, only in cases where cheaters, like yourself, feel the need to keep coming back.

I was in contact with Betcoin. Nothing has been confiscated. As I said in your thread, your case is still under review. As I also said in your thread, all rating guides here at BCT have Betcoin #1 or #2. That’s a strong book. It’s not just my opinion. Post number 2 here under other resources shows other guides. I’ve just been made aware of this and this seems reasonable.

Edit - I just read your thread so made an edit. One question, do you use a VPN?

In the history of BitcoinTalk scam accusations, no one has ever said "show me the evidence" and then been shown the evidence and admitted fault. Oddly enough, they just use the evidence to find new ways to claim they are not guilty! We don't provide cheaters with the information they need to find new ways to cheat. We have not spent many years and many hundreds of thousands of dollars developing this system so that we can bust it out for the first cheater who says "show me the evidence". We have thousands of people each month who are winning far more than you have, who don't have an issue. We have an exceptional relationship with SBR and an exceptional relationship with the BitcoinTalk community. You are the outlier. Learn from this, because if you keep trying to exploit bitcoin sportsbooks, it will happen every time. We will contact you within 7 business days with a resolution.

Coingambling, thanks for bringing this to the attention of the thread. Betcoin says that it's just under review at this point. No decision has been made. I wouldn't worry too much. Betcoin is a strong book.

If you don't want to be in positions like this, stop cheating sportsbooks. That part is confirmed.

In the meantime, our reputation as one of the most trusted bitcoin sportsbooks speaks for itself

A very old casino will jus take a small amount is not worth it for them. It doesn't make sense for Betcoin.ag  had been around since the price of our coins are less than 10% of its current price.

But casino accusing you of violating their basic TOS will always come down to consequences when it look like you win and run. You violate a gambler's etiquette.

TOS violation is still a violation.

Players can rest assured that we are still in full compliance with the regulations of Curacao. Once the new Betcoin is fully released, we will have an operable validation link, live at new.Betcoin.ag. In the meantime, our reputation as one of the most trusted bitcoin sportsbooks speaks for itself.

This player must be unaware of our reputation, however, because by threatening to go to BitcoinTalk, SBR and arbusers, he was clearly unaware that it is well known that Betcoin is a book that takes a hard stance against bets, which are decided upon and placed by a computer. This has been established multiple times on this and every forum. Fortunately for the industry, many other books are now coming together and sharing tips and technology to detect this same type of behavior. Unfortunately for this player, his remaining time being allowed to do this will be short-lived. None of the other reputable bitcoin sportsbooks on this forum will permit him or players like him.

Regarding this being a "scam accusation", the player needs to review the definition of scam. We did not set out to take his funds. It was not our intention to operate for 10 years just to take his 0.1 BTC in earnings, all the while paying out much more than that, countless times per day. We did not intend to have to spend the next week going through his data, trying to see if he has had previous abusive accounts. We wish we did not have to do this at all. But that's where we are and we have informed the player that a resolution is coming within the next 7 business days. If this is a 1st offense, we can certainly treat it as such, however in these cases, we have to do a full investigation or else previously banned players would have no reason to keep creating new accounts.

As always, players who don't need a robot to tell them who to bet on are welcome to play! Check out the early stages of the new Betcoin at new.betcoin.ag. Thanks and best of luck to all.

Make sense, the curacao gaming license seal with unique link should be in  the website footer. So betcoin.ag is operating without a license then?

Can you share a screenshot or a link about this, just curious.

I wonder what it is, usually casinos just use a general term when it comes to reasoning when their "alleged" user uses a banned service, trick, anything that is against them. When in the very first place they can detect it to warn the users first and banned them, but no, they will wait until the alleged user will withdraw, give their personal info as they required then totally banned them. They don't just get the money but their personal information as well

I'm not trying to defend betcoin.ag and I've nothing to do with them but, unfortunately, it seems like some people are trying to get advantage of the freedom of peach this forum is offering to attack their competitors. I hope this is not the case here.

OP, please provide some proofs to back up your claims, otherwise no one is going to believe you giving that those Accusations ate coming from a newbie account with no reputation.