Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 67 results by DarkMatter
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Topic OP
Bitcoin Core 0.10.2.0 x64 on Win 8.1 crashing
by
DarkMatter
on 02/07/2015, 12:48:44 UTC
...
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested
by
DarkMatter
on 06/11/2013, 20:08:13 UTC
I smell a 13 hour + round blurgh

20751    2013-11-06 18:45:28    7:48:00
Not bad, not bad  Lips sealed
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested
by
DarkMatter
on 06/11/2013, 15:28:33 UTC
Slush pool page is down??

+1
Mining is working as expected.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested
by
DarkMatter
on 29/10/2013, 19:14:29 UTC
Our luck is going down the drain  Cry
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested
by
DarkMatter
on 25/10/2013, 19:38:27 UTC
I've been offline now for 3 hours+
Failover to eclipse for now.

I had the same issue, but now my miners are working correctly.
I had to restart bfgminer a few times, because the pool was timing out.
3rd try, it worked and I've been connected since.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested
by
DarkMatter
on 16/10/2013, 17:42:21 UTC
Approx. cluster performance (30 min average):   173333.022 Ghash/s
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested
by
DarkMatter
on 14/10/2013, 06:28:40 UTC
I'm making progress here. Do I need two separate copies of BFGMiner on the hard drive to run 2 instances? What happens to config file if I run 2 instances from one copy?

You definitely need 2 separate copies in different folders.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested
by
DarkMatter
on 13/10/2013, 09:14:48 UTC
Just to make you all feel a little bit better:

Next Projected difficulty: 275,075,241

+45.3%

+85,793,992

Quite amazing.


Oh God, please...
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested
by
DarkMatter
on 11/10/2013, 21:27:16 UTC
Suddenly all of my workers are reported as disconnected on the website, but bfgminer is happily hashing.
What's going on?
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested
by
DarkMatter
on 11/10/2013, 10:59:44 UTC
'e-hug', and  'e-cuddle', accepted.

Initiating 'e-cuddle 2.013 protocol'

<10> go to 20 if < Ü, else go to 30
<20> if hump is > than Ü, go to 40, else go to 10
<30> square root an apple pie 'like the movie' , initiate 'new-wave' protocol, go to 40
<40> initiate command 'sexy party'

Remembers me of the good old Basic on C64
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested
by
DarkMatter
on 11/10/2013, 10:28:38 UTC
just curious, is anyone else having payout issues at the moment?

I've been over my min limit for awhile now (almost double it now), everything from the set default payout has been confirmed for awhile.

My quotes are low, but no 0 rewards.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested
by
DarkMatter
on 09/10/2013, 19:33:25 UTC
10h10m im butthurt

No blocks found, makes me frown.   Cry

11:03:22 and counting...
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [100 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested
by
DarkMatter
on 08/10/2013, 18:41:32 UTC
I guess it's the KNC miners coming online. Most of them will leave as soon as they notice that the current round is 5+ hours (so far).


Shhhhhhhhhhhh...!
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [120 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested
by
DarkMatter
on 08/10/2013, 17:54:11 UTC
Well that's one way of looking at it - that Slush is forcing the increase with the updates Smiley
I thing that he is waiting for some stable value to list, but with the constant increase in power it immediately becomes 'the minimum' instead of average, so maybe he should change it to 100+TH

EDIT: WOW THAT WAS FAST!
 He changed it while i was typing, but my suggestion for 120+ is still valid (we are at 123Th now Smiley )

Nope, it was me changing reply title Tongue
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [120 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested
by
DarkMatter
on 08/10/2013, 17:36:10 UTC
Did someone else noticed that every time the thread title is updated to reflect the total speed, it jumps up quite a lot, just a bit after that.
It was updated to 100TH and in few hours went to 120TH after a stable week of 90-100

Well, time to update the title Smiley
SLUSH!!!
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [65000 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested
by
DarkMatter
on 07/10/2013, 17:15:35 UTC
Wow, hashing power keeps increasing.  My cut keeps decreasing. 

Exciting and sad at the same time, isn't it?

Exciting because the project goes on, media talk about it and even with the latest value drop after SR busting everything seems going fine.
Sad because my hashrate is everyday less significant Sad
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [65000 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested
by
DarkMatter
on 07/10/2013, 14:32:47 UTC
Wow, hashing power keeps increasing.  My cut keeps decreasing. 

Exciting and sad at the same time, isn't it?
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [65000 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested
by
DarkMatter
on 07/10/2013, 09:51:45 UTC
Aaaaaaaaaand we're back!
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [65000 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested
by
DarkMatter
on 01/10/2013, 09:39:06 UTC
Still offline ATM
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [65000 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested
by
DarkMatter
on 28/09/2013, 19:25:25 UTC
Sacrifice done.

Cross your fingers