Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 58 results by Darkbot
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
by
Darkbot
on 14/03/2018, 04:56:23 UTC
No. I sold a lot of my Bitcoin Segwit, buying Bitcoin Cash with it. I did not 'switch over' in any absolutist sense. I still believe that Bitcoin Cash has the proper roadmap for the future, but I am hedged.

LAWL R.I.P B-CASH NAB
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
by
Darkbot
on 15/02/2018, 15:33:15 UTC
Yep. I simply do not agree that Bitcoin Cash is centralized any more than Bitcoin Segwit in any meaningful way. I realize that there is an oft-repeated narrative that Ver and Wu have made every significant decision in regards to Bitcoin Cash, but this view is utterly ignorant bullshit. And if all y'all would venture outside of this echo chamber of a walled garden, you'd likely realize that latter point as being the truth of the matter

--R.I.P Bcash Shill Jbreher--
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
by
Darkbot
on 17/10/2017, 12:13:01 UTC
bch +30% and bitcoin is dipping. looks like shitcoin supporters are pushing it.
Ver is once again pushing it with lies and bullshit.

Plus, it bottomed and Bitcoin Core is heading for another fork which might may or may not make Luke-Jr and Gmax shitcoin generals and Lauda its Comical Ali.

Funny story, Gmax is a chain of sportswear shops in Scandinavia.

http://www.storostorsenter.no/globalassets/fellesgemensamt---webolavthon.no/-butikklogos/g/g-max-logo.svg

Edit: They're also a bit outdated. I bought some socks there, brand was Frank Shorter. The music they played in the roof speakers was Culture Club.

F.U.D.

R.I.P. r/btc troll Fatman
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: I don't see why big blocks are a problem, even 10 MB blocks right now aren't.
by
Darkbot
on 17/07/2017, 14:25:34 UTC
Ahh.. look at all those BU noobs like Jbreher, Hv and above all the biggest copy/paste noob+BU troll   ****rolling drums****   paid shill Franky1.

The raw low intellect from those shills are unbelievable.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Please run a full node
by
Darkbot
on 15/05/2017, 14:10:52 UTC
Well, I'm a big blocker too and think Blockstream/Core is 100% wrong.  Most of the time Franky posts good things, although, I also can't understand Franky's thinking in this thread.

R.I.P BU Noob Jonald Fyookball. Why are you still doing here, why dont you move youre ass back to r/btc? You love sitting in Rogers ass even when he farts you keep smiling.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Why Bitcoin Core Developers won't compromise
by
Darkbot
on 15/05/2017, 02:32:41 UTC
Core refusing to provide bigger blocks IS the problem.

R.I.P BU Troll Jonald Fyookball
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Gavin Andresen: stay away from Blockstream, Greg and Samson are toxic trolls.
by
Darkbot
on 04/05/2017, 12:11:55 UTC
FUD Thread from Kiklo. = Lambie. Lambie's 9384673764th troll account. She's trolling only to try to get cheaper coins.

Followed by BU troll Rawdog.

Followed by R.I.P BU troll Jonald Fyookball

Followed by copy/paste noob and paid shill Franky1.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Fuck: SegWit, LN, Blockstream, Core, Adam Back, and GMazwell
by
Darkbot
on 01/05/2017, 01:58:45 UTC
Well to me you just sound like an apologist for core-created stagnation. 

I'll continue to ring the alarm bells because the fundamentals of Bitcoin house are indeed burning down.



BU shill Jonald thinks 95% off all segwit people dont understand what segwit+LN is...

This BU troll went full retarted!

R.I.P

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/68hkk5/former_core_fanboy_admits_95_of_core_loyalists/
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: /r/btc loons already twisting Antbleed facts to meet their agenda
by
Darkbot
on 28/04/2017, 12:05:38 UTC
No one in their right mind would be on Bitcointalk that many hours a day, saying the same shit over and over again without it being a job.
 

what you dont realise is that i and many others dont need to be paid.

i hold bitcoin from the earlier times.
i am not expressing my opinion to earn an income. i am doing it because i care about my hoard and future. i dont even look at the bitcoin price because even that is just temporary drama to me. i care about the long term viability of the bitcoin network as a diverse decentralised peer network, not a cludgy cesspit with a blockstream dominant tier network

my rationale about antbleed is that their firmware check server doesnt respond, and for months has not been used for anything malicious. and most pools are behind firewalls anyway. if pools were to become malicious all they would be doing is hurting themselves. directly and indirectly

secondly my rationale is that for months nothing has happened but now that segwit supporters are getting very desperate to find excuses to kill off pools to fake a 95% activationof the cludgy tier network, by purely rejecting blocks based on version number.. is a bigger threat because that is more likely to happen than all the if's and maybe's of antpool shooting themselves in their own foot using antbleed

thirdly i will emphasis the last point. shouting out a sudden 'pools are bad because they 'could' shutdown some pools, so segwit/uasf 'must' shut down some pools is hypocrisy in its finest. thats like saying there could be a nuclear war, so america must start a nuclear war.
come on think logically about the mindset of some people "omg X could kill 30% so we must kill 70%" rathre than actually listening to the 70%
its even funny that things have got so desparate that some are saying that 70% are all one man.. (illogical facepalm)

lastly. if segwit supporters want to go down the kill 70% route(which is not 1 person by th way).. this can only be done via a node consensus. then atleast use that opportunity to actually recode segwit as a 1 merkle version where there is just a single block parameter of 4mb that both native and segwit can sit in and include other features the community want and can unite everyone

not simply push out another version that has one small temporary purpose just to allow in something else that only has temporal positive features "at best" but a bigger negative, more long term issues it can and will cause.

now try to reply about my context above without just screaming any thing that amounts to 'typical shill response' or 'wrong because cant find reason but your a shill'  because thats just a whistle in the wind response. P.S dont reply about me presuming your just going to scream something about shilling like your playing the victim card. again whistles in the wind.
reply about the context of the black writing not this grey writing


Why oh why i never see Franky1 in the Development & Technical Discussion section if you know so much about this topic? You're just a fake copy/paste noob try to troll people who doesn't know much about it.

Gmaxx is active there so you can have youre debat with him...Oh no you aint got the balls for it right? It's much easier to troll!

Paid shill Franky1!

Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Antbleed: A remote shutdown backdoor in antminers
by
Darkbot
on 27/04/2017, 14:35:45 UTC
https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fib2xnNn.png&t=576&c=OC-lDjgqk4tzvA

Lmao. This pretty much invalidates anything jonald the troll says from now on. The blocksize obsessed trolls/paid shills can't see beyond what number the blocksize has.
A guy has a mining monopoly capable of killing the network? Who cares, just raise the blocksize!!
Those trolls should be banned.

+1

Here we have it R.I.P BU Troll Jonald Fyookball and paid shill Franky1.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Blockstream/Core lost. It is only a matter of time now.
by
Darkbot
on 27/04/2017, 14:32:36 UTC
I was wondering if the Antbleed news would finally cause BU/Bitmain defenders to admit they have been wrong, or if they would go full bore insane. Guess I have my answer. Defending an exploit that could be used to wipe out much of the network is stark raving insane, as is the notion that exposing it somehow helps the clowns who perpetrated the exploit.

bitmain having a switch in its own server, that only affects only its own equipment, which will cause its customers to request refunds.
hmm

oh and also if they wanted it as a weapon they would have pulled the trigger already

however
this last month has all been about blockstream flock trying to find any bug in anything not blockstream advocated.. but not willing to listen when code made by blockstream has flaws

Bla bla bla bla like ussual from paid shill Franky1.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Yep.. BU absolutely definitely possibly maybe ready for prime time..
by
Darkbot
on 25/04/2017, 15:11:08 UTC
and if you are like that how is possible to support scammer guys like Roger Ver or miners like Jihan Wu. This guys only want to form a cartel and to control bitcoin.

your reading reddit stories

1. im for dynamic blocks so that we as a community dont need to beg to devs for them to spoon feed us new block sizes.
meaning users get to change settings themselves at runtime.
meaning no dev control.

do you understand diverse decentralisation.

2. you think the debate is about ver+wu vs blockstream.. no its blockstream dictatorship vs many many implementations and pools saying no. but the redit crowd are just pointing the finger at one direction to try distracting people from looking deeper at blockstream as the culprits
.. remember if you are thinking "but pools shouldnt dictate the rules".. guess what they dont.. only in the blockstream(core) case blockstream BYPASSED node consensus.. .. the pools didnt do anything.. so dont blame pools. (which there are 20+ of no just 1)

3. other implementations are just plodding along waiting for full node and pool (proper symbiotic full network consensus) without threats or violence. without deadlines or deceipt.


dynamic blocks as Bu propose give a huge power to miners and the opportunity to them to form a cartel and a kind of Opec for fees in bitcoin. Dont expect anyone to agree so easy in this crap. Miners is here to serve the network and not to govern it.
And why you has this psycho with blockstream? this blockstream developers has maintaine the network an always propose tech solutions to bitcoin and for sure not harm it.
Can i ask you what Roger Ver has done for bitcoin network all of this years?
My answer is MTgox and this community split and division.
Can i ask you what Jihan Wu have done for bitcoin network?
My answer is only to form a cartel and break decentralisation.
If we want bitcoin to be the future payment free payment system then this will not happen with nodes that runs through big datacenters and with a mining cartel that can change consensus rules whenever they want.


Do NOT listen to this paid shill Franky1. This guy has been rejected, he is the black sheep ore the ugly duck.
Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: Bitcoin obstructionists
by
Darkbot
on 21/04/2017, 19:12:31 UTC
I am going to keep track of those that I personally feel are
trolling, shilling, fudding, and hurting the discussion of
Bitcoin here.

If you can recommend someone who belongs in the hall
of shame, post their username and a link to a reference.

This is a self moderated thread and I will delete any posts
that are trolling, shilling, fudding, and probably put you on
the list as well if you do that.


Here we have it R.I.P Jonald fyookball, one of the biggest trolls/shills here and on /btc.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Segregated Witness vs Bitcoin Unlimited vs Do Nothing
by
Darkbot
on 20/04/2017, 12:41:43 UTC
i laugh at that statement
along with 'core are the best team'

if everything is perfect and core are the best team.. then there is no need for segwit, there would be no debate
because there are no problems and bitcoin is already in utopia.. right (sarcasm)

oh an the other laugh
core are independent..

after all if independent then when devs do something independently they why would they be subject to REKT campaigns. or fear peer reviewing and helping out independently of other implementations.

the only way they can end up helping is by pretending to attack by publicising the issues of other peer implementations. that way they wont get pigeon holed into other implementations be acting like they are attacking it. when realy they are saying something needs to be fixed at line x,y,z

even gmax is keping his head low by hiring samson mow to be the face of UASF so that gmax doesnt get the face smack talk about Uasf issues and thrown the BIP's moderation over to luke JR and trying to make it look lik achow is the cencorship master of the tech discussion of this forum.. although the puppet strings are visible

How much does Roger pays you for each FUD post you make? $1 $10? If you know so much about it why dont you share youre opinion on GitHub? You wont do that because youre troll ass will be destroyed over there.

I know you have been rejected Franky1, youre pessimism is not a way to excuse youre self.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Fuck: SegWit, LN, Blockstream, Core, Adam Back, and GMazwell
by
Darkbot
on 19/04/2017, 14:03:40 UTC
https://medium.com/@ViaBTC/why-we-dont-support-segwit-91d44475cc18

Quote
Second-tier networks such as Lightning Network (which relies on SegWit) cannot be considered as a block scaling solution. LN transactions are NOT equal to Bitcoin’s peer-to-peer on-chain transactions and most Bitcoin use scenarios are not applicable with Lightning Network. LN will also lead to big payment “centers”, and this is against Bitcoin’s initial design as a peer-to-peer payment system. It can be a good method though for frequent and small Bitcoin transactions in certain cases. But we cannot rely on it as a cure for Bitcoin scaling.

Noob Jonald Fyookball, he still doesn't understand that Bitcoin cannot go mainstream with only bigger blocks.

FUD article.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Segregated Witness vs Bitcoin Unlimited vs Do Nothing
by
Darkbot
on 19/04/2017, 13:11:44 UTC
classic, xt, bcoin, bitcoinec, bu and other diverse nodes do not want to "take over" (only blockstream(core) want a take over)
blockstream have offered and demanded a few times for anything not core to split away, but that was not taken up because the community does not want a civil war but a real consensus choice of something the whole community can unite around.

hence no deadline, hence to threats, hence no hardware bombs.

blockstream are the ones that bypassed node consensus.
blockstream are the ones that gave only pools the vote.

but blockstream are not getting the pool vote they were hoping for. so now blockstream are looking for blaming everyone. rather than listening to everyone and programming something that the community want..

all of you blockstreamists are forgetting one small thing.

blockstream can code things differently to a way the whole community would be happy.
but no.. its a blockstream short cut or kill every opposer in the community and blame the opposers

Here we go again from troll, noob and paid shill Franky1. As usual bla bla bla bla bla bla bla BULLSHIT!

Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: Is franky1 a shill?
by
Darkbot
on 18/04/2017, 01:56:58 UTC
Frankly1 is the biggest paid shill here and Jonald is just a 15 years old noob crying for his lolypop.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Inside-the-Dragons-Den-Bitcoin-Cores-Troll-Army
by
Darkbot
on 08/04/2017, 14:50:01 UTC
Kiklo = Lambie in disguise, trolling for cheaper coin.

Jonald_fyookball is just a noob crying for his lolypop.

Franky1 is the total package; troll/noob and paid shill.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: ASICBOOST Aftermath: What Now Must Be Done?
by
Darkbot
on 07/04/2017, 01:55:35 UTC
im much more informed and actually able to add content to a topic
your just mad that i am frank about how i say it..

yep im frank, the biggest noob, troll and ***rolling-drums*** the ultimate paid shill at Bitcointalk!


Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Greg Maxwell on Scaling in 2011 (what a difference $71M makes)
by
Darkbot
on 04/04/2017, 02:33:45 UTC
Very interesting to see

-large full nodes not catastrophic for decentralization
-will be a long time before 'visa scale' needed
-can see a world where offchain freely competes with onchain

https://web.archive.org/web/20140328052630/https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Talk:Scalability

Pretty different stance than the rhetoric of today.  Gee, I wonder why...

Why cant people's opinions change over time?

You're really trying to sell me the idea that this is totally unrelated...and that the other Blockstream paid devs is unrelated. ok.
 
Quote
Why choose risky methods like a hardfork when a soft fork gets the job done?

A HF isn't risky if the community is behind it.  This is the lie that Core told everyone
to stall the scaling...and it worked.


Jonald Fyookball, you sound like a real noob/troll and paid shill just like Franky1.