How big must ego of an ordinary member of this forum to not take into account opinions of such huge organizations as entire football leagues?
This casino is one of the biggest in the world.
Do you really think your opinion means anything?
Wake up kids

If an intelligent person wants to check the history of these people's statements, I am sure that they will quickly understand that they only speak "on topic" without using any arguments, and not even paying attention to the arguments that appear in the conversations.
Please don't support these morons, even if you think they're "doing something good" for the community. These are the morons who write around that 1xbit is bad based solely on unconfirmed sources. They make fun of the number of comments and that is their only goal, because they have no arguments.
I can understand all the arguments but their only argument is that 1xbit is a bad casino. And that's all. Feel free to exchange specific examples and arguments.
Ps, I'm sure that no one will be able to do it - it will start again saying that a lot of bad opinions and if there are a lot of bad opinions, it's definitely bad.. no arguments. funny )))

That's true! I didn't like it either. However, as far as I know, 1xbit recently changed person responsible for running signature campaign, so let's hope it will be different from now on.

Man! What loyalty are you talking about? Most users of this forum change campaigns every few weeks at most
When there is a campaign that pays better, everyone just tries to get to it.

You are in Sinbad campaign not even 2 weeks


1xbit signature campaign last 2 years, so stop talking about loyalty you hypocrite!

---

It's not hard to get the information you need to get a bigger picture of what 1xbit's project is:

https://www.similarweb.com/website/1xbit.com/#overview

and these are results from only one domain



now multiply it by 15

Now sit down and think - with these numbers, is one complaint per week a lot? (in addition, from a newbie with no evidence)
Because in a shop on my street, the seller has more complaints a week.
But it takes a little more developed logic to understand it, so don't worry if you don't get it.

If you did research, you wouldn't write nonsense, but you would see that the signature campaign thread is locked.
If you did any research you would also notice that after my post spreadsheet was updated.

---

Thank you @1xbit_official for update of week 81.
There is missing week 80 and info about continuation of campaign.

Just to make it clear, it's not an account trader because he simply doesn't have any accounts. This is just a scammer:

SCAM

His method is:

He informs that escrow on Bitcointalk is risky because after some time after the transaction, escrow (or his forum fellow) can still give red trust.

He proposes that if you first send 50% he will send the login details and later you can send the rest.

I go for Full Member for $50 - so I sent $25 and the scammer disappeared.

His wallet: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/addresses/btc/1N3nww3xE8L17sDnrcumfcA5fhEUS24iLP

Transaction confirmation for $25 that I send to him: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/ce4fe5b4d9b6234136543e8283f8729097e775532c3c96daf543ce41e2b6a0b9


If there is an honest account seller who will go first (for obvious reasons, I will no longer go first) or with trusted escrow, I invite you to cooperate.

I am open to cooperation. Suggest some escrow in PM. I guarantee that if the transaction goes through, I will confirm it in your thread.

I suppose that it is about escrow from Bitcointalk forum.  Just provide username of escrow you recommend.

Which forum escrow do you suggest?

Hi, I am interested in a transaction using escrow. Let me know what escrow you offer.

Yes, I was trading accounts.


No, if I want join 1xbit campaign I will use red trust accounts, not clean.


It is bounty for finding two accounts of this same person in their campaign.

What do you think this has to do with promoting 1xbit?

Guys! Read the topic: "@JollyGood is a liar and trust system abuser."

I never promoted 1xbit or even intended to do it.

His accusation is a lie and an abuse of trust system.

What to prove     Read my posts history, how could I ever apply for this campaign or promote 1xbit at all  

Maybe in this way JollyGood lier will answer to my question:

@JollyGood is a liar and trust system abuser.

@JollyGood is a liar and trust system abuser. This user gave me a negative trust for no reason:



Reference - lead to a thread where there is not a word about me.

He didn't react even after I (aggressively) brought his attention to it.


One more time after he ignored me:


Later he called me "sock-puppet" and "paid shill", again for no reason:


I have never promoted 1xBit or intended to do so. On the contrary, I have repeatedly criticized the work of the manager of their signature campaign. (there are a lot of posts on this subject in my history, so I won't quote them all here)

It's obvious that for some reason @JollyGood is ignoring me and wanting to spoil my opinion.

This means that he has some hidden purposes, or he is wrong, but despite the fact that he is aware of that, anyway he is giving out a negative trust for no reason.

I would like to draw the attention of other DT members to the fact that the actions of this user are destructive to the meaning of the trust system.

If he does not improve his behavior and appologise me in public, this person should not be allowed to give a red trust to other users.

Can you explain how it came to your sick head that I have ever promoted 1xbit?

Hey idiot!

You gave me red trust for promoting 1xbit, but where do you see i'm doing anything like that?

I think you have some mental problems, don't you?