I should have got 0.01 BTC today but got 0.0062, don't know what that is all about. Well, strange, moving on to the next pool.

There aren't enough uptodate scrypt coins on the switcher. Please add a link to this thread on your "about" page. Consider going with a fee of 1.5% instead to give your pool some kind of incentive to mine there. At the moment coinshift is doing substantially worse than clevermining.

Also show the profitability calculations of how coins are being selected. eg. Something like coin profitability vs LTC like your example under "about".

Oh, I knew what I was doing by cranking my miners the way I did - but as I said, I have discovered many blocks for WafflePool, and a rare few were orphans.
Ya... I still think that was one of the best parts about wafflepool - haha.
Indeed.

--

I am getting around 2.5% average reject rate now after re-tuning for the new reject profile.

Looks like the new stratum server is costing me overall about 2% in decreased hashrate, and 2% additional rejects (very short sample period so far, mind you)

Guess this was the point of these changes.  Not overly pleased myself.

Terk!

What is the deal...?!

on the Homepage right up top  I read 2% fee in big black letters.  


But reading through the FAQ I read : "All numbers are after fee, so they are your actual earnings. Our fee is progressive and depends on how good we perform in a given day. On good days we take a bit higher fee but on bad days we take very little fee. This ensures that your profits aren't hit that much on a bad day. Our fee during bad days is as low as 1%."

Listen, I am not complaining about the fees.  I am quite a happy camper here.  I just think if there is one thing that should be clear...it should be the fees.

Edit to add:

I dont mind getting wet, but dont piss on my leg and tell me it is raining.

lol, nice1 mate  

What i meant was that middlecoin came back to the top of the list with 0.008328 per mh/s

I have 3 computers on the new east server. 1 of them is getting the Rejected untracked stratum share messages, and the other 2 are not. I know they don't affect anything, but on the west server all 3 were getting that message.

The 1 getting the message has all 280X's. The 2 not getting the message are 1 of all 270X's, and one of a mix of both. Maybe that will give you a clue to track down the issue. Perhaps it has something to do with hash rates.

Payouts more regular, access to BTC sooner.

A feature of Clevermining has been removed because people can't do maths?

Hi, i live in new zealand and i was wondering if it would be better to connect to the asian vs u.s. servers

O my! Are there still people mining here?!

Now, why would the efficiency ever be below 100% of LTC, why not mine LTC if it's more profitable?

It's a two ended stick with you-know-what on both ends. Channeling that much power without breaking something is hard if not impossible.

The only thing he needs to improve is communication - and a bit more manual trades like in the old days, alright. That's thousands of people and you can't make them all happy but a few tweets a day would go a long way.

All of them multipools have their own kind of problems at the moment. Just a brief experience of a few days on each shows that:

Wafflepool doesn't know what to mine with all that power right now without forking an actually profitable coin. They mined WorldCoin almost all day long. It goes like this: WDC-DOGE-LTC-WDC-WDC-WDC-LTC....

CleverMining has still absurd amounts of rejected shares issue and yes, this actually affects your earnings. Duh!

HashCows guys seem to be working personally on the background but their problem is the website interface. Lacking the simplest of the stats even some 20Mh/s pool is able to offer. If they can keep up the manual trading and get some technical help for the site maybe, they'd be #1 in no time.

Been mining for about 2 weeks now and am totally impressed.  about a day ago though hash rate displayed seems to be way off from CGminer.  as you can see, my reject percentage shouldn't account for a 400kh/s difference between the chart on the site and my WU.  in the bottom graph showing -10, -20,-30, etc it's showing hashrate above 1.7.  is there a bug in that chart or am i really only getting credit for 1.2? did something change in the last few days?

http://i.imgur.com/Wt6Tl3m.png

The other stuff yeah, but why EU servers be damnes? Us in EU dont deserve a low latency server?

hashco had a btc/Mh/s spike, possible longterm unexchanged being delivered? But now the btc/Mh/s has went back where it used to be.
[Suspicious link removed]/en/stats[/url]
Would like to see that kind of longterm detailed stats for clevermining too. Trek, is ith hard to modify your graphs timespan?

d@mn how you add url in post here?

Yep read that also this morning.
Poolpicker.eu is not so accurate

actually this is not what hashcows users say on their bitcointalk thread...

my GPU rig cannot seem to handle a set difficulty of 512. on other pools at 128 or 256 it runs fine on all 4 cards, but at 512 GPU 2 is declared sick in less than 30 seconds

any ideas? its a sapphire R9 270x