Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 307 results by Divinity666
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: SRBMiner-MULTI AMD & NVIDIA & INTEL & CPU miner
by
Divinity666
on 24/02/2024, 10:59:37 UTC
Hey guys! Does anybody knows what additional settings to use with 6800XTs for optimal performance? Thanks!
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: miniZ v2.1c Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 Beam ProgPoW Ethash CFX KASPA
by
Divinity666
on 01/08/2023, 17:54:55 UTC
No its core voltage in my case. But whatever the cause the problem still remains - miner not gonna restart like on nvidia cards...
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: miniZ v2.1c Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 Beam ProgPoW Ethash CFX KASPA
by
Divinity666
on 01/08/2023, 05:44:23 UTC
On AMD card miner won't restart or shut down if card crashes, it will continue to work and produce invalid shares:

Quote
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=  4.81 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 31.47k
[ 0d 9h45m00s|05:47:17] S: 80/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT  100% [52 C/44%]*36.91 I/s 74.21(73.53)Sol/s 110(112.1)W clk=1864MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.656 (96.1%) (3.9%)
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=  5.43 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 35.33k
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=  5.05 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 35.33k
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=  4.65 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 35.17k
[ 0d 9h50m00s|05:52:17] S: 83/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT  100% [52 C/44%]*36.91 I/s 73.28(73.53)Sol/s 110(112.1)W clk=1859MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.656 (96.2%) (3.8%)
[ 0d 9h55m00s|05:57:17] S: 83/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT  100% [52 C/44%] 36.91 I/s 73.26(73.52)Sol/s 110(112.1)W clk=1865MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.656 (96.2%) (3.8%)
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 10.32 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 36.17k
[ 0d10h 0m00s|06:02:17] S: 84/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT  100% [52 C/44%]*36.90 I/s 73.56(73.52)Sol/s 112(112.0)W clk=1841MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.656 (96.3%) (3.7%)
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=  4.24 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 36.53k
[ 0d10h 5m00s|06:07:17] S: 85/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT  100% [52 C/44%]*36.91 I/s 72.81(73.54)Sol/s 110(112.0)W clk=1859MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.656 (96.3%) (3.7%)
[ 0d10h10m00s|06:12:17] S: 85/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT  100% [52 C/44%] 36.90 I/s 73.58(73.54)Sol/s 110(112.0)W clk=1864MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.657 (96.3%) (3.7%)
[ 0d10h15m00s|06:17:17] S: 85/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT  100% [51 C/44%] 36.90 I/s 73.82(73.55)Sol/s 112(112.0)W clk=1853MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.657 (96.4%) (3.6%)
[ 0d10h20m00s|06:22:17] S: 85/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT  100% [51 C/44%] 36.90 I/s 73.97(73.57)Sol/s 110(112.0)W clk=1858MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.657 (96.4%) (3.6%)
[ 0d10h25m00s|06:27:17] S: 85/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT  100% [52 C/44%] 36.94 I/s 73.74(73.51)Sol/s 109(111.9)W clk=1855MHz mclk=2122MHz Sol/W=0.657 (96.4%) (3.6%)
[ 0d10h30m00s|06:32:17] S: 85/0/0 0>RX 6800 XT  100% [52 C/44%] 36.90 I/s 72.50(73.47)Sol/s 113(111.9)W clk=1858MHz mclk=2120MHz Sol/W=0.657 (96.4%) (3.6%)
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=  5.04 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 12.02 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 16.76 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=  7.03 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 17.45 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 52.51 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 11.70 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 16.93 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=  6.34 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=  4.92 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=  7.87 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=414.72 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=  4.02 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=  9.32 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=  8.81 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=  4.95 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=  5.67 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=  4.30 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=  5.09 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=  5.10 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 13.57 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=  5.60 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=  4.74 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=  6.75 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 13.38 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty=  8.77 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 10.44 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[INFO   ] GPU[00]: Found share with difficulty= 26.44 /810.42  pool:  4.00  net: 39.83k
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: miniZ v2.1c Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 Beam ProgPoW Ethash CFX KASPA
by
Divinity666
on 23/07/2023, 05:28:10 UTC
Why do I get miner crashing every 24 hours or so with error 77 on random GPU when I run all 8 cards with 1 instance(1 window) of miner + some invalid shares(3-4 per 1500 or 1 day), but if I run each card with separate instance of miner(8 windows) I don't get any crashes for 2 weeks(and I simply didn't mine longer that until I close miner myself) and may be 1-2 invalid share during that time from all cards combined?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: GMiner v3.39 IronFish/Radiant/Ergo+IronFish+ZIL/KAWPOW/Equihash/Cortex
by
Divinity666
on 10/05/2023, 06:28:00 UTC
Hi. I'm getting 47sol\s on my 6800XTs mining 125,4 with this miner while miniz gives me 72sol\s+, any plans to improve Gminer efficiency?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: miniZ v2.0c5 Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
by
Divinity666
on 10/05/2023, 06:02:13 UTC
I've tested low values simply out of curiosity - I need high values(to work). Ping is 50-60ms but even 200ms shouldn't cause anything. Haven't tried other pools.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: miniZ v2.0c5 Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
by
Divinity666
on 07/05/2023, 16:50:27 UTC
Well its basically same as not using --jobtimeout at all. Unless you use small values(like 0-120 or so) that it happens sooner - so they work. Really high values seem not to work though.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: miniZ v2.0c5 Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
by
Divinity666
on 05/05/2023, 07:21:34 UTC
I'm mostly encounter it with my 6800xt in my PC, because in rigs I've got 6-8 cards so share rate is higher, but it can be any videocard. Im mining flux at Herominiers and use big share size(24ksol) because overall it gives higher h\r, but sometimes when it's taking too long to find a share it would disconnect\reconnect from pool. I tried settings like 0 or 60 - and they work, with 0 you disconnect\reconnect after 10-15 seconds and then it starts doing it constantly. With 60 its like the same 10-15 second buffer + 60, but if I use like 999 or 9999 or something in between it seems it doesn't work because I get disconnect\reconnect sooner than it's supposed to. And I mean even with 999 seconds setting it shouldn't get any disconnects because single 6800xt finds a share sooner than that with 24ksol sharediff.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: miniZ v2.0c5 Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
by
Divinity666
on 05/05/2023, 04:11:25 UTC
What is --jobtimeout max setting? Tried =999 but it certainly doesn't work because I had disconnect\reconnect to the pool in less than 15 minutes if there is not a single share submitted.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
by
Divinity666
on 12/12/2022, 12:45:46 UTC
There is an issue with GPU initialization once I've add 8th card to the rig. Some times if fails to initialize 1 cards, another time 2+. Its completely random. Running 2 instances of miner with 1-4 and 5-8 cards helps when you run them one after another though:

Quote
************ miniZ v2.0a ************
Number of miniZ CUDA>=[8.0] using driver CUDA[11.70] devices found: 8
Driver:      516.94
Algo:      EQ[125,4] [smart-pers]
Pool#0:    
      server[ru.flux.herominers.com] port[1200] ssl[no] pers[ZelProof]
Telemetry:   [http://localhost:3333]
Logging::    file[miniZ.log] period[60] delay[0]
Temp. limit:   [90 C]
[INFO   ] Mining fee set to 2.00%
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#6[6] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#5[5] ASUS GeForce RTX 3070
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#4[4] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#3[3] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
miniZ<125,4>[18:0:00.0: 9100]: Selecting GPU#0[0] Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3080
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#2[2] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#7[7] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#1[1] EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra
[ 0d 0h 0m03s|13:33:23] 504(504.0)Sol/s 332(331.9)W
 0>RTX 3080      S:  0/0 [48 C/ 0%] 52.48 I/s 104.70(104.70)Sol/s  88( 88.2)W clk=1649MHz mclk=8991MHz Sol/W=1.186
 1>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [43 C/ 0%] 34.15 I/s  68.13( 68.13)Sol/s  35( 35.1)W clk=1574MHz mclk=7193MHz Sol/W=1.942
 2>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [37 C/30%] 34.38 I/s  68.59( 68.59)Sol/s  30( 29.8)W clk=1574MHz mclk=7193MHz Sol/W=2.301
 3>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [41 C/30%] 34.21 I/s  68.25( 68.25)Sol/s  42( 41.8)W clk=1559MHz mclk=6994MHz Sol/W=1.633
 4>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [44 C/30%] 34.27 I/s  68.37( 68.37)Sol/s  32( 32.5)W clk=1574MHz mclk=7193MHz Sol/W=2.105
 5>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [44 C/ 0%]  0.00 I/s   0.00(  0.00)Sol/s  38( 38.0)W clk=1589MHz mclk=7193MHz Sol/W=0.000
 6>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [37 C/30%] 28.76 I/s  57.38( 57.38)Sol/s  34( 33.8)W clk=1529MHz mclk=7193MHz Sol/W=1.700
 7>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [37 C/30%] 34.36 I/s  68.56( 68.56)Sol/s  33( 32.7)W clk=1574MHz mclk=7193MHz Sol/W=2.100


************ miniZ v2.0a ************
Number of miniZ CUDA>=[8.0] using driver CUDA[11.70] devices found: 8
Driver:      516.94
Algo:      EQ[125,4] [smart-pers]
Pool#0:    
      server[ru.flux.herominers.com] port[1200] ssl[no] pers[ZelProof]
Telemetry:   [http://localhost:3333]
Logging::    file[miniZ.log] period[60] delay[0]
Temp. limit:   [90 C]
[INFO   ] Mining fee set to 2.00%
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#2[2] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#3[3] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#5[5] ASUS GeForce RTX 3070
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#4[4] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#6[6] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#7[7] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#1[1] EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra
miniZ<125,4>[18:0:00.0: 9100]: Selecting GPU#0[0] Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3080
[ 0d 0h 0m03s|13:34:09] 134(133.9)Sol/s 334(334.3)W
 0>RTX 3080      S:  0/0 [50 C/ 0%]  0.00 I/s  0.00( 0.00)Sol/s  89( 89.1)W clk=1649MHz mclk=8990MHz Sol/W=0.000
 1>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [45 C/ 0%]  0.00 I/s  0.00( 0.00)Sol/s  35( 35.4)W clk=1574MHz mclk=7193MHz Sol/W=0.000
 2>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [39 C/30%]  0.00 I/s  0.00( 0.00)Sol/s  31( 30.7)W clk=1574MHz mclk=7193MHz Sol/W=0.000
 3>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [43 C/30%]  0.00 I/s  0.00( 0.00)Sol/s  42( 42.0)W clk=1559MHz mclk=6994MHz Sol/W=0.000
 4>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [45 C/30%] 33.96 I/s 67.76(67.76)Sol/s  33( 32.6)W clk=1574MHz mclk=7193MHz Sol/W=2.076
 5>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [40 C/ 0%]  0.00 I/s  0.00( 0.00)Sol/s  37( 36.8)W clk=1589MHz mclk=7193MHz Sol/W=0.000
 6>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [40 C/30%] 33.14 I/s 66.11(66.11)Sol/s  34( 34.4)W clk=1529MHz mclk=7157MHz Sol/W=1.924
 7>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [39 C/30%]  0.00 I/s  0.00( 0.00)Sol/s  33( 33.3)W clk=1574MHz mclk=7120MHz Sol/W=0.000

************ miniZ v2.0a ************
Number of miniZ CUDA>=[8.0] using driver CUDA[11.70] devices found: 8
Driver:      516.94
Algo:      EQ[125,4] [smart-pers]
Pool#0:    
      server[ru.flux.herominers.com] port[1200] ssl[no] pers[ZelProof]
Telemetry:   [http://localhost:3333]
Logging::    file[miniZ.log] period[60] delay[0]
Temp. limit:   [90 C]
[INFO   ] Mining fee set to 2.00%
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#5[5] ASUS GeForce RTX 3070
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#3[3] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#2[2] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#1[1] EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra
miniZ<125,4>[18:0:00.0: 9100]: Selecting GPU#0[0] Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3080
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#4[4] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#7[7] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#6[6] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
[ 0d 0h 0m04s|13:32:02] 309(309.2)Sol/s 305(305.0)W
 0>RTX 3080      S:  0/0 [39 C/67%] 51.80 I/s 103.34(103.34)Sol/s  70( 69.9)W clk=1619MHz mclk=4997MHz Sol/W=1.479
 1>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [36 C/ 0%] 34.20 I/s  68.23( 68.23)Sol/s  34( 33.9)W clk=1574MHz mclk=7193MHz Sol/W=2.011
 2>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [36 C/30%]  0.00 I/s   0.00(  0.00)Sol/s  30( 29.5)W clk=1574MHz mclk=7193MHz Sol/W=0.000
 3>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [39 C/ 0%]  0.00 I/s   0.00(  0.00)Sol/s  41( 41.5)W clk=1574MHz mclk=6994MHz Sol/W=0.000
 4>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [39 C/30%] 34.35 I/s  68.52( 68.52)Sol/s  32( 32.0)W clk=1574MHz mclk=7193MHz Sol/W=2.139
 5>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [36 C/ 0%] 34.66 I/s  69.15( 69.15)Sol/s  32( 32.2)W clk=1589MHz mclk=7193MHz Sol/W=2.150
 6>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [36 C/30%]  0.00 I/s   0.00(  0.00)Sol/s  34( 33.6)W clk=1529MHz mclk=7193MHz Sol/W=0.000
 7>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [35 C/30%]  0.00 I/s   0.00(  0.00)Sol/s  32( 32.4)W clk=1574MHz mclk=7131MHz Sol/W=0.000


************ miniZ v2.0a ************
Number of miniZ CUDA>=[8.0] using driver CUDA[11.70] devices found: 8
Driver:      516.94
Algo:      EQ[125,4] [smart-pers]
Pool#0:    
      server[ru.flux.herominers.com] port[1200] ssl[no] pers[ZelProof]
Telemetry:   [http://localhost:3333]
Logging::    file[miniZ.log] period[60] delay[0]
Temp. limit:   [90 C]
[INFO   ] Mining fee set to 2.00%
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#1[1] EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#3[3] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#6[6] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#4[4] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#7[7] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#5[5] ASUS GeForce RTX 3070
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#2[2] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
miniZ<125,4>[18:0:00.0: 9100]: Selecting GPU#0[0] Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3080
[ 0d 0h 0m04s|13:28:33] 429(429.0)Sol/s 329(329.0)W
 0>RTX 3080      S:  0/0 [48 C/67%] 51.31 I/s 102.36(102.36)Sol/s  89( 89.2)W clk=1649MHz mclk=8991MHz Sol/W=1.148
 1>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [42 C/42%] 28.74 I/s  57.33( 57.33)Sol/s  36( 35.7)W clk=1574MHz mclk=7193MHz Sol/W=1.605
 2>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [34 C/30%] 33.76 I/s  67.35( 67.35)Sol/s  30( 30.0)W clk=1574MHz mclk=7193MHz Sol/W=2.248
 3>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [34 C/30%] 33.82 I/s  67.47( 67.47)Sol/s  41( 41.1)W clk=1574MHz mclk=6994MHz Sol/W=1.643
 4>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [42 C/30%] 33.66 I/s  67.16( 67.16)Sol/s  33( 33.0)W clk=1574MHz mclk=7193MHz Sol/W=2.035
 5>RTX 3070      S:  1/0 [43 C/49%]*33.76 I/s  67.35( 67.35)Sol/s  33( 32.9)W clk=1589MHz mclk=7193MHz Sol/W=2.050
 6>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [41 C/30%]  0.00 I/s   0.00(  0.00)Sol/s  34( 34.5)W clk=1529MHz mclk=7193MHz Sol/W=0.000
 7>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [40 C/30%]  0.00 I/s   0.00(  0.00)Sol/s  33( 32.7)W clk=1574MHz mclk=7120MHz Sol/W=0.000


************ miniZ v2.0a ************
Number of miniZ CUDA>=[8.0] using driver CUDA[11.70] devices found: 8
Driver:      516.94
Algo:      EQ[125,4] [smart-pers]
Pool#0:    
      server[ru.flux.herominers.com] port[1200] ssl[no] pers[ZelProof]
Telemetry:   [http://localhost:3333]
Logging::    file[miniZ.log] period[60] delay[0]
Temp. limit:   [90 C]
[INFO   ] Mining fee set to 2.00%
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#2[2] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#1[1] EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#3[3] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#5[5] ASUS GeForce RTX 3070
miniZ<125,4>[18:0:00.0: 9100]: Selecting GPU#0[0] Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3080
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#4[4] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#6[6] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
miniZ<125,4>[19:0:00.0: 7127]: Selecting GPU#7[7] MSI GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Gaming X Trio
[ 0d 0h 0m04s|13:26:29] 413(413.2)Sol/s 282(282.1)W
 0>RTX 3080      S:  0/0 [34 C/67%] 50.73 I/s 101.20(101.20)Sol/s  68( 68.5)W clk=1619MHz mclk=4997MHz Sol/W=1.478
 1>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [32 C/48%] 29.62 I/s  59.09( 59.09)Sol/s  32( 31.7)W clk=1574MHz mclk=4995MHz Sol/W=1.862
 2>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [33 C/36%]  0.00 I/s   0.00(  0.00)Sol/s  30( 30.0)W clk=1574MHz mclk=7193MHz Sol/W=0.000
 3>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [34 C/ 0%]  0.00 I/s   0.00(  0.00)Sol/s  28( 28.0)W clk= 880MHz mclk=3158MHz Sol/W=0.000
 4>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [34 C/33%] 33.13 I/s  66.10( 66.10)Sol/s  32( 31.8)W clk=1574MHz mclk=7193MHz Sol/W=2.076
 5>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [33 C/53%] 33.29 I/s  66.41( 66.41)Sol/s  31( 31.2)W clk=1589MHz mclk=7193MHz Sol/W=2.128
 6>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [33 C/33%] 30.00 I/s  59.85( 59.85)Sol/s  32( 32.2)W clk=1544MHz mclk=4995MHz Sol/W=1.857
 7>RTX 3070      S:  0/0 [33 C/33%] 30.33 I/s  60.50( 60.50)Sol/s  29( 28.6)W clk=1574MHz mclk=4995MHz Sol/W=2.112
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
by
Divinity666
on 05/12/2022, 10:05:30 UTC
Dunno but --priority=2 doesn't change process priority from normal to high for me. I got "Run this program as an administrator" enabled in miniZ.exe Properties > Compatibility.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: miniZ v1.9z5b Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW EthashCFX
by
Divinity666
on 13/11/2022, 20:35:53 UTC
There is still an issue with miner loosing pool, only now it's not showing it got stuck in dev fee - its shows as if it's mining regularly. Got it on two rigs already.

Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: lolMiner 1.61: Significantly faster Flux mining on AMD and Nvidia
by
Divinity666
on 13/11/2022, 19:48:44 UTC
Has anyone compared lolminer vs miniZ on flux with ampere cards? Is miniZ still faster?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: miniZ v1.9z5 Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
by
Divinity666
on 06/11/2022, 16:00:51 UTC

I'm not doing any undervolting, only locking core clock, memory oc is not touched at all. I think i need to install some app for that, dont want to do that. Electricity is free, just want lower temps if possible...


You will need MSI Afterburner thats all. Dropping 30Wt+ per card would help temps for sure.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: miniZ v1.9z5 Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
by
Divinity666
on 06/11/2022, 13:18:29 UTC

Your powerdraw is way too high for your hashrate. You should lower the voltage even more while retaining current core clock speeds or even raising core clocks at the same time.
As for the fan control, yeah, it doesn't work that good for now, but give developers some time - it's been just over a month that they have introduced it. I remember it took T-rex team a while to finesse their fan control as well
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: miniZ v1.9z5 Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
by
Divinity666
on 02/11/2022, 13:00:57 UTC
I've found some issues with fan control: if card can't go below certain fan %(like Colorful Vulcan and MSI Gaming Trio won't allow you to go below 30% fan speed) when GPU temperature drops below targeted, miner will stop controlling its fans completely, so they will remain at 30% even if temperatures will start to go up again.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: miniZ v1.9z4 Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
by
Divinity666
on 01/11/2022, 18:51:52 UTC

Hi Divinity666,
Thank you for sharing the results. These are useful for reference.
We'll update our tables in the near future. Smiley

Regarding cpu priority, what values for priority are you using?

Cheers

I set miniZ.exe process priority to high in task manager it helps vs. h\r drops when u are doing something else on the rig, e.g. using MSI Afterburner, cos CPU gets loaded when u tune curve or just hover mouse over monitoring graphs.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: miniZ v1.9z4 Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
by
Divinity666
on 29/10/2022, 18:57:54 UTC
Btw here are my hashrates @ flux:

GTX 1080 Ti  -   ~50sol\s@136Wt (1430Mhz core, 4500Mhz mem)
RTX 3070      -   ~73sol\s@128Wt (1620Mhz core, 7000Mhz mem)
RTX 3080      - ~106sol\s@243Wt (1620Mhz core, 8250Mhz mem)
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: miniZ v1.9z4 Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
by
Divinity666
on 27/10/2022, 16:54:55 UTC
⭐ Merited by miniZ (1)
Hm, never happened with z3 version... Anyway, since its only happening after 24hr+ of uptime I'll just keep restarting miner on each rig every day as a temporary workaround.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: miniZ v1.9z4 Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX
by
Divinity666
on 27/10/2022, 05:44:04 UTC
who cares this miner has been consistently 5% over 24hrs reported hashrate at the pool for me.

It's 0% if it's mining dev fee all the time. And it keeps happening again and again with this version.