Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 29 results by Doc Martin
Given that you have bid on and offered to buy accounts in the past
I have not.This is a lie. The proof that you bid on and offered to buy accounts is irrefutable. Proof quoted below to make that clear.
If address posting + wallet linkage is not sufficient evidence of alt connections, none of the connections listed in the OP are proven, and you are therefore "a liar" for listing them there (by your standards)...........
Accounts connected: Lauda, Xanis
Lauda nuked the Xanis account in July 2015. It previously had almost 3000 posts.
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/0159d14a67570b3d/addresses
Lauda: 1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.msg10896717#msg10896717 / http://archive.is/XzVUk)
Xanis: 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (https://bitcointa.lk/threads/cloudbet-signature-campaign-up-to-0-1-btc-per-month-for-50-posts.314489/page-14#post-7131942 / http://archive.is/tikrd / https://github.com/mikispag/bitiodine/blob/master/deploy/classifier/Lists/bitcointalk.csv)
cd40260d5a57d13eb5d2a4582ef036346f2a66ff948f7ba4ef981795bd64b3ef
^^ 19zYTT7QoCqURn5oZw8VMMSo4tbpERUB4i signs with 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD as change address)
3a5f78995c9b93c6192d93fabc4bf0534e27a9b781d42626330d0b6cce41a6d7
^^ 19zYTT7QoCqURn5oZw8VMMSo4tbpERUB4i signs with 1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD -- provably links Lauda to 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (Xanis)
As I said, Lauda nuked the alt account. But the Xanis address was archived on bitcointa.lk (https://bitcointa.lk/threads/cloudbet-signature-campaign-up-to-0-1-btc-per-month-for-50-posts.314489/page-14#post-7131942). It was also archived by a Bitcointalk address scraper on Github (https://github.com/mikispag/bitiodine/blob/master/deploy/classifier/Lists/bitcointalk.csv). A cursory glance through the addresses archived by the scraper shows that they are quite accurate. Pick a few at random and see for yourself.
Miscellaneous notes:
Lauda/Xanis buying forum accounts:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=320328.msg3435067#msg3435067
http://archive.is/2TBKt
https://i.imgur.com/EBcWS4c.jpg
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=292662.msg3334977#msg3334977
http://archive.is/qFolm
https://i.imgur.com/Ge0WOAr.jpg
But why would Lauda be buying forum accounts? The answer is obvious:
https://bitcointa.lk/threads/primedice-highest-paid-signature-earn-up-to-2-4-btc-month-by-posting.168569/page-465#post-7616384
http://archive.is/4D76m
https://i.imgur.com/OzC84Hy.jpg
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=216854.msg3005096#msg3005096
http://archive.is/zcn2G
https://i.imgur.com/lCiJZda.jpg
"Signature managers against spam?" Oh, the irony!
There is a non-zero chance that Lauda has used (and continues to use) his Default Trust status to facilitate these account trading and signature spamming practices.
The fact that Lauda has been outed as an account trader while simultaneously heading up the SMAS initiative and being a signature campaign manager himself raises questions about a conflict of interest. In any case, please see the feedback Lauda has left for other users. Specifically, Lauda has extensively tagged users with negative trust with the following feedback: "Account sales encourage scams, spam, and account farming." I agree, and by Lauda's own standards, Lauda is clearly untrustworthy for engaging in these practices.
I don't have the time or energy to look further into this now, but Xanis had thousands of posts in the Altcoin sections. I believe that both accounts were being used to scam giveaways. I've recently archived giveaway entry posts made by Lauda (those which haven't been deleted yet) for further research. Unfortunately, as Xanis was nuked, we only have quotes and archives like bitcointa.lk to work from. C'est la vie.
Lauda nuked the Xanis account in July 2015. It previously had almost 3000 posts.
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/0159d14a67570b3d/addresses
Lauda: 1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.msg10896717#msg10896717 / http://archive.is/XzVUk)
Xanis: 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (https://bitcointa.lk/threads/cloudbet-signature-campaign-up-to-0-1-btc-per-month-for-50-posts.314489/page-14#post-7131942 / http://archive.is/tikrd / https://github.com/mikispag/bitiodine/blob/master/deploy/classifier/Lists/bitcointalk.csv)
cd40260d5a57d13eb5d2a4582ef036346f2a66ff948f7ba4ef981795bd64b3ef
^^ 19zYTT7QoCqURn5oZw8VMMSo4tbpERUB4i signs with 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD as change address)
3a5f78995c9b93c6192d93fabc4bf0534e27a9b781d42626330d0b6cce41a6d7
^^ 19zYTT7QoCqURn5oZw8VMMSo4tbpERUB4i signs with 1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD -- provably links Lauda to 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (Xanis)
As I said, Lauda nuked the alt account. But the Xanis address was archived on bitcointa.lk (https://bitcointa.lk/threads/cloudbet-signature-campaign-up-to-0-1-btc-per-month-for-50-posts.314489/page-14#post-7131942). It was also archived by a Bitcointalk address scraper on Github (https://github.com/mikispag/bitiodine/blob/master/deploy/classifier/Lists/bitcointalk.csv). A cursory glance through the addresses archived by the scraper shows that they are quite accurate. Pick a few at random and see for yourself.
Miscellaneous notes:
Lauda/Xanis buying forum accounts:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=320328.msg3435067#msg3435067
http://archive.is/2TBKt
https://i.imgur.com/EBcWS4c.jpg
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=292662.msg3334977#msg3334977
http://archive.is/qFolm
https://i.imgur.com/Ge0WOAr.jpg
But why would Lauda be buying forum accounts? The answer is obvious:
https://bitcointa.lk/threads/primedice-highest-paid-signature-earn-up-to-2-4-btc-month-by-posting.168569/page-465#post-7616384
http://archive.is/4D76m
https://i.imgur.com/OzC84Hy.jpg
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=216854.msg3005096#msg3005096
http://archive.is/zcn2G
https://i.imgur.com/lCiJZda.jpg
"Signature managers against spam?" Oh, the irony!
There is a non-zero chance that Lauda has used (and continues to use) his Default Trust status to facilitate these account trading and signature spamming practices.
The fact that Lauda has been outed as an account trader while simultaneously heading up the SMAS initiative and being a signature campaign manager himself raises questions about a conflict of interest. In any case, please see the feedback Lauda has left for other users. Specifically, Lauda has extensively tagged users with negative trust with the following feedback: "Account sales encourage scams, spam, and account farming." I agree, and by Lauda's own standards, Lauda is clearly untrustworthy for engaging in these practices.
I don't have the time or energy to look further into this now, but Xanis had thousands of posts in the Altcoin sections. I believe that both accounts were being used to scam giveaways. I've recently archived giveaway entry posts made by Lauda (those which haven't been deleted yet) for further research. Unfortunately, as Xanis was nuked, we only have quotes and archives like bitcointa.lk to work from. C'est la vie.
This guy does some good but he also hurts users who are not trying to scam and he basically ruins accounts with no evidence. When are the moderators going to put this guy on a leash and tell him to tone it down? He is abusing his power and everyone knows it.
INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY!
Get your facts straight before you post bullshit negative feedback.
INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY!
Get your facts straight before you post bullshit negative feedback.
This is a trust issue and a matter of default trust, not related to moderation or staff.
Is there a thread where discussion of Default Trust takes place?? Apologies for veering off-topic. I did search for it but to no avail.
Heck, Lauda was banned several times for spamming, too.
Why are you repeating something that is well known and irrelevant? I became a staff member as a result of my ban(s). Without them, we wouldn't be having this conversation.and post the ban.I guess the moral of the story is to aspire to be the worst shitposter in forum history because then you might get promoted to staff?? Good example.
Yet adds people to SMAS w/o informing them then neg trusts them just for applying to a sig campaign.
Both of which are my right. If you try to cheat, then you are not trustworthy and you get tagged.If you add someone to SMAS without informing them how are they "cheating"?
In fact, even if they know they are on SMAS, how are they "cheating"? Its the campaign managers prerogative to accept an applicant or not on the merits of their posts.
I think this is activity is actually far worse than your account trading history.
You think those people get a second chance??
Depends on each individual case.Given that you have bid on and offered to buy accounts in the past, will the 8 people that you tagged yesterday with negative trust and the following for feedback be offered a second chance?? "Account sales encourage scams, spam, and account farming."
Lauda gets lots of second chances and double standards. Funny that.
That is a lie. This connection is just a butthurt and weak attempt at discrediting me. The "second chance" regarding Xanis and myself happened during and post the ban.Right so you engage in account trading while giving everyone else red paint for doing the same. Your proven alt is perma-banned and engaged in account trading, but you are exempt from having your alt connections added to "[User Generated] - Known alts of anyone." Got it.
And everyone is a liar and deserves negative trust from you for pointing out these proven connections. Cool story!
or we can take the other perspective and imagine it being a shitpost.
If this standard applies to Lauda, it should apply to everyone. Everyone should get the benefit of the doubt. Because Lauda does.
But clearly, this standard only applies to Lauda. Everyone else caught buying accounts get red paint. From Lauda.
Heck, Lauda was banned several times for spamming, too. Yet adds people to SMAS w/o informing them then neg trusts them just for applying to a sig campaign. You think those people get a second chance?? Haha!! Lauda gets lots of second chances and double standards. Funny that.
People have voiced their disapproval of Lauda's actions. The problem is in the demographic of most of them being a bunch of kakapos.
I got negative trust for bringing Lauda' activity up at all. I never lied once. Everything I said was proven, clearly as day. But Lauda neg trusted me for "lying."
Now my account is ruined. And you wonder why people are scared to speak against Lauda??
Now my account is ruined. And you wonder why people are scared to speak against Lauda??
You think any Hero or Legendary member will risk having their account permanently ruined by saying anything against Lauda??
Of course I used my fucking alt account. And look what happened, just for speaking about it!
Even great timelord is silent about this one.
Indeed, how interesting!
When Lauda is giving out negative ratings for being a "liar" and a "troll" who are speaking against him, it sure looks like he is leaving negative ratings in retaliation to speaking out against him.
Especially when the references show they aren't lies........
Lauda admits Xanis is his alt (although clearly trying to dance around the subject) but denies that anything Xanis did can be associated with him. Haha!
Why don't we all have this privilege?? The first several posts of this thread are examples of hundreds of people who don't get that privilege. Why is it reserved only for Lauda??
people are so scared to speak against you
Lauda is hitler! All hail Bitcoin Cash! /sYou don't really believe that people can't voice their disagreement towards Lauda, do you?
I got negative trust for bringing Lauda' activity up at all. I never lied once. Everything I said was proven, clearly as day. But Lauda neg trusted me for "lying."
Now my account is ruined. And you wonder why people are scared to speak against Lauda??
BTW the multiple trust ratings you gave me today show why
Did not happen in one day.Happened in less than 24 hours for the same alleged "lies."
And if it happened over two days instead of one, what difference does it make??
Lauda just lives in Bizarro World, where everyone who disagrees with her = Quickseller and every disagreement = "a lie" that justifies ruining their account forever.....
Re: Lauda, Sold bitcointalk accounts, Giving neg for others for same reason.
Neg trusting a fellow campaign manager (competition) for engaging in the same behavior as you? Tsk tsk.
Moot point.....Once you confront Lauda, this is all your account is good for. All I did was point out Lauda's behavior, proven with blockchain evidence. And I received negative trust (twice) for "lying." Mind you, these lies were perfectly verifiable as truth.
Some trust system ya got here!!
And what do you think this will do? Do you think that this thread will get Lauda kicked off DT-2?
Moot point.....Once you confront Lauda, this is all your account is good for. All I did was point out Lauda's behavior, proven with blockchain evidence. And I received negative trust (twice) for "lying." Mind you, these lies were perfectly verifiable as truth.
Some trust system ya got here!!
Dead accounts are not alts. Dead accounts should not be listed unless they have other implications such as more alts, ban evasion, and similar.
By your own standards, your alt engaged in untrustworthy behavior. That reflects on you. Nobody cares about the dead account lol.
So you are trustworthy because the account buying happened on your alt account instead of your main account? That's the logic here??!
BTW the multiple trust ratings you gave me today show why people are so scared to speak against you......all I did was fucking point out the allegations that are well-sourced and proven.
I would recommend adding the following to your trust list:
Code:
~lauda
Agreed!!
See Lauda's outed alt connection and various scammy behavior here, which Lauda refuses to add to the OP.
Lauda immediately revenge negged me for even mentioning it.
Re: [SMAS] Signature Managers against Spam (light version)
It's you...
If you say that it is me, does that make it me? Huh? The links provided show that "LaudaM" had its account name changed to "Lauda".
Why would you deny that?
If I don't remember it being me, was it still me?Right, just like how you were caught buying dozens of forum accounts. But now, "to your knowledge" you have never traded accounts.
Convenient lapses of memory, these.
Can you prove I'm the same me as the claimed user from 2013? Can you prove that I was not replaced with a reptile? Can you prove I was not cloned by an agency and replaced by such clone? I have a lot more questions that need to be answered before you can reasonably conclude that it is me.
What are you saying, that your account was sold? Indeed, I've long suspected so.
I suppose this one won't be added to the OP
It will not as it is a worthless connection. You'd realize this if you were smarter than a baboon. Most of the connections are "worthless" then. Many are self-admitted, neutral trust, no scamming. Why are they listed at all? Why do the rules not apply to you??
You tried to buy dozens of accounts over multiple occasions. Since those posts were recovered from deleted posts, there's probably more. That seems relevant in a thread called "[User Generated] - Known alts of anyone." Also, you say one of your alt accounts is perma-banned. An opportunity to add pretty colors!!!
Why no add??
Edit: And immediately, Lauda DT neg trusts my account just for mentioning the accusation against him/her. Such fair rules, much even application!
Re: [SMAS] Signature Managers against Spam (light version)
LaudaM, probably the single worst spammer in this forum's history (and banned several times for it), running an anti-spam blacklist.
Who is that 
It's you...
See:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg2228474#msg2228474
https://bitcointa.lk/threads/asicminer-entering-the-future-of-asic-mining-by-inventing-it.61268/page-282#post-2109937
Why would you deny that?
Accounts connected: Lauda, Xanis
Lauda nuked the Xanis account in July 2015. It previously had almost 3000 posts.
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/0159d14a67570b3d/addresses
Lauda: 1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.msg10896717#msg10896717 / http://archive.is/XzVUk)
Xanis: 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (https://bitcointa.lk/threads/cloudbet-signature-campaign-up-to-0-1-btc-per-month-for-50-posts.314489/page-14#post-7131942 / http://archive.is/tikrd / https://github.com/mikispag/bitiodine/blob/master/deploy/classifier/Lists/bitcointalk.csv)
cd40260d5a57d13eb5d2a4582ef036346f2a66ff948f7ba4ef981795bd64b3ef
^^ 19zYTT7QoCqURn5oZw8VMMSo4tbpERUB4i signs with 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD as change address)
3a5f78995c9b93c6192d93fabc4bf0534e27a9b781d42626330d0b6cce41a6d7
^^ 19zYTT7QoCqURn5oZw8VMMSo4tbpERUB4i signs with 1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD -- provably links Lauda to 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (Xanis)
As I said, Lauda nuked the alt account. But the Xanis address was archived on bitcointa.lk (https://bitcointa.lk/threads/cloudbet-signature-campaign-up-to-0-1-btc-per-month-for-50-posts.314489/page-14#post-7131942). It was also archived by a Bitcointalk address scraper on Github (https://github.com/mikispag/bitiodine/blob/master/deploy/classifier/Lists/bitcointalk.csv). A cursory glance through the addresses archived by the scraper shows that they are quite accurate. Pick a few at random and see for yourself.
Miscellaneous notes:
Lauda/Xanis buying forum accounts:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=320328.msg3435067#msg3435067
http://archive.is/2TBKt
https://i.imgur.com/EBcWS4c.jpg
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=292662.msg3334977#msg3334977
http://archive.is/qFolm
https://i.imgur.com/Ge0WOAr.jpg
But why would Lauda be buying forum accounts? The answer is obvious:
https://bitcointa.lk/threads/primedice-highest-paid-signature-earn-up-to-2-4-btc-month-by-posting.168569/page-465#post-7616384
http://archive.is/4D76m
https://i.imgur.com/OzC84Hy.jpg
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=216854.msg3005096#msg3005096
http://archive.is/zcn2G
https://i.imgur.com/lCiJZda.jpg
"Signature managers against spam?" Oh, the irony!
There is a non-zero chance that Lauda has used (and continues to use) his Default Trust status to facilitate these account trading and signature spamming practices.
The fact that Lauda has been outed as an account trader while simultaneously heading up the SMAS initiative and being a signature campaign manager himself raises questions about a conflict of interest. In any case, please see the feedback Lauda has left for other users. Specifically, Lauda has extensively tagged users with negative trust with the following feedback: "Account sales encourage scams, spam, and account farming." I agree, and by Lauda's own standards, Lauda is clearly untrustworthy for engaging in these practices.
I don't have the time or energy to look further into this now, but Xanis had thousands of posts in the Altcoin sections. I believe that both accounts were being used to scam giveaways. I've recently archived giveaway entry posts made by Lauda (those which haven't been deleted yet) for further research. Unfortunately, as Xanis was nuked, we only have quotes and archives like bitcointa.lk to work from. C'est la vie.
Lauda nuked the Xanis account in July 2015. It previously had almost 3000 posts.
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/0159d14a67570b3d/addresses
Lauda: 1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.msg10896717#msg10896717 / http://archive.is/XzVUk)
Xanis: 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (https://bitcointa.lk/threads/cloudbet-signature-campaign-up-to-0-1-btc-per-month-for-50-posts.314489/page-14#post-7131942 / http://archive.is/tikrd / https://github.com/mikispag/bitiodine/blob/master/deploy/classifier/Lists/bitcointalk.csv)
cd40260d5a57d13eb5d2a4582ef036346f2a66ff948f7ba4ef981795bd64b3ef
^^ 19zYTT7QoCqURn5oZw8VMMSo4tbpERUB4i signs with 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD as change address)
3a5f78995c9b93c6192d93fabc4bf0534e27a9b781d42626330d0b6cce41a6d7
^^ 19zYTT7QoCqURn5oZw8VMMSo4tbpERUB4i signs with 1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD -- provably links Lauda to 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (Xanis)
As I said, Lauda nuked the alt account. But the Xanis address was archived on bitcointa.lk (https://bitcointa.lk/threads/cloudbet-signature-campaign-up-to-0-1-btc-per-month-for-50-posts.314489/page-14#post-7131942). It was also archived by a Bitcointalk address scraper on Github (https://github.com/mikispag/bitiodine/blob/master/deploy/classifier/Lists/bitcointalk.csv). A cursory glance through the addresses archived by the scraper shows that they are quite accurate. Pick a few at random and see for yourself.
Miscellaneous notes:
Lauda/Xanis buying forum accounts:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=320328.msg3435067#msg3435067
http://archive.is/2TBKt
https://i.imgur.com/EBcWS4c.jpg
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=292662.msg3334977#msg3334977
http://archive.is/qFolm
https://i.imgur.com/Ge0WOAr.jpg
But why would Lauda be buying forum accounts? The answer is obvious:
https://bitcointa.lk/threads/primedice-highest-paid-signature-earn-up-to-2-4-btc-month-by-posting.168569/page-465#post-7616384
http://archive.is/4D76m
https://i.imgur.com/OzC84Hy.jpg
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=216854.msg3005096#msg3005096
http://archive.is/zcn2G
https://i.imgur.com/lCiJZda.jpg
"Signature managers against spam?" Oh, the irony!
There is a non-zero chance that Lauda has used (and continues to use) his Default Trust status to facilitate these account trading and signature spamming practices.
The fact that Lauda has been outed as an account trader while simultaneously heading up the SMAS initiative and being a signature campaign manager himself raises questions about a conflict of interest. In any case, please see the feedback Lauda has left for other users. Specifically, Lauda has extensively tagged users with negative trust with the following feedback: "Account sales encourage scams, spam, and account farming." I agree, and by Lauda's own standards, Lauda is clearly untrustworthy for engaging in these practices.
I don't have the time or energy to look further into this now, but Xanis had thousands of posts in the Altcoin sections. I believe that both accounts were being used to scam giveaways. I've recently archived giveaway entry posts made by Lauda (those which haven't been deleted yet) for further research. Unfortunately, as Xanis was nuked, we only have quotes and archives like bitcointa.lk to work from. C'est la vie.
Quoted for reference
I suppose this one won't be added to the OP
I have the same problem...i used to warn people about potential scammers and i all got was a negative trust. Won't do that anymore,just let the scammers do their job,if naive and stupid members of this forum keep believing everything...not worth it mate.
That's the trouble with trust on this forum. Your feedback is just as meaningful as a scammer's.
Hello! I am new and have an answer! Friend is important to be an active reader and write more often. Comment, report and rating will grow the only thing that will not be fast. Do it every day.
Trust is usually not influenced by number of posts. The quickest way would be to just buy stuff from people in the services and goods section and hope that they will give you positive reviews.
So, in other words, trust farming?
Re: ✅ Verify Signature Campaign ✅ [OPEN] ✅ [5 SLOTS ONLY] ✅ [0.0325 Weekly] ✅
These users have been tagged with attempting to cheat a SMAS campaign.
I think if you are going to tag users for attempting to "cheat" the campaign, you should say more than "This campaign is part of the SMAS blacklist" in the OP. FYI, no one is informed when they are added to that list, so it's quite a stretch to presume intention to "cheat" anyone.
Re: [ANN][ELITE] Ethereum Lite | FIRST ETHEREUM CURRENCY | LOW SUPPLY | YOBIT | CMC
Hahaha bought the dip while everyone else was terrified.
Same, already nearly doubled my money. I'm looking for one more double here. Not too late.