You are making a lot of the same points as me, but I am suggesting that if you feel compelled to sell some, then to sell the lower amounts at various increments and never all at once and even to be in a position that you are never selling more than your profits (so you are not selling principle), even if we have a lot of confidence that the top of the cycle might have been met, so surely I don't even recommend selling as much as I mentioned but I am trying to provide some kind of a compromise possibility that others might consider rather than selling 100% of their stash, and from my perspective, you surely are going quite high.. because you are thinking that the odds are going to be with you to be able to buy back more BTC with the proceeds of your sale... which surely is getting us further and further from the topic of this thread when you start to think about selling as an accumulation strategy rather than mere a kind of insurance or just a BTC portfolio maintenance strategy.

Yeah, sure. If you have a billionaire father behind you, you can open a business, lose a couple of millions with  that, and open another. Fail with that business too and, no problem, start another one. And so on until, whatever idiot you are, you eventually succeed by chance. This is business advice: Don't listen to Donald John Trump, guys.

if you think you have the financial capability for long-term holding while waiting for the impact of halving, why not? that is, if you truly believe as well that there will be positive movement in the near future. not many can wait for months and months, hence, some are just speculating and not buying. lucky if you have that capability as many are only here for short-term gains.
and if you have such chance, secure your coins the best possible you think of, outside from any potential threats from scammers or hackers.

Jika inti dari thread ini ingin membandingkan resiko investasi/ trading antara forex dan crypto, maka saya bisa mengatakan bahwa kedua aktivitas itu sangat beresiko karena memiliki potensi kerugian daripada hanya berpikir tentang potensi. Hal utamanya karena volatilitas harga, crypto dan forex rasanya sama saja dalam hal volatilitas.

Dampaknya (besar kecilnya) sangat tergantung pada strategi trading dan pemilihan aset, tetapi resiko kerugian akibat volatilitas harga tidak selalu bisa dihindari terlepas dari pengetahuan dan pengalaman anda.

Ada sisi yang positif di setiap warung kopi, diliat dari sudut pandang sosialisasi dan interaksi sesama masyarakat. Segala dinamika permasalahan yang terjadi di dalam maupun di luar negeri akan terus hidup dan di bahas di meja perkopian nasional.
Sisi negatif nya
Mohon maaf belum saya temukan🙏
Karena saya bagian dari penikmat kopi😊

Kalau dilihat dari kebutuhan nya sebenarnya paylater membantu beli sekarang bayar nya bulan depan dan bunga nya juga ga besar-besar banget, umpama beli sepatu harga 100k dengan metode paylater bayar bulan depan hanya dikenakan biaya penanganan sebesar 7k. Masih wajar kalo menurut saya

Tapi kalau pinjol ini justru jebakan bisa merubah situasi hidup anda yang tadi nya damai, ceria, tenang menjadi rumit , kacau hingga serasa hancur berkeping-keping.
Korban pinjol ini justru kebanyakan dari pinjol legal yang terdaftar di OJK.
Bukan dari ulah pinjol ilegal, karena faktanya cara menagih PINJOL LEGAL saat ini sama saja seperti pinjol ilegal, gak bermoral , mengancam, menghina, caci maki dll.
Gak ada beda nya sama pinjol ilegal.

Entah kenapa fenomena seperti ini jadi menjamur di Indonesia?

Saya pikir setiap pengguna memiliki pendekatan berbeda dalam proses belajarnya. Sebagian dari mereka punya rasa ingin tahu, tapi mereka tidak berusaha untuk tahu yang pada akhirnya menjadi tidak tahu. Pendekatan anda dalam mempelajari sesuatu adalah cara dari sebagian pengguna yang belajar secara otodidak di forum ini, jadi tidak mengherankan jika mereka memiliki skill yang lebih baik dalam membuat postingan.

Seperti kata pepatah; ada banyak jalan menuju Roma. Tapi jika mereka tidak mencoba menemukan jalannya, maka pada akhirnya mereka tidak akan pernah sampai. Hal yang sama juga harus terimplikasikan dalam proses belajar.

It seems to me that you are asking questions that have been answered various times in this thread, so it might be helpful to read through several of the posts in the past month or two, and if you need to refocus your question based on what you read, then come back with some more specific questions.

I am pretty sure that I had several times attempted to address the essence of the stable versus unstable finances in terms of DCA should be based on discretionary (meaning extra) money that you have available after you account for your various expenses, including your emergency expenses.

A person who has more unstable income and or expenses then has more difficulties DCA'ing , but they are still able to DCA so long as they make sure that they create a sufficient of enough reserve or cushion.  I gave some specific examples  in some recent posts that I made in this thread regarding and so it likely would be good to read back through them, but if there is a range of expenses that you have which might be between $800 to $1k per month, but your income varies between $400 and $2.5k per month with many of the months being around $1,200-$1,400, you likely need to keep at least enough reserves to cover the difference between the bare minimum that might come in and whatever are going to be your expenses, and sure some expenses can be deferred, too. 

Maybe a person in this here example that I just gave should try to keep at least $3,600 in his/her reserves prior to investing.  Since the difference between the minimum amount that s/he might make and the top of the expenses is $1k, so $3,600 would be enough to cover $6months worth of low income and high expenses.  If such person has not sufficiently created an adequate enough cashflow reserve, then DCA investing would be risky.. and maybe if s/he aspires to get to $100 per week investing into bitcoin, but if the reserves are not high enough and they are being buit, maybe such person ONLY invests $10 per week while the reserve is being built to a sufficiently high enough level that would be practical, and maybe the person believes that $1,800 rather than $3,600 is enough of a reserve, and that they are not gambling, and so that is their choice regarding how many chances they believe that they are able to get away with taking while still attempting to be somewhat prudent with their finance and trying to invest into BTC at the same time.

For sure it is not easy to strike a comfortable balance in between holding some cash for just in case the BTC price drops more and making sure that you buy a sufficient amount in order to be content with the price going up rather than down.  If the price goes up and then you start to panic and to buy some more, you likely did something wrong, but those kinds of things can end up happening to anyone, even those who might be buying regularly and buying on dips, and then if the price bounces 10% or even 40%, then they end up feeling a kind of dread/panic about not having had bought as much as they should have bought when the BTC prices were lower.

Saya tidak yakin kripto lain bisa mendapatkan peluang bagus untuk dijadikan sebagai investasi jangka panjang selain Bitcoin. Ethereum satu lagi yang membuat saya memiliki keberanian untuk menahan dalam jangka panjang.
Jangankan koin lain yang tidak memiliki fundamental yang kuat, keberanian untuk menahan BNB sudah mulai khawatir. Takut jadi seperti FTX (FTT).

Untuk mengajari orang tentang bitcoin tetapi dengan metode yang sperti agan jelaskan, saya belum bisa melakukannya gan. Soalnya bitcoin adalah mata uang digital, jadi bagaimana menunjukan bukti kongkretnya? karena bitcoin tidak bisa di pegang, dan di wujudkan secara nyata

Biasanya dalam menjelaskan bitcoin, saya akan menjelaskan tentang sistem keuangan, terutama dollar. Bercerita tentang dollar yang di cetak secara besar-besaran, prediksi para pengamat yang menilai dollar akan runtuh, dan lain-lain sebagai pembukaan kemudian berbicara bitcoin sebagai sebuah solusi. Tapi kalau misalkan minat dari lawan bicara tidak terlalu respek, biasanya saya memilih untuk tidak menjelaskan lebih lanjut, karena percuma biasanya mereka tidak tertarik dengan bitcoin.

Selain itu, kebanyakan saya cerita tentang bitcoin ketika ada yang menanyakannya,  saya tidak terlalu tertarik untuk membuka obrolan tentang bitcoin atau sengaja menjelaskan tentang bitcoin kepada orang yang sama sekali tidak tau bitcoin. Saya khawatir karena resiko trade atau invest pada bitcoin sangat besar

Fed kembali kerek suku bunga 25Bps (basis point) atau sekitar 5,25-5,5%. Kenaikan masih akan terus berlangsung jika keadaan Ekonomi tidak bekembang sesuai rencana. Sepertinya sebelum keputusan ini dikeluarkan banyak trader yang save aset mengakibatkan penurunan harga BTC.  Tapi ketika saya melihat setelah berita keluar harga BTC sampai saat ini masih cukup kuat diatas $29k. Sebenarnya jika kepercayaan terhadap BTC masih kuat, ini bisa menjadi momen baik untuk memperbanyak jumlah BTC


Sumber: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20230727043421-17-457653/tok-fed-kerek-suku-bunga-25-bps-masih-berpotensi-naik-lagi

Nah betul, karena thread ini menyasar ke mengajari orang awam, jelas dari segi materi tentunya mesti dari yang sederhana yang sekiranya dimengerti olehnya. Memang kemungkinan akan lebih sulit dibandingkan dengan mereka yang sudah punya basic minimalnya cara menggunakan komputer atau 'melek' teknologi di smartphone.

Even though there will be several Manchester City players who will leave in the transfer market later, I personally still believe that Manchester City will remain in the title race. So, at least for competition in the top four, of course, it will still be interesting, especially about Newcastle. Because with Newcastle playing in the Champions League next season, of course, Newcastle will have some new players later and hopefully there will be star players who will play at Newcastle next season. That way, of course, Newcastle's performance will continue to be boosted by changes in many aspects of their squad.

I'm not trying to take anything away from Inter Milan, but they were not the better side in the final. Manchester City dominated the whole game. Inter were just more direct. Their directness led to them having chances, but that doesn't mean they were the better team. Manchester City also created chances that the failed to score. For a team to be the better team in astch, they have to had dominated their opponent.
Inter Milan were good defensively, and players like Lautaro Martinez, Dimarco, Berrella were very good for Inter but they couldn't just finish the work in attack.

Theres only one country for now that we can see following the steps of El Salvador and its The Kingson of Bhutan who will be using their waterfalls to generate electricity to mine Bitcoin. Both country are just banking that BtC will win, they may really be in the right path though. And we could see this because even US is not banning BTC nor considering BTC as Security.

The result of the adoption of BTC in the country will need to prove it help the people otherwise it won't make much difference. But if its doing positive effect, many will see it good.

It only need one countryIf one country using the Congo river to generate power and mine BTC and I think more countries in Africa will also follow. Its possible.

I am glad you think that way. There are people who dislike Bitcoin because they think it's a mere number in the computer and doesn't have a physical attribute which could be lost anytime. I understand them, you could not please everyone and some people just like the tradition kind of thinking where they should feel it to say it is their property.

If Bitcoin is physically available?
I was not asked this type of question before, but I may not buy it. I don't see why I should buy it instead of gold. That precious metal could increase its value in time and that's not even doubtful. Its demand keeps on increasing everyday so competing against that is too hard.