Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 203 results by Duchess
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: 🔷 Waves Tech - a powerful blockchain-agnostic ecosystem
by
Duchess
on 17/02/2022, 14:28:38 UTC
Waves Keeper looks like it swaps between Waves tokens only? Do you have plans to make it possible to swap between chains for example from Waves to Polygon?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Ethereum: Welcome to the Beginning
by
Duchess
on 17/02/2022, 14:25:45 UTC
With the changes from Eth 2.0 to consensus layer, when will proof of stakes be implemented? I have coins in Eth wallets that I cannot send anywhere. I hope it is soon and that fees will go cheaper.
The proof of stakes algorithm is part of Ethereum 2.0. But this will not help you much, because the commissions will not decrease until sharding is launched. But even now, you can send your coins to the exchange for amounts less than $3.
https://etherscan.io/gastracker

Thanks for that. Fees must have come down a lot. Last time I looked it was too expensive. I think I must quickly move my coins while I can.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: 🚀 [ANN] Stabila Public Chain (STB) | Decentralize the financial system. 🚀
by
Duchess
on 17/02/2022, 14:21:36 UTC
How will you back your stable coins? Normally for a stable coin to be "stable" you have to back it with something otherwise the price will not stay the same as the fiat currency it is pegged to. Good stable coins have 1:1 of fiat currency to back the stablecoin.
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: ⚪️ [ANN] CARTESI | BINANCE | Smart Contracts Taken to the Next Level | Stake NOW
by
Duchess
on 16/02/2022, 18:26:22 UTC
I was not around lately but I see Cartesi and like poker. How is it possible to play your poker game and how does it work to install it? The list is full, but maybe explain how to do it or show me where to read it for when the testing is over?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Ethereum: Welcome to the Beginning
by
Duchess
on 16/02/2022, 18:15:07 UTC
With the changes from Eth 2.0 to consensus layer, when will proof of stakes be implemented? I have coins in Eth wallets that I cannot send anywhere. I hope it is soon and that fees will go cheaper.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: 📢🔥[ANN][BSC] CPLAY Network, One Ecosystem For All Your Crypto Needs | IDO Live
by
Duchess
on 16/02/2022, 17:35:30 UTC
Hello,

It looks like your Bounty Campaign ended at 9th February.

Bounty thread is closed, so let me ask you here for a specific bounty rewards distribution date.

Hmm... How sure are we that they'll answer here? They've going silent for weeks now, posting on their bounty thread and managed to went online three days ago, but ignored all the questions and discussion here. I would really appreciate if they can be as active on this forum as they're on their telegram channel

I won't be surprised if the fate of bounty hunters here will be the same with most of bounty programs that ended up not receiving any from the project. This is the risk of joining a bounty program because mostly, it depends on how well the project will do in terms of crowdsourcing or sales of their token. From their site, they will be listed in pancakeswap in about 17 hours. We will see how this will perform in the trading market but expect that there will be surge in the first couple of days, and then, the true market value will be seen after more than a week or so in the trading market.

It is the risk that bounty hunters take and they have to live with it. The project looks promising and it will be interesting to watch progress. If you are correct then it will be bad for the project trust.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: BiblePay - TestNet Thread - Pool Testing for Proof of Bible Hash Pool (PoBh)
by
Duchess
on 17/08/2017, 17:39:09 UTC
What version must be used for pool mining?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][KEK] Kekcoin | PoS | MemeTech | Tipbot
by
Duchess
on 06/08/2017, 22:35:04 UTC
What? This means that there is no such address, cause all letters are capital. The right key probably has appropriate balance on it. But this guy won't be able to import his keys unless he will find the right pair of public and privat keys with small and capital letters in them.
I dont think so, dev noticed this before he distributed the coin, so all caps address wont have balance on it dev only send kekcoin to the correct address

That not true, cos my key were in the correct format when i generated it, but only saved to cap after i did a print to pdf in other to save the keys. if he or she copied their kek address directly from the site like i did they will have a balance but won't be able to claim it after.

I'm not sure if this would work, but you could try a brute-force approach. Test every possible combination of caps and non-caps for your private key. You'd need to build a program to do it for you, but since you know what all the letters/numbers are you *might* be able to do it.

If your keys were correct when you generated them and you followed all other steps correctly then the airdrop will have been sent. Are you sure you recorded the correct public key into the RADS smart chain?

Good luck!

Check your public all caps address in the block explorer. If there is a balance on it then you have a problem. An all caps address can be valid. The problem is it is not possible to reverse engineer from a public key to a private key. If one number changes in the public key then the private key could be something completely different. Maybe it is not the case that it is a matter of upper and lower case combinations of the private key to match the all caps public key. Coins successfully sent to an all caps address will be lost forever.

Yes i recorded the correct public key on the smart chain, my profile is on the list of airdrop recipient, I also confirmed it with the dev. However, I didn't notice the keys saved to caps till it was too late to have the dev resend the coins to a different address. i vivildy remember seeing the keys in the correct format after it was generated, so the only reason i can attribute to the all caps, is when i did the print to pdf to save the info.

Look inside the text file you saved before upload to Radium.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][KEK] Kekcoin | PoS | MemeTech | Tipbot
by
Duchess
on 06/08/2017, 11:16:15 UTC
What? This means that there is no such address, cause all letters are capital. The right key probably has appropriate balance on it. But this guy won't be able to import his keys unless he will find the right pair of public and privat keys with small and capital letters in them.
I dont think so, dev noticed this before he distributed the coin, so all caps address wont have balance on it dev only send kekcoin to the correct address

That not true, cos my key were in the correct format when i generated it, but only saved to cap after i did a print to pdf in other to save the keys. if he or she copied their kek address directly from the site like i did they will have a balance but won't be able to claim it after.

I'm not sure if this would work, but you could try a brute-force approach. Test every possible combination of caps and non-caps for your private key. You'd need to build a program to do it for you, but since you know what all the letters/numbers are you *might* be able to do it.

If your keys were correct when you generated them and you followed all other steps correctly then the airdrop will have been sent. Are you sure you recorded the correct public key into the RADS smart chain?

Good luck!

Check your public all caps address in the block explorer. If there is a balance on it then you have a problem. An all caps address can be valid. The problem is it is not possible to reverse engineer from a public key to a private key. If one number changes in the public key then the private key could be something completely different. Maybe it is not the case that it is a matter of upper and lower case combinations of the private key to match the all caps public key. Coins successfully sent to an all caps address will be lost forever.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Fork 1:1 of Bitcoin - Pro on-chain scaling
by
Duchess
on 05/08/2017, 11:07:25 UTC
lol, 20 confirmations needed at Bittrex for deposit. I will have to look again in a week's time if it cleared yet.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][Airdrop + No ICO] Agenda Tokens ~~~ WAVES + UBQ
by
Duchess
on 23/07/2017, 09:08:21 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Ethereum: Welcome to the Beginning
by
Duchess
on 22/07/2017, 04:18:17 UTC
It would be great if countries move their fiat to Eth tokens. Imagine what it would do to the Eth price. I would just like to know what would happen if a country does move its fiat to some kind of contract and it gets hacked and drained like we see with these hacks? What guarantees does a country have how it would be handled and if so would there be a difference in handling between countries of different sizes/locations/principles etc?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][AL] Anonymous Lending Protocol
by
Duchess
on 20/07/2017, 19:26:09 UTC
I like it as Idea. But most important question - debt collection, How do you plan realise it in frame of anonimity?


The anonymity is so that the guy taking out the loan can disappear with the money without being traced.
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: If Segwit2x gains 90% support before Aug 1st, will BIP148 still go live?
by
Duchess
on 18/07/2017, 19:31:57 UTC
Where can I see current signalling stats for the various SegWit BIPs?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: COINDASH - Future of trading - Token Sale 17th July 2017
by
Duchess
on 17/07/2017, 17:08:18 UTC
7 million has been stolen like this ?? they should rollback ...
I doubt they will rollback the blockhain for this  , and most likely this coin has lost all volume and it will be dumped as soon as possible ,  even if the people who sent eth to the fake address will receive the coin , the devs have no funds to proceed with this project , making this coin worthless.

They have to. The Eth dev team set the precedent with DAO and they have to do it again here. The impact of future rollbacks on the Eth price was taken into account when they made the call with DAO. $7m is a lot of money to lose and $6.4m will produce an inferior product.

Everyone knew the day would come with the next big Eth related hack and now another rollback must happen.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: COINDASH - Future of trading - Token Sale 17th July 2017
by
Duchess
on 17/07/2017, 17:05:28 UTC
Reply on slack:



People pay for $12m to develop with not $6.4m. The $7m Eth will be dumped. This is contract breach and investors have the right to request a refund/Eth rollback.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: COINDASH - Future of trading - Token Sale 17th July 2017
by
Duchess
on 17/07/2017, 16:07:38 UTC
let me think about this situation clearly,

1. i make announcement " hey everybody, i will launch the ico, this is the apps we would use ( going to hire some ultra beginer developer to make beta apps ) "
2. i advertise my ico launch date
3. when ico date comes, i make a new eth wallet in MEW then i put it on website.
4. i watch the eth coming to my New Eth wallet i just made
5. when i check it reach 7 million and i feel its enough for me i write in ann thread and twitter " hello my fellow supporter and investor, our website is getting hacked and hacker put his address on it "
6. i let people reacting...screaming...
7. i announce to people " hei my fellow supporter and investor, dont worry we will send you our token even if you send it to hacker address ( the fact its also my address )
8. i act like a hero who put my money on this project because of hacker.


this is just my negative though

however we did not know what is really happened, right now


they announced a hardcap of $12m. they have to return the excess. if the remainder is less than $12m the are in breach of contractand liable  as people invest based on a promise to develop with $12m, not $3m or $5m or $10m. They also closed the ico with objective reached. people should be able to have a case claiming their money back.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: COINDASH - Future of trading - Token Sale 17th July 2017
by
Duchess
on 17/07/2017, 15:54:26 UTC
All eth trading should be halted and a rollback done. it is the only fair solution. but only EthHF  not Etc obviously. Etc can decline all requests for rollback. EthHF cant.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: COINDASH - Future of trading - Token Sale 17th July 2017
by
Duchess
on 17/07/2017, 15:34:00 UTC
This is an interesting situation for the Ethereum dev team in my view.

I believe they will have to roll back the Ethereum blockhain. Those that say WHAT?? must realize that with the DAO rollback they set a precedent. this was what the people against the DAO rollback warned against. this is a perfect example of the warning realizing. A good lawyer should be able to force the Eth team to rollback again as they did it previously without specifying criteria for rollback qualification. If the hack really happened, this is the only way to get the peoples money back.

if the Eth team did not want to be in this position, the should not have allowed the DAO rollback. it is a matter of principle.

you are probably right,  but it won't be rolled back
it is selective outrage - just like everything else these days

they have to halt all Eth trading to minimize the damage and do a rollback. they have no choice as if they dont it could potentially be seen as negligence. i am against rollbacks but the eth team signaled differently that they are willing to rollback in the case of DAO and this instance is no different. By choosing the path of rollback with DAO they have chosen the path off rollback for other hacks.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: COINDASH - Future of trading - Token Sale 17th July 2017
by
Duchess
on 17/07/2017, 15:11:33 UTC
This is an interesting situation for the Ethereum dev team in my view.

I believe they will have to roll back the Ethereum blockhain. Those that say WHAT?? must realize that with the DAO rollback they set a precedent. this was what the people against the DAO rollback warned against. this is a perfect example of the warning realizing. A good lawyer should be able to force the Eth team to rollback again as they did it previously without specifying criteria for rollback qualification. If the hack really happened, this is the only way to get the peoples money back.

if the Eth team did not want to be in this position, the should not have allowed the DAO rollback. it is a matter of principle.