I don't think they have a chance to catch up with their rival - Orderbook. And here is why:

-Orderbook actually holds patent for regulated token technology https://www.newsbtc.com/press-releases/orderbook-announces-one-kind-regulation-aware-protocol-tokenized-securities/
-Orderbook has the best tool set for enabling compliance. They have implemented KYC/AML, Accredited Investor Status check and DocuSign electronic signature. Also they have license for trading bitcoin, ethereum and USD in 50 states.
-Orderbook is now in process of acquiring SEC licenses for public securities offerings and private securities offering.
-Orderbook is actually working decentralized exchange and ICO platform and they have done couple of dozens of ICO's.

They also have a private SAFT round. You could try your luck writing to their telegram support channel or sending them email. They are quite responsive.

They are far behind their competitor from Ambisafe - the Orderbook.

-Orderbook actually holds patent for regulated token technology https://www.newsbtc.com/press-releases/orderbook-announces-one-kind-regulation-aware-protocol-tokenized-securities/
-Orderbook has the best tool set for enabling compliance. They have implemented KYC/AML, Accredited Investor Status check and DocuSign electronic signature. Also they have license for trading bitcoin, ethereum and USD in 50 states.
-Orderbook is now in process of acquiring SEC licenses for public securities offerings and private securities offering.
-Orderbook is actually working decentralized exchange and ICO platform and they have done couple of dozens of ICO's.

They also have a private SAFT round. You could try your luck writing to their telegram support channel or sending them email. They are quite responsive.

On Ethereum there is at least Ambisafe's project Orderbook that does pretty much the same except far ahead, because:

a)Orderbook is already working decentralized exhcange.
b)Orderbook is an ICO platform that launched couple of dozens ICO's.
c)Orderbook actually holds patent for regulated token technology . https://www.newsbtc.com/press-releases/orderbook-announces-one-kind-regulation-aware-protocol-tokenized-securities/
d)Orderbook has implemented KYC/AML verification, Accredited Investor Status verification and DocuSign electronic signature. This is the best compliance tool set that is implemented by any exchange.
e)Orderbook is now in process of acquiring SEC licenses for private securities offering and public securities offering. And you can't even apply for those if you don't have all of the above mentioned technologies in place already working.


Also instead of ordinary ICO they do a private SAFT round. You can ask them by mail or in telegram support chat about it.

Polymath is strictly worse version of Ambisafe's Orderbook.
They are not even first with regulated tokens idea since Orderbook holds patent for this stuff.
https://www.newsbtc.com/press-releases/orderbook-announces-one-kind-regulation-aware-protocol-tokenized-securities/

Also unlike Polymath they start with private SAFT round instead of shoving it into everyone's throat with overrated commercial budgets. You can ask about the private round on their email or in support channel in Telegram and maybe you will get invited.

Sorry to disappoint you but Ambisafe holds patent for regulation-aware tokens. They are more general technology for all kinds of tokens that check any third-party regulator database before enabling trade transaction. Here is a press release https://www.newsbtc.com/press-releases/orderbook-announces-one-kind-regulation-aware-protocol-tokenized-securities/


Also their ICO platform/decentralized exchange Orderbook has already implemented KYC/AML, Accredited Investor check and DocuSign. Currently they are in the process of getting license from SEC for private security offerings and public security offerings.

And they open with SAFT private round they don't speak about anywhere. But you can write a mail to Orderbook or ask in the telegram chat of their support and they might invite you to participate.

We need both regulated and unregulated financial markets. Blockchain as a technology leads to unregulated financial market becomes a thing.

But we don't want it become too big. There is still kinds of businesses we don't want to have access to large scale financial infrastructure. Like money laundering or drug trade or human trafficking or child pornography. To keep this at bay we need stuff like KYC/AML checks on major exchanges.

Also paying taxes in crypto plus establishing blockchain control over government spendings will be an incredibly powerful combination for a better state.

That's basically the reasoning behind orderbook.io exchange implementing KYC, Docusign, accredited investor verification, getting licenses to trade BTC, ETH and tokens in all 50 states and in the process of getting licenses for private securities and public securities issuance and trading.

Use orderbook.io - a decentralized exchange with hackproof architecture and decent investments into security auditing (unlike ether delta). 

However if you trade in small volumes then you better take risks to be hacked.

Orderbook is a pretty good one. However it is more of an ICO platform but they accept fiat USD with wire transfer. Also they have password recovery and are strictly superior in terms of design and UI.

Ok, here is a wierd thought: It is arguable how good is cryptocurrency versus widely adopted fiat and all of already existing banking infrastructure.

But there is a niche where blockchain outshines existing technologies by orders of magnitude. And this is stock markets.

I mean modern stocks are still papers with fancy stamps, that are regulated by legislation and enforcement. And also there is a very complex financial and legal infrastructure to keep those stocks of different companies tradeable across the globe. And smart contract blockchain reduces this infrastructure and legislation enforcement bureaucracy  to distributed network of computers.

World combined market cap of all paper assets is near $300trln.

All we need to move it to all-around better blockchain infrastructure is just legislation about smart contracts. A crypto stock should be legal equivalent of an ordinary stock if its coded to work the same way a stock would work.

Rape is a crime. Period.

But "sexual harassment" is way more disturbing trend. Nowadays in US any initiative towards women can be punished as sexual harassment. And after this women are whipping about decline of "real men" in western world.

It depends how that token functions. It is a inner currency tied to some economy (like HKN) and as this economy grows the purchasing power of this token also grows.
Or it could be a profit share token (like ACR). They basically are digital stocks and they will pay you dividends over time.

If it's another useless coin that does nothing then there is no point in buying it.

Actually you can think of dogecoin as of strictly cheaper bitcoin or litecoin. If all you need is just payment system then its pretty good one.

This is why www.orderbook.io is better. It is expensive as fuck but strictly superior to everything else in terms of security.

From technological perspective every single hard fork is now better then bitcoin because it has lower transaction fees.

Every single smart-contract supporting blockchain is better then bitcoins since it allows to do way more advanced things with your finances.

The only thing bitcoin has for now is huge PR with that skyrocketing prices and all the buzz in mainstream media. Thats about it.

Bullying is a natural behavior that promotes pack survival. Either man up and don't be an easy target for bullying or go search for another pack where there will be some easier targets.

First - rank one in the kill list of muslims are other muslims. They kill each other orders of magnitude more then representatives of any other religions.

Second... For all Islam apologists - could you explain why there were no religious wars between christians, jews, hindus, buddhists or atheists for the last couple of centuries? Is that a coincidence?

I guess there is no One Main Reason for this.

My own reason to not be religious - I don't like false confidence.

My bet for most widespread reason is "My parents were religious and enforced their dogma on me so I rebel."

The first answer is right. It's an environment lottery.

You may be lucky to be born in a family that knows how to treat money properly and just learn those skills from childhood.

You may be not born in a family with good financial skills but you may come across right people who can teach you these.

Or come across right books and right videos and use your knowledge to search for right opportunities to climb the financial ladder (my case).

Or you may be unlucky for all of the above.

The point is - your brain is inclined to attribute everything you succeeded at to your hard work and put a large discount on this environmental luck factor. So don't get big headed. If you worked your way from the bottom to be successful  then nothing will bring you so much long term pleasure as sending that elevator back down.

It depends on how do you define atheism.
Atheism could be defined as strict denial of existence of any deity. Then it is just irrational as any religion.

Dawkins definition of Atheism is "Atheist is a person who thinks there is no compelling evidence for any existing narrative for any deity." In Dawkins definitions atheism = agnosticism.

For me I am a rationalist. I don't have a goal to believe in god. I don't have a goal to disbelieve in god. My goal is to believe in god in the universe where god exists and not to believe in god in the universe where he doesn't exist.

Use DDOS protection with something like CloudFlare?