We developed a scoring model in partnership with Group IB, a well-known company with a long history in cybersecurity. They are one of the leaders in their field in Eastern Europe. Based on this scoring model, we deemed 24 exchanges and wallets eligible to be insured. Obviously, they are fairly large exchanges with extensive customer bases and high traded values. As for the other exchanges with an unclear level of risk, we have developed a special approach to form an insurance fund at the expense of the exchange, which functions as a franchise.

I am not ready to believe such a services. In my country, there are no such insurance options for covering my bank saving accounts or my trading accounts. Why this service is taking responsibility for exchanges and web wallet providers whereas real life insurance companies are not able to do so (or at least in my country).

I was entering to this discussion like imagining typical insurance services which is also accepting major cryptos for buying policies and for paying premiums. But, this sounds like non-realistic as it will not be possible to cover our BTC holding by an insurance company. I guess they have messed up by without analyzing how a basic insurance coverage works.

We developed a scoring model in partnership with Group IB, a well-known company with a long history in cyber security. They are one of the leaders in their field in Eastern Europe. Based on this scoring model, we deemed 24 exchanges and wallets eligible to be insured. Obviously, they are fairly large exchanges with extensive customer bases and high traded values. As for the other exchanges with an unclear level of risk, we have developed a special approach to form an insurance fund at the expense of the exchange, which functions as a franchise. In the event of a loss, this fund will initially be used to cover it, with subsequent indemnification from the insurer. It gives the exchange incentive to ensure stable operation.

You do not have a quality agency with unknown specialists. How do you prove that your ratings are not corrupt?

Gentlemen, just to inform, that working with this team could be for free, since Digrate is trying to save money not paying to interpreters. The guys have set themselves the goal of having a translation at the level of the "native speaker", but they are looking for it for some reason in the Russian language branch of the forum in the low price segment, instead of contacting ABBY, for example, which takes much more money for such services.

As a result, the test task by their side was passed. Then there is a translation, as soon as the translation is completed the flashing phrases about the "native speaker" suddenly become the basis for refusing to accept the work. I emphasize this happens when translated text in thier hand after passing the test task; text  correspond to origin in terms of meaning and technical terms. The only one criteria to refuse is that you are not at level of the "native speaker", which can be speculated indefinitely.

Attempts to get out of the situation finding compromise with the correcting of the text do not work either. Discussion lost sens finally, as it's difficult to reach required level of "native speacker" from point of view of non-native speackers from Digrate.

Rating scale of attractiveness to have deal: D - Low, default level