Don't shatter their precious little egos, it is us peasants who are in the wrong. Always. They always have the moral highground.

---

Sorry to see you go.

If you would like statistics that aren't skewed, you can check out the following page that was created over the course of around a year:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180825232210/http://minifrij.com/nasty/

Assuming that the return is linear over the year (which it wouldn't be) and the return is on one seat (which it absolutely isn't), the return halved is around 0.00020501. Compared to the price of a seat around one year ago, 0.0077BTC, the return is closer to 2.5%. Not that this is accurate whatsoever though, as the reward given is a result of multiple seats, therefore meaning the percentage return is significantly lower.

Regarding the sale price of a seat alone, in USD (as Og loves to reference), you would have made more than double your money by just keeping the BTC used at this point (and up to 3x more over the course of the last year), rather than buying the seat over a year.

Now, if those aren't returns worth creaming yourself over, what is?

---

I have no intention of replying to anyone over this, the statistics are there for anyone to see and figure out. If you expect me to answer anything, don't hold your breath.

Huh? Who are you again?

There's an auction for a roll running for a few more hours, if you're quick.

You don't necessarily have to exclude users from your list (~) unless you distrust their ratings. In most cases, just deleting them from the list entirely will accomplish the same result.

---

It's not particularly fair to blame the forum in it's entirety for the actions of (mostly) one user. Not naming any names of course.

A domain isn't a physical good. I expect that hilarious is referring more to places like the 'Collectibles' subforum, where actual physical items are bought and sold.

---

It's likely a similar story to what happened with bigtimespaghetti and his coin making guide.

Damn, you mean that my username (miniFrij) suggests that this is an alt? Perhaps the staked message and trust rating left on this account was a bit of a giveaway too.

While you didn't explicitly say you were going to do so, the implication is there and plain to see.

I haven't once said any lies about you, I explained how I think owlcatz's thought process went and showed the evidence I used to get there. Once again, you are trying to use negative trust to silence anyone that speaks out against you.

Og mentions contacting the police here.

I can agree that some arguments/threads against Og have perhaps been taken too far, however I don't see owlcatz being at fault whatsoever in this case.

OgNasty said that he would be contacting the police on who he thinks did it. He also said that he thinks owlcatz is the person who he thinks did it. Logically owlcatz then assumed that, because of this, Og would be contacting the police on him.

According to Og, this means that owlcatz is guilty.

I'm not even sure you know what you're trying to accomplish at this point. Your messages make absolutely no sense.

Why should they? Because some mong on the internet is asking for it?

Not all parties in your OP are responsible.

To which they have been. Those behind this have been tagged, and will likely stay so for the foreseeable future.
Considering they have a seemingly permanent mark on their profiles due to this, I don't understand what else you plan to accomplish.

So, after Zeroxal wants it to stop and go away, you continue bumping it for over a year - despite the people behind it being tagged for such?

I'm not going to argue about this further though, it's clear that you won't even remove the incorrect information about me in this thread, let alone be respectful to the victim.

Correct.

---

I can personally vouch that Hhampuz and TMAN are two separate people, and the three people you listed will likely be able to do the same.
I'd expect that the majority of people in the Collectibles section have dealt with these two previously, and so can likely also vouch.

Significantly more than you currently have. If you look on the Boards breakdown, you can see that almost all boards have several thousand posts (with the exception of Korea). This is significantly more activity than the Ukraine seems to have.

In addition, AFAIK it helps if you have a trusted user who fully understands the rules and how to enforce them (E.G with a significant amount of reports) to moderate the section. I am doubtful that either aiwe or yourself fit that quota.

You could have easily posted this in the Stake Your Bitcoin Address thread; there was no need for it to be it's own.
Either way, I have quoted it. You can lock it and move it to Archival now, before the signature spammers get hold of it.

Tell you what, I'll even reply from another account without a signature. Aren't I good to you?

You see, if you had read the thread, you would see that the OP asked why referral links were banned. All Sharma did was say that they were and link to the rules. The OP already knew this, so that post was completely useless to the topic. What I did was tell him why referral links were banned, like he asked.

Let's see, not reading threads or replies properly before posting. Sounds like you're the pot calling the kettle black here.

Let's go into these posts a bit more. The first posts that you showed (the quoted post, and the first two in the image) were both me claiming something someone was offering, and auction bids. There is no possible way to make these posts constructive, and I'm not going to change my posting habits simply because I have a signature campaign.
The last post in the Auction section of the forum. If you had been around this forum long enough (shit-posting about the price and USD in the Economics section doesn't count, which seems to be all you did) you would know that I could not edit my original post to include that, as no posts in the Auctions section can be deleted or edited by anyone other than staff members. It was impossible for me to send that message in any other way than by posting again, else I would have done so.

Secondly, I like that you're pointing out all of the short posts I do to try and paint me in a bad light, whilst completely ignoring posts like this or this or the majority of my other posts which are on-topic and constructive (at least more-so than your own).

And finally, on this topic, I have a campaign manager who looks over all of my posts at the end of the month. Any posts like the ones that you have quoted, are not paid. So basically, every single one of your arguments are invalid, try again.

Apart from, the first half of my post was giving possible solutions to your problem. Of course, you don't read posts properly however, so you would have missed that.

I hope you're not suggesting my account has ever changed hands, as it hasn't. My name has been attached to me for almost 6 years at this point, I would not sell that for any amount of money (especially not $60-$100).