All the action is not happening here, but on Slack, right?

Don't mind it. A one man opinion overshadows a lot. I actually *did* fund, though only 4 shares, and they took that money too 

I don't know. And I didn't gave them +200% back; them, I gave back 100% by ratio for the amount what had been compromised.
The other part, was a refund of the project itself (not towards its participants), as it was my "pet project"; I left the community, not my work, for which I had opted quite a few months before it finally went live. And I guess some people were happy with it, at least to some degree, as at one point nearly half the Slack userbase was in.
I revamped it, left and handed it over in good order, and that was it for me. How the project is doing now, I don't know and I don't care, as that's up to the one(s) in control now.

Communicating, obviously: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1343317.msg15815665#msg15815665 , last sentence.

How's the file reporting going?

So? You weren't in, nor in any of the details, were you?

Yes, the project got compromised on my part. And I didn't hit and run, I faced the community as per my own request, as I was the one responsible over the compromise. Instead of a proper conversation on how to solve and possibilities to explore, accusations were made pretty fast (which given the circumstances, I could understand) and threads made both to the person and my children (which, obviously, I have no understanding for). All together, it made me decide to leave.
I left an amount of BTC's by ratio equal to what had been compromised for those affected, on a public address (<== verifiable) with the private key in possession to those affected, out of my own personal bag.
The logins and work method were handed over, in private, as well (not to the ones flaming and threatening, obviously). Before I did that, I had refunded the project with a rough ~150% (<== verifiable) of what had been compromised; again, out of my own personal bag. The sub-project I was working on to counter the upcoming halving, I did finished that one and sent it along shortly afterwards.

So all together, everything affected was compensated/refunded with ~230-240% out of my own personal bag (verifiable). How's that for a 99.9% scam chance...



Oh, and btw, before the compromise, I wasn't anonymous anymore...

Seriously?

If some of the community feels the desire or urge to file a report, kindly, then be my guest.
And no, I have no intention of removing my post. It's Gulden related, and if not specified on the why by the sender otherwise than his personal desire, I see no valid reason why to remove or revise it.

I am surprised still getting reactions/follow-ups regarding Project Hybrid/Guldenshares. So, summary:

End June, project compromised.
July 3, project refunded with personal balance.
July 4, every shareholder compensated for the compromised amount by ratio (associated with 1FfHX8VoVUAsQsuADyeHo8MqUfuVxTBpTn ).
July 4, announced my departure from the Gulden community.
July 4, transfered the logins and work method (associated with 1CafDNRgkDsF16zgo4zucNZ7E9r4eiHFV2 ).
July 6, transferred the details, address and private key for subproject to counter upcoming halving (associated with 1Bjija19MyUEvPFEhtnZLvVgTuQ8XnCmU7 ).

So kindly, to those applicable, turn your questions/comments/whatever to the one(s) now responsible for the project, as I am no more, nor any part of this community and nor wish to (and hence, neither wish to answer your questions/comments/whatever anymore)

Ah... Okay, let's do some fun!

I claim it to, that you owe Waterloo the 2k.
Reason: You stated your bet, with easy exploits 


Like Waterloo already noted very easily:

 

No, project Hybrid doesn't contribute to such. It is buying Guldens from the market, not selling them 

3e betalingronde is uitbetaald @ 1050 NLG per share.
Totaal uitbetaald deze ronde: 276.150 NLG (263 shares).

Met een gestegen difficulty van iets onder de 20% sinds de laatste uitbetaling, hebben we deze ronde een leuke prestatie neergezet. Yeah 

Address: 1FfHX8VoVUAsQsuADyeHo8MqUfuVxTBpTn

Message: GeorgeAurea, 28-May-2016, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.3980 for future references.

Signature: H5gSU2ZxB3vXtKiI79plu14qtE2neYZcCgDdIBpNyC8uYAZBWuHdveVE+hOSdovFM+/DRPjp8Ibe4s0xrdm1WQc=

Yes, it's an ether investment.

Currently, you can only buy DOA's with ether.
After the 28st of May, when DOA's get listed on exchanges, you can also trade DOA's for other currencies.

Yeah, the message I was referring to was derived from Bittrex; forgot to mention that in my post 

There is a lot of talk about adoption, yet what I miss, is any talk regarding technological development...

"The last block update occurred 35 minutes ago". <-- this is just from a random transaction I did today, and still pending whilst writing this.
Quite likely, no merchant or customer is fond of waiting for more than half an hour, when buying let's say for instance a pack of bubble gum of whatever other goods with their AUR's...

If adoption is being targeted before resolving and countering technological issues as above, I highly doubt any true success potential irl...

Indeed. This whole DAO thing could prove a nice mileage towards how crypto is being looked upon in general... 

Valid argument.

What works and what not, is everyone's own decision. Though sharing results on what is being debated and subject to this threat, is a bit off topic and contradictory towards the intention of this thread. So if you would like to share results, then other threads are more appropriate to do such 

Where did you derived that number from if I might ask?

Anyways, in my experience, Gulden is received with a smile. Mostly such conversations are started with Bitcoin, since that's an entity most have heard of; but when I tell them that there is so much more, I tell them of Gulden as well. Guldens were our nations currency before the euro, so when I tell people about it how it still exist, I always see a little sparkling. But that's probably due to my generation and the generation I am conversing with on such occasions    At least from some I know whom I have spoken to have been purchasing Guldens, and a few have even started mining them... 

Ah, okay. Got an 404 error earlier this day when trying to access http://aurpool.com:8080/, whilst just plain http://aurpool.com/ seemed to work, hence I quoted that one.

If some of the algo's are showing irregularities, perhaps update the initial post temporary with the advice as LTEX stated; I think it's not a good commercial if miners were to direct their hardware, and would found out AUR showing irregular behavior to the algo's they were aiming at... 

Maybe scammers is a harsh word, but I do not know how else to describe it properly. "We have now information about that the new S9 miner soon will come out on the market so now you can preorder your mining shares with the new S9 Miners", is what is stated on their page. That's pretty vague. Under such arguments, one could also be pre-selling quantum computers (the S9's), because there are already regular computers on the market (the S7's)...

Fact is, is that S9's are not there yet, let alone any (rough) specifications. S9's are thus date still a rumor, nothing more. Though Miningsweden is selling such units, be them as preorders though, at the same price/speed as S7's, without them having any knowledge on those (rough) specifications.
So basically, until Bitmain itself is a) announcing them, and b) enclose their (aimed) specifications, and c) selling them, and d) actually shipping them, Miningsweden is simply (pre)selling air or vaporware...