Eventually, it seems there is an incompatibility between Tor v2 and v3 addresses depending on the versions of Tor and bitcoind and Bitcoin Core so when you update Tor you need newer Tor v3 addresses, and when you update Bitcoin you need newer Tor. I am running bitcoins v0.18.1 (stable Bitcoin) and it is running fine with Tor 0.4.6.9 (recommended). I had a lot of Tor v2 addresses in my `-addnode` list.

Actually, I am running Tor 0.4.6.9 (recommended) and I get `tor: Add onion failed; error code 513`.

What was the solution?

The ',' may be used to add clarity - alternatively hyphenating a section may also be used - depending on whether additional explanation is required. The use of bracketing is best avoided and it provides for some readers non-reading sections (rather than to explain and provide inline notes where it is better with -).

[Withdrawn]

3 @ 0.04 or 2 @ 0.06 or 1 @ 0.11

You will be welcome, of course, to support our project with the signature and avatar, but places currently are filled. Keep in touch, and keep building your reputation you may be considered in future.

-DA.

Terminology is a mutex in the lexicography of Bitcoin  where we  equate many views of the same operations with only one truth rather than an expanding model including differential references. UTXO's, true but in the mind of the user that is a wallet address, in many cases several UTXO's a set of even if some are reused.

Let m e establish a testing protocol if you have some Bitcoin to mix anyway and choose to participate. This is suggested because I do not have the answer, there are two intermediate buckets in the diagram, however, an undefined limit of input sources to those buckets, even where the relationship to the bucket is undetectable we suppose, and that the return from a mixing deposit transaction is not immediate but with some delay, so to establish a mixing session and then make multiple deposits immediately subsequent to each other and all greater than 0.005 BTC in value, then to observe or better to analyse the resultant returns. Often, I am mixing en-route concisely with the making of a payment in which case my wallet is certainly disconnected, but, I am still able to monitor the receiving address(es). If you consider?

Thank-you. Certainly SegWit addresses are supported but at this time not native bech32.
Thanks, we decided to leave the calculator alone since the only valid amount to send fo free mix is 0.001 BTC and people should get used to seeing the amount with the fee, which with full service mixing 0.005 BTC returns 0.00406 BTC.
Thank you for trying this for me. Unfortunately, for the free mix the amount must be exactly 0.001 BTC or it does not register for free mix and as it is less than 0.005B BTC it is dust to your transaction. It is a little problem and occasionally people find this but it is already announced just to send a precise amount.

It is worth questioning, it was more than months ago. I took note of what was said at the time but, not to create a reference, only thinking how good it was to have a consistent view now, nonetheless, it is in the public media released on free-to-air television, or on MSN or similar, I believe taken in Canberra published not more than three-and-a-half Years ago, and at least eighteen-months ago.

A wallet is a group of addresses. If you wallet has non bech32 addresses that a re segwit ie. starting with 3, or native starting with 1 then you can put through the transaction fine. Otherwise, you can transfer it from one wallet program to another easily.

In reality, if input < 0.005
  output=nothing: dust
except
  free mix=true
&
  input = 0.001
  output = 0.001

If you create your mixing session again you will see there have been a few updates since your screen capture was taken and it now only displays one message either for Full service or Free Mix.

The Free Mix is only for 0.001 BTC to trial the service, to establish trust effectively and so that people can see what the mixing service does.

Otherwise, the Full Mix minimum is 0.005 BTC

Good Afternoon,

Thank-you, I can see that you have started on your review.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267826.msg54970001#msg54970001

Please note, the information displayed for Free Mix is correct and there are two separate buttons, 'Start Bitcoin Anonymization' for full service mixing and '' to trial the service mixing 0.001 BTC only. On the Mix My Coins For Free button there is only one address input and it correctly states 0.001 BTC



On the Mixing Active screen the calculator is still shown but it is irrelevant as you are running a free mix of 0.001 BTC in the example you mentioned. There is only one Mixing Active screen regardless if it is a Free Mix or a Full Mix.

Most I have calculated are around 5% + 0.0007 BTC

A small saving is significant when distributed across a large number of transactions using the service regularly.

Hello, the community!

Welcome to Go-Vert bitcoin mixer partner of Jambler. We are happy to announce our platforms with the great bitcoin community 'Bitcointalk'. We are more excited to launch a mini "honest-review" campaign to improve our platforms. For the test our mixing service, we will select 10 people who will receive 0.0013 from us to test our mixer.

To know more details you may read our official announcement thread.

How does the mixer work?

source: Jambler.io

Terms & conditions:
1. Since our test review campaign has limited spots, we only allow applying above Sr. Member. It doesn't mean below Sr. Members aren't experience, we are limited with the spot.
2. Post your Bitcoin address only if you want to review our mixer. We will send the fund to the selected person and we will announce to whom we have sent the funds.
3. We will send 0.0013BTC to each participant to test our mixer. We are encouraging to use "Start Bitcoin Anonymization" to mix coins, (Service fee: 4.9% + 0.0007 BTC) and minimum mixing amount is 0.005BTC. But you may use "Mix Coins For Free*" option if you don't want to use your own funds. ( Network transaction fees may apply.)
4. The exact 0.001BTC has to send if you want to test on the "Mix Coins For Free" service. So we are sending you 0.0013 which would cover your sending fee as well.
5. You don't need to make a new reply with your review, just edit your application with your honest review. Of course, we will be happy to see your honest review and feedback on our official announcement thread, but it isn't part of review campaign and totally dependent on you. We will appreciate your feedback to improve our platforms.
6. This isn't like first come first serve system. We will manually select the participants. You may proceed with further action after receiving the fund.

---

* Participants will be selected by Coolcryptovator and funds have been escrowed to him. So the funds will be sent from Coolcryptovator's wallet.

You imagine the operation of the technology that I employ for Bitcoin Mixer 2.0 to be simple like a regular implementation. In fact, it is difficult. It is possible to use a VPN to connect a server to Cloudflare so that it has no external IP addresses and it is a good service, reasonably secure.

Nothing on the internet is impervious to inspection and you should presume all traffic is inspected even if it is not necessarily. That is why people prefer The Onion.

Anyway, what person is busted using a legal service legally? As it is the platform is a modular and mixing Bitcoin cannot be wrong, it is not an attempt to hide from the legitimate government.
Even if you ignore this attached document it is referenced here.
https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/q/87694/75001

-DA.

You imagine the operation of the technology that I employ for Bitcoin Mixer 2.0 to be simple like a regular implementation. In fact, it is difficult. It is possible to use a VPN to connect a server to Cloudflare so that it has no external IP addresses and it is a good service, reasonably secure.

Nothing on the internet is impervious to inspection and you should presume all traffic is inspected even if it is not necessarily. That is why people prefer The Onion.

-DA.

The free mix is to trial service and is only for deposit amount of 0.001 BTC

You have identified one main advantage, it is always good to have more reliable mixing services in crypto space, but you can see on the posts above yours that they admit participants and moderate incoming Bitcoin supply.

0.005 BTC is not very much, likely the amount will reduce as the value of Bitcoin increases.

-DA.

If you inspect the Invest Bitcoin with Jambler.io program you will see easily that the supply is from the real exchanges. I am aware from those working separately on other partnerships with Jambler.io that they often reject Bitcoin deposits depending on several factors but also the traceable history of Bitcoin in the transaction, for example they may be linked back to a heist or high-risk casino I suspect.


See above.


Each mixing session is open for 168 hours and you can send multiple times, some people have been known to send hundreds of BTC in multiple lots of 50 BTC. Once you send, check your wallet to monitor progress.


This seems to be a custom implementation, you may ask in Telegram on the Jambler.io support https://t.me/jambler

I am aware from those working separately on other partnerships with Jambler.io that they often reject Bitcoin deposits depending on several factors but also the tracable history of Bitcoin in the transaction, for example they may be linked back to a heist or high-risk casino I suspect.

I invite you to trial the mixer and post back with your success, you can see I have attached now also some data to the announcement, however, you can mix for free minus your transaction fee if you use the Mix Coins For Free button to see how it works?