Where can trade?  Right here!  How many would you like to buy?    

Beware, demand is high!

If there are any Clam developers, then it is their place to speak about any blockchain issues.  If there are not any Clam developers who can fill that role, then any blockchain issue is difficult to resolve, no?

Completely separate to those matters:  someone carried out a suspicious market pattern on Clams (that is, this large pump and dump), and they used Polo as the platform to do it.  I am not surprised if the aftermath includes some amount of delay and background investigation of the asset in question.  That is a danger inherent to trading something with this risk profile.

Plus a single whale (not even a big one!) in this tiny market pairing, can instantly drop the value of Clams by 70% (like occurred the other day), or by any amount.  

When they are ready, and all their ducks are in a row (as the saying goes).  When their Lending profit peaks out.  When their mega-Shorts are ready to trigger.

The recent chart should be a clear indication to all traders, about the risk factor involved in over-staking here.

It's not just the fees.

Their method of using odd and varied numbers of decimal points for different pairs, means that every account ends up with loads of unspendable and unwithdrawable dust.  

Every single account ever used for trading diverse pairs on that exchange, has probably left behind an average of $5-10 (guessing, based on my own old account there from years ago) of untradeable and unrecoverable dust.

A factor of at least 10x (probably more like 100x) dust generation compared to other exchanges.

So who was responsible for the clam scam PnD?  As if trade a coin that's only on one real exchange, one which has Margin trading.  That's just asking to get taken for a massive ride by any random smallwhale that cares to play with you all.  Nothing prevents this happening again.

Hi Graham. I read your article about organisational structures and social groups.  It was interesting.  I can't call my passage a brisk canter, more of a wandering trot.  

One method of growing a small organisation is to innovate.  AKA meritocracy.

Another method is to somehow tether (excuse the unintended pun) it to a larger organisation, e.g. symbiotic, or parasitic.

I like the concept that the ideal crypto project is a highly functional collective intelligence.

I'm interested in your work and the conversation.

That's of such massive relevance, a123canz999888, and as such, it's extreme pertinence to this thread is eminently applicable.

Fascinating post, Graham.

Would you like fries with that supercontinent?

Talk about a killer application.  Pretty cool.  The tech outline you gave makes sense, I think.
 Thanks for the update.

Really looking forward to seeing it all come together.

By posting in the Civic thread?

And then buying some CHIPS. 

Not necessarily in that order.

I'll bet!

If there's any way the community can help just let us know.

How goes the project?

Was there any luck getting any discussions going with upcoming exchanges?

There is obviously little point going after the top tier exchanges as they moved a long way out of everybody's reach many months ago.  The billionaires don't care to talk to the mere thousandaires.

The good thing is there is a surge of new startup exchanges, to meet the needs of the crypto projects that don't have millions just to list.  Some of these startups have shown by their behaviour to date that they are poor prospects.  Others seem quite promising.

You're a harsh critic ComputerGenie. 

Nobody dares speak now.  :p

If you want a good writer who can formalise your communications, I can help.  But it would still need your close direction in the end.  I have no contacts at exchanges, and possess only the most casual technical knowledge about CHIPS.

Indeed, I can't imagine any popular centralised exchange being anything other than expensive to list at, these days.

Therefore the aim may be for a "cheap good" option, aka reasonably priced (which is still going to be relatively expensive!) non top tier exchange which is up and coming (consistently increasing in volume).   I am not knowledgeable to name such a one off top of my head.  But I think those may be a balanced criteria to follow.

A good project must more than make the listing money back (else why is anyone else bothering?!), and this project has the fundamentals to be popular.  And with that popularity would come the financials to afford further listings.

Well, all good in theory.  I'm not the one offering the listing money, obviously.

Didn't you create Komodo, jl777? - which is listed on many big exchanges.  

Due to that, I assumed (no doubt wrongly) that you would already have contact with many exchanges, who should be interested in all your future projects including CHIPS.

Personally I think CHIPS is pretty cool.

Decentralised exchanges like BarterDEX (while still at the small volume stage, so far) are an option too.

Or coinexchange.io.

We need the founder or current developer to reach out.

There has been a large resurgence in exchanges in recent months.  There are quite a lot now.  

We should get Deepcoin on one of the upcoming exchanges like stocks.exchange or similar.

This is one of the higher ranking threads in page views in this whole altcoin subforum, relatively speaking. Did you know that?  Have a look.   By that metric and many others, every other project and a whole lot below us, are all listed on multiple exchanges.

This needs to be rectified.  They don't call it Deepcoin for nothing.