I chatted quickly with this user via pm - he seems legit & said he is trying to find a way to sign a previous btc address to prove ownership as I told him that's the only real way...
Why does the user need to sign previous btc address to prove ownership
Is another forum member claiming the account with him?
Does anyone suspect change of language or change or local board?
Or is it because of change of email and password that the user need to sign a message?
I don't think he needs to sign a message unless the account is in contention or there is clear evidence of change of hands.
He also claimed he did not know 1xbit was a scam, so he removed the sig etc...
That said, I am not 100% sure it's the same owner, but I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt and removed my red trust.
I can say that the owner of the account deserve red tag for joining 1xbit and not for any other reason. Then if he has removed Signature and avatar and has not received pay from 1xbit yet, he deserves the red tag removal.
@BlackStar_ re-examine.
Thanks for your insight.
As you said, i didn't got payed from 1xbit sig campaining, to be honest I didn't even get a reply from them: which of Im actually glad in this case...
Unfortunately, I do not own private keys to the wallet I posted there because it is 3rd party (freebitco.in wallet).
I may log on cryptogames account if that is needed to remove the red trust. Im not happy with all the stuff that happened, should have known better and make my research when joining ANY sig campaining.
Anyway, I totally get why this happened as it is my responsibility to check twice, if the company I am advertising is legit or not.
Next time, I will be more careful when it comes to promoting some website or company.