No, but I also feel like these tech giants are the antithesis of BTC anyway.



Maybe privately; but I think these companies are more in the business of generating cashflow than holding assets, so no.



I'm going with a controversial "never", unless it becomes necessary to hold BTC as a hedge against currency fluctuations. But the reason I'd say "never" is because (afaik) they don't hold gold either so I doubt that they'll start accumulating BTC, unless shareholder sentiment shifts in a significant way.

I remember a few years back I saw a video for gold bars that would break apart like bars of chocolate, "solving" the fungibility problem. Maybe it's just coincidence but sometimes it really seems like the gold industry is trying their hardest to catch up with Bitcoin.


Huh? How is gold earning passive income? Also why would you want to spend gold over currency that is de-valuing?

Vor allem, selbst wenn man prinzipiell recht hat gibt es ja noch die alte Binsenweisheit das der Markt länger irrational bleiben kann als man selber liquide.

Absolute Shitcoins können kurzfristig massive Profite einfahren. Solide Investitionen können kurzfristig droppen. Selbst gute (bzw. gut gemeinte) Tips müssen in der Praxis nicht immer aufgehen.

First off, awesome! But why not ask your tax advisor? If you don't have one you definitely need one anyway. Per default you're presumably still a tax resident of Denmark but depending on where you travel and how long you stay there you might owe some taxes there too, assuming you're officially even allowed to work there. I'm not sure how much e.g. an offshore LLC would improve that situation given that the LLC then still needs to pay you personally, but a professional tax advisor should be able to tell you more.

GameStop hat sich nur aus dem Europäischen Markt zurück gezogen; es hat zwar lange Zeit nicht gut ausgeschaut aber die scheinen immer noch auf der Welle der Memestock Rally 2021 zu schwimmen. Nachdem die letztes Jahr auf den NFT Zug aufgesprungen sind nur um wenige Monate später ihren NFT Marktplatz wieder zu schließen würde ich nicht allzuviel auf GameStops Kryptostrategie setzen.

Betrifft jetzt nicht rein Kryptowährungen, aber: Keine Investitionsempfehlungen an Freunde und Verwandte geben; also weder was das Kaufen noch das Vermeiden von bestimmten Kryptowährungen betrifft (eindeutige Scams ausgenommen).

Wenn sie auf Empfehlung kaufen und Verluste machen seid ihr schuld. Wenn sie auf Empfehlung nicht kaufen und Gewinne verpassen seid ihr auch schuld. Sobald ihr das Wissen habt, gerne weitergeben, aber auf den Rest müssen alle für sich selber drauf kommen

Ich persönlich drücke auf alle Fälle c_lab fest die Daumen

I believe the way the gold standard restricted their capabilities to issue currency was a larger concern than gold's volatility, but the result is the same, given that Bitcoin is not only more volatile than gold but also even rarer.



How would a government's infinite money printing capability enable them to clog the Bitcoin network? Fiat currencies don't pay for transaction fees, bitcoins do and it's not like the government can print Bitcoin.

Von den Börsen bei denen ich bin hat bis jetzt noch keine nach der Steuer ID gefragt, aber nachdem die neue Regelung erst 2026 in Kraft tritt würde ich auch noch nicht im Vorfeld damit rechnen.

Selbst nachdem neue Regelungen in Kraft treten vergeht in der Praxis ein bisschen Zeit bis die entsprechenden Änderungen tatsächlich ausgerollt werden, sieht man derzeit ja z.B. bei der neuen Travel Rule (wobei diese auch ein komplexeres Problem darstellt als eine Abfrage der Steuer ID).

Meanwhile the rest of the world is still waiting on the proper ATH because so far we've only reached it due to the devaluation of the dollar. But you're right, without Trump's leadership the USD probably wouldn't be the first major currency to break ATH

Oh wow, die schauen richtig geschmackvoll aus!

Aber wie weiß man dass die echt sind wenn nicht irgendein NFT rangetackert ist :p

Well in that case it only stands to reason that it the symbol for sat should be $. So 1 sat = 1 $, sounds about right, no?

In all seriousness tho I don't think it makes sense to add a sat button until there actually is an official symbol for sats. And whether we need that is just as questionable imho.

Ich feier erst ab dem Euro ATH, auch wenn wir schon auf einem guten Weg sind bis jetzt

Solid ciphers should by definition not have hidden patterns, so while QC might become a threat eventually I doubt that AI ever will (or AGI for that matter, aside from potential capabilities of social engineering or accelerating research on QC).

I think that's the main takeaway here. No matter how careful and tech savvy are, something will always slip through the cracks eventually if your device is connected to the internet.

1. Yes
2. No
3. Yes
4. Yes
5. Yes
6. No
7. No
8. Yes
9. No
10. No
11. Yes
12. No
13. Yes
16 goals

€91,828

I don't think the blocksize limitation was put in place to slow down adoption, however it is true that satoshi was advocating for a slow and sustainable growth in Bitcoin's early days:



Incidentally satoshi disappeared not long after, leaving this as his second-to-last post:

If you call this a decline, are you sure you can stomach an actual crash? Not trying to knock on you, just setting expectations. Whether this is a good price to buy in is anyone's guess, but you need to know for yourself how much of a potential loss you can handle. (and on the flipside, how much FOMO you can handle if the current prices turn out to be cheap in retrospective)

I could see venture capital flowing into AI endeavours over crypto-related ones (miners, exchanges, alts) but if anything that market is already oversaturated anyway and dependent on Bitcoin's popularity rather than the other way round. Apart from that I'm not sure where a correlation would lie.