What do the lifetimes mean?

My dear, you must understand that I am not defending all ponzis, just mine. I will be interested in sharing the statistics of honest bitcoin if you want, and you can see that nothing that I have said is untrue.

See, this is the type of generalization that Slow death is so good at. He uses one totally unrelated example to justify another.


Man, I pity you if seeing corn makes you triggered. Does this make you upset?

I'd like to start a poll here, just reply with you answer. Which is right?

1) All ponzis are scams because people lose money.

2) Ponzis that make it clear that they are ponzis are not scams because the investors know the risks.

If you're afraid of voting because people will abuse the trust system against your right to speak out, my friends and I will give you positive trust.

I am curious what the public thinks about this, not just the big players on this thread

Indeed. And in some cases, the recruits are aware of their position. But, I am not interested in what you have to say. Read the last sentence in my last post

I'd like to start a poll here, just reply with you answer. Which is right?

1) All ponzis are scams because people lose money.

2) Ponzis that make it clear that they are ponzis are not scams because the investors know the risks.

If you're afraid of voting because people will abuse the trust system against your right to speak out, my friends and I will give you positive trust.

I am curious what the public thinks about this, not just the big players on this thread

Wow. It's not like all you do is call eveeything a scam that you don't like

Hey geniuses, maybe you could advise us on how to make doublers that aren't scams. Because doublers will always continue to happen, then how about you actually try something useful. Like I said before, Honest Bitcoin is not supposed to be a scam, or else I would never have told you it was a ponzi.

How about you read my previous posts to see how wrong you are? And that would be an abuse of the trust system that you are suggesting....

Can you answer my question?

And what about you? What exactly have you accomplished here?

It would be great if you could advise me...

"***If you post something useless and non constructive well we understand that you are useless by nature yourself.***"
 

Indeed. But if you were trying to say that here on this post to get attention or pity, it's not going to work.

Ok. I am legitimately confused. I actually wanted to make a bitcoin doubler (for a profit to myself) that wasn't a scam. If I wanted to scam naive investors, I would not have told them that this was a ponzi system. I wanted to make sure all investors were educated in the system, as you can see in my post. I don't think it is insolvent because the investors know exactly when the resets are, also since I have been paying all payouts up to now.

If you read this article (https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/is-social-security-a-ponzi-scheme/2011/08/25/gIQA2t0dcL_blog.html
), it says:
"What makes a Ponzi scheme a Ponzi scheme is that it’s a giant fraud. People think they’re investing in postal stamps. Their money is actually being invested in nothing. In Social Security, conversely, it’s perfectly clear what is going on. Every year, Social Security’s actuaries release an insanely detailed report on the system’s finances, its balance of payments, the potential problems it could face, and so on. You can read their report here. In a Ponzi scheme, the finances are a secret, and that’s central to the enterprise. In Social Security, they are, as a matter of law, public."

Honest bitcoin is not a fraud because the investors know that it is a ponzi. People don't think they are investing in anything with me. I make it clear to the users of Honest Bitcoin "what is going on". And all of the transactions are on the blockchain, so would be easy to accuse me if I moved money out of the system.

How can I make Honest Bitcoin not a "scam" in your eyes:
Is it educate people more on what a ponzi is?
Or take less that 5%?
Or what?
But don't tell me to scrap it.

Boi, how does being mandatory make it any better? People chose whether or not to participate in my ponzi, and I encourage only those educated to do it. But, looking back at the definition of a ponzi:
A Ponzi is any scheme which pays interest to "Investors" from Bitcoin coming in from new Investors

other than the bitcoin part, social security indeed is a ponzi, just one that doesn't collapse.

Indeed, it is on the list. However, the list is run by a bunch of narcissists who feel like they have the right to accuse all ponzis of being scams. You can see from the blockchain that there have been no new deposits. But if there were any made, I would continue to pay out.

I'm not sure what you mean here.

Also, you were asking for an example of a long-paying ponzi, well, Social Security is a great example.

Just because all of the previous ponzis have stopped paying, doesn't mean that they all will.

Think about how social security works, when you compare it to the definition, it's a ponzi too.

This service is still up and running everybody!