Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 51 results by Invincible
I think segwit will not be able to happen with bitcoin, the request rate is too high, it is almost impossible for bitcoin. LTC is only 75%, so it's easy to achieve and will soon grow. For bitcoin, the head of the second largest lake in China has stated that bitcoins do not need segwit, which is a very hard affirmation of the heads, they assert that the bitcoin is strong enough to grow freely. And it does not need any impact. I personally feel that is true, and I believe segwit will not happen to bitcoin.
...
So, if we are still having these discussions next year, we know that bitcoin is decentralized and that an oligarchy of miners is playing its role of keeping bitcoin immutable ; if bitcoin activated segwit, we know that Core is the ultimate master and central power of bitcoin.
you are raving dude, Bitcoin needs to be scaled, because the quantity of it's users is rising constantlySo, if we are still having these discussions next year, we know that bitcoin is decentralized and that an oligarchy of miners is playing its role of keeping bitcoin immutable ; if bitcoin activated segwit, we know that Core is the ultimate master and central power of bitcoin.
I am not trying to play sides by stating this. I am stating this as a programmer with 37 years of experience and I have become reasonably knowledgeable about blockchain technology and economics in my 4 years since I entered the Bitcoin ecosystem.
I thought programmers are very busy people they don't have time to post loads of crap all day. 
Communist China owns Bitmain and wants to control Bitcoin. Are you communist?
I didn't follow you... How does your question fit in with the reddit article?
Communist China controls every process of busines in China. And you're so naive to think they don't control one zitty sophomore?
http://mikelanceworldhistory.wikispaces.com/file/view/cultural-revolution-poster.jpg/338109584/450x315/cultural-revolution-poster.jpg
http://www.labitconf.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/jihan.jpg
What I mean is let's not give Bitcoin to Jihan Wu and Communist China.
Re: if Bitcoin HF, it will become "uninteresting" to Greg Maxwell
logic : NON-core implementations DONT want to split the network, they want consensus of level playing field PEER network
It's a great achievement to become one in a million in Bitcoin. There are approximately 15 mln dollar millionaires on Earth. So if you are one in a million in Bitcoin it's 15 times cooler than to be a dollar millionaire 
if people wake up to reality. so that they stop kissing team X ass and stop following like sheep and start asking their favourite team to do it.
um hello, wakey wakey
core need to release it
other implementations need to release it.
but that involves core dropping their crown and being part of concensus, on an equal playing field with the other implementations
I see that we are not going to easily achieve this consensus and what should we do? What can you suggest?
seing as there is a "brand name" civil war of trust.
every implementation should have multiple releases
eg
core 0.13.2 - segwit only
core 0.13.2b - segwit and dynamic blocks
core 0.13.2c - dynamic block only
other implementation - dynamic block only
other implementationb - dynamic block and segwit
other implementationc - segwit only
I see that we are not going to easily achieve this consensus and what should we do? What can you suggest?
Why not look at real life, instead of just what 1 person says?
Bitcoin has had dozens of soft-forks, some of which took longer to activate. That's what's happened in the past soft-forks, all programmed with 95% acceptance thresholds. What makes you think this fork will be different?