Supposedly everything he writes is through a translator..

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5303363.0

He was even kicked out of chipmixer for this evidence..



How the fuck does rat here get a pass on all this text spinning, translating, and lies, and he even gets to go on crusading against others for the same thing he is completely guilty of?

Completely agreed, those two threads you have mentioned are far more informative that this one  as they collected the views of people who have read  the book they have mentioned so one can follow their recommendation. OP doesn’t seem to have read any of the books on his list otherwise he would share his own review on that book/s. The annotation  taken from Amazon is not equal in value to review of the actual reader.

xenon131, fuck off from this topic and do not write anything more here, otherwise I will delete all your fucking shitposts immediately in the future.

That's the issue with the way that you're thinking OP. One shouldn't be hunting for merit

But he is also a massive trust abuser. Why is he on DT? Just look some of his feedback. These are all just from the last two months only! (Russian ones transalted to English using automatic translation. Ratimov knows how this works well! Hahahaha.)

Trust abuse. Stupid lying idiot and whiner. He wrote me some kind of nonsense in the trust, entirely based on his fantasies. From the point of view of the rules of the forum, this text, to which he refers, does not violate anything. He breaks something there only in his sick head. Don't trust this troll.

Could it be possible that Ratimov has found a way to flaunt the forum's rules, and deceive it's users into rewarding him with merit and lucrative employment?  All it takes is one click of a button to use the forum's quote feature, making it abundantly clear this work is not originally yours.

I read some of the thread that accused him of plagiarism, but from what I've read from everyone else he didn't actually plagiarize anything

Hello @Ratimov.
All I can do now apparently is being your accountant:

Some people cannot calm down until they ruin the lives of others. They spend time searching to avenge their mistakes.

Yes, thank you. Several users and a moderator have already given me a couple of tips on how to avoid such accusations.

If you create a very long topic, but only show the sources after clicking Page Down 21 times, it looks like you wrote it by yourself until I finish reading. If you copy data from other websites, it should be obvious to the reader that you did this. If someone stops reading before reaching the end, he'll never see your sources.

Let me put it this way: if you (or anyone else) would use my text in such a way, it wouldn't feel like you do justice to the effort I put in.
If you improve on your referencing, you'll also avoid giving anyone an excuse to create topics like this.

If I originally wrote an article in the first person, then after the phrase In this article there would be a comma(according to google translate, because we have already figured out that I used it when creating the English version of the text), but I don't have it. Because the storytelling is never in the first person. So it can translate, but in the original there were no such words as "I" and could not be.

Why do this when you can do it properly without making anyone guess what is copypasta and what isn't? I can understand newbies fumbling with quotes but more experienced posters should know better.

If you create a very long topic, but only show the sources after clicking Page Down 21 times, it looks like you wrote it by yourself until I finish reading. If you copy data from other websites, it should be obvious to the reader that you did this. If someone stops reading before reaching the end, he'll never see your sources.

Let me put it this way: if you (or anyone else) would use my text in such a way, it wouldn't feel like you do justice to the effort I put in.
If you improve on your referencing, you'll also avoid giving anyone an excuse to create topics like this.

I checked his merit history because I knew I'd given him a few merits here and there, and he can and does write original content that isn't just a huge article with a citation at the end.  The last merits I gave him were for a thread he started, calling out a scam, and it looks like he put a lot of work into the OP of that thread--and I'm not the only member who merited him there, by the way.

If I originally wrote an article in the first person, then after the phrase In this article there would be a comma(according to google translate, because we have already figured out that I used it when creating the English version of the text), but I don't have it. Because the storytelling is never in the first person. So it can translate, but in the original there were no such words as "I" and could not be.

Will I create topics like the one discussed here? I certainly will. And I don't care if someone doesn't like something, because topic are not original

If I said that I am the author of these articles, even if there are links to the original, it would be a different moment. And what you thought there is already another moment.

Nonsense.  On the face of your English-language post, it would require magical psychic powers to discern that you had posted a Google translation of Russian-language link #3 of 7 in your so-called “sources” list.

Let us take a look at the rules regarding plagiarism, which I found on some literature forum.

hat's what I would do, or you can use quotes. Example: Satoshi said (https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/quotes/banks/): "Banks .... lend it out in waves of credit bubbles with barely a fraction in reserve". It's obvious this is a quote, but less disruptive than putting this short text inside quote tags.

Point is he included the links in his articles.

If we were all doing the same the forum would be a mess. (oops hold on, the Beginners and help section IS a mess) Sometimes they copy-paste topics that have nothing to do with cryptocurrencies

If you create a very long topic, but only show the sources after clicking Page Down 21 times, it looks like you wrote it by yourself until I finish reading. If you copy data from other websites, it should be obvious to the reader that you did this. If someone stops reading before reaching the end, he'll never see your sources.

When I was doing this article, I used a large number of articles

But I am not a native English speaker, and therefore will have to use auxiliary tools in many places. Well, why spoil the text with good English, replacing it completely with your bad English

But I will take note of your words, I will soon release a large guide to UniswapV2, where I will apply a slightly different approach to citations from the original. Thank you for your opinion.

Ratimov isn't a shitposter, and I'm not convinced he's a plagiarist.  Not sure why you've built up such a grudge against the guy.

Augur is a very complicated system, so if you want to find out all the little details of it you should look at their whitepaper. For a high level understanding let’s review a simple case of using Augur.

- Anyone can create a market. Essentially, this is like asking a question that can be either a multiple choice question or, for the sake of simplicity, a binary question. For example, Will 1 BTC be worth more than 1,000,000 USD by end of day December, 31st 2020.

- Until the market ends (December 31st, 2020), anybody on Earth can bet on either “yes, it will be worth more” or “no, it won’t be worth as much”.

- When the market ends the person who created a market will act as the oracle for it.

- If they provide the truthful answer there is nothing that needs to be done. Simply wait until the dispute period is over (3-10 days) and collect your payout.

- If they provide a wrong answer, or somebody disagrees about a technicality (e.g. there was no timezone specified, so which price over a 24 hour period should the oracle pick?), a dispute gets opened and that’s where the $REP tokens come into play.

REP token holders act as judges in this case and they vote on which outcome they think is the right one, and the majority decides on which outcome the system will think is correct. Those who have voted for the correct outcome get a financial reward, those who voted for the wrong answer do not. This financial incentive for every vote, combined with “Augur is working and trustworthy = REP price goes up”, is what secures the Augur decentralized oracle.

To summarize, in Augur whoever created the market acts as the oracle, and the REP token holders act as judges in a court - they review disputes and make sure that oracles do not liep-

Augur is a very complicated system, so if you want to find out all the little details of it you should look at their whitepaper. For a high level understanding let’s review a simple case of using Augur.

Anyone can create a market. Essentially, this is like asking a question that can be either a multiple choice question or, for the sake of simplicity, a binary question. For example, Will 1 BTC be worth more than 1,000,000 USD by end of day December, 31st 2020.
Until the market ends (December 31st, 2020), anybody on Earth can bet on either “yes, it will be worth more” or “no, it won’t be worth as much”.
When the market ends the person who created a market will act as the oracle for it.
If they provide the truthful answer there is nothing that needs to be done. Simply wait until the dispute period is over (3-10 days) and collect your payout.
If they provide a wrong answer, or somebody disagrees about a technicality (e.g. there was no timezone specified, so which price over a 24 hour period should the oracle pick?), a dispute gets opened and that’s where the $REP tokens come into play.
REP token holders act as judges in this case and they vote on which outcome they think is the right one, and the majority decides on which outcome the system will think is correct. Those who have voted for the correct outcome get a financial reward, those who voted for the wrong answer do not. This financial incentive for every vote, combined with “Augur is working and trustworthy = REP price goes up”, is what secures the Augur decentralized oracle.

To summarize, in Augur whoever created the market acts as the oracle, and the REP token holders act as judges in a court - they review disputes and make sure that oracles do not lie.

The proper way to show an external article would be by giving a short summary, or quoting a short relevant part, followed by a link for further reading. But I don't think there's much much discussion value if you create a new topic solely for an article on another website. I probably wouldn't do it myself.

If you use several different articles as reference (by copying text directly, by translating text or by paraphrasing), I think you should add a reference to each part. If you use a source many times, you can use for instance super script numbers ("^[1]") (like Wikipedia).

Wow, he's definitely CPM. Is this permitted to copypaste the whole content and cover ass with the shared link?

yours, verbatim and litteratim, is today's.