And last but not least, ISIS forces (trained and fed by Western instructors)
now need to be evacuated somewhere after defeat in Syria.
They were hired in every Arab country destroyed by "colour coups".
Iran - coup failed.
Turkey - coup failed.
India - will not believe Englishmen ever.
But ISIS owners need them in Central Asia or even in China.
(How they would mask them as Chinese, I would like to know).
Maybe, if they are really lucky, they will manage to smuggle ISIS mercenaries into Russia.
But I doubt.
i wouldn't care about ISIS if the negative consequences of it would be filtered out away from where i live.
putting the western demcracy, central banking, and human rights system on all places of the world isn't working well and also has negative consequences like the demographic crisis and loss of population growth. russia is supportive for religion not without reasons.
if isis would have its defined borders i wouldn't care about it. but i rather think that the power elites in saudi arabia (gulf) want to inherit isis power position.
but the biggest question here is, why is this OP so hostile when others are developing their countries economy? is he some kind of troll of the iranian oil industry that are afraid because they cant sell enough oil to russia anymore to then buy nuclear powerplants (foreign trade deficit) thats what i would suggest.
i mean did you ever saw, germans, russians or chinese posting hostile topics, because the saudi arabians, indians or others are developing their country and their economic infrastructure?
Western democracy just doesn't work in all countries. Eastern ones especially need to have a firm hand as a leader or they feel lost. Just look at the Central Asian "democracies" which have reelected the same man since the Soviet Union fell almost 30 years ago. Although there is a good amount of vote fixing going on there too...
In Middle Eastern nations an interesting study has found that communities ruled by a Padishah cannot tolerate democracy in the western model. They prefer to trust their local leader instead.
Most major conflicts in the past several decades have been targeted at countries that don't allow fractional reserve western style central banks. They're the ones that had refused to open up to western corporations wanting to invest. That didn't take bailouts from the IMF. That have no Goldman & Sachs, no MacDonald's, no Ford.
