Fastest way to krill up quickly at low stakes is low stakes limit games (as these usually see a flop) and short handed BigO (0.25/0.50 PLO8 hilo), or 0.2/0.4 12 game mix.
You want games where almost every hand sees a flop, as you only get krill from raked hands, and you earn double krill with only 2 or 3 players at the table.

Maybe it depends where you are. I'm in Australia, and the site I use to purchase bitcoin has a 200 chip (0.0002 btc) withdrawal fee for transfers. So yes the network fee is low but exchange fees are often not.
If someone wants to buy 100 chips (about $12 of btc) to try out the site, is there a way to do that without it getting chewed up in fees?
It's small amounts like that that I am talking about for chat purchases. Obv if you're buying $1k or more fees are less of an issue. YMMV.

Some people have reported having cashapp accounts frozen by sending chips directly to gambling sites, and there are people who have said it has happened to them on seals.
As far as purchasing from the chat, as I said, there are several trustworthy people in there. Normally you would send via Paypal or on of the cashapp type services and then get chips. Players such as pman, JamieGold and TheCaretaker sell chips there regularly and have never stiffed anyone.
Obviously there are scammers there too, and while the chat community can be somewhat 'raw' at times we try to warn noobs about them. Just gives people another option.

Bitcoin is easily bought and deposited, but buying small amounts can have big fees depending on where you live. Also, some providers will close accounts or restrict them if sending directly to a gambling site, so you have to send to private wallet first and then from there to the site.
For someone buying a few hundred chips to play small stakes the chatbox is often the cheapest option. May not be for everyone but it works for a lot of regulars on the site.

If you have made the 50 krill for chat privileges in the chatbox there are some trustworthy people there who will sell you chips for Paypal or cashapp type transfers if you can't transfer btc to the site.
Ask around and you will soon see who can be trusted and who cannot.

Seems more like a bunch of rec players excited about playing on a new site, many of whom who probably don't have English as their native language. Obviously the get a bonus when they post, but it really doesn't look like AI.

Good to see extra entries coming in from the forum for the series, perhaps this will help the site grow.
AB deRoyse, free entries are always welcome, but perhaps consider putting them up as a satty prize? This would give all your members a chance at the ticket, and also give players new to the site a chance to get familiar with the software before the actual tourney. Just a suggestion.

Cause or effect?

Seriously, Aussies are mad gamblers and a lot of ppl got cut out of poker when the govt dropped the hammer on the poker sites. Most (of the ones I knew) switched to sports betting. There is a solid market there just waiting for a campaign.

If it sat behind a drawer in a padded bag untouched for 15 years, how did it get broken?
If I had a device that I believed had up to 1000 btc on it I'd be training myself up to try to recover it myself. Maybe go buy an old but working mp4 player on ebay and swap the motherboards. If that doesn't work it's probably fried. "Smoking" is generally a bad sign for electronics.

Once again, the "Biggest BSOP Ever" shuts out half the world. Every tournament set to suit USA times only. In my time zone the tourneys run from midnight to 9am. East coast it's 10pm to 7am,so I guess at least they can play the early ones. Might as well call it the USBSOP.

So you and popek1990 are the same person? Explains a lot. Glad you got caught.

It looks like he was talking about his bitcointalk account being hacked, not his swC account.

INVALID BBCODE: close of unopened tag in table (1)

lol just noticed I was in that hand.

Tourneys did used to run much more reliably than they have the last year though.

Must be bluffing, only men have the nuts.

Very hard to accumulate krill if you are predominantly a tourney player.

To the people asking for the minimum wdl to be raised, fair call, but an option is to sell chips in the chat box - there are quite a few reputable regs who will steer you to the right people.

In the first 250 hands there is exactly *one* 3bet pre between the accused colluders. That hand both players had AK and got it in pre after the others folded to chop. The bet sizes post also seem to be smaller vs each other than vs the marks. I think there is enough to say they are at the very least soft playing each other and card sharing. Obv SwC has all the hole cards and i would expect there to be some very damning hands. Too many coincidences for me.
Well done SwC.

Ok, I play small stakes on SwC, and have successfully reported colluders before (with my HH evidence). I like to think I am playing on a fair site, so I gave OP the benefit of the doubt and started to look through the HH's.
First, it seems clear they have been edited. The most obvious one is the hand starting at line 710, which is incomplete. OP is dealt KK otb, rest of the hand is missing, and his stack size is unchanged for the next hand, showing it was folded. Red flag 1.

8 hands are played HU to start with. Not only are there no showdowns, there is only 1 flop seen in a limped hand. HU. Hmmm. Ok, maybe they are just nits.

There are then 35 hands played mostly 3 hands, although Caroline93 changes seats 4 times for god knows why. Valentino sits after hand 33 and is dealt in hand 36. Only 7 of 32 hands see a flop, with no 3! and the first hand to see a turn is the one where the mark sits. So it's not 43 hands with no showdown, it's 40 without even seeing a turn and only 8 seeing a flop! Three handed, that's just really improbable. OP isn't playing tight either, so there should be some playback here somewhere.

Once one and then 2 new players join, about half the next 50 hands see a flop and 10 get to turn or river. There are zero 3 bets in those hands, which again is odd but fits if we just play the best hand and fold the other 2.

Certainly enough to be suspicious, even without hole cards. Will look through the rest as i can.