Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 236 results by KaneVWE
Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Merits 2 from 1 user
Re: Absuing the trust system: nutildah
by
KaneVWE
on 11/11/2020, 21:22:43 UTC
⭐ Merited by Arcas (2)
I think you're missing the central and key point.

It wasn't that he offered or even sold his account. ( impossible to tell which)

But rather than he was running around screaming at others they deserved red trust for trying to sell accounts because he was certain it facilitated scammers and scamming ( which it probably does)

He is a hypocrite and willing to facilitate scamming for a small fee.

He has no place on DT running around tagging people who mention his past or even for lesser evils than he himself would willingly conduct for the correct price.

Trust abusing willing scam facilitating scum bag.

Best part is the old nutildah was a nem stake holder ( worth 300btc) and early dash adopter.
The new nutildah or broke bum nutildah here was begging for 0.02btc loans recently.

I suspect a different user but even better if he let millions of dollars slip through his slimey little paws.

Better to go to meta and voice your complaints.

Lfc and nutildah could be alts but unlikely.
Both are scum though.

Lfc was recently caught out lying and abusing the trust system. Do some homework most are dirty.
Just search rep here plenty of info on them both.

I haven't looked at your specific case but those 2 dirty scum bags abusing the trust system is well documented.
Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Re: Covid vaccine: First 'milestone' vaccine offers 90% protection
by
KaneVWE
on 11/11/2020, 15:37:12 UTC
ok lets clear up the inaccuracies

1. the pfizer vaccine is not taking the rna of the neucleus(central part that tells a cell what to replicate)
2. the pfizer vaccine is taking rna from the spikey shell that 'knocks on door' of a cell asking to be let in
3. the 90% is not 90% of all 22k vaccine participants

the 90% is based on this
44k total participants .. 22k had the vaccine 22k had a placeblo
out of all 44k so far only ~95 people then got covid. where ~85 were in the placebo group and 9 were in the vaccine group
Do you mean 100 were initially for sure exposed to covid in sufficient dose to certainly infect non vaccinated people?
Maybe better to have dosed the entire sample with covid and see the difference?


pfizer/biontech were not giving people the vaccine/placebo. and then later giving people covid
instead they give the vaccine/placebo and tell the participants to go away and do normal life stuff and if the participants then get covid in their normal lives. tell the trial about it.
so far only 94 people have been exposed to covid in their normal lives and when biontech look at which groups those 94 fall into they found 9 in the vaccine group and 85 in the placebo group

meaning 21.9k from each group have yet to be exposed.
meaning less than 0.05% exposure rate
meaning to soon to be of an international indicator for advocating its good for billions of people to take

..
im all for vaccines. but so far its too soon to call it

I see. Thanks for explaining.
Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Re: Covid vaccine: First 'milestone' vaccine offers 90% protection
by
KaneVWE
on 11/11/2020, 02:02:34 UTC
ok lets clear up the inaccuracies

1. the pfizer vaccine is not taking the rna of the neucleus(central part that tells a cell what to replicate)
2. the pfizer vaccine is taking rna from the spikey shell that 'knocks on door' of a cell asking to be let in
3. the 90% is not 90% of all 22k vaccine participants

the 90% is based on this
44k total participants .. 22k had the vaccine 22k had a placeblo
out of all 44k so far only ~95 people then got covid. where ~85 were in the placebo group and 9 were in the vaccine group

so the ASSUMPTION is that the 2 groups should have had same risk of getting covid. and by a placebo group having 85 cases and vaccine group only having 9. they judge it as a v9:85p thus 90% effectivity

but these numbers are based on only 100 of the 44k being exposed to covid. meaning its too early to actually know



Do you mean 100 were initially for sure exposed to covid in sufficient dose to certainly infect non vaccinated people?
Maybe better to have dosed the entire sample with covid and see the difference?


I will try to read about the entire experiment more deeply.
The 90% seems a open to a few factors that were not controlled and could have contributed to the difference between the groups other than the vaccine. Then again I'm not clear on the conditions or duration of experient. Will have look.

Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Revoke self-moderating privileges from korner and other hypertrolls
by
KaneVWE
on 11/11/2020, 01:42:59 UTC
Time for a monthly bump with example #459 of korner's hypertrollery.

We now have two BSV announcement threads:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4985868
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5211986

Apparently at some point he locked the older thread and started a new one: http://archive.is/CEWNP#selection-5443.0-5447.47

Now both are unlocked. Twice the exposure for everyone's favorite shitcoin.

Menstruating again?

You didn't comment on Vods example above where he does worse? Actually appears to be asking or challenging people to provide evidence of his wrongdoing and saying it is not moderated. Then deleting well documented independently verifiable evidence of his wrongdoing when people present it.
Why is that suchmoon?

Want different rules for different people?
No thanks.

Let's have the same rules for everyone.
Stop crying about people you don't personally like.
Get tired of being a pathetic snitch bitch.?

Until you comment on Vods bogus self moderation you shouldn't be able to keep harping on about lesser evils of a similar type by non DT  members.
Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: Justice to ME as a victim of Lauda
by
KaneVWE
on 11/11/2020, 01:22:38 UTC
AFTER 2 YEARS: I'm a member of this forum for 5 years. Spent 40 days, 8 hours and 24 minutes in here. Translated over 55 ICO projects for my community.  I left the forum 2 years ago because of these stupid reasons below. I couldn't do any work after getting tagged by Lauda. Just came here time to time to check whether Lauda is still on DT. And as I see now Lauda is gone but my trust is still on the other side thanks to his heritors... Isn't there anyone who can help me? I gave so much time to build this profile and it get destroyed for just meriting a person for fun. And I know it wasn't a crime in here only reason was that guy became a fraud but we didn't have anything to do with it.

Imagine youd been here 8 years or 9 years and crushed the scammer lauda and stopped his fav scam dethroning bitcoin and made a tons of people into millionaires and pushed multiple projects to be fairer to all participants.


Then you got red tagged by the scammer lauda for presenting independently verifiable evidence about his past.
Then all his scammy DT pals added more red trust and admitted they gave you red for presenting facts.
Then theymos went on their side.

You think you have it bad. I know of a case where that happened.

Rather than begging for help for yourself only. Better to force changes where such abuse can not and will not be possible for all members.
Shame you didnt know lauda and his pals were known for giving each other 50 merits for fun.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2829282

No point fixing one persons problems the system needs fixing for all to enjoy fair and equal treatment.

Having said that I hope yours gets fixed if you deserve it.
Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: Arcas -- Bought account?
by
KaneVWE
on 11/11/2020, 01:10:22 UTC
----
And you are.... who exactly?

I'm not sure yet but anyway...
Let's not go off topic.
Let's stick with the possible alts of Arcas. Aka nutildah, GP, CH and that other guy who is maybe from Indonesia.

Now have you examined thoroughly nutildah? And CH ? Maybe they are working together as a team?
Those two are always chatting away together or maybe to themselves.

I'm just saying don't exclude any possibility.
Are you Arcas? Seek only the truth however painful.

Don't get fixated on your first suspicion.

You see that outburst from the new nutildah account owner?
That's a sign you're on track.

Cross reference his account sale with his password changes.
Tell.me what you find.
Then cross reference those with CH and GP

When considering who is an alt or possible alt of another member then consider all available data.

Listing accounts for sale is a big red warning.
Follow the link above.
Nutidah = Arcas.
That is a far higher probability that it being CH as you speculated above.
But I wouldn't rule CH out.




Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: ''Betnomi and yahoo62278'', something fishy is goin on...
by
KaneVWE
on 11/11/2020, 00:43:28 UTC
Yahoo will promote scams if he makes money out of it.
Of course he will have his DT dogs back him up like jollygood scammer supporter

They will run around tagging those in Yahoo's campaigns ( not other dts) lol for promoting his sponsor but then praise him and probably add him to their trust includes.

Yahoo will promote anything. DT will promote anything.
They just want da money.

Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: LFC_Bitcoin alt account nutildah
by
KaneVWE
on 11/11/2020, 00:38:56 UTC
This is going so well for you, please do continue....

of course when you have so many alt accounts. Now they got four identical feedbacks from four different accounts. I am not sure is it easy for him to understand what happened here  Cheesy

I must agree with @nutildah, why it is considered as alt? His account is a few months older than LFC_Bitcoin.

What? You can even work that out?

Clearly lfcbitcoin could be the one that purchased the nutildah account when the original nutildah put it up for sale

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190369.0

So the person controlling lfc would probably consider that the original with his alt being his new purchased account.

I say this is possible but unlikely. Both have never achieved anything and are clearly retarded.
However, lfc is retarded and has a poor command of English. I expect it is not his first language.
Nutildah is thick as shit but has a more polished output.  Obviously you can not polish a turd but it reads a little easier.
I like the word Chode.

I doubt they are one and the same. Bitcointalk is hardly worth the effort of switching posting styles. I mean you can for a few posts then just get sloppy and cant be bothered.

I mean when I sometimes adjust to Indonesian or Italian or chinese output it is fine because the output is immediately unrecognisable by the confines and natural flow of each language. Variant forms of the same language especially if not your first language is more tedious.
You need to have a strong reason.
Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: Arcas -- Bought account?
by
KaneVWE
on 11/11/2020, 00:26:54 UTC
----
I had figured that it was either GP or CH; but haven't been able to find any definitive link between them

(and if it reqlly was GP, it's odd that I've seen a total of 0 "mentally ill" or "difamation" sentences...)

CSImiami is here folks.

You could be on to something about CH. He is always talking about the turd world and admitted his first language isn't inglish.
I have heard he looks like a grubby little gambling addict. Maybe he lost his last rupiez at one of those gambling dens??

Then again maybe its nutildah?
Have you considered that?

Did you note that nutildah put his account up for sale for 6 months?
Did his password change in the same period? Did you check?

Some say he was a gambling addict. He's pushing gambling sites too

I mean how else does one go from being a nem stake holder and early dash adopter to begging for 0.02 btc loans.

Have you looked into this??
Have you explored this possibility.

What if the account was not bought ? merely powered up alongside another account?

You seem to be taking yourself very seriously when clearly you're a joke?
CH is clearly your man here. Don't bother looking else where. Lol

Indonesian CH. Wonder how many passports that guy has. I've heard he was chinese, russian, french, Italian, Japanese Indian, from outta space.
I see his fingerprints on this though for sure. Keep digging.

CSImiami - scamhunter extraordinaire



Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Merit earners & the Pareto principle
by
KaneVWE
on 11/11/2020, 00:02:23 UTC

The top 200 merit earners lose around 80% of their merits if you subtract that which they have sent each other.
Some perhaps  even more if you just take away their top 10 merit fans.

So basically merit sources and their pals send each other lots of merit.

It's far more akin to pal points or let's give each other all the merit so we can dominate DT and thus the best rev streams and enforce double standards on everyone else.

If you want to ask some of these " top" .merit earners to present their very best original thought provoking posts that made any real lasting difference here on this forum get ready for a deafening silence from 90% of them.

Here have a try with

Thepharmacist. - an moron defending his merit swag bag who has never made an notable post or achieved anything here.
Lfcbitcoin- his first 3000 posts are mostly 1 liner speculative crap or sports betting.  Youd get banned for that now.
Tman ? - clearly retarded.


Well most of them really.

Also your principle only considers those that have earned 1 merit.
Making the merit distribution look more reasonable than it really is if you consider the forums membership or even prior active membership.

Also why worry about the distribution of a meaningless mess like merit at all.

The real genius members posting here have earned in some cases perhaps 20 merits total and you have complete imbeciles with 3000 earned. Lol

So from millions of members those giving merits  out, give them out mostly to each other and their pals or alts.
I'm sure that principle is evident somewhere. ....like the central banking system, big corps etc

The selfish self serving colluding scum principle let's call it    ... pareto doesn't do it justice.


Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: Using the trust system for personal Vendetta
by
KaneVWE
on 09/11/2020, 16:15:51 UTC
I think objective obaervers can see you're a pathetic drooling imbecile ready to suck up to anyone that will support you on DT.

Observers is mispelt by you.

Quote
Your judgement is literally meaningless.

Which is why you felt compelled to comment on it.

Quote
So shut up about it as if it is some piece of important and weighty data that needs to be given serious consideration. Lol

Likewise I am sure.

Quote
You're clearly deranged or a serious drug user.

Without proof, we'll never know.

Quote
You are one of the dumbest and least successful legends here.

And yet I have no negative trust feedback from any DT1 or DT2.  Yet you do.  (pokes out tongue)

Quote
Still begging and spamming around on a 3rd rate sig.

I'm being paid to post the posts I would have posted any way, how cool is that (especially given there is no editorial control over my posts...)

Quote
What a loser.

Stick and stones...

Quote
And a scammer protector.

Without proof, it's only the voices in your head telling you that.

Quote
I have clearly demonstrated that

Oh come come - your rant is against me, surely you can focus on one shiny thing at a time?

Quote


  • Icopress uses the trust system as a tool for personal retribution
  • Icopress has given red trust for personal retribution on weaker and less appropriate evidence than he is crying he received it.
  • Icopress is a cry baby bitch who wants to be treated way better than he treats others.
  • Icopress is clearly trying to pass art off as his own that is the work of others.
  • Icopress appeared from WHERE? Never heard of this loud mouth twat attention seeker before lauda and tman started vanishing
  • Icopress seems to be getting the nullius protection racket text wall defense treatment that lauda did.
[/s]

I've added BBCode to your list (such as it is) given you don't seem to know how to do such things.




I'll wager BTC 0.0001 you can't make it to Legendary.

Okay baller. Lol

What if I already have several legendary accounts ? Those are practically a badge of being an assmuncher now to colluding scammers and scammer protectors. Legendary asskisser and scumbag. Only pre merit legends are worth noting.
Lol who cares about some gamed metric or rank now?


The only important part of your post is that you deny you're a scammer supporter and protector.
I can demonstrate that you are. Want to debate on a new thread?
I have already demonstrated icopress is crying about being treated better than he treats others.
Another pathetic drooling hypocrite.

Thanks for correcting my spelling, but that is nullius job generally. Don't step on his toes.
Although I shouldn't mind which of you gets on to it as long as one of you does.
Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Does anyone want a "I'm in the area lets hangout board"
by
KaneVWE
on 09/11/2020, 01:09:21 UTC
This would be a fantastic idea.
Although I'd like to say now that if I don't get back to you it's only because I can only see so many new friends per week.
Suchmoon will always take priority and autographs for DT1 merit source non achievers only. I'm always for the under dogs.
Bones and bob I will meet chaperoned only. Nullius only with my Trilon coated dura-steel  chastity belt and earplugs super glued in place. Lauda I'll meet out only when my new home security upgrade is complete and I want it fully stress tested, been chomping at the bit to try out my new slinky cat suit.

Let's do this.
Who's in Monaco next week?

No rags or patched up clothes. Or the blue oyster bar will turn us away.
Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Re: It's ok for any man to divorce their wife and marry a younger and prettier woman
by
KaneVWE
on 08/11/2020, 11:30:09 UTC
People always want to know if it's ok to divorce? The correct answer is YES.

It's ok for any man to divorce their wife and marry a younger and prettier woman.

Many men thinks that their wife has gone old and they need a younger women but they forget two things.

First the woman whom they married in the first place, was young in the old days of marriage and if she has become old, then the man also has become old.
why only to blame her.

Secondly, the younger girl may also need a young man and this marriage of yours may not last long. Its more than the Lust which you are trying to fulfill, than the love with the younger women.

P.S  Can you move this to off-topic because this has nothing to do with politics.  Smiley

Politics and society.
Just because the elections have dominated this section of late don't lose sight of the fact this forum is open to discussion on all manner of topics that may have implications for society here in the US or elsewhere.

I find hearing others thoughts on this interesting.
If you prefer to read only strictly political threads then only click those.
Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: Using the trust system for personal Vendetta
by
KaneVWE
on 08/11/2020, 11:12:36 UTC
That would be an quite unpleasant move even after knowing icopress has motives of mobbing around by sending PMs to veteran members here.

I don't really see that as being that big an issue - reaching out to others for help and tho obtain their opinions...

It'd be like setting up a group of people in a conglomerate ... or a guild even.

I haven't just arbitrarily taken heavy handed action, rather I've opened the discussion up further.

Thoughts anyone?

I think objective obaervers can see you're a pathetic drooling imbecile ready to suck up to anyone that will support you on DT.
Your judgement is literally meaningless. So shut up about it as if it is some piece of important and weighty data that needs to be given serious consideration. Lol

You're clearly deranged or a serious drug user.

You are one of the dumbest and least successful legends here. Still begging and spamming around on a 3rd rate sig.
What a loser. And a scammer protector.

I have clearly demonstrated that

1. Icopress uses the trust system as a tool for personal retribution
2. Icopress has given red trust for personal retribution on weaker and less appropriate evidence than he is crying he received it.
3. Icopress is a cry baby bitch who wants to be treated way better than he treats others.
4. Icopress is clearly trying to pass art off as his own that is the work of others.
5. Icopress appeared from WHERE? Never heard of this loud mouth twat attention seeker before lauda and tman started vanishing.
6. Icopress seems to be getting the nullius protection racket text wall defense treatment that lauda did.



Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Red Trust Account
by
KaneVWE
on 07/11/2020, 17:48:44 UTC
I personally feel that we should use this weapon very carefully and give red trust after giving at least 1 warning to a member.
I don't think we should have any more warning before the red tag is given. The reason is because If I'm not mistaken then we already have the previous 33 warning point as a forum rule. If a user break this rule then it is possible that DT member can mark their account with a red tag as the reason for breaking the rule. The 33 point that I mentioned must always be remembered and read so as not to make mistake in making decision that will later become habit. As in one example, someone complained and continued to complain about the unfairness of staff and the merit source in distributing merit to user. If the person keep complaining and complaining, eventually there will be hate speech thrown at the staff and the merit source so that the person will be marked as a troll.

In addition, there are many thing that get a person get red tag and clearly all wrong that have been breached, especially there are warning for that.

Complaining about unfairness whilst presenting a solid case that has never been debunked is not trolling.
Please stop promugating such nonsense.
Hate speech? Another meaningless term. Is this any speech someone else doesn't approve of.
Your post could be hate speech? Why trying to conflate independently verifiable evidence as trolling?
Sounds like hate speech to me.
Also sounds like trolling as per the rules.

Sadly a Red trust account has zero meaning any longer.

Only a type 2 or 3 flag should have some meaning but don't be shocked if you find that proven scammers on DT have no red tag or flag of any kind. Because they collude to prevent them. 

Red tagged accounts have zero meaning aka you cant say oh look a DT1 or multiple DT1 have tagged them they must behaviors in their histories that show they are scammers or attempting to scam or setting up a scam.

Even the flags that claim this are bogus for type 1 or can be.

If you were trust abused on the old system ( pre flag) you are treated to a red tags and a nice warning banner defaming your account as financially dangerous or telling lies that some members have located such behaviors.  This could be entirely untrue if you analysed it.

Repeat after me. Red tags mean nothing alone. You would need to investigate the entire background to the claim yourself. Most are too dumb or lazy to do that.

All you have are type2 and type3 flags to rely on.  Even then I would be checking for myself.
Campaign managers on the  big projects are working with DT to ensure they get the best spots regardless of whether they have red tags or can even make objectively valuable posts. 

Don't contradict me unless you can debunk my points with evidence because you just look like a pleb to those that will objectively analyse your reply. Bring evidence or request it from me if you're not privy to the core arguments around here since the silly new merit and trust mess was introduced.
Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: nullius abusing his DT powers? Share your thoughts here.
by
KaneVWE
on 07/11/2020, 17:30:05 UTC
Nullius is not on DT.
It is undeniable that nullius does indeed attempt to abuse the trust system.

People can try to legitimise any reason to leave red trust. These says red tags are worthless.
However one thing that always keeps catching people out is clear double standards.

Double standards are a form of deception and scamming. The changed my mind phoney defense doesn't work since they have the option of undoing their prior actions to fit with their convenient change of mind where the trust system is concerned.

People that have a change of heart or mind that suddenly places them or their pals at an advantage over their prior stated views ....well lol we know all about those generally.

Nullius is dirty in numerous ways.
Doesn't matter if he makes it on to DT. Plenty more like him there.
Double standards pushed for personal gain is their mantra.
Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Red Trust Account
by
KaneVWE
on 07/11/2020, 17:20:45 UTC
Why is everyone talking about scamming being respective and subjected to red trust on a user, i have seen several users on the forum (name not to be mentioned) having red trust because of indecent/inappropriate accusations on other member without proof, this sound something like a rebel, that results to that user getting red trust by DT1, DT2, ......members, and that's something to avoid to enable oneself in joining campaigns. Its always stated by BM & CM never to allow such users to participate in their campaigns so as to maintain their good reputations throughout.

Can you point to some of those specifically
Show me examples.
Specific details.

I can show you the exact opposite.

I mean if you say something is happening but wont bring conclusive proof of highly corroborating evidence that is the same thing really you are talking about others doing.

I'm not sure if speculating on others is worthy of red trust if they cant conclusively debunk it especially concerning behaviors apparently conducted on the forum.



See Red trust was made just to flag out people for their suspicious activity in the group so that other members in the forum get alert/caution while doing any transaction or deal with them.
Signature campaign or bounty managers start filtering the best out of many applications by dropping red trust members. Then slowly, It becomes the guidelines(rule) for campaigns that red trust members are not allowed to participate in it.
Now as Lordhermes said there are various incidents that happened in past where people are got red trust just for silly reasons or to destroy their profile(or campaign income) on Forum.
I personally feel that we should use this weapon very carefully and give red trust after giving at least 1 warning to a member.

Yes indeed.
However if there is no punishment or requirement to use red tags in a useful and credible way and there is clear financial incentive not to use them correctly... the guess what happens?

The system is wide open to abuse and gives financial incentive to abuse it 
Hence those controlling it miraculously have all the best sig spots and control the other rev streams.

It's a mess. Its undeniable.
Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Merits 2 from 1 user
Re: Trump Election Results Speech: Here Are All The False Claims
by
KaneVWE
on 07/11/2020, 16:06:46 UTC
⭐ Merited by eddie13 (2)
Well Trump should practice what he preaches and follow on what he proudly tweeted about Putin and the Democrats.

Trump is a narcissist on a scale that has never been seen before in a president of the USA, he will not go quietly and will try to pull as many diversion tactics as possible to delay the inevitable. He actually thinks he will cling on to power but he is a deluded and mentally weak fool who should never have won the presidency in the first place because he was (and still is) unsuitable for the roles and responsibilities attached to the post.


The SCOTUS ordered "ballots received after election day be
segregated so that if the State Supreme Court’s decision is
ultimately overturned, a targeted remedy will be available."

That's what's happening.  Election officials are following the orders of both PA State and SCOTUS.

Trump is arguing that they they are already fraudulent and should not be counted and a whole bunch of other nonsense.

They should be accepting the ballots, counting them, and keeping them separate from the votes received on or before election day.

Here's the ruling: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-542_i3dj.pdf

And no, I'm not being paid to post 'propaganda talking points', silly.


Now would be a good time for Trump to go back and read this tweet:


Calm down and take a breath.

I'm sure that once it's all been analysed and found to be in order Trump will do what is required.
Those that seem to worry and complain about scrutiny are often found to be hiding something.

1. If it the rules have been provably broken = Trump and the US majority have a right to be upset and demand fair treatment.
2. If there is strong corroborating evidence the rules may have been broken = Then time must be allowed to thoroughly investigate.
3. If the rules themselves have not been broken but holes have been found and used to unfairly and inaccurately misrepresent the will of the majority then they must be fixed but it must be legally decided upon when they will be fixed.

There is no point either Trump or Biden trying to claim this until full analysis and investigation has been completed.
Anyone trying to rush or skimp on thorough investigation and analysis looks dirty.

Surely nobody can disagree that there is no harm in rooting out the truth.
Some shady sounding events have seemingly taken place. If there are not conclusively and thoroughly debunked you will end up with some very disgruntled people believing genuinely they have been scammed.

Some people make it sound very easy to cheat this voting by mail system. If it is then this could provide the impetus to plug the holes.
Trump or Biden? Let the genuine votes decide.

Perhap blockchain could help fix this shambles.
Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Re: Trump Election Results Speech: Here Are All The False Claims
by
KaneVWE
on 07/11/2020, 01:38:52 UTC
Will this not all get appealed to the supreme court? Or if the local courts feel there is no grounds for considering a case does it just get shelved there and then with no route to supreme? RG is a high profile lawyer isn't he? Wouldn't be pushing this if he knew there was zero evidence to corroborate ? I don't know much about the legal system.

I mean ruling the observers should be permitted closer to the counters now won't help them see that which they previously missed observing closely enough?

Surely everything contested will need to be counted again under tighter scrutiny.

I don't care which wins that much but surely everything must be observably and unquestionably and strictly by the rules.
This is a closely run and rather important event right?

This shit happens everytime recently. How can this process be so sloppy and open to such abuse?

Who ever wins should do so fair and square.
The numbers are super close in some states.

Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Re: It's ok for any man to divorce their wife and marry a younger and prettier woman
by
KaneVWE
on 07/11/2020, 00:47:21 UTC
They can I guess. It's not illegal.
If the wife has been a loyal and faithful partner through life and he still does this even though she has fulfilled her side entirely then..
Hes a selfish cunt and I look sincerely hope he lives to thoroughly regret it.

If you lack loyalty there is no redemption. They are the lowest of the low.

I mean of course there are mitigating circumstances but simply leaving a wife that loves you and has put her all into you only because you see something younger and more physically appealing is gross.

Sure if the relationship has for years been nothing more than a sham or shell of what it should be from both sides then just agree to split up and go your own ways.

That's only my own view. Some cultures and religions may groom women to expect or accept such treatment.

Also it cuts both ways so same thing if the wife does it to her husband.

This is worse to me than a momentary lapse like a drunken one night stand. Which is still gross and demonstrates a lack of loyalty but if willing to confess and attempt to redeem then it to me personally shows some care consideration and value for the wife still exists and although still a grave and disgusting act is not entirely devoid of some humanity.

I mean it would be silly to suggest there is not temptation for you and your wife through your life. I see tons of hot girls and want most of them.  That's why I'm never getting married and always tell girls casual only.  I don't think guys can realistically handle being loyal until nearly 30 or more. The hardwired evolutionary force to bang everything you can is not something one should have to fight against until your sex drive or hormones start to decrease. Also once you hit the larger numbers the excitement or hope of something totally novel or new is gone. You know it will be similar or the same to one of the others you had a few times before.  Then you can start focusing more on say their personality and compatibility long term. I mean the foot rubs test is handy. Those that stop quickly are no good at all. I like my piggies rubbed the entire film and with some vigor. No " oh my hand aches, or is that enough now? " the potential wives just rub away until you feel a bit guilty and offer them some respite ...perhaps you just say they can run their fingers through your hair. I mean mine isn't as thick as it was a couple of years ago due to this blasted tren and test eth, so the finer hair offers little resistance and soothes their tired little paws.

I mean love is clearly simply a threshold or critical mass in areas ( you find them amusing, smart , funny, attractive, interesting, they make you feel even better about yourself with constant praise and recognition, give great foot rubs while you watch tv etc etc)where the feedback or interaction is immensely enjoyable to the point you kind of crave and require that feedback or experience in all of those areas regularly and if you go to long without satisfying that then you get frantic. I mean I'm kind of guessing since if I start to miss girls in some way then it is very selfish to retain them longer. It is best not to allow them to feel the same way so regular annoying or obnoxious irrsric behaviors can be injected to prevent their attachment to you.

So yes I digress, getting a wife and making a serious commitment is kind of forever, so you cant just later dump her to get some younger better looking snatch. That's just not loyal at all.

Casting off the wife for a younger hottie = evil. Roast in hell mofos.