You can just send your merits to those newbies as intended so why is the need to open another thread?  Honestly I found this thread to fish merit since most of the merit giveaways thread are bombarded with merits.  Whether you admit it or not that is how I, or maybe some of us see it.
 see this ↓↓↓?

It seems even malls are taking advantage of crypto craze, it is a good site to see that bigger store is taking notice of NFTs and cryptocurrency, it is quite surprising because Banco de Oro is somehow hostile on cryptocurrency but SM Megamall rides NFT and Bitcoin popularity.  If I am not mistaken Banco de Oro  is an SM Investment.

Not that PoW is dying, POS is cost-efficient in scamming people.  That is one of the best reasons why many prefer POS than PoW

In a money-grab developer's mind: why bother with PoW when they can use PoS to mine 100% of the coins and sell them to unsuspecting investors.  If you happen to see the pattern of new projects today, there are lots selling their pre-mined coins/token here and there.

Kakagulat naman ang mga pangyayari about sa mga respected members natin dito sa local forum. 


I wanted to believe that pero sa mga ganung pagkakataon tanging documents lang ang makakapagpatunay.  Applying logic about amount in hand at mga activities.. and without supporting documents talagang doon babagsak ang conclusion kahit na wala talaga silang kasalanan.  Anyway, we are all just speculating, only them knows the truth  . 



I think crwth is a good choice.

Thank you for the information however, theymos also stated that:


This neutral rating somehow is permanently branding any account that is tagged to be one of the worst spammers of all time..  A little tweak on the sentence may do, probably.


I believe actmyname will be actively monitoring his list and update or remove his neutral rating to those who were tagged if they have proven that they had improved over time? Since, theymos also stated that:




That said, thank you for hearing me out.

Kudos to @actmyname to help the forum identify the worst spammer but whether it is negative, positive or neutral rating the guideline theymos gave regarding rating is very simple and clear.


I am very much agree to what vaculin stated .

user : boytrial
Bet Id: 5fad6a7450f8c57d23d2bc8e
Bet Amount: 0.01
Multiplier : 1049.00x

username: boytrial
multiplier: 116.6x

Talagang labasan na ng kita sa BTC ahh.  Masaya ako sa inyong mga success story,  kaya lang senxa na wala ako maambag na nabili ko, puro nasa pautang kasi ang kinita ko kay BTC at 90% doon hindi nagbayad  .

Mahirap magpautang, wala na ngang tubo hindi pa babayaran hehe.

Kaya siguro ang maiilista ko dito sa nabili ko ay:

Utang na loob ng mga nangutang na hindi nagbayad!!!   Hindi man siya bagay at least makakatulong din sa akin ito balang araw.

Here is my work :



BTC address: 1KuaLaU49bcQ3UqnkL7mtTwLK6Un5cib9K

---

Description:

Broken Anonymous Mask : Bitcoin used to be known as anonymous coin but later found out that it is not fully anonymous but rather a pseudonymous cryptocurrency.  Worst, the government forced their way into tracking Bitcoin user through the use of KYC on exchanges,
"We are Satoshi" :  in absense of Satoshi Nakamoto, each and every one of Bitcoin enthusiast became the Satoshi of Bitcoin which help in propagation of awareness campaign for bitcoin mass adoption.

For 10  years Bitcointak.org had been an all out discussion for personal belief to blockchain technology, thus discussion covers every walks of life's topic, from off topic, Bitcoin discussion, altcoin discussion to technical and development.  Any topic a person has.. we discuss it all here!!!

Highlighting some typo..  please check the bolded part of the qouted message.  Baka magkaroon ng conflict though alam ko na hindi  magtitake advantage ang nagpahiram .

He should be updating the Announcement post after updating such, I also checked the spreadsheet but it seems the payment adjustment is not implemented.

Indeed but declaring the token in a certain unrealistic value at its current state, just to lure participants to join, i believe it is a shady activity in part of the Bounty manager. 

I know but this case I think is kinda exaggerated, pricing the token 100 times the IEO to attract participants, Veil on the other hand gives at least a reasonable conversion depending on the exchange rate.  See the difference of these two bounty.

Update:

I wanted to know your opinion regarding this matter, I am browsing bounty campaigns to kill time and possible project to invest in since I need to know the allocation of Bounty token since often times this influx of token saturate the market and caused the price to go down when I stumble on this bounty thread titled: (BOUNTY) 💰💰🔥 P2PS Bounty Campaign $450k Worth Of Token For Hunter 💰💰🔥  I noticed this thing..

The bounty,/ bounty manager priced the initial token price as $3  


While the IEO price is $0.03





I would not mind if it is in stake distribution but the token reward is fixed.  I feel sorry for the bounty participant being deceived by this rate.  I have nothing against the bounty manager but I just feel that there is something wrong.  How can you clasified this kind of action?  I'm kinda confused because I believe, with deception hunters will end up nothing.  What can you say about this?  I need your input since I am confused.  Is this kind of deception allowed in the bounty campaigns?  Are bounty managers allowed to intentionally increase the price of token to attract more participants?  I think this is deception and should not be tolerated.

Pointing out a huge discrepancy on the IEO price and the rate here.  IEO price is around 0.03 USD per p2ps, how could 1 p2ps equivalent to $3?  How did you end up on this calculation?


Is this another way of cheating/deceiving the bounty hunters?

It seems tmfp agrees with you

---

Good selection of Books btw, nice list

---

@OP you could have used column and row format  to make it look better for viewing.

Other investors use fundamental analysis before investing.  That includes the position of the token/coins in the market, the fund of the project, the team or developer of the project, etc.  Your friend is right when he told you to know the person or team behind the project.  Please be aware that the anonymity of developer raises a red flag especially when they are undergoing a crowdfunding.  Bitcoin had established its industry and several developer of it are not anonymous anymore.  Sure Satoshi Nakamoto is anonymous but he had stopped participating in the development for a very long time (probably behind the scene if he is still up to it).

Tama ka dyan kaibigan, maraming tao ang nagkakamali sa hindi paglagay ng stop-loss sa kanilang mga trades.  Marami kasing scenario na maganda ang presyo ng tinitrade bago matulog ngunit pagkagising mo ay bagsak na pla ang presyo.  Marami  tuloy ang nagiging bagholder ng isang coins or token na walang halaga.

---

Patuloy kong iaupdate ang OP ayon sa mga ibinahaging karanasan at impormasyo sa talakayang ito.  Mas maganda kasi na mayroong real life experience na halimbawa ang mga bawat pagkakamali na nabanggit o mababanggit sa usapang ito.

Because of the mission to spread the word and broaden the sphere of influence of the said belief?