what a shame, with devs' info and pictures, you have only 58 btc, but without info disclosed like opair, it has 150 btc, very unfair to you guys. 200 btc threshold is not easy at all, only 4 days left. If not reach, will be a refund?
Read the thread man. It won't be a refund.
It will if ppl vote in favor of it
If the majority votes "no" implying that they wish to be refunded then Jewels project will not proceed and we will begin the process of issuing a refund of all BTC.
^ from OP are u guys blind or something?
Jewels isn't directly letting their players convert their earnings to real money either. Jewels isn't "real money"...
Jewels are a virtual currency. If virtual currencies aren't real money explain why Charlie Shrem and the creator of egold landed in jail.
Obviously these big names consult lawyers they're huge multimillion dollar companies what would you expect them to yolo

lol!
When you grow up you'll understand that people use lawyers all the time from buying property to setting up businesses to resolving contentious matters to dealing with divorce etc. Your "only million dollar busimesses use lawyer" stance may be true in hollywood movies but this is not hollywood. Beside if you actually read what I said instead of throwing your uninformed opinion around you would know that what I recommand OP is not to bother with the legal process but use smart contracts to get rid of the problem altogether.
At any rate you are entitled to your opinion however uninformed and naive it may be, but I don't really care what you think. It's to OP I am talking here.
I'll be straight with you I have no idea what eGold is but based on its name it sounds like its suppose to represent gold virtually. Jewels isn't representing anything virtually. Like CS:GO keys its nothing more than a commodity, likewise so is that of BTC. BTC only gets more attention and special treatment though because of how much it has grown in mass.
"When you grow up" lol? I didn't say only a million dollar companies use lawyers but more so am stating that it's clear all of this has loop holes and as necessary I'm sure they will find their legal safe zone as required. Yes, I get it you keep throwing out the idea of shoving smart contracts down a persons throat, great but when did you become a legal expert on how the law sees ownership of who's created a smart contract and who is in control of it? Your advice of "not to bother with the legal process" seems like the absolute most ridiculous shit I've ever heard. Think you need to grow up and stop living in your smart contract delusional world buddy.