Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 531 results by Levole11
Re: [ANN][COVAL] Circuits Of Value - Introducing the Emblem Vault Sidechain
from telegram:
Since our last update several positive developments have happened at Coval. By the end of this month we will unveil some major partnerships, a solid roadmap and exciting new features which will pave the way for the mass adoption of the Coval/Emblem platform.
Please stay tuned. Now is the time to join the Coval News channel and be the first to get the good news to come:
https://t.me/Coval_Announcements
Since our last update several positive developments have happened at Coval. By the end of this month we will unveil some major partnerships, a solid roadmap and exciting new features which will pave the way for the mass adoption of the Coval/Emblem platform.
Please stay tuned. Now is the time to join the Coval News channel and be the first to get the good news to come:
https://t.me/Coval_Announcements
Re: XVC Vcash [UNOFFICIAL] ▱ Zerotime ▱ Zeroledger ▱ Anon ▱ Innovative
Once again John's immaturity is proven on Twitter.
Getting real tired of his shit
Getting real tired of his shit
hey noob! please explain with a link. kthanksbye
I think he means this:
https://twitter.com/john_a_connor/status/750975784735551489
12 + never happened, still equals 12.
But ATM he has a stage and an audience and a stated 1 of 12 exploits to pick from....any day now....
Never happened??
http://i.imgur.com/wHVlCK8.jpg
That tweet is the next day after the bug was already publicly known. I proves nothing about john-connor's claims.
I asked for a him to show a link to a tweet (not a screenshot) with a timestamp prior to the bug being publicly known, proving his knowledge as he claimed could be done via twitter, and got crickets. I'm still waiting.
Quote
Who''s lying?
You
Monero devs sold it as an attack at the time, John was the one pointing out it was an exploit. There's a difference.. anybody is free to look it up on Twitter themselves, so i really don't care for your troll games smooth
12 + never happened, still equals 12.
But ATM he has a stage and an audience and a stated 1 of 12 exploits to pick from....any day now....
Never happened??
Who''s lying?
What the hell is steem?
A blockchain-based social media platform, somewhat resembling reddit:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1466593.0
I am obviously intrigued. I also immediately see a lot of voices crying foul over a flawed distro scheme and its hard to discern what happened. Was it just difficult to mine at first, leading to the devs mining a lot, though fairly? Were there honestly no shenanigans similar to Dash or Vanillacoin?
Steem is just another Larimer scam. Nobody is going to end up using it. The Larimer Gang pulled the same stunt with PTS mining. I know, because I was mining PTS from day one and there were several people complaining about not being able to connect to the network. Nothing the Larimers are involved in is fair. The only blockchain-based social media network that will be of importance is Synereo.
Ah a Larimer scam, makes sense then that smooth and the monero gang are also involved.
Yeah a larimer scam with huge instamine by the devs.. except smooth not shouting scam because he's invested.. says a lot about smooth's Integrity, or better, the lack of it
It wasn't an instamine; coins were created at the specified rate and nothing happened to create a big chunk of coins instantly (difficulty adjustment was excellent). It was certainly a fast-mine, with a large chunk of coins mined in a week. It had barriers put up to participation, and yet at the same time everything was fully disclosed, including that fast that there were deliberate barriers put up.
I've stated all this on the Steem thread BTW. People can make up their own minds whether to support it in any way, I'm not out here selling it. Given the clear disclosure and distribution according to the stated schedule I don't see anything even remotely fraudulent. "Unfair" perhaps, but fraudulent, no.
Oh, I see, your agenda is that you're one of those Vanillacoin/Vcash retards who doesn't accept that your dev stealing Bitcoin's code and lying about it makes both him and the coin worthless pieces of shit, and hate that I'm one of the people telling people about it. Can't fix stupid.
I have no agenda smooth, other than to expose you for what you are.. Combine my previous post with anonymints admission that you influenced/hoodwinked him into making statements which suited your interests, then the picture gets even clearer..
The situation with jc has been discussed on the forum many times and is off topic here...
What the hell is steem?
A blockchain-based social media platform, somewhat resembling reddit:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1466593.0
I am obviously intrigued. I also immediately see a lot of voices crying foul over a flawed distro scheme and its hard to discern what happened. Was it just difficult to mine at first, leading to the devs mining a lot, though fairly? Were there honestly no shenanigans similar to Dash or Vanillacoin?
Steem is just another Larimer scam. Nobody is going to end up using it. The Larimer Gang pulled the same stunt with PTS mining. I know, because I was mining PTS from day one and there were several people complaining about not being able to connect to the network. Nothing the Larimers are involved in is fair. The only blockchain-based social media network that will be of importance is Synereo.
Ah a Larimer scam, makes sense then that smooth and the monero gang are also involved.
Yeah a larimer scam with huge instamine by the devs.. except smooth not shouting scam because he's invested.. says a lot about smooth's Integrity, or better, the lack of it
Re: Does anyone really believe that "HONCHO" isn't TPTB_Need_War/Anonymint?
Lol, ppl believing its not him, must be blind.. pretty fucking obvious.. His buddy smooth tried to some damage control for him, but tptb even fucked that up
Poor TPTB, getting silenced like that in this forum and having someone else do all the talking for him. Something just doesnt feel right,
how can we be sure HONCHO didn't kill TPTB and took over his life and work ?
TPTB, if you read this please give us a sign of life... pref in the form of alenghty reply so we know its you 
how can we be sure HONCHO didn't kill TPTB and took over his life and work ?
TPTB, if you read this please give us a sign of life... pref in the form of a
Look at the post above yours
yeah, i did notice HONCHO has rather lengthy replies as well
So, yeah, please give us a sign anonymint, like you always did when banned:)
Poor TPTB, getting silenced like that in this forum and having someone else do all the talking for him. Something just doesnt feel right,
how can we be sure HONCHO didn't kill TPTB and took over his life and work ?
TPTB, if you read this please give us a sign of life... pref in the form of a lenghty reply so we know its you
how can we be sure HONCHO didn't kill TPTB and took over his life and work ?
TPTB, if you read this please give us a sign of life... pref in the form of a lenghty reply so we know its you
Look at the post above yours
to drive investment in the proposed ICO.
will your ICO be legal in the United States of America and the Philippines?
Probably not and that's why anonymint has created honcho.
This..
Re: First they spread fud, but now bitcoin core will copy Vcash code
How much nodes exist right now and what amount of vcash is needed to run one?
Currently there are about 340 nodes, 312 of them incentivised.. you needed 10k xvc to run one..
Sick of reading all the hype driven by promises such as Vcash.
If you want to invest in something that actually delivers and is already being used in real word applications, look at NEM.
Its got a very stable market cap and is not driven by hype, rather by its results.
If you want to invest in something that actually delivers and is already being used in real word applications, look at NEM.
Its got a very stable market cap and is not driven by hype, rather by its results.
lol, if there are development teams delivering on promises then vcash definitely is one
Obviously you need to dyor before making such statements.
Have you conquered the world already without your project mate?
Is that a valid technical rebuttal to my prior post mate?
Moving the goal posts and creating strawmen is a tactic of deception.
You have a lot in common with Craig Wright.. he backs off too when it really matters:)
I haven't back off of anything.
I will win. Watch.
I am watching you "win" everyday in here, don't worry
Have you conquered the world already without your project mate?
Is that a valid technical rebuttal to my prior post mate?
Moving the goal posts and creating strawmen is a tactic of deception.
You have a lot in common with Craig Wright.. he backs off too when it really matters:)
1. Craig said he signed a hash of some Sartre document but did not disclose which portion of the text. No one has written a script to prove that no portion or combination of portions of that Sartre text will not hash to the value that was signed. Thus I stated until someone has proven that it is impossible for Craig to later show that some portion of the Sartre text will hash to the sign hash value, then you can't claim with certainty that he can't do that. At the bare minimum, those who were checking Craig's proof, should have at least run a simple script to try every contiguous portion (no permutations) of the Sartre text (which is a tractable computation).
Such a script would prove nothing, since you know nothing about the input Craig allegedly used.
If we are basing it on the drcraigwright.com website "proof", then the Sartre document is the one claimed to have been hashed, but he didn't disclose what portion of that document.
Nice try. Fail.
My point is the you Bitcoin zealots didn't do your homework. Haha. You also didn't even validate if that was his official website. You guys are derelict, as well as censoring free speech and technical discussion. No wonder you will end up in failure mindlessly following Blockstream's SegWit soft forking Trojan Horse.
2. I have stated that no one seems to know why Bitcoin employs double hashing, and I have stated a theory that double hashing may weaken the collision resistance of the SHA256. I gave my logic for why that may be the case. I also note that SHA256 is documented to be reasonably close to being broken with 46 - 52 of the 64 rounds already broken. Thus I presented the theory that perhaps the double-hashing might push the vulnerability over the edge of breakage of 64 rounds. I didn't present that as a likely theory. I presented it as a point of discussion. If you have no way to refute this technical possibility because you don't know a damn thing about cryptographic hash function construction then that means you are not expert enough to comment about the quality of my theory. Do you for example even understand why two SHA256 hash function applications in series is not equivalent to 2 x 64 rounds? I ask you a specific question and I expect a specific answer.
Because double hashing is routinely employed to avoid preimage and length extension attacks, whether such protection is needed or not. Multiple iterations do not make it more vulnerable (again, if you believe it does, it's up to you to produce evidence of such a vulnerability), so there's no downside except for a slight reduction in performance.
I asked you a specific question, "Do you for example even understand why two SHA256 hash function applications in series is not equivalent to 2 x 64 rounds?". I see you are unable to answer it?
After we confirm that you can't answer it, then I will REKT the rest of your technically incorrect response above.
I understand you don't like me, but that is your personal problem.
No, it isn't. It would a problem if I did like you, since anyone who does must be a poor judge of character.
Try reading the linked article to learn more about your character.
Have you conquered the world already without your project mate?
I don't know if I'm on the right section but I needed some help with regarding to my vanilla (xvc) wallet, I'm mining it from suprnova and decided to stake it from my own wallet, unfortunately when I already send it to my wallet the coins is not appearing keep looking for any support coming from their thread but it's no longer updated so I decided to open this thread to seek help to anybody who have an Idea how it will work. Thanks in Advance.
Come to irc #vcash or ask the question on official forum https://v.cash/forum/
Re: First they spreading fud, but now bitcoin core will copy Vcash code
This surely is something for VCash. With regards to Zero confirmations creating fast transaction, aren't other altcoins having an instant transfer as well.
The only one iam aware of is Dash, but that requires a higher fee to use, while xvc's is the standard fee and through xvc's ZT txes, coins are respendable faster..
There might be other differences as well, but i have never really looked into Dash to be honest.
Re: First they spreading fud, but now bitcoin core will copy Vcash code
never held a single dash or xmr, i just am here to laugh at xmr trolls... 
This is the first thing that came to me my mind when I saw the news, going to be some major butthurt, get the popcorn. I don't hold either coins either, too low risk, low reward for me.
I didn't know the success of a coin is measured based on its availability on BTC-E.
It might not be a succes meter, sure is a butthurt one
and it shows this:
