Well, there was this banner on ask-socrates.com that they are still migrating the data and there may be issues. So there was and still is a warning on the system.  I think MA just wanted to get the system released and grant access to the reversals. I don't want to discuss that things went wrong with the release of SOC Pro. This I've mentioned already numerous times. I just wanted to say that the arrays didn't make any sense before, but they do now. So your tests have been done based on inaccurate data (which was of course not your fault).  I'm also not talking about whether the arrays are good or not. That is a different question.

Now that the British Election has been concluded, let's see what statements/predictions Armstrong made about this subject in the past few months:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/britain/brexit-live-decline-fall-of-western-society/


WRONG - since when did Corbyn refuse the results of this election last night (either way, he wanted a second democratic referendum)? And since when is Johnson not going to deliver Brexit with his healthy Conservative majority? Armstrong is such a doomsday dramaqueen as usual here.


WRONG - Nigel Farage is very happy about the election result, didn't contest in Conservative constituencies and is content with Johnson's Brexit deal.

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/britain/the-coming-british-elections/


WRONG - best Conservative result since Tatcher, Lib Dems lost 1 seat.


WRONG - Brexit Party 0 seats.

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/britain/brexit-pound-rally/


WRONG - There was no chaos at all, the election was very orderly. No protests to speak of by the general public.

This is what Socrates/MA said about the DOW in the 2018 Year End Report:


"The US share market is still trying to figure out which way to move next.  As I have stated number of times, ideally after 8 years up in 2018, there should be a correction.
The formation of the high in 2018 was not indicative of a bubble top since the Nasdaq peaked in August, the SP500 peaked in September and the DOW in October.
No major bubble high has ever formed with such disparity."

In the end the conclusion was:
(Please note: in 2018 the DOW closed at 23.327,46)

"The 2017 closing was 24719.22 and the 2017 high was 24876.07. A lower closing for 2018 will warn that the market is entering 2019 weak.
We do have a Monthly Bearish reversal at 23344 following 21600. The quarterly bearish reversal lies at 22416 followed by 20378. While there remains a risk of retest of support in January 2019, the scope of this decline will hinge on the Monthly and Quarterly Bearish reversals. If these Reversals hold, then they may become the target for support in 2019. Yearly support in 2019 seems to be lining up at 22600"


This Year end report is dated December 16th 2018.
So we elected the monthly bearish in December 2018 of 23.334. The DOW did not test the next reversal (21.600) as from here we went straight up.
How can anybody say Ray Dalio missed this rally and MA predicted it?
Please let me know if anybody can explain that MA called for a rally.
MAs said CAPITAL  LETTERS.   DO NOT GO LONG THIS MARKET IN HIS PRIVATE BLOG

Armstrong is worth an absolute fortune he doesn't need the money, you clearly know nothing about him. I can understand your criticism of ask-socrates it does need a lot of work still and can be confusing. The most likely reason you and others are not having success is because you were day trading and not playing more strategically like in line with the ECM. we already have all his major predictions based off the ECM(business cycle) so by 2024 you are going to realize your mistake and you would be a fool to bet against the ECM.

the next wave is 2020.05 to 2028.65, the peak of that wave will be 2024.35(major turning point) the top and bottom of each wave is where the markets tend to make highs or lows so we have a commodity boom from 2020(low) with a high in 2024,  agricultural boom from 2020 with a high in 2024. Armstrong is also calling for a equities to breakout from 2020 with a temporary high in 2024

@MA_talk

The ECM is probably the best way to trade, in line with the business cycle. There is also no need to argue about it not being accurate to the day because this is not going to help you with your trade. Each market has its own unique cycle so it often will not line up perfectly with the ECM so for example the Dow Jones may make a cycle low in December which looks likely based off the monthly array since we also have a directional change in January.

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/uncategorized/what-kind-of-trader-is-trading/



I don’t really care if he’s worth a fortune nor do I care if he thinks he’s so much smarter than 5he rest of humanity
What I care about is if someone sells me something or a product then I expect and demand that the service or product does as claimed.
If not then that person or company has an obligation to prove it does what It says it does or to instruct the purchaser on the correct use of that service or product
MA does nothing to rectify, prove otherwise nor instruct his subscribers in any w@y shape or form.

Now as for you Gumbi as u have your head so far up MAs ass that he can’t scratch it then why don’t u post the evidence as has been asked of u by others on this forum. YOU CANT BECAUSE IT DOESNT WORK.

Just because you and a few other people failed to understand it and trade profitable, doesn't mean it's not working.  
Maybe there is no need to adapt the system because human behavior doesn't change over the decades or centuries.

yes, someone will get the code when Armstrong is gone, but he wants to avoid that the banksters get it. He has presented a roadmap for this in his blog, somewhere....  I read about it 3-4 years ago. I guess it could be something like a cooperative that is managed by the Socrates user itself. I think this was his vision.

Either way, That all still doesn't matter today :-)
The point is, is Socrates working or not? If yes, then all of those things will only matter mid or long term.
If you don't believe that Socrates is working, then there is no point in thinking or talking about those  questions brought up by you, anyways. It is just a distraction from what really counts. People who follow Armstrong for a long time have asked those questions before (yes questions about the future of Socrates are valid questions) and the plan is already in place and will be executed once the time has come.

from a quick search:  https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/products_services/socrates/socrates-7-the-ipoa-lot-of-emails-are-coming-in/

All MA is doing is trying to leave his Socrates system so his kids or other family members can continue to fleece the sheeple who believe that this system actually works. Ive tried the Pro version with another poster on here whose very well schooled in the trading game and plain and simple it doesn’t work
The penny finally dropped for me when he posted in late December or very early January
DO NOT GO LONG!!!  well no further comment required on that statement..
He is a Dud Dude who makes his money pulling the Socrates scam