I agree with you, that's exactly what I tried on a couple of occasions when I had Credits. It's impossible to do it... but don't worry, Credits fans are blinded by the wonderful light of 1m tps, they don't know how to reason, what a hell they're all going to give each other...

You're really stupid. Anyone who understands a little of this market can see for themselves. Enter and try to trade in that exchange, your order will be there for a long time without moving while the exchange is reporting that lots of buy and sell orders are being filled. Anyone with two front fingers knows that, although I see that on your forehead it doesn't take even one of those fingers. Lol, what a clown you are.

"""A full swap of tokens will occur after 2-3 months of stable Mainnet operations. This measure has taken with focus to maintain the high level of platform security. As such, we intend to carry out our bug bounty campaign and test the level of platform workflow at different layers before the beginning the common public swap.""


Hahaha, Credits revolutionizing the market, it's true, guys, it's the first blockchain with mainnet without token swap for up to 2-3 months. What a joke. Cheer up Credits fans. Keep supporting this great project. LOL

Hahaha, they'll make you suffer until the end. Lol, on the 31st. LOLOLOL. On the 1st of April we will see each other's friendly faces. Don't cry too much. What a shitty scam and what a fall you are having in Kucoin. I have warned you friends.

Lol. Do you think there is little reason to have bought from Ico and to have been following their Telegram for a year? What did you miss, friend? It is the most incompetent team in this market. There will be delays for sure, ¡¡champion!!. It's a good thing I sold this shit on time. You will live it in your flesh and I will be here to see it. At least I have warned you all. As I said, many testers sold when they saw that the code was shit and they couldn't deliver. You are warned. And I'm on my way to multiply x4. LOL.  

In three days you'll tell me if it's unfounded or not. Lol.

Lol. 1000 CS? What an idiot you are. And I'm wasting my time with a commoner like you.. Lol. I have more than 100K dollars invested in Crypto. Of course it's the last time I'm down to your level. So much headache for 1000 miserable dollars and also in this shitty project..... On the other hand I wouldn't think of pumping any coin in this thread that only 3 people read. Already there are many followers of Credits that sold everything and bought Fantom. Enter their Telegram, you will see some familiar faces of Credits over there and many of them were great whales. Learn from friendly whales, they are intelligent people. For me this is just a diversion and if on the way I convince idiots like you they are welcome

I invested in Fantom 3.6 million FTM, that's now more than 40K dollars. I sold all my Credits at 0.18 and bought Fantom at 0.0045.  I have multiplied my investment by more than 3 and not only that, Fantom is a great Dag with many great associations and a great future and Credits is a shit pricked on a stick. LOL.  LOL.

Lol. IBM has already partnered with dozens of blockchain, is even creating its own, does not need to depend on anyone and least of all this shit. I never said that Credits has nothing, I just said that it will be another blockchain of so many and will not revolutionize anything.  When Credits took out his Ico there were only less than a dozen blockchains. Now there are several dozens and many of them quite more promising than Credits and much more advanced, with serious equipment and to whom the development has not cost so much time, that only bases its advertising on the tps, when apart from not being true is not the most important thing either. Nowadays any blockchain that makes 5k-10k tps in a real environment has all the problems that Eth has solved. Credits is not going to stand out among the other blockchain. Just do a search on the internet to realize that nobody takes it seriously, not a single major publication has taken it into account. The clowns are still saying that administrators have managed to make 1.3 million tps in a real environment. Lol, big assholes, especially the arrogant Arseny that. Either people are very silly or they don't investigate well.  It's a shame they put their investments at risk like that. Even those who have lost almost ten times their investment in this scam can still sell it and earn money and better projects. If they keep waiting for a miracle to happen they can lose everything. Sell this shit friends.

With the so-called mainnet approaching and with a real volume of 67k dollars in 24 hours in Kucoin, Coinbene and Lbank are only decorating to deceive the unwary. This is dead and the worst of all is that they are all locked up.  Lol.

Lol. You're right, and just six days before the end of the month, they're still running out of time as usual. There are people with test 4.2 with synchronization problems among other things, as always, a shit testnet. No evidence of decentralization or speed.  But surely there will be people who, as always, will say that technology needs time. Lol. Credits are like that, veterans sell and leave and other unwary ones enter new ones and allow them to continue spreading their deception. How I'm going to laugh at the end of the month. I hope and wish that they sink into shit.

I didn't just want to advertise the Dag, I had a lot of Credits and I sold that shit to buy something better. Now to say the truth is called fud, Lol. A lot of Credits' buddies left with me and bought Fantom when I was on the floor. Now everyone is thanking me... I've already said it, in ten days I'll go in and laugh at all the Credits fans to see who has the big eggs to tell me I'm laying fud. LOL.I'm having a good time watching this shit fall out. By the way, have you seen the last video of the Igor? Shame on the CEO, what a shitty presentation... No wonder today the price fell so much. English speaks it badly, but well, that's the least of it, the worst thing is that you can tell he has no idea what he's saying. These people are experts at breaking up their own business.

All right, all right, buddy.

Andre Cronje Technical explanation for Credits fans. Lol:

Two nomenclatures to first clear up;

1. Blockchain the category
2. Blockchain the structure

A blockchain is a DAG.

Directed (moves in one direction only)
Acyclic (you can't return to a node from the current node)
Graph

All blockchain (structures) are DAGs. A DAG can be a blockchain (category)

That out of the way, there are lots of DAGs already; ethereum, even has leaf nodes (uncles).

So I don't get the DAG vs Blockchain argument.

Also, when looking at DAG, what implementation?

You get storage DAG (like Avalanche, where the UTXO are stored in DAGs)
You get block DAG (ghost / spectre/ phantom)
You get consensus DAG (Fantom / Hashgraph and derivatives, where the output can still be a normal blockchain (structure) or it could be another DAG (structure)

There are account level DAGs (Nano) and transaction level DAGs (IOTA).

So you can't really say DAG vs blockchain.

But what I will infer, is the "Are DAGs more scalable than blockchains". And that answer is entirely dependent on your network graph and consensus architecture.

In a POA / permissioned / consortium solution, DAGs are definitely more scalable. In a completely unpermissioned environment blockchains are more secure.

It's a very difficult question to answer because there are so many variables at play.

Personally, I think DAG's are fantastic for aBFT consensus, so I like them there, but I think traditional blockchain is the better structure for time based sequences. So most of my research work is focused on how to order a DAG to output a blockchain

So how do a lot of these other projects achieve high TPS? Not as a function of the output structure, but instead as a function of consensus.

An easy example, let's take Ethereum right now. Currently it's Proof of Work at ~13s block time @ 9 TPS, but what if we simply decrease the block time to 1s? Would we then get ~117 TPS? (Here we need to look at data transmission, I will cover that a bit later).

Next let's look at consensus, if we change from PoW to PoS and keep the block time the same, does anything change? No, since proof of work is just the security, not the scalability. If we change block size (or gas limit in ethereum) or block time then we can achieve more throughput.

So what options do we have to achieve more throughput? Let's look at traditional technology scaling, if you have a single threaded process that does 1 action per second, and you want to increase it, you simply add more threads, 10 threads equals 10 actions per second. But what if all of these threads at some point need to share the same data? This is called a dead lock, where the system needs to make a decision. Normally fairly easily resolved in centralized systems, first come first serve for example (but here you don't have any malicious actors).

So the problem we are trying to solve is one of ordering, which event happened first? This is done in proof of work based systems because the proof of work is essentially a timer that makes sure to only allow events to trickle in and not cause a deadlock.

But let's assume we could get rid off that time limit, but still achieve scalability, you could do this via standard BFT, but that increases message complexity (since you need at least 3 rounds of messages x the amount of participating nodes and the delays on messages can be unbounded). So a lot of systems use BFT but they limit the amount of validators (for example only selecting 9/12/21/... validators out of thousands - dPoS with BFT).

Another solution is sharding, an easy example is namespace sharding, group 1 handles all accounts that start with the letter A, group 2 handles B and so forth. Now you could essentially have one PoW network that handles all the A accounts and another all the B accounts etc. You could also do this based on some namespace, for example ETH could have a consensus layer per ERC20 (all separated for parallel / concurrent throughput).

So it's less blockchain vs DAG and more storage / consensus / abstraction considerations.

But even with all the above, there is an easier answer, any chain saying they  reach hundreds of thousands of tps they're just lying.

That's how an expert talks, see if they learn. Lol.:


https://youtu.be/9rWGse31aXE

Lenovo, shit, is a branch of lenovo dedicated to augmented reality, like IBM, partnering with everyone, something nobody uses. Lol. Credits is going to be big, very big, of the biggest shit. Lol.

Dude, scam means when someone cheats on you, they have claimed that they have done 300k tps in a real environment and that's a lie, in addition to being technically proven by reputable analysts. These people have based their whole strategy on selling that they are going to be the fastest and put themselves in the first places. I don't know the association with IBM and the nature of it.  IBM has partnered with almost every blockchains already. If Credits has something it will be one more blockchain of the heap, they won't revolutionize anything.  Lol.

Instead of talking so much nonsense, they should lie less. They are compulsive liars. I have already seen several reputable developers like Andre Cronje dismantle that lie of hundreds of thousands of tps in a real environment, is impossible. Stop with the patents and the nonsense. The longest patent in history. The director of blockchain is not going to lose any prestige for that, he is only advisor of a project, if they are not able to deliver it is their problem not his. There are only 10 days left for me to come back here and laugh in your face at everything you're saying. I have invested my more than 200000 Credits in Fantom, a serious and transparent project, a Dag and open source, I bought at the lowest today I just multiplied by 3 my money. Dag are much more scalable than blockchain and is proven to be faster, Ftm will do between 6k and 8k tps in a real environment. It does not sell smoke. To make that million tps of Credits you need a quantum computer and some connections that now do not even exist. That project is the joke of this market. No one knows it, no one analyzes it and there are no videos of anyone who talks seriously about their technology, because there is none. The most serious thing I've heard about it is that the source code so far is novice. Anyway, in ten days I'll be back to expose you. Sell this shit that you are being swindled friends. I don't know how a team of fucking developers without any prestige, you just have to look at their profiles on LinkedIn to see if they will discover the gunpowder. lol...By the way, I guess the vast majority knew me as a great Credits advocate from Ico. I felt a long time swindled and tired of so many lies and delays. I know very well what I am talking about and I was even talking privately with two Credits testers who made me see The Light. They told me many times to leave the project, that they had nothing and that they were deceiving us all. I have known Credits since the beginning. I hope I can convince some fans before they lose all their money.

Even having something revolutionary that is not the case, lol, in a couple of months arrive several blockchain and some other Dag that are going to put ahead in all aspects and with big associations behind and big investors. Credits has no investor behind it and that is suspicious when most of the blockchain have great investors, nobody smart bets on this scam. Nobody has noticed this shit to invest, only the more than 20k unsuspecting who are waiting for Credits to be among the top ten. Lol, not even in your best dreams is that going to happen. Some have already been advanced and with the next delay that there will surely be will go to hell.

Anyway it seems that all these fans have not been well informed about who these guys are and their team. The Ceo picked up trash and his friend is a simple computer developer . I have researched the entire development team and no one is known or highlighted in any matter or have worked in large companies. With what they racaudaron in Ico even I myself would have done much better. A nice website with lots of nice documents, that's worth practically nothing, just a few hundred thousand dollars to keep that and all the workers. I see them in many conferences but almost always visiting and if they speak in one they do not share any video. They know very well what they are doing. They are playing cat and mouse, but I think they don't have many races left to win. After the next delay they'll be out of business.

Lol 1.3m tps. Imao. Technically in a real environment is proven to be impossible, rather than proven, even a few thousand is very difficult. They still keep the goose with the golden eggs behind a patent, by the way. the longest in history...Lol. The little code that has been published already there are several analysts who said it is beginner. Those associations you're talking about, as for Lenovo it's related to Virtual Reality, something that nobody uses right now and as for Ibm, well, that's funny, I think Ibm has already associated with all the blockchain.  They only sell smoke. A smoke that will soon dissipate. Remember, in less than quice days I'm going to laugh at you as well as a few thousands of unwary. It won't be because I haven't warned you in time. This is a scam and remember that there will be another delay. Read this article and get your illustration, friend. You really believe that these guys are able to multiply by 50 the speed of the best blockchain in a real environment. Don't be an innocent man. : https://cointelegraph.com/news/who-scales-it-best-inside-blockchains-ongoing-transactions-per-second-race. Maybe within ten years when they buy a quantum computer and the internet speed is several terabytes per second they can do it, at the moment they are just a few more scammers in this big circus.

It's a simple copy and paste back in to make him a foolish Credits fan. And it's not fud, it's reality, in a few days we'll laugh at all of you. LOL