Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 22 results by Mr.Fuck
Quote
“The prevailing opinion in the media (including Gizmodo, 11 December 2015, BBC News, 2 May 2016, The Guardian, 3 May 2016 and GQ Magazine, 18 November 2016) has been, and is, that Wright is unlikely to be Satoshi Nakamoto,” reads the transcript.
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/legal/hodlonaut-wins-defamation-case-against-craig-wright
Quote
“The prevailing opinion in the media (including Gizmodo, 11 December 2015, BBC News, 2 May 2016, The Guardian, 3 May 2016 and GQ Magazine, 18 November 2016) has been, and is, that Wright is unlikely to be Satoshi Nakamoto,” reads the transcript.
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/legal/hodlonaut-wins-defamation-case-against-craig-wright
I find it sad that Craig Wright is the subject of so much malice. He was the first to publicly explain how bitcoin is Turing. He was immediately mocked by his colleagues and yet he is right. What are his colleagues doing to further develop bitcoin "for some define themselves as bitcoin researchers"? The answer is: nothing.
There are dark forces at work to discredit him in unison, using extremely elaborate social engineering tactics. As evidence of this, I came across this profile https://twitter.com/Twetchdater/with_replies which had fun cataloguing the gratuitous nastiness and stupidity created by a stream on the bitcoinsv blockchain. Look at the typography of the censuses, the words used, the waves, some profiles have exactly the same establishment, hidden behind images, very few real profiles in the end and yet. This creates a current of social engineering.
That said I understand that many people (real people) appear frustrated because Craig Wright has signed blocks in front of people in the past. And these people don't understand why he doesn't do it again. Apart from the legal exposures this creates but at the same time it seems obvious that at the moment if Craig Wright were to do it again this same process could be invalidated by the corrupted code that has become the modified source code of BTC over the years. The missing alert key feature removed from the BTC code is a perfect example. How many trojans have been implemented since Core and Blockstream have been in charge of the scam that BTC has become?
try it 
introducing zkBattleship: The world’s first interactive Zero-Knowledge Proof tutorial https://coingeek.com/introducing-zkbattleship-the-world-first-interactive-zero-knowledge-proof-tutorial/ & https://coingeek.com/zero-knowledge-private-machine-learning-on-bitcoin/
introducing zkBattleship: The world’s first interactive Zero-Knowledge Proof tutorial https://coingeek.com/introducing-zkbattleship-the-world-first-interactive-zero-knowledge-proof-tutorial/ & https://coingeek.com/zero-knowledge-private-machine-learning-on-bitcoin/ About Radiant. Infinitely scalable UTXO blockchain with account emulation, induction proofs, native L1 NFTs and tokens. Solves back to the genesis problem with UTXO in two distinct ways which mean pretty much any application can be created and it will be fully verified by the miners with no requirement for third party oracles.
A video with the lead developer being interviewed about Radiant. Will give you a good understanding of the of the purpose and vision of the project:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apBVGJHr7Cw
A video with the lead developer being interviewed about Radiant. Will give you a good understanding of the of the purpose and vision of the project:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apBVGJHr7Cw
Quote
Notorious defamation troll Arthur Van Pelt who constantly harasses BSV and Craig Wright with misinformation and lies, admits that he "lives off of donations to do this" in reference to defaming Craig Wright and trolling BSV on Social Media at 1:18 mark:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHvzIbnQ_mQ&t=4685s
Source: https://twitter.com/cryptorebel_SV/status/1448872867098025985
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHvzIbnQ_mQ&t=4685s
Source: https://twitter.com/cryptorebel_SV/status/1448872867098025985
Getting paid to harass people? Seriously! The 🤡 is fucking wasting his life, time is running out but he only has one life and he's wasting his time.
sad.
crazy man cuck 
Quote
1/15 Some have asked me: "Why do you assume that Craig S. Wright (CSW) invented Bitcoin?". First of all: I am an independent third party (I'll skip my personal background). I've heard a little bit about CSW and BSV in advance, but my deep dive started shortly after 20. Sep 2021.
2/15 Realizing that smart contracts run natively on BSV with instant confirmation (<1s), it aroused my interest. I've now spent at least 250 hours on reading documents and watching videos. It was better than reading a crime novel and maybe this knowledge will be worthwhile.
3/15 To assess this properly, we have to consider different categories of evidence: A) proof of key possession, B) witness statements, C) proof of knowledge & proof of work. There are many other areas of evidence, but I will only cover the most important ones for now.
4/15 A) Proof of key possession: There was no public proof so far. Neither CSW nor any other entity signed with an address that is connected to Satoshi. We neither have a public proof nor disproof in this regard.
5/15 B) Witness statements: Following witnesses said that CSW signed messages with the addresses associated with either block 9 or block 1 (or both):
@gavinandresen @jonmatonis Stefan Matthews and @CalvinAyre. The statements of Gavin Andresen are under oath and thus valuable.
6/15 Opponents like @CoinDesk twist Gavin Andresens statements and are thus outright lying about what Gavin Andresen really said. (For those who don't know Gavin: He was picked by Satoshi as the software maintainer of the Bitcoin code in 2010/11 when Satoshi left)
7/15 Further witnesses with first hand knowledge that CSW invented Bitcoin: Ian Grigg, Joseph VaughnPerling, Uyen Nguyen, Donald Lynam, Ramona Ang/Watts, Lisa N. Edwards, River and Danielle De Morgan. The latter five are family. Donald Lynam and Ramona Watts testified under oath.
8/15 C) Proof of knowledge and proof of work: Having knowledge about Bitcoin which only the inventor might have and being able to make use of the complete protocol as it was designed for. CSW presented many theories which most laughed about. But we can now see that most was true.
9/15 i) Turing completeness: He mentioned that Bitcoin is Turing complete. Many disagreed, but it seems that Bitcoins Turing completeness was proven by now. ii) Smart contracts run natively on BitcoinSV. When I first realized this I thought "WTF?". Are you kidding me?
10/15 This must be some scam? - It is not. The smart contracts are coded in Script, a low-level programming language which was implemented in the very first Bitcoin versions. Coding in Script is hard, thus Xiaohui Lui created Scrypt, a high-level programming language similar to
11/15 Solidity and Javascript. You can code in Scrypt and decompile it to Script to run a smart contract on BSV. Examples of dApps running on BSV include: a DEX (AMM) @tswap_io, social media onchain Twitter @twetchapp, a game CryptoFights and other stuff:metastore.app
MetaStore.app - Search all Bitcoin apps on the free blockchain store that anyone can contribute to.
12/15 iii) blocksize: Satoshi Nakamoto was a big blocker. He mentioned Bitcoin can scale more than VISA with daily transactions of more than 100GB (divided by 144, this equals to 700mb blocks). If Bitcoin can scale this much onchain, there's no reason for other solutions.
13/15 Conclusion: We still have no proof of keys. What we have are more than ten witnesses with first hand knowledge who put their reputation at risk. But the most important proof are smart contracts on Bitcoin using the original code. Either Craig Wright invented Bitcoin or he
14/15 is the only surviving core member of Satoshi. In contrast, BTC now is merely a shadow of what Bitcoin was meant to be. One phrase that still impresses me is CSW saying in 2014: "Bitcoin is basically the future of everything. I'm not talking money, I'm talking everything."
15/15 My recommendation: Do some research, read more than the headlines and think about why things might have happened this way. Also: If you don't want to invest time, a position as small as 0.25% of a crypto portfolio is a sufficent hedge for a possible black swan event.
https://twitter.com/Optilon1/status/1462501245252472833
Quote
Interview from Michael Saylor
Sven Henrich (aka Northman Trader on Twitter) has published a fantastic (and long) interview with Michael Saylor. Rather sceptical about bitcoin until now, Sven was open-minded. At the end of the interview, he even said he was ready to invest very soon.
An informative Straight Talk
Saylor sometimes comes across as a guru, but not in this very informative interview. If you don't have time, start at the 52nd minute. If you're not an Anglophile, here's a translation of some interesting passages.
"Cryptocurrencies, for the most part, are not currencies at all. Crypto' is a misnomer that creates a lot of confusion. [...] A lot of people are speculating in "crypto" without having a long-term thesis on what they are doing. This is how I segment the market. There are four categories:
Bitcoin is the king of "digital property". It is designed to last a very long time. 100 years, 100,000 years. Imagine your family has owned a piece of land in central London for 100 years. When would you sell it? Never! Do you want to sell it? No! How are you going to live off it? You'll rent it out. But land is not a currency... If you own 10 buildings in NY and the FED prints 10% more of the money supply every year, you can indeed expect your buildings to appreciate by 10% a year as well because it is a desirable and scarce asset. But it is not a currency. This is the first category: Digital property
The second category is "digital currencies" such as Tether, Circle (USDC), Diem (facebook) or CBDCs. These are digital assets in the form of stable currencies. They are an intermediary of exchange. If you want a decentralised, very fast exchange intermediary that can transfer $50 million from Zimbabwe to the United Arab Emirates on a Saturday afternoon, outside the FED's networks, outside the banking system; if you want to pay every Salvadoran $37 on their phone, you have to use a digital currency. That's no small thing. Eight billion people need a currency. Money is the intermediary of exchange and its purpose is to act as a store of value.
Third category: "digital platforms". Ethereum is a platform for creating applications such as decentralised exchanges, insurance, companies, NFTs. Their mission is to create decentralised applications. When you buy ETH, you buy a digital asset, a token that gives you a share in the environment of this platform.
Fourth category, "decentralised applications". Uniswap for example. They are trying to replace NASDAQ, Coinbase. Binance smartchain is trying to replace Binance (a centralized exchange).
Good. Now imagine I give your family a billion dollars. You can choose between buying a billion dollars worth of land in London, or buildings, or the equivalent of a billion dollars in British pounds, or companies that are housed in those buildings. Okay? Well, the British pound is the equivalent of digital currency, the land is the equivalent of digital property, the buildings are the digital platforms and the companies are the decentralised applications. You can understand the good and bad of each of these categories. The land will still be there in 500 years... But not the building, which won't be there in 100 years. Nor the businesses."
Michael Saylor says in essence that bitcoin is not a currency but a digital asset. This is a way of beating around the bush in order to avoid any murderous legislation. On the understanding that bitcoin is an "asset", a "property", the law ensures that no one will be able to prohibit it.
The CEO of Microstrategy is playing cat-and-mouse with the FED and the US deep state, which will do anything to protect the petrodollar, the centrepiece of US imperialism. He goes on to speak on behalf of the Salvadorians when he says: "In El Salvador, they want the Digital Dollar (CBDC) to make their purchases, but they want the bitcoin asset as a long-term store of value.
Here is another very interesting passage on how Michael Saylor sees bitcoin:
"When I invest in the stock market, I want to buy a stock that 99% of people disapprove of but everyone needs and no one can stop. That's how I described Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google and even Microsoft in 2010-2012. Amazon already accounted for all online sales in 2012. They buried everyone. They had 89% of the market. The stock was worth $50, but everyone on Wall Street was talking about diversifying their portfolio by selling Amazon to buy other merchants; selling Apple to buy the other companies. The problem with that is that Amazon won; Wallmart held on; but the other 25,000 merchants failed. To bet on them was to lose. To bet on Wallmart was to win, but it was Amazon that broke the bank. The same with Apple. [...] Everyone lost money trying to compete with Apple. The winner takes all. So diversifying is like selling Microsoft to buy the one Microsoft is destroying. Selling Amazon to buy Toy'sR'Us. Selling Facebook to buy the losers. Selling Google to buy newspapers. It doesn't make sense. [...]
Now the macro investor in me says I need to find a non-sovereign store of value that is not a currency derivative. The reason I chose bitcoin is because the dollar is a currency derivative, debt is a currency derivative, a stock is a currency derivative, real estate is a currency derivative. The only things that are not a currency derivative are art, gold, maybe some residential real estate but also crypto. I'm going to keep the most liquid, the most irrefutable, the one with the most potential. And that's bitcoin.
The technology investor in me says (pause), if you read my book The mobile wave, I say if you want to educate 8 billion people, you have to extract the information from the books and the bookstores of universities and dematerialize them. Then you can give education to everyone for very little money. If you want to give the world intelligence, you extract geological data from a hundred million satellite photos, put it in an Android device and call it Google map; then you measure how fast people are moving, plug in an AI and the device can drive your car. A digital map is a million times better than a paper map. A million times cheaper too. That's why Google map is worth 50 billion while Rand McNally map is only worth 50 million. The same goes for books. You can hold a million books in your hand for nothing. The same goes for music. You can access all the music in the world with Amazon music for $3 a month.
What's happening here is that platforms are dematerialising products or services. They are absorbing the value of CDs, videos, orchestras, bookstores and so on. They absorb the value in real life and put it into cyber space. When you dematerialise social energy, you get facebook. A thousand billion dollars. When you dematerialize information and education, you get google. A thousand billion dollars. When you dematerialize all objects, you get Apple and its iPhone. When you dematerialize merchants, you get Amazon. Anyway, coming back to bitcoin, I see it as a digital property that dematerializes the monetary energy that is in gold, silver, currencies, buildings, land. Anything that has value.
If you want to leave $100,000 to your descendants, what are you going to buy to keep that $100,000 intact; not taxed, stolen, devalued in 100 years? Land? Gold? Apple stock? Artwork? Or Bitcoin? Bitcoin is the hardest to tax, the hardest to steal. It's the most mobile. It's decentralized."
Sven Henrich (aka Northman Trader on Twitter) has published a fantastic (and long) interview with Michael Saylor. Rather sceptical about bitcoin until now, Sven was open-minded. At the end of the interview, he even said he was ready to invest very soon.
An informative Straight Talk
Saylor sometimes comes across as a guru, but not in this very informative interview. If you don't have time, start at the 52nd minute. If you're not an Anglophile, here's a translation of some interesting passages.
"Cryptocurrencies, for the most part, are not currencies at all. Crypto' is a misnomer that creates a lot of confusion. [...] A lot of people are speculating in "crypto" without having a long-term thesis on what they are doing. This is how I segment the market. There are four categories:
Bitcoin is the king of "digital property". It is designed to last a very long time. 100 years, 100,000 years. Imagine your family has owned a piece of land in central London for 100 years. When would you sell it? Never! Do you want to sell it? No! How are you going to live off it? You'll rent it out. But land is not a currency... If you own 10 buildings in NY and the FED prints 10% more of the money supply every year, you can indeed expect your buildings to appreciate by 10% a year as well because it is a desirable and scarce asset. But it is not a currency. This is the first category: Digital property
The second category is "digital currencies" such as Tether, Circle (USDC), Diem (facebook) or CBDCs. These are digital assets in the form of stable currencies. They are an intermediary of exchange. If you want a decentralised, very fast exchange intermediary that can transfer $50 million from Zimbabwe to the United Arab Emirates on a Saturday afternoon, outside the FED's networks, outside the banking system; if you want to pay every Salvadoran $37 on their phone, you have to use a digital currency. That's no small thing. Eight billion people need a currency. Money is the intermediary of exchange and its purpose is to act as a store of value.
Third category: "digital platforms". Ethereum is a platform for creating applications such as decentralised exchanges, insurance, companies, NFTs. Their mission is to create decentralised applications. When you buy ETH, you buy a digital asset, a token that gives you a share in the environment of this platform.
Fourth category, "decentralised applications". Uniswap for example. They are trying to replace NASDAQ, Coinbase. Binance smartchain is trying to replace Binance (a centralized exchange).
Good. Now imagine I give your family a billion dollars. You can choose between buying a billion dollars worth of land in London, or buildings, or the equivalent of a billion dollars in British pounds, or companies that are housed in those buildings. Okay? Well, the British pound is the equivalent of digital currency, the land is the equivalent of digital property, the buildings are the digital platforms and the companies are the decentralised applications. You can understand the good and bad of each of these categories. The land will still be there in 500 years... But not the building, which won't be there in 100 years. Nor the businesses."
Michael Saylor says in essence that bitcoin is not a currency but a digital asset. This is a way of beating around the bush in order to avoid any murderous legislation. On the understanding that bitcoin is an "asset", a "property", the law ensures that no one will be able to prohibit it.
The CEO of Microstrategy is playing cat-and-mouse with the FED and the US deep state, which will do anything to protect the petrodollar, the centrepiece of US imperialism. He goes on to speak on behalf of the Salvadorians when he says: "In El Salvador, they want the Digital Dollar (CBDC) to make their purchases, but they want the bitcoin asset as a long-term store of value.
Here is another very interesting passage on how Michael Saylor sees bitcoin:
"When I invest in the stock market, I want to buy a stock that 99% of people disapprove of but everyone needs and no one can stop. That's how I described Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google and even Microsoft in 2010-2012. Amazon already accounted for all online sales in 2012. They buried everyone. They had 89% of the market. The stock was worth $50, but everyone on Wall Street was talking about diversifying their portfolio by selling Amazon to buy other merchants; selling Apple to buy the other companies. The problem with that is that Amazon won; Wallmart held on; but the other 25,000 merchants failed. To bet on them was to lose. To bet on Wallmart was to win, but it was Amazon that broke the bank. The same with Apple. [...] Everyone lost money trying to compete with Apple. The winner takes all. So diversifying is like selling Microsoft to buy the one Microsoft is destroying. Selling Amazon to buy Toy'sR'Us. Selling Facebook to buy the losers. Selling Google to buy newspapers. It doesn't make sense. [...]
Now the macro investor in me says I need to find a non-sovereign store of value that is not a currency derivative. The reason I chose bitcoin is because the dollar is a currency derivative, debt is a currency derivative, a stock is a currency derivative, real estate is a currency derivative. The only things that are not a currency derivative are art, gold, maybe some residential real estate but also crypto. I'm going to keep the most liquid, the most irrefutable, the one with the most potential. And that's bitcoin.
The technology investor in me says (pause), if you read my book The mobile wave, I say if you want to educate 8 billion people, you have to extract the information from the books and the bookstores of universities and dematerialize them. Then you can give education to everyone for very little money. If you want to give the world intelligence, you extract geological data from a hundred million satellite photos, put it in an Android device and call it Google map; then you measure how fast people are moving, plug in an AI and the device can drive your car. A digital map is a million times better than a paper map. A million times cheaper too. That's why Google map is worth 50 billion while Rand McNally map is only worth 50 million. The same goes for books. You can hold a million books in your hand for nothing. The same goes for music. You can access all the music in the world with Amazon music for $3 a month.
What's happening here is that platforms are dematerialising products or services. They are absorbing the value of CDs, videos, orchestras, bookstores and so on. They absorb the value in real life and put it into cyber space. When you dematerialise social energy, you get facebook. A thousand billion dollars. When you dematerialize information and education, you get google. A thousand billion dollars. When you dematerialize all objects, you get Apple and its iPhone. When you dematerialize merchants, you get Amazon. Anyway, coming back to bitcoin, I see it as a digital property that dematerializes the monetary energy that is in gold, silver, currencies, buildings, land. Anything that has value.
If you want to leave $100,000 to your descendants, what are you going to buy to keep that $100,000 intact; not taxed, stolen, devalued in 100 years? Land? Gold? Apple stock? Artwork? Or Bitcoin? Bitcoin is the hardest to tax, the hardest to steal. It's the most mobile. It's decentralized."
Oh my Satoshi! Bitcoin SV fills all the listed cases and then some more.
I tried Bitcoin SV and it was slow when I sent to my wallet.
This is very strange. Transfers are instantaneous with Handcash, ElectrumSV, Simplycash, RelayX and almost all those natively BSV....
But if you go through an exchange.... very often the exchanges ask for several tens of "confirmation" of blocks, that has nothing to do with the security as they claim it. that has for effect to delay all transactions with which they do not have partnership (of speed, put forward...) and then there are 2 reasons,
Firstly, depending on the amount of money coming in, some exchanges adjust the bots to take more from you by acting directly on the prices, thus creating an arbitrage situation very often (99% of cases) in their favour. For outgoing amounts again you are taxed to the hilt and they pay the minimum or very minimum fees, which means that some trades (excluding SPVs) can take natively longer to be confirmed.
The second reason is that exchanges don't even bother to upgrade the SPV technology that comes natively with Bitcoin Satoshi Vision solutions. Besides, if you audit 3/4 of the exchanges have the same source code base and the same security holes (cloned websites).
These exchanges are mainly used to generate volume thanks to bots and thousands of transactions then a large transaction occurs almost immediately (often the same person) it is cyclical. which has the effect of rigging the game and send via APIs truncated information. Add to this the stablecoins backed by promises to buy at a time X (with almost no real liquidity) and then take the Asian markets out of the equation as CZ does with coinmerketcap (coinmerketcap owned by Binance by the way) which communicates the prices to you (with delay? ) and you get a perfectly speculative bubble made in China with sometimes the open complicity of companies from all over the world sometimes formed in consortium under the cover of sharing the patents between them against 3 years of commitments. Yeah it's FUCK, just ROYAL FUCK!
Bsv -7% BTC +5%
it appears that the market(and everyone else)knows something you fans of bsv don't
Are you paid to be such a jerk or does it come naturally to you?it appears that the market(and everyone else)knows something you fans of bsv don't
The manipulations are 'planned' ?
https://coingeek.com/crypto-crime-cartel-behind-adam-back-and-blockstreams-attempts-to-constrain-bitcoin/
Fascinating https://coingeek.com/crypto-crime-cartel-behind-adam-back-and-blockstreams-attempts-to-constrain-bitcoin/
BSV movement is the same as yesterday same configuration are active since 40 minutes increase of the +£462.822.794 the volume is absolutely not coherent the trading bots seems to carburize
just look exchanges. I'm not worried DoJ, SEC, CFTC are on the case, one wrote me from an int s'rc that they are already warned that they are watching closely. Crimes will not go unpunished BSV.Currently in progress BSV $283 to $304 in 30 minutes
Again the same Z pattern in action seems to have just turned on his trading bots while the whole market is bearish. The total volume has just taken off on BSV for 30 minutes for no reason at all or almost £403,793,546 moving. This BSV market is rigged.Granted means a lot
https://coingeek.com/2021-and-the-btc-end-game/
https://coingeek.com/craig-wright-granted-permission-to-serve-bitcoin-developers-in-landmark-suit/
The end?
https://coingeek.com/2021-and-the-btc-end-game/
https://coingeek.com/craig-wright-granted-permission-to-serve-bitcoin-developers-in-landmark-suit/
The end?
Quote
Why do you think the Commodity Futures Trading Commission classifies #Bitcoin as a commodity, and the Internal Revenue Service classifies it as an asset? The scope for wrongdoing can be very broad.
Do you know what happens in the U.S. when someone creates even virtual money? Hey go straight to jail
if craig wright is found guilty of being satoshi.
good luck24hr high at $403.43 - 24hr low at $282.00 now a differential of over +$42 there in less than 30 minutes with overall volume down to -17%. It looks like bots are running the stock like the previous days. This BSV market is undeniably rigged like everything else. https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin-sv/historical-data/
After what appears to be regular manipulation of volumes by individuals with shady egos who think they are acting anonymously and boast of manipulating prices. https://twitter.com/TraderWisdom/status/1392142616586719233
Now there are people making money by representing what looks like a strangely similar murder of Changpeng Zhao CEO of Binance under the guise of being art? Wait did you engrave this murder representation into the bitcoinsv blockchain? https://coingeek.com/bitcoins-first-gif-nft
Now there are people making money by representing what looks like a strangely similar murder of Changpeng Zhao CEO of Binance under the guise of being art? Wait did you engrave this murder representation into the bitcoinsv blockchain? https://coingeek.com/bitcoins-first-gif-nft
Hey did you know that: "BSV is a full-stack, stable implementation of the original Bitcoin protocol, maintained for globally scalable enterprise data use. This unbounded Bitcoin ledger upholds Satoshi Nakamoto's written definitions of a system of casual cash transactions, contracting and data commerce."
👆️ Hey dude I agree with you to compare everything else but how many people didn't like the Nazis (myself included) yet everyone uses the highways and many of their many innovations. A sad fact indeed...............
Brainswashed, do you live in Jones Town?
Yeah that's why Bitcoin Shit Version is now ranked 23. Get a clue newbie.
Don't worry, your IP's have been recorded. Each one of you will face the music.
[/quote]
любительский
Yeah that's why Bitcoin Shit Version is now ranked 23. Get a clue newbie.
Don't worry, your IP's have been recorded. Each one of you will face the music.
[/quote]
любительский
oops wait for the real Satoshi then we will see who is crying you bitch.
Craig is satoshi 
LOL SUE ME YOU CLOWN IF YOU HAVE ANY BALLS. YOU PIECE OF SH-T
Oopps pricked in full live 
you're offended.... Cry baby it's going to make you feel good.Too bad you guys can't handle the truth or stop deleting posts.
Craig Wright is Jim Jones.
To pc888 so very easy to slander Craig in public. And what do you do? So you've come to parade on the BSV wire now? Had you noticed the huge dump on BATA after you had supposedly been hacked? Have you completely disappeared from your BATA project management? Did you ever really get the legal permissions? People are looking for you to get their funds back https://github.com/BTA-BATA be honest you owe them because they trusted you and entrusted you with their savings. Do you really think you are anonymous here? Then you are wrong. Pick up your pots they make noise.Craig Wright is Jim Jones.