Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 38 results by No HATE
I just noticed recently that this guy was remove from BC and he is not active anymore.
His last log in was February 27, 2021 and I'm just curious as he is so active before especially in finding alt accounts cheating the bounty campaigns.
Anyone knows? Did he left or got removed from BC?
account URL : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2363935
His last log in was February 27, 2021 and I'm just curious as he is so active before especially in finding alt accounts cheating the bounty campaigns.
Anyone knows? Did he left or got removed from BC?
account URL : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2363935
Since yahoo62278, the original complainant had remove his negative rating to Roobet, maybe it's time for Isildur (official) to evaluate the trust his gave to Roobet and maybe change it to neutral.
Let us not make an speculation here, do stick with the evidence above.
Malubit is innocent until proven guilty, their big mistake is they hire a manager who cheats the campaign.
The manager broke his own rule here and therefore he should be tag for scamming the participants and scamming the owner of the campaign if they are not aware of he situation.
Thanks to Darkstar for bringing to the public what he notice, I know he will see it as unusual since he is very active in gambling board, particularly in gambling section, it's where his interest is at if I'm not wrong.
Lesson learned for Malubit, hire an experience campaign manager in the forum, I don't want to name names as I don't want to be bias.
There reputation are at risk, but they can correct this by choosing a reputable managers who does not cheat.
I wish I still had merits, I could have merit darkstar for the job well done.
Malubit is innocent until proven guilty, their big mistake is they hire a manager who cheats the campaign.
- Alt accounts are not allowed.
The manager broke his own rule here and therefore he should be tag for scamming the participants and scamming the owner of the campaign if they are not aware of he situation.
Thanks to Darkstar for bringing to the public what he notice, I know he will see it as unusual since he is very active in gambling board, particularly in gambling section, it's where his interest is at if I'm not wrong.
Lesson learned for Malubit, hire an experience campaign manager in the forum, I don't want to name names as I don't want to be bias.
There reputation are at risk, but they can correct this by choosing a reputable managers who does not cheat.
I wish I still had merits, I could have merit darkstar for the job well done.
I think yahoo62278 is correct, Duckdice wants to conduct their business in the forum since there's a huge audience here but how can they attract audience if their profile is full of negative. Gambling sites can make mistakes but what matters if they learn from it and they are going at the right path, do understand that Duckdice also contributed to the forum in terms of revenue and most of the members who tagged Duckdice has been enjoying the perks of being a reputable member in the forum.
The last time I remember they try to run a signature campaign but was not successful since there is no participants that would like to work with them as they are afraid they might get red tag of promoting a scam site.
DT members has to ensure they are fair, carefully evaluate who's running the business here and think of everyone's benefit and not on personal wants.
The last time I remember they try to run a signature campaign but was not successful since there is no participants that would like to work with them as they are afraid they might get red tag of promoting a scam site.
DT members has to ensure they are fair, carefully evaluate who's running the business here and think of everyone's benefit and not on personal wants.
Another DT has remove the negative trust which is the right thing to do, DTs can put a trust(positive or negative) based on their opinion but since you are in the DT network that opinion is very important and could hurt the reputation of the account you are tagging, please consider all the evidences and explanation of the account you had tagged, remember that they are new here, trying to build their business so welcome them instead of being harsh to them. why I say so?
YOSHIE's feedback is like this :
This has been answered by bestchange already.
Claiming that the exchanges are fraudulent is wrong, the way you think is different than what a business thinks, they act based on the evidence and abide the law, even if the exchange has a bad reputation but they are don't violate the law, business is still good with bestchange and the exchange.
Other DT members had already remove the negative trust because they are satisfied with the resolution, will you try to review the reply once again.
On JollyGood feedback
Hilarious, home come this is a scammy behavior? you aren't using the trust system properly JollyGood
read again.
Just because they are not actively replying every post, you think they are scam, you can't make this reasoning in the court.
Please stop ruining people's business, I admire you but this one is too much which is not right anymore.
YOSHIE's feedback is like this :
Quote
promoting fraudulent exchange sites, see References
This has been answered by bestchange already.
Unfortunately, its also possible to understand the exchanger, because if the funds were indeed obtained illegitimately, they will be held responsible for helping fraudsters/drug dealers or the like.
On the other hand, the exchanger has not yet provided any serious evidence for their suspicions, just their subjective opinion.
~snip~
On the other hand, the exchanger has not yet provided any serious evidence for their suspicions, just their subjective opinion.
~snip~
Claiming that the exchanges are fraudulent is wrong, the way you think is different than what a business thinks, they act based on the evidence and abide the law, even if the exchange has a bad reputation but they are don't violate the law, business is still good with bestchange and the exchange.
Other DT members had already remove the negative trust because they are satisfied with the resolution, will you try to review the reply once again.
On JollyGood feedback
Quote
BEWARE - this user has no history on the forum but created a signature bounty without escrow
Shouldn't this one be remove already, BC has been consistently paying the campaign without delay. Quote
Furthermore, this user watched from the sidelines WITHOUT entering the conversation when users discussed bestchange. Instead this user sent PMs to its supporters rather than have an open transparent debate therefore not definitely not trustworthy.
Hilarious, home come this is a scammy behavior? you aren't using the trust system properly JollyGood
read again.
Quote
Negative - You think that trading with this person is high-risk.
Just because they are not actively replying every post, you think they are scam, you can't make this reasoning in the court.
Please stop ruining people's business, I admire you but this one is too much which is not right anymore.
You aren't obliged to. Ask yourself first, why did I distrust a certain user? your answer - because I don't trust him and when you don't trust a person you stay away from them and you don't explain to them.
Expecting instant response isn't always fair.
The thread was created 4 days ago, am I expecting instant reply?They don't deserve to be in DT if they are not making judgment for the benefit of the majority.
Its your cheap thinking and its better not to apply on others. They are holding their positions with the acceptation of their judgement and without you majority number of people have trust on their judgement. You are defending someone who are busy connecting accounts on bounty cheating but don't have the balls to correct their wrong judgement on a more serious matter, is that how DT members suppose to act now? if so, then this system is broken.
None of these people have responded yet (imhoneer, YOSHIE, TMAN, Hueristic, JollyGood.)
They don't deserve to be in DT if they are not making judgment for the benefit of the majority.
Most of you who responded here are DT members, to list the names.
examplens - DT2
Yatsan - DT1
yahoo62278 - DT1 and great campaign manager
Bitcoin_Arena - DT2
LoyceV - D1
sheenshane - DT1
My gosh, where are you people? when there is an accusation you were so active finding all the evidences now that it's settled, you refuse to not look on it.
They don't deserve to be in DT if they are not making judgment for the benefit of the majority.
Most of you who responded here are DT members, to list the names.
examplens - DT2
Yatsan - DT1
yahoo62278 - DT1 and great campaign manager
Bitcoin_Arena - DT2
LoyceV - D1
sheenshane - DT1
My gosh, where are you people? when there is an accusation you were so active finding all the evidences now that it's settled, you refuse to not look on it.
These are the accounts that are still not revising their feed back.
imhoneer, YOSHIE, TMAN, Hueristic, JollyGood.
JollyGood
They already paid the signature, you might want to check, they are actually on the 3rd week now might continue longer and you know they replied in the scam accusation but they don't sit 24 hours to reply in every comment, their reply were complete and based on facts.
YOSHIE
seriously, promoting fraudulent site just because you don't like that they are in partner with?
Bestchange replied using legal terms, while you make a comment based on your personal opinion.
The rest who tagged bestchange just follow what these two as they are not actively engaging in the discussion.
imhoneer, YOSHIE, TMAN, Hueristic, JollyGood.
JollyGood
Quote
BEWARE - this user has no history on the forum but created a signature bounty without escrow
Furthermore, this user watched from the sidelines WITHOUT entering the conversation when users discussed bestchange. Instead this user sent PMs to its supporters rather than have an open transparent debate therefore not definitely not trustworthy.
Furthermore, this user watched from the sidelines WITHOUT entering the conversation when users discussed bestchange. Instead this user sent PMs to its supporters rather than have an open transparent debate therefore not definitely not trustworthy.
They already paid the signature, you might want to check, they are actually on the 3rd week now might continue longer and you know they replied in the scam accusation but they don't sit 24 hours to reply in every comment, their reply were complete and based on facts.
YOSHIE
Quote
promoting fraudulent exchange sites, see References
seriously, promoting fraudulent site just because you don't like that they are in partner with?
Bestchange replied using legal terms, while you make a comment based on your personal opinion.
The rest who tagged bestchange just follow what these two as they are not actively engaging in the discussion.
Here I am again, you just wake me up because the community is divided again, some would say "okay", some would say "they should be tag for promoting scam" ..Are you serious?
But before I share my point on the issue, everyone must have an idea first on the active campaigns in the forum, they'll know by checking on https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=615953.0.
So here's my stance on the issue.
Don't tag members of yobit campaign, just skip that x10, it's been there a long time already, and the last time yobit run a campaign, participants were not tag and livecoin participants were not tag as well because that's the right thing to do.
Be matured guys, you're complicating things a lot and why not just allow people to do (wear) what they want by not threatening them of tagging them when they wear yobit signature.
IMO, Mixers are the most evil in crypto because they use for money laundering and those who wear a signature supported that shady activity of them.
Why wear chipmixer? Because they paid you a decent rate, up to BTC0.0375 a week is big enough, big enough for the members to sell their souls and criticize others, sorry if I make that as an example because I notice that most of the critics are from that campaign, sorry again if I'm wrong.
No offense, this is only my opinion and I always like to see fairness in the forum, besides those investors are not kids, they know the risk when investing.
STOP THE HATE, LOVE ONE ANOTHER BECAUSE IT'S CHRISTMAS.
But before I share my point on the issue, everyone must have an idea first on the active campaigns in the forum, they'll know by checking on https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=615953.0.
So here's my stance on the issue.
Don't tag members of yobit campaign, just skip that x10, it's been there a long time already, and the last time yobit run a campaign, participants were not tag and livecoin participants were not tag as well because that's the right thing to do.
Be matured guys, you're complicating things a lot and why not just allow people to do (wear) what they want by not threatening them of tagging them when they wear yobit signature.
IMO, Mixers are the most evil in crypto because they use for money laundering and those who wear a signature supported that shady activity of them.
Why wear chipmixer? Because they paid you a decent rate, up to BTC0.0375 a week is big enough, big enough for the members to sell their souls and criticize others, sorry if I make that as an example because I notice that most of the critics are from that campaign, sorry again if I'm wrong.
No offense, this is only my opinion and I always like to see fairness in the forum, besides those investors are not kids, they know the risk when investing.
STOP THE HATE, LOVE ONE ANOTHER BECAUSE IT'S CHRISTMAS.
@No HATE - Can i just add that I dont agree with the red tagging of Livecoin campaign participants.
I like Hhampuz a lot but on this issue I disagree with him.
Now you are talking with
@LFC_Bitcoin, stop threatening me by tagging my account because I'm not here to cause trouble, I'm here to speak my unbias opinion.
I hope you understand.
3.) I am so close to leaving your shitty account red trust & if I found out what your main account is Ill create a flag against it.
This is why people post with alts.
I haven't tagged anyone.
You didn't, good manager. I've stated that I can see the reasoning behind tagging them, and thus won't exclude anyone who does. I personally won't be tagging anyone.
Look at this way, participants earn from signature campaign, so getting red tag is a big deal for them, it's their life that was taken away.
You see someone under your trust abusing the trust, and you don't do anything? How do you call yourself then?
Again..
Negative - You think that trading with this person is high-risk. You might also be able to add a flag.
reppying your PM as I'm not allowed to reply anymore, newbie restriction maybe.
From you : Maybe not, but you've been avoiding a lot of my valid counterpoints and changing the subject which makes me lead to believe that you are.
Answer : I can do that when I see it's beyond the topic " Livecoin participants should be tag? "
He never did bother with an update but I'm assuming he received his funds as he didn't complain the next day.
Assumption does not play fair in the scam accusation, it's supported by evidence, not assumption.I have no problem with you, you don't abuse the trust system and you express your opinion fairly.
BitCasino has made poor decisions in the past but overall seem to be much better now, with a 8.05 rating on AskGamblers. I'm not going to start attacking people advertising Bitcasino for something that happened 2 years ago. I've never stated that my decision to ban those who apply to Livecoin was permanent either; forgiveness is a thing.
Then forgive livecoin, they are scammy but not a scam exchange.
Scam accusation of livecoin happened a year ago also, but was raise this year for whatever reason, and hhampuz loss his job and now hhampuz want's the participants to loss their job. He doesn't know forgiveness like you, you are a good manager.
I do think you're a liar - you still haven't shown me that you're willing to stand behind your statements and deposit a significant amount to TradeSatoshi, a totally legitimate exchange that despite blocking and stealing customer funds, has not been seized by authorities and thus are 100% legitimate by your reasoning.
I don't need to show proof due to privacy reason but I did try using TradeSatoshi with a small amount because it's a high risk trading site.
Satisfied? It's how you deal with a high risk trading site like Livecoin but you don't stop them from operating like tagging participants taking their life in the forum.
Another non sense from this DT depending his 0.018 weekly. LOL
I'm still waiting for a link to a valid unresolved Sportsbet scam accusation.
21.5 BTC TAKEN BY SPORTSBET.IO
Lutpin and Zepher tagged them. Zepher is dead but still added in the trust system, ohh boy,, you have a dead trust system. EXCLUDE HIM ALREADY.
bitcasino.io The brother or the sister company.
For like the fourth time, the accuser was trying to do a double spend attack, they reached a mutual agreed upon settlement and no financial damage was caused (15 BTC deposit was returned). If Zepher's ratings are still accurate, there's no reason to exclude them.
OP did not confirm, hence scam accusation is still open. You admitted that ratings are accurate, that's contradictory.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=832366 (check again, and re phrase your statement)
How about this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=207035? You think lauda and Stunna are liars?
I agree and I think it's better decision than tag Livecoin participants.
They said that but Hhampuz is not pro community but pro self and some DTs are closing their eyes on this.I just thought that's a bit strange that OP didn't said nothing against you both. Following his logic you also had to blacklist participants of Sportsbet, Bitcasino, Yobit, Betcoin and some other campaigns.
There's nothing strange here, I am not against on blacklist as it is their prerogative, I'm more concern on how the trust system is abuse.
Negative - You think that trading with this person is high-risk
It is the correct definition, so if you are wearing Livecoin signature, trading with you is a high-risk?
To Hhampuz, if more than 10,000 members are wearing the livecoin signature, will you tag them all?
After that, start tagging sportsbet and bitcasino too, and double tag for BitBustah for applying livecoin and wearing yobit signature. 
1.) Post from your main account & stop being a coward
2.) Stop shit stirring & tarring us all with the same Livecoin brush
3.) I am so close to leaving your shitty account red trust & if I found out what your main account is Ill create a flag against it.
1. I agree with
2. Everyone has an opinion, can't stop that from being posted
3. This would be textbook trust abuse
1. and 3
3.) I am so close to leaving your shitty account red trust & if I found out what your main account is Ill create a flag against it.
This is why people post with alts.
2. I agree with.
I'm still waiting for a link to a valid unresolved Sportsbet scam accusation.
21.5 BTC TAKEN BY SPORTSBET.IO
Lutpin and Zepher tagged them. Zepher is dead but still added in the trust system, ohh boy,, you have a dead trust system. EXCLUDE HIM ALREADY.
bitcasino.io The brother or the sister company.
I'm sorry, who are you again? Did not realize I had to work around YOUR schedule. In time, I'll do it, today has just begun and quite frankly I have better things to do 
.
"Fair and not afraid" are interesting choices of words though. I assume you've already posted in this thread from your main account but why keep hiding behind the alt? Tell us how you really feel, from your real account, please.
."Fair and not afraid" are interesting choices of words though. I assume you've already posted in this thread from your main account but why keep hiding behind the alt? Tell us how you really feel, from your real account, please.
Good excuse Hhampuz, keep dragging I have an alt account, just be fair as a DT and we will have no problem.
You are starting to sound like another mouth breather that keeps preachign about "be fair and transparent". Hmm, it couldn't be, could it?
Time for me to relax and wait for another tomorrow, I get back to you soon.
EDIT1: Tagged all members that applied on the first page, will do 2nd page tomorrow.
After that, start tagging sportsbet and bitcasino too, and double tag for BitBustah for applying livecoin and wearing yobit signature.
I'm sorry, who are you again? Did not realize I had to work around YOUR schedule. In time, I'll do it, today has just begun and quite frankly I have better things to do .
"Fair and not afraid" are interesting choices of words though. I assume you've already posted in this thread from your main account but why keep hiding behind the alt? Tell us how you really feel, from your real account, please.
."Fair and not afraid" are interesting choices of words though. I assume you've already posted in this thread from your main account but why keep hiding behind the alt? Tell us how you really feel, from your real account, please.
Good excuse Hhampuz, keep dragging I have an alt account, just be fair as a DT and we will have no problem.
johhnyUA is no longer on DT2, he was/is included by kzv, but is now excluded by suchmoon and DarkStar_.
hhmmmm...because he applied for livecoin campaign? Not enough yet, Hhampuz has to tag him/her.
Just don't feed this troll, he is just stirring the drama here !
Troll? How? You are trying to close your eyes so you can't see the injustice.
Made a post in the other thread reminding him...
EDIT1: Tagged all members that applied on the first page, will do 2nd page tomorrow.
It's time to tag other members as per schedule Hhampuz, I'm here to remind you if you forgotten.
Tag these DTs first and show us you are not afraid and fair.
1) Halmater
2) johhnyUA
And the rest is in the ss .https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Tv7tkG6SSwrSOyz8PlBpUNxslh7dTxKCcgXiu0sKu3A/edit#gid=0
His been online and did not bother to tagged other applicants, hmmm... I get it, only the first page applicants are promoting scam.
I don't know why opinions of such shitbags are taken seriously and replied to.
Because they care for the community and you don't, you are the real troll here.
Ive been wearing the bitcasino.io avatar & sig for probably over 18 months now. At no point have I been made aware that they are scammers (because theyre not).
For 18 months and you don't know about the scam accusation. You are old enough, go find it and read, then come back here, we will talk, remove your signature because you don't promote a business with scam accusations.bitcasino.io also own sportsbet.io
No wonder they both have scam accusations?
EDIT1: Tagged all members that applied on the first page, will do 2nd page tomorrow.
It's time to tag other members as per schedule Hhampuz, I'm here to remind you if you forgotten.
Tag these DTs first and show us you are not afraid and fair.
1) Halmater
2) johhnyUA
And the rest is in the ss .https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Tv7tkG6SSwrSOyz8PlBpUNxslh7dTxKCcgXiu0sKu3A/edit#gid=0