Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 161 results by OddJobsForBitcoin
I didn't see your location in the OP. That might be of some relevance to prospective jobs. I have a job in mind that would require you to leave your house and do about 30 minutes of work. I'd be willing to pay you depending on your location. Drop me a PM if you're interested. I can't promise that it will pay great, but I can promise that it will be a lot of fun. 
Hi buddy. No time for offline ventures at the moment. Nevertheless, I'll announce it when I'm I'm available for yard work. Regards.
That's understandable. Nobody wants to do yard work am I right? More seriously though... I was curious to know if you would be willing to test drive a Tesla Model S (for free) and how much you would charge me for such a thing. I was hoping that maybe you might want to drive a $75,000 car and wouldn't want to charge me too much money for the experience of doing so. No worries though. If you ever do decide to make your location known and want to start doing real tasks, feel free to drop me a line.
Aww... that would have been nice, but life is too precious to take certain risks. I never meet strangers who know I own bitcoins to avoid you know...
I didn't see your location in the OP. That might be of some relevance to prospective jobs. I have a job in mind that would require you to leave your house and do about 30 minutes of work. I'd be willing to pay you depending on your location. Drop me a PM if you're interested. I can't promise that it will pay great, but I can promise that it will be a lot of fun.
Hi buddy. No time for offline ventures at the moment. Nevertheless, I'll announce it when I'm I'm available for yard work. Regards.
Watching you post in the thread on a regular basis knowing you will not receive any jobs (odd or otherwise) makes me question your state of mind. Does it not take a toll on your mental capacity posting using different accounts that will never join a signature campaign therefore will not be monetised? How long do you intend to keep up this charade when it serves no purpose.
Let's do another odd job today.
Bump
I think it's a good idea. I would support the idea if it worked somewhat in the way of adding 1 "dmerit" per 3-5 earned merits.
I made a poll about in support. I think this could really change the community for the better.
URL to poll. All credits given.
I made a poll about in support. I think this could really change the community for the better.
URL to poll. All credits given.
~snip~
About having many accounts, I absolutely do not deny it. In fact, I have many low and high rank accounts...
---
The summary is that I don't even know the number of accounts I have because it's not among the important priorities of my life.
About having many accounts, I absolutely do not deny it. In fact, I have many low and high rank accounts...
---
The summary is that I don't even know the number of accounts I have because it's not among the important priorities of my life.
I believe that this is just another in a series of alt accounts that the OP has, and it is really funny that he thinks that he is smarter than everyone else when he thinks that such naive tactics can help him in his plan. Now that he has completely exposed himself, I believe that his idea is to take revenge on some members with his alt account farm - but he has two very big problems - the first is to convince the admin to make a change in the merit system, and the second is how to we all pretend we don't know what he's doing.
This is pathetic. You're actually one of the reasons why the demotion button should be implemented. So anyone that supports the idea is automatically my alt? Folks like you who live for signature campaigns think the world revolves around posting rubbish without thinking them through. I sure admit having perhaps a dozen accounts because the first time I encountered BTT, it was a Google ad showing someone selling Legendary accounts so I thought it's a place to do such. The fact remains that I attempted to sell just one account before I realized that a better way of making money off the forum is through services. I've since earned close to or more than $20,000. And that with only a single participation in signature campaign but mainly through services. Those of you who are idle enough to go through a persons posting history can run through my alts that you know to understand if this is true or false. I have also built businesses that I focus on and so, the many account I set up earlier are of no consequence at the moment. Anyway, your low quality of reasoning as an old member is the reason why such a button is necessary.
This is a strange line of thought . I think some of the measures already put in place to curtail these excesses are the "report to moderator" button and the trust system, which includes positive, neutral, and negative ratings. Another measure on an individual level is to write to them directly. However, a demotion or demerit button is not an effective way to deal with it. Instead, you can use the ignore button for those specific users if their comments bother you so much. One other thing you could do is whenever you create a topic, you could self-moderate it by deleting comments that aren't useful or helpful to the conversation, thus keeping it clean and maintaining a meaningful discussion.
Yeah, but the issue is that many new members won't know some of these things and the effect could last a long time.
2. Newchanka
Newchanka! That name sound familiar. I have definitely come across it a dozen times, perhaps before the profile got tagged. Small world.
This explains nothing about the chap who sent me the proposal. Neither does it infer that I sent it myself.
The fact is that it's now hard to trust you. Anything is possible. If you could cheat on bounties, then what else can you not do here, given you have quite a number of alts. I hope you understand.I rarely participate actively in the forum because I have other jobs and businesses.
I just want to know why you chose to cheat on the review campaigns if you have other jobs and businesses?For fun. Trust me. I definitely didn't originate this. I'm sure the chap behind it is having a field day. As I said earlier, Royse777 already guessed correctly who I suspected, though he added 2-3 others for effect.
It can be distressing to new members reading some of the posts from old members who should be knowledgeable but unfortunately bland. The quality of reasoning (and posts) of many Legendary members is appalling. This could be due to the fact that they were promoted before the introduction of the merit system or they simply bought a high-ranked account to spew rubbish on the forum.
With the rampancy of signature campaigns, the tendency for participants to type to meet quota (even if they don’t really make sense is high). This is why I think that a demotion (or demerit) button is appropriate. This would mitigate the preponderance of the disappointment in reading posts from some so-ranked Legendary sounding like it’s from a 12-year old.
We even have trolls and spammers who are high-ranked members (Legendary trolls). This means that these chaps have never contributed something meaningful to the community debar having been around for ages. This ought not be so. What impression does it make on new members, especially now that Bitcoin is massively being advertised by big names like Blackrock?
You can implement this by adding a demerit button. If a member can rank up through a thousand merits, they should be demoted through a hundred De-merits. This could be open to members or assigned to moderators. You may also bestow demotion powers to intelligent reputable members like LoyceV, Yahoo62278, Notatether, Moccaccino, Logfiles, Suchmoon and others.
A ranking system should reflect competence, integrity and credibility of those it is bestowed upon. Unfortunately, the BTT system should be stremlined and made balanced through the implementation of necessary trade-offs. A system that promotes but never demotes never gets the best of its men. Let’s make this happen.
With the rampancy of signature campaigns, the tendency for participants to type to meet quota (even if they don’t really make sense is high). This is why I think that a demotion (or demerit) button is appropriate. This would mitigate the preponderance of the disappointment in reading posts from some so-ranked Legendary sounding like it’s from a 12-year old.
We even have trolls and spammers who are high-ranked members (Legendary trolls). This means that these chaps have never contributed something meaningful to the community debar having been around for ages. This ought not be so. What impression does it make on new members, especially now that Bitcoin is massively being advertised by big names like Blackrock?
You can implement this by adding a demerit button. If a member can rank up through a thousand merits, they should be demoted through a hundred De-merits. This could be open to members or assigned to moderators. You may also bestow demotion powers to intelligent reputable members like LoyceV, Yahoo62278, Notatether, Moccaccino, Logfiles, Suchmoon and others.
A ranking system should reflect competence, integrity and credibility of those it is bestowed upon. Unfortunately, the BTT system should be stremlined and made balanced through the implementation of necessary trade-offs. A system that promotes but never demotes never gets the best of its men. Let’s make this happen.
Whatever the OP's intention was with this, I don't think we should believe everything he says. Even with this "evidence" he provided (which is easily faked, by the way). It seems to me that he just wants free promotion for his questionable service offerings.
This sounds far fetched. OP hasn't been involved in any of the forum dramas or trolling or spamming their service so I'd give them the benefit of the doubt that this offer indeed happened.
It might be far fetched.
But here is a little bit of evidence why I have a suspicion that the OP might be lying in this case and that he might have ulterior motives.
He used a Telegram handle that connects him to at least two other forum accounts.
Code:
Telegram @Jinka
Accounts Connected:
1. OddJobsForBitcoin
Quote from: OddJobsForBitcoin
Hey, I can do this. Chat me on Telegram @ Jinka. Thanks.
archive: https://ninjastic.space/post/59450118 (He edited his post and removed the telegram contact. Last edit: December 10, 2023.)2. Newchanka
Quote from: Newchanka
Telegram: @Jinka
Metamask address: 0xBD7b2e1A9748C7E6FA72Ef357eb2919cA4114364
Network: Binance Testnet
archive: https://ninjastic.space/post/60990139 (post is now deleted)Metamask address: 0xBD7b2e1A9748C7E6FA72Ef357eb2919cA4114364
Network: Binance Testnet
3. Michael63
BTC: 3NNwo2iPzqJkMXQ6z6dazdBMuvUXQcJhaF
Telegram @Jinka
archive: https://ninjastic.space/post/62666164Telegram @Jinka
All three accounts have similar service offerings and similar topic bumping style:
Quote from: Newchanka
More jobs are welcomed.
archiveNew jobs are welcome
I'm taking more odd jobs folks.
Quote from: Michael63
Taking more jobs
archiveQuote from: Newchanka
Taking more jobs.
archiveQuote from: Michael63
Who else needs an article written?
archiveQuote from: Newchanka
Who else needs a writer?
archiveBased on this, we can conclude that it is the same person behind all the accounts.
When we look at the history of his alt accounts, we can find plenty of evidence of suspicious and corrupt activities.
For example, he cheated in the Utopia P2P Review Campaign with two of his accounts: Michael63, OddJobsForBitcoin
Also in GamblingBro's campaign: Michael63, OddJobsForBitcoin
The Newchanka account has a history and is tagged as an account seller so I can assume that he has more accounts available, some of them may be even higher ranked. It's possible that some of these accounts are involved in forum dramas or hold a grudge against Royse777 but he is too much of a coward to come out publicly. I know I'm speculating here, but it makes more sense to me than someone actually offering him such a job.
Good job, but it explains nothing about the chap who sent me the proposal. Neither does it infer that I sent it myself. About having many accounts, I absolutely do not deny it. In fact, I have many low and high rank account, but I have no reason to hate Royse777 because I never has dealings with him. In fact, I rarely participate actively in the forum because I have other jobs and businesses.
About having many accounts, I do because when I found Bitcointalk in 2016 or thereabout, it was through Google result showing someone selling a Hero or Legendary account. I then supposed that this is a place people raise accounts to sell later. That was why I has many accounts set up many of which are high ranking. But the reality is that when I realized that it wasn't acceptable, I never made attempt to sell after my first attempt years ago. I've earned 1000s of USD from the forum from members like Notatether, Efialtis and more, but definitely not through selling accounts or anything unethical. Neither have I tries selling any of the senior accounts I have.
In other words, finding a few of my alts doesn't make me the originator of this. This is with due respect to Royse77. I think he already guessed who may be behind this because his guess is as good as mine since it's definitely not Poker Player.